SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Were done with the whole trade Marner phase right

Créé par: QualityTrades1
Équipe: 2021-22 Maple Leafs de Toronto
Date de création initiale: 26 févr. 2022
Publié: 26 févr. 2022
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
Based on a previous post (@majormoose007).

Canucks get:
- Young, controllable RD who has looked good with limited ice time
- A couple high picks and a prospect

Leafs get:
- A cheap PPG guy (175 points in his last 173 games) for a playoff run and for next year (super important for cap purposes as many Leaf fans know)

Also, if Muzzin comes back before the playoffs there is enough room to add him to the current roster and if he doesn't, maybe another trade can be made? What should the Leaf's upgrade next if they could add to one more position?
Transactions
TOR
  1. Miller, J.T. (2 625 000 $ retained)
  2. Schenn, Luke
VAN
  1. Abruzzese, Nick [Liste de réserve]
  2. Kerfoot, Alexander
  3. Liljegren, Timothy
  4. Choix de 1e ronde en 2022 (TOR)
  5. Choix de 3e ronde en 2023 (TOR)
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2022
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
2023
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
2024
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2281 500 000 $75 416 450 $0 $0 $6 083 550 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
950 000 $950 000 $
AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
11 640 250 $11 640 250 $
C
UFA - 3
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
10 903 000 $10 903 000 $
AD
UFA - 4
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
2 625 000 $2 625 000 $
C, AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
11 000 000 $11 000 000 $
C, AG
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
6 962 366 $6 962 366 $
AD
UFA - 3
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
1 645 000 $1 645 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
C
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
1 250 000 $1 250 000 $
AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
1 250 000 $1 250 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
750 000 $750 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
900 000 $900 000 $
AD, AG
NTC
UFA - 2
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
DG
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
DG/DD
NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
3 800 000 $3 800 000 $
G
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
1 650 000 $1 650 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
1 350 000 $1 350 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
894 167 $894 167 $
DG
UFA - 1
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
796 667 $796 667 $
AG, AD
RFA - 3
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
5 625 000 $5 625 000 $
DG
NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
850 000 $850 000 $
DD
UFA - 2

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
26 févr. 2022 à 8 h 28
#1
Pop Pop
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2018
Messages: 14,559
Mentions "j'aime": 8,255
I don't think trading marner was ever a serious consideration. Now if they get swept out again in the first this year then who knows.
26 févr. 2022 à 8 h 36
#2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2019
Messages: 288
Mentions "j'aime": 73
Quoting: Jfstompers
I don't think trading marner was ever a serious consideration. Now if they get swept out again in the first this year then who knows.


If we are out in the first round we will see Willy Styles move as he will be the easiest of the big fout to trade.
He has good contract and the Leafs wouldnt need to take on any bad contracts to accommodate a trade. You can also make a pure hockey trade for a Dman.
26 févr. 2022 à 8 h 36
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2020
Messages: 432
Mentions "j'aime": 93
Canucks fan won’t like it but ya I agree that’s a strong offer.
If muzzin is gonna be out, I think getting Gio is the way to go. Maybe dermott and a second? Not that I wanna take Brodie away from Rielly but it would be an easy transition to get him and play him with Brodie. At least some of the time.
Maybe if he likes it in Toronto he would even resign next year for a reasonable price.
QualityTrades1 a aimé ceci.
26 févr. 2022 à 8 h 38
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2020
Messages: 432
Mentions "j'aime": 93
Quoting: armer918
If we are out in the first round we will see Willy Styles move as he will be the easiest of the big fout to trade.
He has good contract and the Leafs wouldnt need to take on any bad contracts to accommodate a trade. You can also make a pure hockey trade for a Dman.


Ya previously I had always said you gotta trade marner if you’re gonna break it up because he can give you the most cap to spread out the lineup but if chychurn could still be had in the off season and we fail again, they should move nylander either to get him or to get the assets to then flip to Arizona.
26 févr. 2022 à 8 h 39
#5
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2019
Messages: 7,880
Mentions "j'aime": 6,386
nope if you aren't including one of Knies or Niemela they'll just trade him somewhere else. Retention is also gonna increase the already huge price and this offer does nothing to help their cap issues which is one of the reasons they're trading Miller
remowilliams et TCMonkey a aimé ceci.
26 févr. 2022 à 8 h 45
#6
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2020
Messages: 432
Mentions "j'aime": 93
Quoting: TheAlien
nope if you aren't including one of Knies or Niemela they'll just trade him somewhere else. Retention is also gonna increase the already huge price and this offer does nothing to help their cap issues which is one of the reasons they're trading Miller


I say if anyone is getting miller retained they will have to pay Arizona to do it.
26 févr. 2022 à 9 h 13
#7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2019
Messages: 7,880
Mentions "j'aime": 6,386
Quoting: rgwhite17
I say if anyone is getting miller retained they will have to pay Arizona to do it.


I think the Canucks would be okay with doing it but they aren't gonna wanna take any other cap back like Kerfoot
26 févr. 2022 à 9 h 19
#8
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2018
Messages: 2,646
Mentions "j'aime": 1,170
So im not trying to be a smart ass but the fact is we hold All the cards in any Miller trade or we just dont trade him, or go in another direction with a better offer.The media has traded Miller several times but word around here is hes NOT getting traded.The same goes for our best players.This is not Jim Benning your dealing with this is JR.We have no interest in Kerfoot we have Hoggy same kind of player but younger, same goes for Abruzzese.Its just not what we need. not a fit with our plans. IMHO
26 févr. 2022 à 9 h 28
#9
Go leafs go
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2020
Messages: 13,209
Mentions "j'aime": 9,173
Pretty solid offer. Only things are

This is tough on Vancouver cap wise.

And according to Friedman they don’t want to trade Abbruzzezze so maybe have a different prospect there.
26 févr. 2022 à 9 h 39
#10
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2021
Messages: 879
Mentions "j'aime": 535
Quoting: Saskleaf
Pretty solid offer. Only things are

This is tough on Vancouver cap wise.

And according to Friedman they don’t want to trade Abbruzzezze so maybe have a different prospect there.


Quoting: TheAlien
I think the Canucks would be okay with doing it but they aren't gonna wanna take any other cap back like Kerfoot


So if we had a 3rd party retain 2.625M for a 4th or something like Arizona, you guys think Vancouver is good with this? Or do you think that because of Vancouver cap restraints, the third party would also have to take Kerfoot too?

Quoting: rgwhite17
I say if anyone is getting miller retained they will have to pay Arizona to do it.


^*
Saskleaf a aimé ceci.
26 févr. 2022 à 9 h 43
#11
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2017
Messages: 27,645
Mentions "j'aime": 14,429
Seems reasonable.
26 févr. 2022 à 9 h 46
#12
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2016
Messages: 4,139
Mentions "j'aime": 2,887
Quoting: QualityTrades1
So if we had a 3rd party retain 2.625M for a 4th or something like Arizona, you guys think Vancouver is good with this? Or do you think that because of Vancouver cap restraints, the third party would also have to take Kerfoot too?



^*


Miller is signed through next year and it's a ton of retention. You're looking at a second at least.
26 févr. 2022 à 10 h 30
#13
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2019
Messages: 7,880
Mentions "j'aime": 6,386
Quoting: QualityTrades1
So if we had a 3rd party retain 2.625M for a 4th or something like Arizona, you guys think Vancouver is good with this? Or do you think that because of Vancouver cap restraints, the third party would also have to take Kerfoot too?



^*


nope the way I see it, Miller straight up will cost a 1st, and either Knies and Liljegren or Niemela and Robertson. With 50% retention and Schenn you're looking at adding a 2nd and Villeneuve. The Canucks aren't trading Miller for a lot of lower quality assets.They're gonna want fewer high quality ones.
26 févr. 2022 à 22 h 32
#14
Go leafs go
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2020
Messages: 13,209
Mentions "j'aime": 9,173
Quoting: QualityTrades1
So if we had a 3rd party retain 2.625M for a 4th or something like Arizona, you guys think Vancouver is good with this? Or do you think that because of Vancouver cap restraints, the third party would also have to take Kerfoot too?



^*


Ya I think so. Might need to be a 3rd but it would be good from Vancouvers prospective.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage