SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

3 team hypothetical- unsure on value

Créé par: MNCountryClub
Équipe: 2022-23 Wild du Minnesota
Date de création initiale: 17 mars 2022
Publié: 18 mars 2022
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
An idea I had on a 3 team involving Fiala. Where do the values need adjusting?
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
2975 000 $
31 900 000 $
33 000 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
23 500 000 $
CRÉÉANSCAP HIT
Goalie, Vet
11 000 000 $
Transactions
1.
MIN
  1. Durzi, Sean [Droits de RFA]
  2. Choix de 1e ronde en 2022 (LAK)
LAK
  1. Fiala, Kevin [Droits de RFA]
2.
Rachats de contrats
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2022
Logo de MIN
Logo de LAK
Logo de MIN
Logo de MIN
Logo de MIN
Logo de MIN
Logo de SJS
Logo de MIN
2023
Logo de MIN
Logo de MIN
Logo de MIN
Logo de MIN
Logo de MIN
Logo de MIN
Logo de MIN
2024
Logo de MIN
Logo de MIN
Logo de MIN
Logo de MIN
Logo de MIN
Logo de MIN
Logo de MIN
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2381 500 000 $81 080 254 $0 $1 615 000 $419 746 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
9 000 000 $9 000 000 $
AG
UFA - 4
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
C
RFA - 3
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
AD, AG
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 2
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
880 833 $880 833 $ (Bonis de performance600 000 $$600K)
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
C
UFA - 1
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
3 100 000 $3 100 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
5 250 000 $5 250 000 $
C
UFA - 7
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
1 700 000 $1 700 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
975 000 $975 000 $
AG, C
RFA - 2
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
1 200 000 $1 200 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 3
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
750 000 $750 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
855 833 $855 833 $ (Bonis de performance82 500 $$82K)
AG, AD
RFA - 3
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
DG
NMC
UFA - 6
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
1 900 000 $1 900 000 $
G
UFA - 2
3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 2
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
7 575 000 $7 575 000 $
DD
NMC
UFA - 5
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
3 666 667 $3 666 667 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
1 125 000 $1 125 000 $
DG/DD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Goalie, Vet
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
1 200 000 $1 200 000 $
DG
UFA - 3
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
795 000 $795 000 $ (Bonis de performance82 500 $$82K)
DD
RFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
18 mars 2022 à 10 h 33
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2021
Messages: 2,663
Mentions "j'aime": 1,907
Quoting: NYRxLundqvist
Some of yall don't even try


Good point.
18 mars 2022 à 10 h 51
#2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2020
Messages: 2,121
Mentions "j'aime": 2,013
Buffalo passes
18 mars 2022 à 10 h 55
#3
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2021
Messages: 2,663
Mentions "j'aime": 1,907
Quoting: Lsendel3
Buffalo passes


That’s fine, but can you elaborate on why, so it’s constructive? My understanding is that BUF is looking for a RD to play with Power.

Are they looking for someone more stay at home? Do they want more of a vet type? Want to try their luck at UFAs?
18 mars 2022 à 11 h 1
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2019
Messages: 4,292
Mentions "j'aime": 2,340
Quoting: drmantalban
That’s fine, but can you elaborate on why, so it’s constructive? My understanding is that BUF is looking for a RD to play with Power.

Are they looking for someone more stay at home? Do they want more of a vet type? Want to try their luck at UFAs?

Yeah probably a want a vet. They can’t trade Peterka. He has been really good in Rochester will be on the team next year. They are probably going to trade for a RD.
RavensShadow a aimé ceci.
18 mars 2022 à 11 h 7
#5
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2021
Messages: 2,663
Mentions "j'aime": 1,907
Quoting: Sabres923
Yeah probably a want a vet. They can’t trade Peterka. He has been really good in Rochester will be on the team next year. They are probably going to trade for a RD.


Yeah I know Peterka has been good, but so has Quinn. And with Tuch coming over, I thought the wings were pretty well set.

I’d try and structure something around Dumba, but I’d imagine BUF is on his 10 team NT list
18 mars 2022 à 11 h 34
#6
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2020
Messages: 2,121
Mentions "j'aime": 2,013
Quoting: drmantalban
That’s fine, but can you elaborate on why, so it’s constructive? My understanding is that BUF is looking for a RD to play with Power.

Are they looking for someone more stay at home? Do they want more of a vet type? Want to try their luck at UFAs?


My understanding of Durzi is offensive defenseman. Buf would be looking for a vet stay at home. My LA target, would be Roy, and the cost would be less then JJ. Hope that helps. Value is probably fine, don’t know much on Durzi, but heard good things.
sabres89 et gretzkyghosts a aimé ceci.
18 mars 2022 à 11 h 43
#7
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2021
Messages: 2,663
Mentions "j'aime": 1,907
Quoting: Lsendel3
My understanding of Durzi is offensive defenseman. Buf would be looking for a vet stay at home. My LA target, would be Roy, and the cost would be less then JJ. Hope that helps. Value is probably fine, don’t know much on Durzi, but heard good things.


Makes sense, thanks. Yeah Roy is great, but I’m not sure you can get him for less than JJ. He’s a bona fide top 4 RD, and if he were on the block, someone would certainly pony up that level of value. But that’s really neither here nor there, in this convo.

Durzi is solid, but def offensive minded. If they want a stay at home, it wouldn’t be a good fit.
18 mars 2022 à 12 h 4
#8
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2017
Messages: 2,111
Mentions "j'aime": 1,021
Quoting: drmantalban
Yeah I know Peterka has been good, but so has Quinn. And with Tuch coming over, I thought the wings were pretty well set.

I’d try and structure something around Dumba, but I’d imagine BUF is on his 10 team NT list


You need to ice 12 forwards, I'm pretty sure they can squeeze in Peterka. Sabres are planning to build around Tompson, Tuck, Peterka, Quinn, Krebs, Cozens, Dahlin, and Powers. Not saying those guys are untouchable but a team would have to blow the Sabres socks off to get one of them. Sabres would move out Olofsson or Mittlestadt before they move Peterka.
RavensShadow a aimé ceci.
18 mars 2022 à 12 h 17
#9
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2021
Messages: 2,663
Mentions "j'aime": 1,907
Quoting: Greysuits
You need to ice 12 forwards, I'm pretty sure they can squeeze in Peterka. Sabres are planning to build around Tompson, Tuck, Peterka, Quinn, Krebs, Cozens, Dahlin, and Powers. Not saying those guys are untouchable but a team would have to blow the Sabres socks off to get one of them. Sabres would move out Olofsson or Mittlestadt before they move Peterka.


I understand that, but you also have logjams with Skinner and Okposo. And at a certain point, it’s irresponsible to not at least consider reallocating your value. If you have a surplus of value at wing, just because you can make room for everyone, doesn’t mean you should. Especially when you have a shortage of value at RD.

I’m not saying BUF would or should do Peterka for Durzi, but I do think it’s the type of move that warrants more consideration than it’s getting. It’s not like Durzi (or some other proxy player you exchange Peterka for) is a slouch.
18 mars 2022 à 13 h 0
#10
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2020
Messages: 2,121
Mentions "j'aime": 2,013
Quoting: drmantalban
Makes sense, thanks. Yeah Roy is great, but I’m not sure you can get him for less than JJ. He’s a bona fide top 4 RD, and if he were on the block, someone would certainly pony up that level of value. But that’s really neither here nor there, in this convo.

Durzi is solid, but def offensive minded. If they want a stay at home, it wouldn’t be a good fit.


I’ll disagree that Roy cost JJ, respectively. I feel stay at home defenseman just get undervalued, and while he’s good, he’s not great. And with the Dman pushing LA on the right side, he’s expendable. Not saying cheap, but JJ would be the premium price for him, imo
sabres89 a aimé ceci.
18 mars 2022 à 13 h 8
#11
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2021
Messages: 2,663
Mentions "j'aime": 1,907
Quoting: Lsendel3
I’ll disagree that Roy cost JJ, respectively. I feel stay at home defenseman just get undervalued, and while he’s good, he’s not great. And with the Dman pushing LA on the right side, he’s expendable. Not saying cheap, but JJ would be the premium price for him, imo


He’s 27, shoots right and has 2 more years at a very friendly contract. Kings would most definitely get a Peterka level player, if they dealt him.


gretzkyghosts a aimé ceci.
18 mars 2022 à 13 h 11
#12
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2017
Messages: 8,245
Mentions "j'aime": 6,234
Peterkas stock seems to keep climbing. Interesting article on the athletic for right d targets for Buffalo, most are bigger defensive defensemen. That's what I would try for, I mean you already have 2 first overall defensemen on the roster who can move the puck, it's our own zone that we (and I think most bad teams) seem to get hemmed up in. Bottom line, peterka seems like a premium that we won't wanna pay for an offensive right shot d.
18 mars 2022 à 13 h 13
#13
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2020
Messages: 2,121
Mentions "j'aime": 2,013
Quoting: drmantalban
He’s 27, shoots right and has 2 more years at a very friendly contract. Kings would most definitely get a Peterka level player, if they dealt him.




I understand, my point is actually he’s 27 vs a 20year old who should have gone in the first round and showing as much. Like I said, respectably, I like Roy. If the cost is JJ I don’t do it. Doubt Adams would either
18 mars 2022 à 13 h 13
#14
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 417
Mentions "j'aime": 162
Quoting: drmantalban
I understand that, but you also have logjams with Skinner and Okposo. And at a certain point, it’s irresponsible to not at least consider reallocating your value. If you have a surplus of value at wing, just because you can make room for everyone, doesn’t mean you should. Especially when you have a shortage of value at RD.

I’m not saying BUF would or should do Peterka for Durzi, but I do think it’s the type of move that warrants more consideration than it’s getting. It’s not like Durzi (or some other proxy player you exchange Peterka for) is a slouch.


As a Buffalo fan, they won't move any combination of Tuch, Cozens, Power, Dahlin, Krebs, Quinn, Peterka, Samuelsson, or Thompson. They are so focused on drafting/developing their young talent and Peterka is one of their best.

Okposo has one year after this and will be a bottom-six forward, so he won't get in the way of Peterka's playing time. The only younger players I can see them moving for other younger players are Mittelstadt, Olofsson, Ryan Johnson, or Jacob Bryson - which they'll have to move one to get a right-shot defenseman.

I would imagine they're looking at more of defensive-defensemen for Dahlin and Power because of the offensive upside of those two, and most likely a veteran for Power.
sabres89 a aimé ceci.
18 mars 2022 à 13 h 14
#15
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2016
Messages: 14,543
Mentions "j'aime": 6,138
Quoting: drmantalban
I understand that, but you also have logjams with Skinner and Okposo. And at a certain point, it’s irresponsible to not at least consider reallocating your value. If you have a surplus of value at wing, just because you can make room for everyone, doesn’t mean you should. Especially when you have a shortage of value at RD.

I’m not saying BUF would or should do Peterka for Durzi, but I do think it’s the type of move that warrants more consideration than it’s getting. It’s not like Durzi (or some other proxy player you exchange Peterka for) is a slouch.


Quoting: Lsendel3
I’ll disagree that Roy cost JJ, respectively. I feel stay at home defenseman just get undervalued, and while he’s good, he’s not great. And with the Dman pushing LA on the right side, he’s expendable. Not saying cheap, but JJ would be the premium price for him, imo


Not commenting on the value here, but Roy is not available for at least another season. Maybe at next year's trade deadline, more likely at the 2023 draft.
18 mars 2022 à 13 h 17
#16
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2021
Messages: 2,663
Mentions "j'aime": 1,907
Quoting: Lsendel3
I understand, my point is actually he’s 27 vs a 29 year old who should have gone in the first round and showing as much. Like I said, respectably, I like Roy. If the cost is JJ I don’t do it. Doubt Adams would either


Yeah and that’s completely fine. I totally get why BUF wouldn’t do it. My point was just that Roy likely returns a Peterka level prospect.

Lots of potential ways BUF can solve for the RD gap.
Lsendel3 a aimé ceci.
18 mars 2022 à 13 h 18
#17
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2020
Messages: 2,121
Mentions "j'aime": 2,013
Quoting: tkecanuck341
Not commenting on the value here, but Roy is not available for at least another season. Maybe at next year's trade deadline, more likely at the 2023 draft.


And that’s fair enough. I think Buf is looking for a Roy type is my point, or at least should, for their young studs
18 mars 2022 à 13 h 19
#18
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2021
Messages: 2,663
Mentions "j'aime": 1,907
Quoting: tkecanuck341
Not commenting on the value here, but Roy is not available for at least another season. Maybe at next year's trade deadline, more likely at the 2023 draft.


Yeah that’s fine, the discussion went on a tangent over to Roy as a hypothetical. We weren’t necessarily swapping him in this trade.
18 mars 2022 à 13 h 24
#19
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2017
Messages: 8,245
Mentions "j'aime": 6,234
Quoting: mac11_716
As a Buffalo fan, they won't move any combination of Tuch, Cozens, Power, Dahlin, Krebs, Quinn, Peterka, Samuelsson, or Thompson. They are so focused on drafting/developing their young talent and Peterka is one of their bets.

Okposo has one year after this and will be a bottom-six forward, so he won't get in the way of Peterka's playing time. The only younger players I can see them moving for other younger players are Mittelstadt, Olofsson, Ryan Johnson, or Jacob Bryson - which they'll have to move one to get a right-shot defenseman.

I would imagine they're looking at more of defensive-defensemen for Dahlin and Power because of the offensive upside of those two, and most likely a veteran for Power.


I think adams would consider moving anybody not named- dahlin and power. You have to give to get. I like olofsson more than most, but I'm not sure that he's returning the kind of right d, and I'm not sure any of the others you mention do either. I'm not interested in moving prime assets for two dimes and a button, but if the right d is available, I bet he pulls the trigger.
MNCountryClub et mac11_716 a aimé ceci.
18 mars 2022 à 13 h 24
#20
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2021
Messages: 2,663
Mentions "j'aime": 1,907
Quoting: sabres89
Peterkas stock seems to keep climbing. Interesting article on the athletic for right d targets for Buffalo, most are bigger defensive defensemen. That's what I would try for, I mean you already have 2 first overall defensemen on the roster who can move the puck, it's our own zone that we (and I think most bad teams) seem to get hemmed up in. Bottom line, peterka seems like a premium that we won't wanna pay for an offensive right shot d.


Yeah that makes sense. This whole proposal was less about Durzi and more about addressing the needs of all 3 teams involved. In some capacity, I’d expect them all to address them this offseason.

If BUFs preference is to pursue a more budget friendly option on RD - ie someone that doesn’t require Peterka level value to acquire - then I have no issue with that.
18 mars 2022 à 13 h 33
#21
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2018
Messages: 5,351
Mentions "j'aime": 4,799
Quoting: Lsendel3
I understand, my point is actually he’s 27 vs a 20year old who should have gone in the first round and showing as much. Like I said, respectably, I like Roy. If the cost is JJ I don’t do it. Doubt Adams would either
IMO that is a fair trade.
Peterka could be the odd man out and Buffalo needs a young RHD.

Please give me the URL for the Matt Roy graph.
Thank you very much.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage