Modifié 21 mars 2022 à 16 h 44
Quoting: remowilliams
So using your logic ,how do you explain the Hagel trade .is that good asset management.not trying to be a smart ass but your logic does not always apply.Thats why every one is entitled to their OWN opinion.
???? Its not my logic. It’s a common concept that every GM/ player personal person uses in every sport. Google it. People just want to argue about everything. Jesus.
They give values and everything. It’s a numbers game. Although u do have to account for the personal sh*t that goes along with sports too. Every franchise uses a combination of the 2.
As far as Hagel. Obviously, we’ll see. I would guess, extremely positive asset management for Chicago. To get that return. But again, Hagel just isn’t a 2nd round pick value; that value won’t follow a player his career. You’d have to look at a chart to see what his value is. That chart is based on, the assets used to acquire him(draft assets, trade assets, contract he’s getting paid etc), his production, contract amount and term.
So a players value is a combination of the assets used to acquire him plus production, production years, contract, etc. So Dermott value for Toronto isn’t just a 2nd round pick value; it’s also his production of 4 NHL seasons(or whatever he played). He’ll get a number value.
And like I said, I’ll almost guarantee that getting a 3rd round pick in return for a player with a value of a2nd round pick plus 2 quality years and 2 average years of NHL production would be positive asset management.
As far as Colorado. Again, we’ll see. Obviously if he just walks in free agency, it would probably very poor or negative asset management. They used a ton of assets to acquire acquire him. So again, his value to the team will depend on that, plus his contract, term, production and years of production, compared against the number value based on assets used to acquire him. Plus the return they get when they move him. Again, if he just walks in free agency I would almost be positive it would be considered bad or negative asset management.