SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Whos Better Please Read The Description First

Créé par: Bbpagewolf
Équipe: 2021-22 Rangers de New York
Date de création initiale: 24 févr. 2022
Publié: 24 févr. 2022
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
Let’s get something out of the way immediately, I know these two will not be traded let alone for each other and let alone one for one. This is merely to start a discussion and a hypothetical. Let’s say in some bizarre universe Adam Fox and Cale Makar are indeed traded for one another. Who do you think is the better player? Are they both equal? Would the trade be one for one if it ever happened? Who would have to add more pieces to make this trade happen? I wanna know what everyone’s thoughts and opinions are and what you think would be the outcome. Please keep it civil in the comments and understand that this is merely a hypothetical what if situation.
Transactions
Rachats de contrats
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2022
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
Logo de STL
Logo de NYR
Logo de WPG
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
2023
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
2024
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2381 500 000 $79 240 594 $0 $7 100 000 $2 259 406 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Rangers de New York
6 500 000 $6 500 000 $
AG
NMC
UFA - 6
Logo de Rangers de New York
5 350 000 $5 350 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo de Rangers de New York
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance2 850 000 $$3M)
AG, AD
RFA - 2
Logo de Rangers de New York
11 642 857 $11 642 857 $
AG
NMC
UFA - 5
Logo de Rangers de New York
4 500 000 $4 500 000 $
AD, C
UFA - 1
Logo de Rangers de New York
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance2 650 000 $$3M)
AD
RFA - 1
Logo de Rangers de New York
3 641 667 $3 641 667 $
C, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 6
Logo de Rangers de New York
2 300 000 $2 300 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Rangers de New York
775 000 $775 000 $
AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Rangers de New York
762 500 $762 500 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Rangers de New York
750 000 $750 000 $
C
UFA - 1
Logo de Rangers de New York
1 750 000 $1 750 000 $
AD
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Rangers de New York
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
DG
RFA - 3
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
9 000 000 $9 000 000 $
DD
UFA - 6
Logo de Rangers de New York
5 666 667 $5 666 667 $
G
UFA - 4
Logo de Rangers de New York
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance350 000 $$350K)
DG
RFA - 2
Logo de Rangers de New York
8 000 000 $8 000 000 $
DD
NMC
UFA - 5
Logo de Rangers de New York
2 425 000 $2 425 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Rangers de New York
2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
DG
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Rangers de New York
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance400 000 $$400K)
DD
RFA - 3
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Rangers de New York
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
AG, AD
RFA - 2
Logo de Rangers de New York
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Rangers de New York
874 125 $874 125 $
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Rangers de New York
750 000 $750 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
24 févr. 2022 à 12 h 9
#1
Pens are the best
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2021
Messages: 5,390
Mentions "j'aime": 1,691
Makar all day everyday
24 févr. 2022 à 12 h 10
#2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 19,527
Mentions "j'aime": 5,029
Neither of them are good defensively, so you take the player with the better offense. That is Makar.
24 févr. 2022 à 12 h 12
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2020
Messages: 8,634
Mentions "j'aime": 3,931
I’d take makar but both are soo good it’s a win win no matter what.
24 févr. 2022 à 12 h 26
#4
Daddy
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2021
Messages: 789
Mentions "j'aime": 581
Quoting: Caniac2000
Neither of them are good defensively, so you take the player with the better offense. That is Makar.


?? They're both very good defensively. What makes you say they're not?
Fox_Czar_Cup a aimé ceci.
24 févr. 2022 à 12 h 27
#5
retired
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2020
Messages: 8,893
Mentions "j'aime": 4,761
the consensus will be makar with fox in a close second.
24 févr. 2022 à 12 h 29
#6
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 19,527
Mentions "j'aime": 5,029
Quoting: AustonMatthews3443
?? They're both very good defensively. What makes you say they're not?


Both have a negative xGA, and both have pulled defensive partners xGA down. They're very good going one way, and both horrible the other. Makar at times positions himself like a forward, and it's...okay if he's got the right partner with him (Devon Toews) but it gets exposed sometimes. Same with Fox and Lindgren.
24 févr. 2022 à 12 h 30
#7
Daddy
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2021
Messages: 789
Mentions "j'aime": 581
Quoting: Caniac2000
Both have a negative xGA, and both have pulled defensive partners xGA down. They're very good going one way, and both horrible the other. Makar at times positions himself like a forward, and it's...okay if he's got the right partner with him (Devon Toews) but it gets exposed sometimes. Same with Fox and Lindgren.


Are you referring to xGA/60?
24 févr. 2022 à 12 h 32
#8
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 19,527
Mentions "j'aime": 5,029
Quoting: AustonMatthews3443
Are you referring to xGA/60?


GAx%
24 févr. 2022 à 12 h 42
#9
Daddy
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2021
Messages: 789
Mentions "j'aime": 581
Quoting: Caniac2000
GAx%


I'm not huge on analytics for dmen. I just use xGA/60 and the eye test. How exactly does xGA% differ from xGA/60? As both of their xGA/60 are good and even though Makar is up on the rush a lot, he passes the eye test.
Fox_Czar_Cup a aimé ceci.
24 févr. 2022 à 13 h 14
#10
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2017
Messages: 8,440
Mentions "j'aime": 6,060
Quoting: Caniac2000
Both have a negative xGA, and both have pulled defensive partners xGA down. They're very good going one way, and both horrible the other. Makar at times positions himself like a forward, and it's...okay if he's got the right partner with him (Devon Toews) but it gets exposed sometimes. Same with Fox and Lindgren.


Quoting: Caniac2000
GAx%


Maybe its just the way this was worded, but im kind of confused. Youre saying a lower expected goals against is bad? Pretty sure limiting goals against is a good thing. Also can you explain what xGA% is? I dont see that anywhere on evolving hockey unless you mean xGF% or xGA/60 like @AustonMatthews3443 said

I cant really find any metric which suggests that either Makar or Fox is bad defensively:

By EV Defensive WAR Makar is in the 66.7th percentile and Fox is in the 70.1st percentile this season among players with 100+ mins of EV TOI (data from Patrick Bacon, which is where JFresh gets his WAR data)

By Evolving Hockey Makar has -0.05 xGA/60 relative to teammates and Fox has -0.13 xGA/60 relative to teammates (negative here is a good thing)

By Dom's player cards Makar's 5v5 On Ice Defensive Impact is in the 90-100th percentile and Fox's 5v5 On Ice Defensive Impact is in the 70-90th percentile (tbh not really sure what stat this is, it isnt labelled on the cards)
Xqb15a a aimé ceci.
24 févr. 2022 à 13 h 33
#11
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2020
Messages: 11,352
Mentions "j'aime": 9,005
So I like Fox, grudgingly respect him, but the things Makar does, and he does it in a way that he makes his teammates better. Other teams have to game plan for how they are going to handle him, I don’t know that they do it to the extent they do for Fox. That’s why I’m team Makar hands doen
24 févr. 2022 à 17 h 59
#12
Daddy
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2021
Messages: 789
Mentions "j'aime": 581
Quoting: UpsideDownQue
Maybe its just the way this was worded, but im kind of confused. Youre saying a lower expected goals against is bad? Pretty sure limiting goals against is a good thing. Also can you explain what xGA% is? I dont see that anywhere on evolving hockey unless you mean xGF% or xGA/60 like AustonMatthews3443 said

I cant really find any metric which suggests that either Makar or Fox is bad defensively:

By EV Defensive WAR Makar is in the 66.7th percentile and Fox is in the 70.1st percentile this season among players with 100+ mins of EV TOI (data from Patrick Bacon, which is where JFresh gets his WAR data)

By Evolving Hockey Makar has -0.05 xGA/60 relative to teammates and Fox has -0.13 xGA/60 relative to teammates (negative here is a good thing)

By Dom's player cards Makar's 5v5 On Ice Defensive Impact is in the 90-100th percentile and Fox's 5v5 On Ice Defensive Impact is in the 70-90th percentile (tbh not really sure what stat this is, it isnt labelled on the cards)


I was also so confused lol, never heard of xGA%.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage