SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

TDL Moves

Créé par: exo2769
Équipe: 2021-22 Blackhawks de Chicago
Date de création initiale: 14 mars 2022
Publié: 14 mars 2022
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
I'm pretty sure Pierre Lebrun is just saying what all us Hawks fans have been saying for a month now. MAF with 50% retention is worth a 1st round pick OR 1st round level prospect. Robertson/Knies are 1st round level prospects in my mind. I'd personally prefer Knies due to the lack of power forwards in the Hawks system, but all (3) options work for me.

TOR should just buy out Mrazek in the offseason. The Hawks aren't looking to have their own Phil Kessel situation...YES, TOR still has $1.2M on their books this year. IF hypothetically Mrazek goes to the Hawks...they're rebuilding. Keep him on the books, but waive him to Rockford. Allow Arvid Soderblom the ability to slide up/down as needed. Mrazek can be a solid back up down there and help teach the prospects how to be true professionals.

The level of the cap dump would increase the return the Hawks get. Mrazek needs to be treated SEPERATE from the 1st round pick/prospect and NOT just assumed because TOR "needs" it. There are lots of ways to solve problems. If you want CHI to solve your problems for you...pay them accordingly.

https://twitter.com/PierreVLeBrun/status/1503165575337545731?cxt=HHwWhsC4yY3IqNwpAAAA
Transactions
1.
CHI
  1. Dermott, Travis
  2. Knies, Matthew [Liste de réserve]
  3. Choix de 4e ronde en 2023 (TOR)
Détails additionnels:
TOR needs to buyout Mrazek in the off season. CHI isn't really interested in having 4 years of dump on their books unless they get paid a handsome reward for doing so.
TOR
  1. Fleury, Marc-André (3 500 000 $ retained)
Détails additionnels:
Buffalo I think jumps in here to take on another 50%. and gets that 4th round pick.
2.
CHI
    Future Considerations or some minor pick. Hawks don't really want Dermott, but there are teams out there that need younger Dmen. The Hawks just have 8 of them currently needing NHL ice time. Getting a 9th that's NOT an ELC isn't their need right now.
    3.
    CHI
    1. Kempný, Michal
    2. Choix de 4e ronde en 2022 (WSH)
    4.
    CHI
    1. Koskinen, Mikko
    2. Choix de 2e ronde en 2022 (EDM)
    3. Choix de 2e ronde en 2023 (EDM)
    5.
    CHI
    1. Choix de 4e ronde en 2022 (NSH)
    6.
    CHI
    1. Choix de 3e ronde en 2022 (PIT)
    2. Choix de 3e ronde en 2023 (PIT)
    Détails additionnels:
    LAK are firmly in a playoff position and this trade doesn't send away any top prospects nor a 1st for Chiarot. It's a low cost option for a LD that's actually played the role of the #1 LD for the Hawks.
    LAK
    1. De Haan, Calvin (2 275 000 $ retained)
    Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
    Enfoui
    Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
    2022
    Logo de CHI
    Logo de EDM
    Logo de EDM
    Logo de TOR
    Logo de VGK
    Logo de PIT
    Logo de CHI
    Logo de WSH
    Logo de NSH
    Logo de CHI
    Logo de CBJ
    Logo de CHI
    2023
    Logo de CHI
    Logo de CHI
    Logo de TBL
    Logo de EDM
    Logo de CHI
    Logo de PIT
    Logo de CHI
    Logo de TOR
    Logo de CHI
    Logo de CHI
    Logo de CHI
    2024
    Logo de CHI
    Logo de CHI
    Logo de CHI
    Logo de CHI
    Logo de CHI
    Logo de CHI
    Logo de CHI
    TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
    2081 500 000 $57 433 381 $452 439 $3 580 000 $24 066 619 $
    Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
    Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
    6 400 000 $6 400 000 $
    AG, AD
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
    3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
    C
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
    2 625 000 $2 625 000 $
    AD
    NMC
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
    1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
    AG
    UFA - 3
    Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
    10 500 000 $10 500 000 $
    C
    NMC
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
    925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance2 500 000 $$2M)
    C, AD
    RFA - 1
    Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
    842 500 $842 500 $ (Bonis de performance32 500 $$32K)
    AG, C, AD
    RFA - 1
    Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
    1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
    C
    RFA - 2
    Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
    811 667 $811 667 $ (Bonis de performance32 500 $$32K)
    AG, C
    RFA - 1
    Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
    842 500 $842 500 $ (Bonis de performance82 500 $$82K)
    C
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
    817 500 $817 500 $ (Bonis de performance82 500 $$82K)
    AD
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
    750 000 $750 000 $
    AD, C, AG
    UFA - 1
    Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
    Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
    2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
    DG/DD
    M-NTC
    UFA - 4
    Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
    5 400 000 $5 400 000 $
    DD
    M-NTC
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
    1 350 000 $1 350 000 $
    DG
    RFA - 3
    Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
    925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
    DD
    RFA - 2
    Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
    800 000 $800 000 $
    G
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
    850 000 $850 000 $
    DG/DD
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
    866 667 $866 667 $
    DD
    RFA - 2
    Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
    4 500 000 $4 500 000 $
    G
    M-NTC
    UFA - 1
    Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
    Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
    3 850 000 $3 850 000 $
    DD
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
    3 900 000 $3 900 000 $
    C, AD
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
    5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
    AD, C, AG
    M-NTC
    UFA - 3
    Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
    975 000 $975 000 $
    AG, C
    UFA - 2
    Équipe de réserve
    Logo de Capitals de Washington
    2 500 000 $2 500 000 $ (1 375 000 $$1M1 375 000 $$1M)
    DG
    UFA - 1

    Code d'intégration

    • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
    • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

    Texte intégré

    Cliquer pour surligner
    14 mars 2022 à 11 h 17
    #1
    KDow88
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: mai 2021
    Messages: 464
    Mentions "j'aime": 148
    Although as an Oiler fan I'd like to bring in Kubalik, I highly doubt the Oilers are going to trade the only goalie on their current roster that is NHL caliber and rely on Smith and Skinner to help go on a run.. Their current needs are Goalie, bottom pairing d, then a middle 6 forward(preferably a C).... Think that deal is something that could take place in the offseason...
    exo2769 a aimé ceci.
    14 mars 2022 à 12 h 23
    #2
    Owly
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juin 2018
    Messages: 4,559
    Mentions "j'aime": 932
    According to the insiders everyone in the league has an asking price of a 1st and a top prospect. Since no one has moved, it's pretty clear these asking prices are too high
    14 mars 2022 à 12 h 27
    #3
    Démarrer sujet
    exo2769
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juill. 2015
    Messages: 15,642
    Mentions "j'aime": 9,754
    Quoting: Logan_Ollivier
    According to the insiders everyone in the league has an asking price of a 1st and a top prospect. Since no one has moved, it's pretty clear these asking prices are too high


    That's why I took out the prospect and inserted a $1.5M change of scenery player, plus a double retention. Should be more than enough.
    14 mars 2022 à 12 h 40
    #4
    Owly
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juin 2018
    Messages: 4,559
    Mentions "j'aime": 932
    Quoting: exo2769
    That's why I took out the prospect and inserted a $1.5M change of scenery player, plus a double retention. Should be more than enough.


    Knies is not being moved
    14 mars 2022 à 13 h 0
    #5
    Démarrer sujet
    exo2769
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juill. 2015
    Messages: 15,642
    Mentions "j'aime": 9,754
    Quoting: Logan_Ollivier
    Knies is not being moved


    Yeah, as I mentioned in the description. One of the three works. Either Robertson, Knies, or the 1st.
    14 mars 2022 à 14 h 29
    #6
    Owly
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juin 2018
    Messages: 4,559
    Mentions "j'aime": 932
    Quoting: exo2769
    Yeah, as I mentioned in the description. One of the three works. Either Robertson, Knies, or the 1st.


    I don't know if I would move any one of those pieces for a 37 year old goalie who may or may not help. It's a very steep price to pay.
    exo2769 a aimé ceci.
    14 mars 2022 à 14 h 31
    #7
    Craig Laughlin Fan
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: nov. 2019
    Messages: 5,296
    Mentions "j'aime": 5,742
    I'd have to check the cap situation, but I think WSH would accept this.
    exo2769 a aimé ceci.
    14 mars 2022 à 22 h 8
    #8
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: déc. 2020
    Messages: 204
    Mentions "j'aime": 127
    Was thinking along the de Haan to LAK lines as well. If the Hawks take back Maata (thought I read Kings aren't high on him) and not retain on de Haan, do the Hawks get their retention slot for Maata "off the books"?
     
    Répondre
    To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
    Question:
    Options:
    Ajouter une option
    Soumettre le sondage