SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Sharks trade at deadline

Créé par: Jetlag
Équipe: 2021-22 Sharks de San Jose
Date de création initiale: 15 mars 2022
Publié: 15 mars 2022
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
LISTE DE RÉSERVEANSCAP HIT
3900 000 $
Transactions
1.
SJS
  1. Choix de 2e ronde en 2022 (TOR)
TOR
  1. Middleton, Jake
  2. Choix de 4e ronde en 2023 (SJS)
2.
SJS
  1. Mrázek, Petr
  2. Choix de 2e ronde en 2023 (TOR)
Détails additionnels:
Leafs keep 30% salary
3.
SJS
  1. Choix de 2e ronde en 2024 (COL)
4.
SJS
  1. Choix de 5e ronde en 2022 (BOS)
5.
SJS
  1. Kravtsov, Vitali
  2. Lundkvist, Nils
  3. Choix de 1e ronde en 2022 (NYR)
Rachats de contrats
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2022
Logo de SJS
Logo de NYR
Logo de TOR
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de BUF
Logo de BOS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de ARI
Logo de MIN
2023
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de TOR
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
2024
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de COL
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2681 500 000 $64 800 000 $0 $2 590 000 $16 700 000 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
8 000 000 $8 000 000 $
C
M-NTC
UFA - 6
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
750 000 $750 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance212 500 $$212K)
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
842 500 $842 500 $ (Bonis de performance82 500 $$82K)
C
UFA - 2
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
925 000 $925 000 $
AG
RFA - 5
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
1 550 000 $1 550 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
1 025 000 $1 025 000 $
C, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
4 725 000 $4 725 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 3
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
750 000 $750 000 $
AG, AD
RFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
842 500 $842 500 $ (Bonis de performance82 500 $$82K)
C
UFA - 2
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
850 000 $850 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
750 000 $750 000 $
AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Rangers de New York
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
AG, AD
RFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
783 333 $783 333 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
10 000 000 $10 000 000 $
DD
NMC
UFA - 6
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
2 175 000 $2 175 000 $
G
UFA - 2
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance212 500 $$212K)
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
5 280 000 $5 280 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
725 000 $725 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
7 000 000 $7 000 000 $
DG/DD
NMC
UFA - 5
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance300 000 $$300K)
DD
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
3 800 000 $3 800 000 $
G
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
750 000 $750 000 $
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
750 000 $750 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Rangers de New York
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
DD
RFA - 3
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
2 250 000 $2 250 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 3
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
796 667 $796 667 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
15 mars 2022 à 20 h 15
#1
John 3 16
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2020
Messages: 9,581
Mentions "j'aime": 4,618
No from Colorado, that does nothing for them.
15 mars 2022 à 20 h 16
#2
Bootheblues
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2021
Messages: 1,530
Mentions "j'aime": 438
Avs decline
15 mars 2022 à 20 h 16
#3
Amirov Forever
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2022
Messages: 6,521
Mentions "j'aime": 6,016
Quoting: Richard88
No from Colorado, that does nothing for them.


Quoting: BluesTheGreats
Avs decline


Seriously? Barabanov would be so good on the Avs
15 mars 2022 à 20 h 23
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2020
Messages: 5,214
Mentions "j'aime": 2,867
just fyi even mrazek 30% retained has significan negative value. Leafs would have to add at least another 2nd.

and maybe take the 4th out of the middleton trade the rumor is 2nd + prospect for him
Jetlag, Vizix et bunnymcfoo a aimé ceci.
15 mars 2022 à 20 h 27
#5
John 3 16
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2020
Messages: 9,581
Mentions "j'aime": 4,618
Quoting: LeafsDude
Seriously? Barabanov would be so good on the Avs


Avs don't have many high draft picks so they can't afford to burn the few they have on bottom of the roster pending UFA's unless they are impact players (which he is not).
15 mars 2022 à 20 h 38
#6
Owly
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 4,559
Mentions "j'aime": 932
I think Mrazek's buyout is better than 30% so no
15 mars 2022 à 20 h 47
#7
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2022
Messages: 22
Mentions "j'aime": 5
Didn’t know that if that’s so I’d just take that out and make it full salary
15 mars 2022 à 21 h 22
#8
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2017
Messages: 786
Mentions "j'aime": 207
Quoting: FunMustBeAlways
just fyi even mrazek 30% retained has significan negative value. Leafs would have to add at least another 2nd.

and maybe take the 4th out of the middleton trade the rumor is 2nd + prospect for him


With 30% retained would be 2.66 million for 2 years. That's not much of a cap dump tbh. Would not take much of anything to dump that contract. No way they would retain that much. Buying him out/him turing into what he has proven to be over 300 games would be much better. Be realistic bud.

The "rumor" is just the starting point for what the sharks want. That would be the absolute maximum. Realistically he won't get anywhere close to Manson, the sharks are just trying to capitalize on that trade. 55 games in the league doesn't get you that much. Maybe a 3rd and a guy who might be able to play like a duzak/hollowell/Rubins
15 mars 2022 à 21 h 49
#9
Tspky
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2016
Messages: 3,885
Mentions "j'aime": 980
Rangers decline, too much for a player that can walk in the offseason
15 mars 2022 à 21 h 58
#10
H.Lindholm Lover
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2021
Messages: 3,598
Mentions "j'aime": 921
Quoting: FunMustBeAlways
just fyi even mrazek 30% retained has significan negative value. Leafs would have to add at least another 2nd.

and maybe take the 4th out of the middleton trade the rumor is 2nd + prospect for him


i remember when the leafs were told this about ritchie. but that didnt happen
15 mars 2022 à 23 h 27
#11
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2020
Messages: 5,214
Mentions "j'aime": 2,867
Quoting: odyssey
i remember when the leafs were told this about ritchie. but that didnt happen


That’s just a weak analogy. Ritchie is a negative value asset but he’s signed at 2.5 for one more season and he plays a very expendable position. Mrazek is playing even worse than Ritchie was, costs 1.3M more and is signed for 2 more years playing the least expendable position. Mrazek single-handedly throws games for the Leafs on a constant basis.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage