SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/NHL Trades

(ANA/COL) - Manson for Helleson and 2023 2nd RD pick

Who won the trade?
Le graphique a été masqué

Options de sondage


15 mars 2022 à 14 h 5
#51
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2016
Messages: 2,513
Mentions "j'aime": 1,544
Quoting: habitantlecolon
we a freaking playing schuneaman, ouellet, clague, nimu or norlinder ... those stats are build with the team you have and every metrics evolve with team response ... you need to fill the whole to understand the validity of a stat.


And even though those ‘bad’ players are on the team, Chiarot is statistically worse for his team than other MTL Canadiens. If his teammates were all studs it would make sense he’s far worse in relativity. Saying he’s worse relatively speaking and his teammates are trash kind of supports the counter argument.
OldNYIfan a aimé ceci.
15 mars 2022 à 14 h 44
#52
Le patriote
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2018
Messages: 6,328
Mentions "j'aime": 1,402
Quoting: Jded
And even though those ‘bad’ players are on the team, Chiarot is statistically worse for his team than other MTL Canadiens. If his teammates were all studs it would make sense he’s far worse in relativity. Saying he’s worse relatively speaking and his teammates are trash kind of supports the counter argument.


you have to add the team system to that DD was atrocius so this impact as well. too many thing to considere before getting to the point that no one were fitting their role but last year was a better point to understand him.
15 mars 2022 à 15 h 5
#53
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2017
Messages: 23,967
Mentions "j'aime": 7,727
Quoting: habitantlecolon
Yeah sure ... Chiarot playing with a depleted d corp and a 3 and 4th goalie in the net while the Manson play in a full backend corp .... mouais vraiment la stats donne les faits.

I used Rels, so your excuses don't hold water.

Nice try.
Jded et OldNYIfan a aimé ceci.
15 mars 2022 à 15 h 8
#54
Le patriote
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2018
Messages: 6,328
Mentions "j'aime": 1,402
Quoting: CD282
I used Rels, so your excuses don't hold water.

Nice try.


popcorn
15 mars 2022 à 15 h 47
#55
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2018
Messages: 9,148
Mentions "j'aime": 2,223
Vote for Pedro .
15 mars 2022 à 16 h 19
#56
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2016
Messages: 2,513
Mentions "j'aime": 1,544
Modifié 15 mars 2022 à 16 h 34
Quoting: habitantlecolon
you have to add the team system to that DD was atrocius so this impact as well. too many thing to considere before getting to the point that no one were fitting their role but last year was a better point to understand him.


I'll be honest I don't really see the logic in your argument. At the end of the day I'm not arguing that Chiarot is a bad hockey player at all. I just think there's an inflation of his value in the minds of Canadiens fans that the statistics bear, which CD highlighted in comparison to someone I feel like a lot of people are somewhat down on in Manson.
CD282 et OldNYIfan a aimé ceci.
15 mars 2022 à 16 h 55
#57
Pens Fan
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2021
Messages: 919
Mentions "j'aime": 123
The avs have too many (if there is such a thing) you don’t dman. There’s makar, girard, barron, Byram,and Toews isn’t old either. Helleson will get a better chance in Anaheim, he was way too far down the depth chart. Manson is an okay defensive dman, but the ducks weren’t all that good around him so I think he will do good in Colorado. Plus the second is probably last four or so.
15 mars 2022 à 18 h 48
#58
hey look a squirrel
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 6,047
Mentions "j'aime": 3,752
Where all the people that said Manson would fetch a 1st rounder with 50% retention?

Manson hasn't been top4 quality D man in years and this return shows that.

This is fair return for 3rd pair D with 50% retention
KSIxSKULLS et Saskleaf a aimé ceci.
15 mars 2022 à 19 h 9
#59
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2017
Messages: 8,440
Mentions "j'aime": 6,060
Quoting: Trickster
Where all the people that said Manson would fetch a 1st rounder with 50% retention?

Manson hasn't been top4 quality D man in years and this return shows that.

This is fair return for 3rd pair D with 50% retention


Helleson + 2nd is more valuable than a 1st, no?
DirtyDangle a aimé ceci.
15 mars 2022 à 21 h 48
#60
v5 Minnesota GM
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2022
Messages: 8,116
Mentions "j'aime": 4,683
Go to hell - son
16 mars 2022 à 14 h 50
#61
MOVE THE COYOTES
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2020
Messages: 4,440
Mentions "j'aime": 1,549
At first I was like, wat is Aniheim thinking, but yeah, now I think they win this trade.
sensonfire a aimé ceci.
16 mars 2022 à 18 h 17
#62
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2021
Messages: 1,051
Mentions "j'aime": 546
Quoting: PaulieWalnuts
Does this mean that the Ducks are moving Lindholm and Rakell as well?


They'd be crazy not to.
16 mars 2022 à 18 h 27
#63
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2021
Messages: 1,051
Mentions "j'aime": 546
Quoting: sensonfire
Compare it to the Graves trade with New Jersey then.

https://www.capfriendly.com/trades/players/ryan-graves


Any comparison with the Graves trade has to consider that it was motivated by Colorado thinking they were going to lose him in the expansion draft. Instead they lost Donskoi, so Colorado really gave up Donskoi for Maltsev and a 2nd.
16 mars 2022 à 19 h 52
#64
sensonfire
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2021
Messages: 11,785
Mentions "j'aime": 4,438
Quoting: jr400
Any comparison with the Graves trade has to consider that it was motivated by Colorado thinking they were going to lose him in the expansion draft. Instead they lost Donskoi, so Colorado really gave up Donskoi for Maltsev and a 2nd.


If we're factoring in the expansion draft to the Graves trade, then the trade should be viewed as follows:


Donskoi + Graves

for

Maltsev + a 2nd


Whatever motivations Colorado might have had at the time are of no concern or relevance to New Jersey in that trade ...

or to Minnesota in this trade.
16 mars 2022 à 23 h 43
#65
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2017
Messages: 516
Mentions "j'aime": 136
Quoting: UpsideDownQue
Helleson + 2nd is more valuable than a 1st, no?


A Colorado 2nd is closer to a 3rd. But, nice reach. And, the FLA 1st for Chiarot is unprotected. With a B- prospect and an additional 4th.
16 mars 2022 à 23 h 46
#66
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2017
Messages: 8,440
Mentions "j'aime": 6,060
Quoting: mr_z
A Colorado 2nd is closer to a 3rd. But, nice reach. And, the FLA 1st for Chiarot is unprotected. With a B- prospect and an additional 4th.


In general teams who trade for rentals are going to have late picks. I think Helleson + late 2nd is more valuable than a late 1st

Not sure what Chiarot has to do with my comment
DirtyDangle a aimé ceci.
16 mars 2022 à 23 h 52
#67
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2017
Messages: 516
Mentions "j'aime": 136
Quoting: UpsideDownQue
In general teams who trade for rentals are going to have late picks. I think Helleson + late 2nd is more valuable than a late 1st

Not sure what Chiarot has to do with my comment


I quoted you by accident. My bad.
17 mars 2022 à 9 h 23
#68
pld apologist
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2021
Messages: 36
Mentions "j'aime": 22
everything’s been downhill since this but bless sakic and verbeek
18 mars 2022 à 8 h 57
#69
WildRock
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2022
Messages: 7
Mentions "j'aime": 1
fair trade.
19 mars 2022 à 20 h 26
#70
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2021
Messages: 1,051
Mentions "j'aime": 546
Quoting: sensonfire
If we're factoring in the expansion draft to the Graves trade, then the trade should be viewed as follows:

Donskoi + Graves

for

Maltsev + a 2nd

Whatever motivations Colorado might have had at the time are of no concern or relevance to New Jersey in that trade ...


It’s not fair to say they gave up Graves and Donskoi for Maltsev and a 2nd because they would have lost one of them in the expansion draft anyway, so the trade only cost them one of them. Assuming Seattle would have taken Graves is he was available, which is what Colorado expected, they had two choices:

1) Colorado doesn’t make the trade with NJ, they lose Graves for nothing in the expansion draft, and they keep Donskoi.

2) Colorado makes the trade with NJ, gives up Graves to NJ and Donskoi to Seattle, and gets Maltsev and a 2nd.

They chose 2), so yes, they lost Graves and Donskoi and got Maltsev and a 2nd, but because they would have lost Graves for nothing otherwise, it’s not accurate to view that trade as Donskoi + Graves for Maltsev + 2nd. The difference between 1) and 2) is Donskoi out, Maltsev and a 2nd in, so that’s what the trade meant to Colorado.

My point was that Colorado may have been willing to take less for Graves in a trade because they thought they were going to lose him whether they made the trade or not. You’re absolutely right that this was of no consequence to New Jersey. They wanted Graves and were willing to give up Maltsev and a 2nd to get him. But they probably wouldn’t have got that opportunity if it wasn’t for the looming expansion draft.

It probably doesn’t make sense to compare these trades anyway. A deadline deal is a very different situation from off-season.
sensonfire a aimé ceci.
8 nov. 2022 à 22 h 13
#71
Tintin over 1122
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2021
Messages: 15,929
Mentions "j'aime": 10,166
Quoting: Tintin
Does this mean that the Ducks are moving Lindholm and Rakell as well?


Why yes it does my friend
oilersguy et Sharkie69 a aimé ceci.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Chargement de l'animation
Soumettre les modifications du sondage