SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/NHL Signings

Boston Bruins signed Hampus Lindholm (8 Years / $6,500,000 AAV)

Was this a good signing?
Le graphique a été masqué

Options de sondage


20 mars 2022 à 12 h 31
#1
Hampus Lindholm has signed a new contract with the Boston Bruins.
Contrat standard (prolongation)
Contrats comparablesCOMPARER CE CONTRAT
SIGNÉ PAR: Don Sweeney
Durée: 8 ans
Valeur: 52 000 000 $
Statut à l’échéance du contrat: UFA
% Cap Info-bulle: 7,98
Contrat signé avec: Logo de Bruins de BostonBruins de Boston
Date de signature: 20 mars 2022
Source: CapFriendly

Hampus Lindholm a signé un contrat de 8 ans d'une valeur de 52 000 000 $ avec les Bruins de Boston, le 20 mars 2022. Le contrat comporte un cap hit de 6 500 000 $.

SAISONClauseCap hitInfo-bulleAAV Info-bulleBonis de performanceInfo-bulleBonis de signatureInfo-bulleSalaire de baseInfo-bulleSalaire totalInfo-bulleSalaire mineuresInfo-bulle
2022-23NTC, NMC6 500 000 $6 500 000 $0 $2 000 000 $5 250 000 $7 250 000 $7 250 000 $
2023-24NTC, NMC6 500 000 $6 500 000 $0 $2 000 000 $6 000 000 $8 000 000 $8 000 000 $
2024-25NTC, NMC6 500 000 $6 500 000 $0 $2 000 000 $6 000 000 $8 000 000 $8 000 000 $
2025-26NTC, NMC6 500 000 $6 500 000 $0 $2 000 000 $6 000 000 $8 000 000 $8 000 000 $
2026-27NTC, NMC6 500 000 $6 500 000 $0 $2 000 000 $4 350 000 $6 350 000 $6 350 000 $
2027-28M-NTC6 500 000 $6 500 000 $0 $0 $4 800 000 $4 800 000 $4 800 000 $
2028-29M-NTC6 500 000 $6 500 000 $0 $0 $4 800 000 $4 800 000 $4 800 000 $
2029-30M-NTC6 500 000 $6 500 000 $0 $0 $4 800 000 $4 800 000 $4 800 000 $
TOTAL52 000 000 $52 000 000 $0 $10 000 000 $42 000 000 $52 000 000 $52 000 000 $
DÉTAILS DE LA CLAUSE: En vigueur de 2027-28 à 2029-30: Le joueur soumet une liste de 15 équipes où il refuse d'être échangé.
SOURCE: CapFriendly
20 mars 2022 à 12 h 33
#2
HonestHockeyNYI
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2019
Messages: 309
Mentions "j'aime": 278
Talk about money to burn…yikes.
KSIxSKULLS, SoFlaSooner et arafay a aimé ceci.
20 mars 2022 à 12 h 33
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2018
Messages: 2,654
Mentions "j'aime": 251
Fair Value, not a steal, 8 years might be much, but it makes us able to trade him later in times so its a good deal
OldNYIfan, KennyBoi, arafay and 1 other person a aimé ceci.
20 mars 2022 à 12 h 35
#4
Jinx god
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2019
Messages: 10,201
Mentions "j'aime": 13,729
How many dman got signed to a 6+ million dollar contracts in the past year or so?

cover10.jpg
JackForHart, oilersfan150, AndrewLadd and 9 others a aimé ceci.
20 mars 2022 à 12 h 35
#5
Hii
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2022
Messages: 1,396
Mentions "j'aime": 570
Jezz, Lindholm will regret this when the Bruins are in a four year rebuild.
SoFlaSooner et BuckoJoyde a aimé ceci.
20 mars 2022 à 12 h 36
#6
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2020
Messages: 204
Mentions "j'aime": 221
Solid cap hit, term is a bit much

As long as the cap goes up steadily this is perfectly fine
20 mars 2022 à 12 h 36
#7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2020
Messages: 1,525
Mentions "j'aime": 668
Why, oh why do the Bruins always get the good contracts?
OldNYIfan, KennyBoi et jpsnow13 a aimé ceci.
20 mars 2022 à 12 h 37
#8
Hakuna Matata
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2020
Messages: 33,185
Mentions "j'aime": 20,724
6.5x 6 years would have been better because of his age.

The final 2 years probs gonna get bought out.
OldNYIfan et jr400 a aimé ceci.
20 mars 2022 à 12 h 38
#9
1-0 them
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2020
Messages: 3,259
Mentions "j'aime": 2,074
Good deal
OldNYIfan a aimé ceci.
20 mars 2022 à 12 h 41
#10
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2019
Messages: 12
Mentions "j'aime": 14
If anything, this justifies the trade for him. Both teams made out well.
OldNYIfan, KennyBoi et Roysboy72 a aimé ceci.
20 mars 2022 à 12 h 43
#11
Amirov Forever
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2022
Messages: 6,374
Mentions "j'aime": 5,863
This makes me hate the trade a little less from the Bruins end of things. Not as bad as people seem to make it out to be. Lindholm - McAvoy should be fun
KennyBoi a aimé ceci.
20 mars 2022 à 12 h 48
#12
Once a Kings Fan Too
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 39,662
Mentions "j'aime": 24,580
The other shoe drops, making the trade a good one for both teams, and explaining the delay that required him to be held out of Friday's game. And I'll bet that the contract is significantly front-loaded, so that he can be bought out without too much pain in years 7 and 8.

I'm happy for Hampus and the Bruins. I hope he has five or six great years there.
KennyBoi et Roysboy72 a aimé ceci.
20 mars 2022 à 12 h 49
#13
WentWughes
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2016
Messages: 10,653
Mentions "j'aime": 10,231
Terrible contract
20 mars 2022 à 12 h 49
#14
Bo Horvat enjoyer
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2019
Messages: 10,711
Mentions "j'aime": 11,932
8 years is gross
rollie1967 a aimé ceci.
20 mars 2022 à 12 h 49
#15
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2019
Messages: 3,490
Mentions "j'aime": 993
Quoting: Hii
Jezz, Lindholm will regret this when the Bruins are in a four year rebuild.


Boston always shoots for the quick retool. Nashville's success this season is likely further encouragement to keep doing what they're doing.
20 mars 2022 à 12 h 53
#16
Hii
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2022
Messages: 1,396
Mentions "j'aime": 570
Quoting: Hockyluv21
Boston always shoots for the quick retool. Nashville's success this season is likely further encouragement to keep doing what they're doing.


Emm, they don't have enough futures in their system to do a quick retool right now, they will have to stop sending over picks to other teams.
rollie1967 a aimé ceci.
20 mars 2022 à 12 h 55
#17
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2019
Messages: 3,490
Mentions "j'aime": 993
Quoting: Hii
Emm, they don't have enough futures in their system to do a quick retool right now, they will have to stop sending over picks to other teams.


Picks are relatively easy to come by, I think. I know it doesn't seem that way, but if Boston has a bad year some time in the next 2-3 years, they have plenty of talent on relatively reasonable contracts to trade for picks if need be.
20 mars 2022 à 12 h 57
#18
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2019
Messages: 1,723
Mentions "j'aime": 535
Modifié 20 mars 2022 à 13 h 6
Makes the trade look better since it's not just a rental anymore. Perfectly fine with that aav, 8 yrs is a bit much but I'll take that for a good 6 yrs of him and McAvoy solidifying that top pairing

The contract is front loaded too so it'll be easier to move him or buy him out in yr 6-8
OldNYIfan a aimé ceci.
20 mars 2022 à 12 h 59
#19
Hii
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2022
Messages: 1,396
Mentions "j'aime": 570
Quoting: Hockyluv21
Picks are relatively easy to come by, I think. I know it doesn't seem that way, but if Boston has a bad year some time in the next 2-3 years, they have plenty of talent on relatively reasonable contracts to trade for picks if need be.


I still don't like their current prospect pool and their going to be going for it as long as they have Pasta, the rat, Bergeron and Lindholm, and McCovoy.
rollie1967 a aimé ceci.
20 mars 2022 à 13 h 0
#20
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 1,220
Mentions "j'aime": 685
8 years way too long
rollie1967 a aimé ceci.
20 mars 2022 à 13 h 3
#21
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2020
Messages: 499
Mentions "j'aime": 408
If he can get back to how he played a few years ago this will be worth it. But at his current level of play, it's a bad contract
rollie1967 a aimé ceci.
20 mars 2022 à 13 h 19
#22
Once a Kings Fan Too
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 39,662
Mentions "j'aime": 24,580
Quoting: KennyBoi
Makes the trade look better since it's not just a rental anymore. Perfectly fine with that aav, 8 yrs is a bit much but I'll take that for a good 6 yrs of him and McAvoy solidifying that top pairing

The contract is front loaded too so it'll be easier to move him or buy him out in yr 6-8


So my prediction in my earlier comment is borne out now that we know the details -- not just years 7 and 8, but year 6 is comfortably low, too.
KennyBoi a aimé ceci.
20 mars 2022 à 13 h 20
#23
LongtimeLeafsufferer
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2015
Messages: 59,065
Mentions "j'aime": 22,462
Modifié 20 mars 2022 à 13 h 26
Quoting: OldNYIfan
The other shoe drops, making the trade a good one for both teams, and explaining the delay that required him to be held out of Friday's game. And I'll bet that the contract is significantly front-loaded, so that he can be bought out without too much pain in years 7 and 8.

I'm happy for Hampus and the Bruins. I hope he has five or six great years there.


I know I'm not making a good comparison because stats don't tell the picture. But...

Lindholm..In 60 games, 22 points, zero plus minus. Bruins paid to get him, and then a 28 year old gets a 6.5m X 8 contract

The worse Dman in the NHL according to CF followers, Justin Holl. 50 games, 14 points, 12 plus minus, 2m a year.

By the way there is pain for a buyout after six years. Two years of 3.6m and two years at 1.6m. total 9.8m
drewjenkins a aimé ceci.
20 mars 2022 à 13 h 33
#24
You know nothing JS
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2017
Messages: 6,997
Mentions "j'aime": 4,395
Bruins always get the player they want to sign a contract with reasonable AAV.

I don't think there is market as attractive for the players than Boston. Must be nice.
20 mars 2022 à 13 h 38
#25
Once a Kings Fan Too
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 39,662
Mentions "j'aime": 24,580
Quoting: palhal
I know I'm not making a good comparison because stats don't tell the picture. But...

Lindholm..In 60 games, 22 points, zero plus minus. Bruins paid to get him, and then a 28 year old gets a 6.5m X 8 contract

The worse Dman in the NHL according to CF followers, Justin Holl. 50 games, 14 points, 12 plus minus, 2m a year.

By the way there is pain for a buyout after six years. Two years of 3.6m and two years at 1.6m. total 9.8m


Well, Holl can't play #1LD opposite McAvoy, and Lindholm can.

Plus-minus is deceiving unless you consider the teams' respective goal differentials.

And $9.8 million is a lot better than, not to mention half of, $19.5 million.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Chargement de l'animation
Soumettre les modifications du sondage