SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

3 overpaid old defensemen - what to do

Créé par: Ichbinian
Équipe: 2022-23 Sharks de San Jose
Date de création initiale: 25 mars 2022
Publié: 25 mars 2022
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
31 750 000 $
33 500 000 $
2800 000 $
23 000 000 $
2875 000 $
1800 000 $
1800 000 $
1800 000 $
1750 000 $
1750 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
42 250 000 $
1750 000 $
1950 000 $
11 000 000 $
Transactions
SJS
  1. Choix de 3e ronde en 2022 (NYR)
Rachats de contrats
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2022
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de NYR
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de BUF
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de ARI
Logo de MIN
2023
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
2024
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de COL
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2482 500 000 $69 091 667 $0 $300 000 $13 408 333 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
8 000 000 $8 000 000 $
C
M-NTC
UFA - 5
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
1 750 000 $1 750 000 $
AG, AD
UFA
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
750 000 $750 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
6 750 000 $6 750 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 8
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
4 725 000 $4 725 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
894 167 $894 167 $
AG
RFA - 4
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
1 025 000 $1 025 000 $
C, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
2 250 000 $2 250 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
850 000 $850 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
875 000 $875 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
800 000 $800 000 $
AG, AD
RFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
750 000 $750 000 $
C
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
10 000 000 $10 000 000 $
DD
NMC
UFA - 5
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
DG
UFA - 4
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
5 280 000 $5 280 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
2 175 000 $2 175 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
2 250 000 $2 250 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 2
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance300 000 $$300K)
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
G
UFA - 2
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
800 000 $800 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
950 000 $950 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
750 000 $750 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
25 mars 2022 à 14 h 52
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2021
Messages: 15,340
Mentions "j'aime": 11,722
Suffer — that’s about the only thing you can do unless someone takes one like half retained or maybe still have to pay for someone to take one
palhal a aimé ceci.
25 mars 2022 à 14 h 55
#2
LongtimeLeafsufferer
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2015
Messages: 59,487
Mentions "j'aime": 22,664
3 OVERPAID OLD DEFENSEMEN - WHAT TO DO. Why wasn't a new GM hired? That would have been a good start
GeneralLandro a aimé ceci.
25 mars 2022 à 15 h 0
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2020
Messages: 211
Mentions "j'aime": 134
Buyout Vlasic next summer, trade Burns at 50% to a contender in 2 years when he's an expiring UFA, and wait out the Karlsson contract and hope he can perform around the same level he has this season. That's really the only option SJ has.
25 mars 2022 à 15 h 43
#4
IamAlwaysRight
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2021
Messages: 2,681
Mentions "j'aime": 1,321
Quoting: JNoons13
Buyout Vlasic next summer, trade Burns at 50% to a contender in 2 years when he's an expiring UFA, and wait out the Karlsson contract and hope he can perform around the same level he has this season. That's really the only option SJ has.


Vlasic buyout is the only option here that will actually happen. Burns has been very productive for his age and contract and continues to be productive as he sits top 12 among defenseman in scoring. IDK why people don't check stats before making ridiculous trades and statements. No offense to you, personally but you should check your facts before posting.
Vizix et FunMustBeAlways a aimé ceci.
25 mars 2022 à 15 h 44
#5
IamAlwaysRight
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2021
Messages: 2,681
Mentions "j'aime": 1,321
Reimer to a rival for an underpayment. Yeah that's intelligent.
25 mars 2022 à 16 h 13
#6
Grierless Sharks Fan
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2017
Messages: 2,962
Mentions "j'aime": 927
Vlasic's contract is the problem. Karlsson's isn't great, but isn't awful either. They need to find complimentary defenseman. They actually had one, but just traded him to the Wild.
FunMustBeAlways a aimé ceci.
25 mars 2022 à 18 h 3
#7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2017
Messages: 27,723
Mentions "j'aime": 14,489
Quoting: gary_bettman
Vlasic buyout is the only option here that will actually happen. Burns has been very productive for his age and contract and continues to be productive as he sits top 12 among defenseman in scoring. IDK why people don't check stats before making ridiculous trades and statements. No offense to you, personally but you should check your facts before posting.


He's 37, has several years left and SJ is near the bottom of the worst division in hockey.

The rebuild should have started 3 years ago

Points aren't everything and 8 million is almost 10% of the cap
28 mars 2022 à 3 h 15
#8
train, train
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2015
Messages: 3,013
Mentions "j'aime": 733
HOT TAKE.

Vlasic has looked better than Burns in the last month or so.
29 mars 2022 à 10 h 53
#9
Grierless Sharks Fan
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2017
Messages: 2,962
Mentions "j'aime": 927
Quoting: CheechYou
HOT TAKE.

Vlasic has looked better than Burns in the last month or so.


Has he?
29 mars 2022 à 16 h 1
#10
train, train
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2015
Messages: 3,013
Mentions "j'aime": 733
Quoting: goodfella
Has he?

Yep.

Since Mar. 6, some basic stats (I know these can be misleading since there's higher competition, difference in minutes, defensive/offensive zone starts, etc.), but FWIW:

Points:

Vlasic: 3 goals and 2 assists (5 points)
Burns: 1 goal, 4 assists (5 points)

Plus / Minus:

Vlasic: plus 5
Burns: minus 3

IMO, the eye test, Vlasic's for sure looked better.
29 mars 2022 à 19 h 29
#11
Grierless Sharks Fan
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2017
Messages: 2,962
Mentions "j'aime": 927
Quoting: CheechYou
Yep.

Since Mar. 6, some basic stats (I know these can be misleading since there's higher competition, difference in minutes, defensive/offensive zone starts, etc.), but FWIW:

Points:

Vlasic: 3 goals and 2 assists (5 points)
Burns: 1 goal, 4 assists (5 points)

Plus / Minus:

Vlasic: plus 5
Burns: minus 3

IMO, the eye test, Vlasic's for sure looked better.


Merkley effect?
29 mars 2022 à 23 h 48
#12
train, train
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2015
Messages: 3,013
Mentions "j'aime": 733
Quoting: goodfella
Merkley effect?

I like that. Merkley's looked terrific. I'm really looking forward to next season and beyond seeing him develop even further.

Having said that, he's a perfect Burns replacement. I'd like to see Burns moved in the offseason for some kind of value even with retention instead of buying out Vlasic (his buyout cap hit in the next offseason wouldn't be nearly as bad as buying him out this offseason).
30 mars 2022 à 12 h 40
#13
Grierless Sharks Fan
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2017
Messages: 2,962
Mentions "j'aime": 927
Quoting: CheechYou
I like that. Merkley's looked terrific. I'm really looking forward to next season and beyond seeing him develop even further.

Having said that, he's a perfect Burns replacement. I'd like to see Burns moved in the offseason for some kind of value even with retention instead of buying out Vlasic (his buyout cap hit in the next offseason wouldn't be nearly as bad as buying him out this offseason).


With some of the ELCs coming on the books, having Karlsson + Burns + Merkley down the right side doesn't seem half bad.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage