SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Vancouver Canucks if they kept all their draft picks and no trades

Créé par: Easton_H
Équipe: 2021-22 Équipe personnalisée
Date de création initiale: 7 mars 2022
Publié: 7 mars 2022
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2081 500 000 $47 039 126 $0 $2 165 000 $34 460 874 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
891 667 $891 667 $ (Bonis de performance200 000 $$200K)
AG, AD
RFA - 2
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
7 350 000 $7 350 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 3
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
5 875 000 $5 875 000 $
AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
AD, AG
RFA - 3
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
4 125 000 $4 125 000 $
C
UFA - 2
Logo de Kraken de Seattle
874 125 $874 125 $
AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Kraken de Seattle
2 940 000 $2 940 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
997 500 $997 500 $
C, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
925 000 $925 000 $
C
RFA - 2
Grabner, Michael
950 000 $950 000 $
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
821 667 $821 667 $ (Bonis de performance82 500 $$82K)
C
UFA - 2
Logo de Golden Knights de Vegas
750 000 $750 000 $
DG
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
7 850 000 $7 850 000 $
DG
UFA - 6
Logo de Panthers de la Floride
2 666 667 $2 666 667 $
DG
UFA - 3
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
G
UFA - 5
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
860 833 $860 833 $ (Bonis de performance150 000 $$150K)
DD
RFA - 2
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
811 667 $811 667 $ (Bonis de performance32 500 $$32K)
G
RFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
750 000 $750 000 $
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Red Wings de Detroit
750 000 $750 000 $
DG
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
7 mars 2022 à 10 h 41
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2021
Messages: 351
Mentions "j'aime": 82
Modifié 7 mars 2022 à 11 h 1
This team is bad lol
7 mars 2022 à 10 h 45
#2
BRUCE THERE IT IS
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2020
Messages: 1,646
Mentions "j'aime": 1,183
oof thank you benning
Easton_H a aimé ceci.
7 mars 2022 à 10 h 53
#3
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2021
Messages: 351
Mentions "j'aime": 82
Quoting: cooliny
oof thank you benning


I know. This is kinda sad lol
7 mars 2022 à 10 h 57
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2020
Messages: 11,195
Mentions "j'aime": 4,657
i have to say this doesn’t look much better IMO.
think getting a new GM and coach was smart.
7 mars 2022 à 11 h 2
#5
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2021
Messages: 351
Mentions "j'aime": 82
Quoting: Rob32sjsharks
i have to say this doesn’t look much better IMO.
think getting a new GM and coach was smart.


Yeah lol. I couldn’t find enough forwards so I had to make a retired one and a defence on forward
7 mars 2022 à 11 h 23
#6
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2019
Messages: 966
Mentions "j'aime": 335
Quoting: cooliny
oof thank you benning


nah, Benning drafted Boeser, Pettersson, Hughes, Demko, Hoglander and Podkolzin.
Good Drafting
Reasonable Trades
Terrible Signings
7 mars 2022 à 11 h 37
#7
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2021
Messages: 351
Mentions "j'aime": 82
Quoting: canucks_Fan_53
nah, Benning drafted Boeser, Pettersson, Hughes, Demko, Hoglander and Podkolzin.
Good Drafting
Reasonable Trades
Terrible Signings


He was not very good at anything tbh
7 mars 2022 à 12 h 43
#8
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2017
Messages: 443
Mentions "j'aime": 78
Two moments that were disastrous for Benning.

One, the Juolevi pick, but not how you think. He should have taken Sergachev, who was hailed at the time as the most NHL ready defenseman in that draft. Yeah, I know, Tkachuk, Tkachuk, Tkachuk. But here we are 5 years later, and what's this team's biggest need, by a country mile? Lesson here, don't be dazzled by players on stacked teams.

Two, the Toffoli trade. And I think this was his single biggest mistake. It lead to them losing not only those assets, but Tanev and Markstrom in free agency. The smart play was move Tanev at that deadline for future returns, keep Madden and the second and then resign Markstrom. Then you sell as high as you can on the remaining potential on Gaudette and Virtanen. And you still have Demko to move. Instead he chased a single playoff run to save his job. Lesson here, when you're rebuilding, stick to the plan, no matter what.
Easton_H a aimé ceci.
7 mars 2022 à 14 h 13
#9
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2019
Messages: 966
Mentions "j'aime": 335
Quoting: gordfish
Two moments that were disastrous for Benning.

One, the Juolevi pick, but not how you think. He should have taken Sergachev, who was hailed at the time as the most NHL ready defenseman in that draft. Yeah, I know, Tkachuk, Tkachuk, Tkachuk. But here we are 5 years later, and what's this team's biggest need, by a country mile? Lesson here, don't be dazzled by players on stacked teams.

Two, the Toffoli trade. And I think this was his single biggest mistake. It lead to them losing not only those assets, but Tanev and Markstrom in free agency. The smart play was move Tanev at that deadline for future returns, keep Madden and the second and then resign Markstrom. Then you sell as high as you can on the remaining potential on Gaudette and Virtanen. And you still have Demko to move. Instead he chased a single playoff run to save his job. Lesson here, when you're rebuilding, stick to the plan, no matter what.


that Juolevi pick will always be a disaster

I disagree though with the Toffoli trade. I think the trade was good, but choosing to re-sign Virtanen and not Toffoli was the disaster.
Markstrom had to go, he got more money, more term and more protection than VAN should have offered, now we have Demko on a much better deal for the team

Tanev would only have been moved if VAN was not in the playoffs, so losing him was kind of inevitable

Gaudette for Highmore is turning out great!
Juolevi for Lamiko and Juulsen is turning out great too
7 mars 2022 à 22 h 1
#10
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2021
Messages: 1,246
Mentions "j'aime": 316
Defense is atrocious
7 mars 2022 à 22 h 2
#11
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2021
Messages: 1,246
Mentions "j'aime": 316
Should have kept Forsling and drafted a couple right D
7 mars 2022 à 22 h 24
#12
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2021
Messages: 351
Mentions "j'aime": 82
Quoting: jedihonesy
Should have kept Forsling and drafted a couple right D


Yeah they definitely should have, but forsling was hardly an nhl caliber defenceman before a couple years ago, tough to call
8 mars 2022 à 5 h 19
#13
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2021
Messages: 1,246
Mentions "j'aime": 316
Quoting: Easton_H
Yeah they definitely should have, but forsling was hardly an nhl caliber defenceman before a couple years ago, tough to call


Gotta stick with your guys and develop them
Easton_H a aimé ceci.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage