SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

trade

Créé par: AdamFox
Équipe: 2021-22 Panthers de la Floride
Date de création initiale: 14 mars 2022
Publié: 14 mars 2022
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Transactions
MTL
  1. Choix de 3e ronde en 2022 (FLA)
  2. Choix de 2e ronde en 2023 (FLA)
Rachats de contrats
Frais appliqués
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2022
Logo de FLA
Logo de FLA
Logo de FLA
Logo de CGY
Logo de FLA
2023
Logo de FLA
Logo de FLA
Logo de FLA
Logo de FLA
Logo de FLA
Logo de FLA
Logo de ARI
2024
Logo de FLA
Logo de FLA
Logo de FLA
Logo de FLA
Logo de FLA
Logo de FLA
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2481 500 000 $80 256 289 $0 $2 700 000 $1 243 711 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Panthers de la Floride
5 900 000 $5 900 000 $
AG, AD
NMC
UFA - 2
Logo de Panthers de la Floride
6 500 000 $6 500 000 $
AD
UFA - 3
Logo de Panthers de la Floride
5 300 000 $5 300 000 $
AD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Panthers de la Floride
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 3
Logo de Panthers de la Floride
5 900 000 $5 900 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo de Panthers de la Floride
2 533 333 $2 533 333 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Panthers de la Floride
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Panthers de la Floride
4 425 000 $4 425 000 $
C
UFA - 4
Logo de Panthers de la Floride
975 000 $975 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Panthers de la Floride
1 666 667 $1 666 667 $
C, AD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Panthers de la Floride
800 000 $800 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Panthers de la Floride
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
C, AG
RFA - 3
Logo de Panthers de la Floride
897 500 $897 500 $
AG, C
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Panthers de la Floride
3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
DD
UFA - 3
Logo de Panthers de la Floride
7 500 000 $7 500 000 $
DD
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo de Panthers de la Floride
10 000 000 $10 000 000 $
G
NMC
UFA - 5
Logo de Panthers de la Floride
3 250 000 $3 250 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 2
Logo de Panthers de la Floride
2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
DD
UFA - 2
Logo de Panthers de la Floride
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance1 850 000 $$2M)
G
RFA - 2
Logo de Panthers de la Floride
2 666 667 $2 666 667 $
DG
UFA - 3
Logo de Panthers de la Floride
750 000 $750 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Panthers de la Floride
750 000 $750 000 $
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Panthers de la Floride
750 000 $750 000 $
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
1 750 000 $1 750 000 $
DG/DD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Panthers de la Floride
750 000 $750 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Panthers de la Floride
2 700 000 $2 700 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Panthers de la Floride
725 000 $725 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
14 mars 2022 à 18 h 32
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2020
Messages: 2,680
Mentions "j'aime": 1,448
Not sure why the ducks pulled the trigger. Getting meh a week out a retaining half
14 mars 2022 à 18 h 37
#2
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2022
Messages: 7,792
Mentions "j'aime": 4,483
Hab fans will cry, they want a 1st rounder for Ben Chiarot.
14 mars 2022 à 18 h 40
#3
Démarrer sujet
bang bang
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2017
Messages: 1,195
Mentions "j'aime": 351
Modifié 16 mars 2022 à 22 h 29
Quoting: TampaBayLightning22
Hab fans will cry, they want a 1st rounder for Ben Chiarot.


Cle
RaZZe et Thor a aimé ceci.
14 mars 2022 à 18 h 46
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2017
Messages: 741
Mentions "j'aime": 297
Quoting: AdamFox
Clearly not getting it after that Manson return


I wouldn't say clearly. Helleson and a 2nd is very close to the equalivant to a late first round pick. Opinions vary but imo Chiarot has a tad more value right now via trade. Still expecting a first but a return like this wouldn't be far off
alex123 et MTLaveragefan a aimé ceci.
14 mars 2022 à 18 h 48
#5
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2022
Messages: 57
Mentions "j'aime": 24
Quoting: AdamFox
Clearly not getting it after that Manson return


I mean Anaheim got a promising future top 4 defensman + a 2nd rounder. Between that and a late 1rst rounder I'd rather take what Anaheim got... I don't think prices for rentals will get higher than that.
MTLaveragefan et ColonelX a aimé ceci.
14 mars 2022 à 18 h 49
#6
Démarrer sujet
bang bang
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2017
Messages: 1,195
Mentions "j'aime": 351
Quoting: Commonsense27
I wouldn't say clearly. Helleson and a 2nd is very close to the equalivant to a late first round pick. Opinions vary but imo Chiarot has a tad more value right now via trade. Still expecting a first but a return like this wouldn't be far off


The 2nd is already going to be 58-64 and helleson most likely returning for a 4th year of college he doesn't have much value at all
14 mars 2022 à 18 h 50
#7
Démarrer sujet
bang bang
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2017
Messages: 1,195
Mentions "j'aime": 351
Quoting: alex123
I mean Anaheim got a promising future top 4 defensman + a 2nd rounder. Between that and a late 1rst rounder I'd rather take what Anaheim got... I don't think prices for rentals will get higher than that.


Lol 2nd rounder is 58-64 and helleson Is most likely returning for a 4th year. Not to mention you are drastically overrating him by calling him a future top 4 d man
14 mars 2022 à 18 h 54
#8
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2022
Messages: 57
Mentions "j'aime": 24
Quoting: AdamFox
Lol 2nd rounder is 58-64 and helleson Is most likely returning for a 4th year. Not to mention you are drastically overrating him by calling him a future top 4 d man


So because he's returning college its not a good player? And you're right maybe not as promising as I said but he's still a good prospect that as the potential. Btw I don't think Mtl will get Lundkvist or whatever from NYR for Chiarot but still its a good return IMO
14 mars 2022 à 18 h 56
#9
Démarrer sujet
bang bang
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2017
Messages: 1,195
Mentions "j'aime": 351
Quoting: alex123
So because he's returning college its not a good player? And you're right maybe not as promising as I said but he's still a good prospect that as the potential. Btw I don't think Mtl will get Lundkvist or whatever from NYR for Chiarot but still its a good return IMO


Returning for college as in Anaheim won't have his rights anymore and pick whatever team he wants to sign with
14 mars 2022 à 19 h 1
#10
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2022
Messages: 3,812
Mentions "j'aime": 2,502
Quoting: AdamFox
Returning for college as in Anaheim won't have his rights anymore and pick whatever team he wants to sign with


like you know anything about whats going to happen. anyway, for the chiarot trade it might be close to his value but i think hughes might try to get a prospect instead of picks.
14 mars 2022 à 19 h 1
#11
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2022
Messages: 57
Mentions "j'aime": 24
Quoting: AdamFox
Returning for college as in Anaheim won't have his rights anymore and pick whatever team he wants to sign with


ohhh mbd didn't realize
14 mars 2022 à 19 h 3
#12
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2017
Messages: 741
Mentions "j'aime": 297
Quoting: AdamFox
The 2nd is already going to be 58-64 and helleson most likely returning for a 4th year of college he doesn't have much value at all


Helleson as a right shot D and the way he has played this year makes him worth his draft stock. Add in another 2nd and it gets you close to a late first rounder. Chiarot has more value than Manson, I say imo but I honestly don't think its a debate.

Either way I wouldn't be shocked if he gets a first in return or a 2nd and good prospect. We will see Monday. Someone will be wrong in this debate lol
14 mars 2022 à 19 h 6
#13
Evans truther
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2019
Messages: 2,506
Mentions "j'aime": 1,434
Quoting: AdamFox
The 2nd is already going to be 58-64 and Helleson most likely returning for a 4th year of college he doesn't have much value at all

So because a prospect goes back to college to get better he's worth jack****? Helleson was primarily seen as a shut down dman but found a new game as he's almost a PPG this season, he's a very good prospect. RDs are a kings ransom.
14 mars 2022 à 19 h 16
#14
Juraj Slapshotsky
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2020
Messages: 1,131
Mentions "j'aime": 582
Quoting: Commonsense27
I wouldn't say clearly. Helleson and a 2nd is very close to the equalivant to a late first round pick. Opinions vary but imo Chiarot has a tad more value right now via trade. Still expecting a first but a return like this wouldn't be far off


Helleson is worth a 1st alone, dunno what you're trying to say here.
14 mars 2022 à 19 h 19
#15
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2017
Messages: 741
Mentions "j'aime": 297
Modifié 14 mars 2022 à 19 h 25
Quoting: Tarlam01
Helleson is worth a 1st alone, dunno what you're trying to say here.


Read the thread bud. And I definitely don't think Helleson is a worth a first. But definitely better than AdamFox thinks above
14 mars 2022 à 19 h 33
#16
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2022
Messages: 1,665
Mentions "j'aime": 653
Quoting: Commonsense27
Read the thread bud. And I definitely don't think Helleson is a worth a first. But definitely better than AdamFox thinks above


First round pick are way to overrated. From 10-32 there a 35% chance of picking a players thay will play sustainable time in the NHL. The chance of getting a all star drop at under 10%. Helleson is a 2019 prospect who had improved a lot and thats for most Gm is much more valuable since players are much more developed at 21 so it make easier for scouts to see the potential. Helleson is a excellent return and clearly the Key pieces in that deal. Regardless of the rank they drafted him now Anaheim know exactly what they get in Helleson.
alex123 a aimé ceci.
14 mars 2022 à 19 h 59
#17
Démarrer sujet
bang bang
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2017
Messages: 1,195
Mentions "j'aime": 351
Quoting: Tarlam01
Helleson is worth a 1st alone, dunno what you're trying to say here.


hes going back to college and going to be a UFA at the end of the year
14 mars 2022 à 20 h 0
#18
Démarrer sujet
bang bang
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2017
Messages: 1,195
Mentions "j'aime": 351
Quoting: Tarlam01
Helleson is worth a 1st alone, dunno what you're trying to say here.


Lol hes gonna be a ufa at the end of the year silly
14 mars 2022 à 20 h 3
#19
Démarrer sujet
bang bang
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2017
Messages: 1,195
Mentions "j'aime": 351
Quoting: Commonsense27
Helleson as a right shot D and the way he has played this year makes him worth his draft stock. Add in another 2nd and it gets you close to a late first rounder. Chiarot has more value than Manson, I say imo but I honestly don't think its a debate.

Either way I wouldn't be shocked if he gets a first in return or a 2nd and good prospect. We will see Monday. Someone will be wrong in this debate lol

hes going to be a UFA at the end of the year but alright bud
14 mars 2022 à 20 h 21
#20
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2017
Messages: 741
Mentions "j'aime": 297
Quoting: AdamFox
hes going to be a UFA at the end of the year but alright bud


I didn't say he wasn't going to be a ufa? Don't forget Manson also has a modified ntc. Colorado might have been one of the few inside that ntc that actually wanted Manson. Chiarot has no say in where he gets dealt. Plus with half retained Chiarot will be a tad cheaper on the cap. Just a couple other factors to consider
14 mars 2022 à 22 h 0
#21
Démarrer sujet
bang bang
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2017
Messages: 1,195
Mentions "j'aime": 351
Quoting: Commonsense27
I didn't say he wasn't going to be a ufa? Don't forget Manson also has a modified ntc. Colorado might have been one of the few inside that ntc that actually wanted Manson. Chiarot has no say in where he gets dealt. Plus with half retained Chiarot will be a tad cheaper on the cap. Just a couple other factors to consider


lol its a 12 team no trade list so they had 20 they can pick from
14 mars 2022 à 22 h 38
#22
Juraj Slapshotsky
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2020
Messages: 1,131
Mentions "j'aime": 582
Quoting: AdamFox
hes going to be a UFA at the end of the year but alright bud



I don’t think you know the NCAA rules about UFA. NCAA players’ rights expires after 4 years of being drafted. Helleson was drafted in 2019, he therefore has 1 more year after this season till he gets full autonomy. Please check your facts before acting silly
ricochetii a aimé ceci.
14 mars 2022 à 22 h 44
#23
Démarrer sujet
bang bang
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2017
Messages: 1,195
Mentions "j'aime": 351
Quoting: Tarlam01
I don’t think you know the NCAA rules about UFA. NCAA players’ rights expires after 4 years of being drafted. Helleson was drafted in 2019, he therefore has 1 more year after this season till he gets full autonomy. Please check your facts before acting silly


completely wrong its 4 seasons in college lol. There isn't much NCAA hockey in Montreal huh
14 mars 2022 à 22 h 45
#24
Go Habs Go
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2017
Messages: 10,667
Mentions "j'aime": 4,091
Quoting: Tarlam01
I don’t think you know the NCAA rules about UFA. NCAA players’ rights expires after 4 years of being drafted. Helleson was drafted in 2019, he therefore has 1 more year after this season till he gets full autonomy. Please check your facts before acting silly


August 15th 2023 to be exact.
Teams - Anaheim - Reserve List
14 mars 2022 à 22 h 47
#25
Go Habs Go
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2017
Messages: 10,667
Mentions "j'aime": 4,091
Quoting: AdamFox
completely wrong its 4 seasons in college lol. There isn't much NCAA hockey in Montreal huh


Quoting: ricochetii
August 15th 2023 to be exact.
Teams - Anaheim - Reserve List


Check again.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage