yes, im aware how habs fans who think Chariot is good despite all evidence view me, they tell me all the time. Angry lot of kids , that.

And now I’m going to quote a guy with whom I have frequent vigorous discussions:

"Funny, I was thinking the opposite. Manson is a better defender than Chiarot. Colorado has a very strong analytics department so they would have known that, of course.

5v5 On-ice Rels, this season
Chariot vs Manson
-2.66 CF% Rel +4.25
-3.65 GF% Rel +6.03
-5.15 xGF% Rel +0.72
-2.14 SCF% Rel +2.90
-6.54 HDCF% Rel +5.00
39.74 Off. Zone Start % 39.42

Manson’s shot-, goal-, scoring chance- and expected goal-suppression is far superior as he actually does good work in these areas, while Chiarot allows more of each than his teammates do. Chiarot has no advantage anywhere, not even in the scoring department:

0.31 Goals/60 0.32
0.68 Total Points/60 0.64
0.56 Primary Points/60 0.56
4.5 Shots/60 4.53
0.16 ixG/60 0.26
2.78 iSCF/60 3.26
0.43 iHDCF/60 1.11

Similar style, similar usage, but only one of these guys is effective at his job."

You can find further discussion on this point in https://www.capfriendly.com/forums/thread/566100

You might find it enlightening.

nah, i watch the games, unlike you who clearly just watch the ice time in the box scored

Lol all you do is quote the most popular analytic guys on twitter and then come on here and act like you know what you're talking about.

If MTL gets better value than Manson, does that means GMs sees him better than Manson ?

Well manson is about 80x better, so by my calculations that means chariot should net the habs a negative 2nd rounder

HAHAHAHAHAHAH

note the word should, i never said he wouldnt get a 1st. I think it's hilarious that florida paid that much, it's a very stupid trade that made them worse

If MTL gets better value than Manson, does that means GMs sees him better than Manson ?

{In light of ensuing events, I owe you an amended response}

Yes.

And I was wrong about Chiarot. Dead wrong. Rasmus Ristolainen wrong -- and I was on the bad side of that one, too.