Forums/Armchair-GM

Rakell for Pettersson and Kapanen

Créé par: Chigurrhh
Date de création initiale: 14 mars 2022
Publié: 14 mars 2022
Équipe: 2021-22 Penguins de Pittsburgh
Explications
Anaheim gets Pettersson back to replace Lindholm (who will probably be traded). Gets Kapanen, who will probably be pretty cheap and easy to re-sign.


Penguins get Rakell who might not be that good anymore but can potentially help the middle six and clears cap space for next season.

Pettersson isn't the guy I would chose to move (because Dumoulin is older and struggling) but he is the guy Sullivan is choosing to scratch in favor of Friedman.

This leaves the Penguins with room for a big move as well.
Transactions
1.
PIT
  1. Rakell, Rickard
ANA
  1. Pettersson, Marcus
  2. Kapanen, Kasperi
Rachats de contrats
  • Jack Johnson: 1 166 667 $
Enfoui
  • Juuso Riikola: 25 000 $ (1 150 000 $)
ANNÉE DE REPÊCHAGERONDE 1RONDE 2RONDE 3RONDE 4RONDE 5RONDE 6RONDE 7
2022
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
2023
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de TOR
2024
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2281 500 000 $76 729 503 $0 $212 500 $4 770 497 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de PIT
Guentzel, Jake
6 000 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 3
Logo de PIT
Crosby, Sidney
8 700 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo de PIT
Rust, Bryan
3 500 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de PIT
Zucker, Jason
5 500 000 $
AG, AD
NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de PIT
Malkin, Evgeni
9 500 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo de PIT
Rodrigues, Evan
1 000 000 $
AD, C
UFA - 1
Logo de PIT
Heinen, Danton
1 100 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de PIT
Carter, Jeff
2 636 364 $
C, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de ANA
Rakell, Rickard
2 463 139 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de PIT
McGinn, Brock
2 750 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 4
Logo de PIT
Blueger, Teddy
2 200 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de PIT
Aston-Reese, Zach
1 725 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de PIT
Boyle, Brian
750 000 $
AG, C
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de PIT
Matheson, Michael
4 875 000 $
DG
NTC
UFA - 5
Logo de PIT
Letang, Kris
7 250 000 $
DD
NMC NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de PIT
Jarry, Tristan
3 500 000 $
G
UFA - 2
Logo de PIT
Dumoulin, Brian
4 100 000 $
DG
NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de PIT
Marino, John
4 400 000 $
DD
UFA - 6
Logo de PIT
DeSmith, Casey
1 250 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de PIT
Friedman, Mark
725 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1
Logo de PIT
Ruhwedel, Chad
750 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de PIT
Joseph, Pierre-Olivier
863 333 $
DG
RFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
14 mars à 20 h 21
#1
Dubois to NYR
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2018
Messages: 17,529
Mentions "j'aime": 6,197
Throw in Guhle or Mahura
14 mars à 20 h 27
#2
Arbiter of Truth
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2017
Messages: 30,420
Mentions "j'aime": 27,951
I actually kinda like it. Now that Ducks has made it clear they'll be retooling that core a bit I could see the sense behind bringing some new faces for the core they're building.
Chigurrhh a aimé ceci.
14 mars à 20 h 30
#3
Fowler 4 Norris
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2021
Messages: 5,961
Mentions "j'aime": 4,108
Anaheim doesn’t want Pattersson back
Jded a aimé ceci.
14 mars à 20 h 35
#4
Démarrer sujet
Chiggy
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2017
Messages: 1,795
Mentions "j'aime": 590
Quoting: GeneralLandro
Anaheim doesn’t want Pattersson back


Well without Manson and Lindholm, they need competent NHL defensemen and he's exactly that. S5ykjJo.png
14 mars à 20 h 36
#5
Being wrong is ok
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 703
Mentions "j'aime": 354
you lost me at "Rakell who might not be good anymore". Wut r Wie doin hure, bud? Also Petterson replacing Lindholm? Really dude? Mad bias here.
Rakell to the Pens would be cool but its gonna be for future assets. Not in the mood to be swapping chairs and letting the pens off easy for their mistakes.
GeneralLandro et Jded a aimé ceci.
14 mars à 20 h 41
#6
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2016
Messages: 202
Mentions "j'aime": 113
This doesn’t happen without picks and/or prospects. Sorry
Jded a aimé ceci.
14 mars à 20 h 43
#7
Démarrer sujet
Chiggy
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2017
Messages: 1,795
Mentions "j'aime": 590
Quoting: BuckoJoyde
you lost me at "Rakell who might not be good anymore". Wut r Wie doin hure, bud? Also Petterson replacing Lindholm? Really dude? Mad bias here.
Rakell to the Pens would be cool but its gonna be for future assets. Not in the mood to be swapping chairs and letting the pens off easy for their mistakes.


Rakell has absolutely declined from his peak. Fans tend to have a hard to grasping when that happens. "How dare you say this guy who was good in 2016 isn't that good anymore!" It's dumb and you should stop. Accusing me of bias for that is hilarious. Have some self-awareness, bud.

Rakell this year:

uwRCA3T.png

Rakell when he was really good:

PH09geO.png


Pettersson replacing Lindholm in the lineup doesn't mean he's as good as Lindholm. He's a solid middle pairing guy that does well defensively.
BuckoJoyde a aimé ceci.
14 mars à 20 h 55
#8
Jah1722
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2018
Messages: 4,460
Mentions "j'aime": 2,393
Quoting: Chigurrhh
Rakell has absolutely declined from his peak. Fans tend to have a hard to grasping when that happens. "How dare you say this guy who was good in 2016 isn't that good anymore!" It's dumb and you should stop. Accusing me of bias for that is hilarious. Have some self-awareness, bud.

Rakell this year:

uwRCA3T.png

Rakell when he was really good:

PH09geO.png


Pettersson replacing Lindholm in the lineup doesn't mean he's as good as Lindholm. He's a solid middle pairing guy that does well defensively.


“Have some self awareness bud” as you trade an over paid D man back to place he was already traded from. So like you said, have some self awareness bud.
14 mars à 21 h 0
#9
Démarrer sujet
Chiggy
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2017
Messages: 1,795
Mentions "j'aime": 590
Quoting: Jah1722
“Have some self awareness bud” as you trade an over paid D man back to place he was already traded from. So like you said, have some self awareness bud.


Players get traded back to to where they started all the time. I’m not sure why that is so mind blowing for you. He’s also worth about what he’s being paid as a second pairing type.
14 mars à 21 h 1
#10
JLaBarre10
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2022
Messages: 23
Mentions "j'aime": 1
i like it. Ive always liked rakell but the Pens are rumored to want term on any player they add
14 mars à 21 h 4
#11
Being wrong is ok
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 703
Mentions "j'aime": 354
Quoting: Chigurrhh
Rakell has absolutely declined from his peak. Fans tend to have a hard to grasping when that happens. "How dare you say this guy who was good in 2016 isn't that good anymore!" It's dumb and you should stop. Accusing me of bias for that is hilarious. Have some self-awareness, bud.

Rakell this year:

uwRCA3T.png

Rakell when he was really good:

PH09geO.png


Pettersson replacing Lindholm in the lineup doesn't mean he's as good as Lindholm. He's a solid middle pairing guy that does well defensively.




I come from the pov if Verbeek gets a 2nd and a b- prospect for Rakell he did well on the trade. Im just saying your pitch is awful. Kapanen is probably gonna be more expensive and less productive than Rakell. On the other hand, Pettersson is serviceable as you say. But, ANA should not be taking up contracts like his. Thus, this is less of "How dare you say this guy who was good in 2016 isn't that good anymore!" and more of a "Not in the mood to be swapping chairs and letting the pens off easy for their mistakes." Rakell is a fine player. Will probably reach 20 goals this year and is pretty cheap. IDK this trade seems like a bad deal and is oddly beneficial for the Pens, who are at the end of their competition window.
14 mars à 21 h 4
#12
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2016
Messages: 970
Mentions "j'aime": 266
Quoting: Stanley_Cup_To_Manhattan
Throw in Guhle or Mahura


I'd decline if I'm the Ducks. Would prefer to target younger assets in return for their UFAs that will be able to help the team in 3-5 years when they're really competing. Neither Pettersson nor Kapanen feel like they fit within the long-term plan, and I think they can certainly get that elsewhere.
14 mars à 21 h 26
#13
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2017
Messages: 5,418
Mentions "j'aime": 1,440
Quoting: BuckoJoyde
you lost me at "Rakell who might not be good anymore". Wut r Wie doin hure, bud? Also Petterson replacing Lindholm? Really dude? Mad bias here.
Rakell to the Pens would be cool but its gonna be for future assets. Not in the mood to be swapping chairs and letting the pens off easy for their mistakes.


Not exactly sure what you mean by letting the pens off easy for their “mistakes”. The pens didn’t make any mistakes. It’s not like they really want to trade Pettersson or Pettersson has been bad by any stretch. It’s a matter of the pens have a cheaper guy that’s likely to be just as good and a cheaper guy that’s also been playing really well for less than league minimum. If the pens didn’t have to abide by the cap, they’d be all for keep MP and trading futures for Rakell. But with how long Anaheim has been rebuilding and given the age of some of their younger players, MP kinda fits in and would make sense. It’s not like Anaheim wants to take another 5-7 years to rebuild. I think they are close and just need a few more pieces and a couple of younger vets to compete. MP is a younger vet who is also kinda cheap for a top 4 D
14 mars à 21 h 40
#14
Jah1722
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2018
Messages: 4,460
Mentions "j'aime": 2,393
Quoting: Chigurrhh
Players get traded back to to where they started all the time. I’m not sure why that is so mind blowing for you. He’s also worth about what he’s being paid as a second pairing type.


So why you trading him for a rental?
14 mars à 22 h 49
#15
Démarrer sujet
Chiggy
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2017
Messages: 1,795
Mentions "j'aime": 590
Quoting: Jah1722
So why you trading him for a rental?


Because cap space is needed for next year and the Penguins currently have too many LD making 4 million and their best prospect is a LD. Dumoulin would be my preference to trade but the coach likes him too much.
15 mars à 0 h 34
#16
Jah1722
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2018
Messages: 4,460
Mentions "j'aime": 2,393
Quoting: Chigurrhh
Because cap space is needed for next year and the Penguins currently have too many LD making 4 million and their best prospect is a LD. Dumoulin would be my preference to trade but the coach likes him too much.


Well it doesn’t much matter as the ducks aren’t trading Rakell for that package.
15 mars à 1 h 19
#17
Démarrer sujet
Chiggy
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2017
Messages: 1,795
Mentions "j'aime": 590
Quoting: Jah1722
Well it doesn’t much matter as the ducks aren’t trading Rakell for that package.


Cool.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Supprimer une option
Soumettre le sondage