SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Projected Hagel deal based on Servelli

Créé par: Wadejos123
Équipe: 2021-22 Blackhawks de Chicago
Date de création initiale: 17 févr. 2022
Publié: 17 févr. 2022
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
I still believe he will still be a blackhawk after the deadline. I want us to keep him, however if teams really are offering this, I would have to hope we accept. Hagel is awesome but just not worth this I think
Transactions
1.
CHI
    Assuming Calgary is OUT on Hagel after the Toffoli trade
    CGY
      Hagel
      2.
      CHI
      1. Tippett, Owen
      2. Choix de 1e ronde en 2023 (FLA)
      3.
      CHI
      1. Foote, Nolan
      2. Choix de 1e ronde en 2023 (NJD)
      Détails additionnels:
      Top 10 protected

      Probably either Foote, Shakir, or Stillman? Maybe Walsh?
      NJD
        Hagel
        4.
        CHI
        1. Amirov, Rodion
        2. Choix de 1e ronde en 2022 (TOR)
        Détails additionnels:
        Could be Knies or Robertson instead. TOR probably add a little if its Robertson
        TOR
          Hagel
          Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
          Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
          2022
          Logo de TOR
          Logo de CHI
          Logo de EDM
          Logo de TOR
          Logo de VGK
          Logo de CHI
          Logo de CHI
          Logo de CBJ
          Logo de CHI
          2023
          Logo de CHI
          Logo de FLA
          Logo de NJD
          Logo de CHI
          Logo de TBL
          Logo de CHI
          Logo de CHI
          Logo de CHI
          Logo de CHI
          Logo de CHI
          2024
          Logo de CHI
          Logo de CHI
          Logo de CHI
          Logo de CHI
          Logo de CHI
          Logo de CHI
          Logo de CHI
          TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
          2581 500 000 $66 457 130 $452 439 $3 580 000 $15 042 870 $
          Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
          Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
          6 400 000 $6 400 000 $
          AG, AD
          UFA - 2
          Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
          10 500 000 $10 500 000 $
          C
          NMC
          UFA - 2
          Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
          2 625 000 $2 625 000 $
          AD
          NMC
          UFA - 2
          Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
          3 700 000 $3 700 000 $
          AG, AD
          UFA - 1
          Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
          3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
          C
          UFA - 1
          Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
          3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
          AD, AG
          UFA - 2
          Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
          1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
          C
          RFA - 2
          Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
          1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
          AD, C
          UFA - 1
          Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
          842 500 $842 500 $ (Bonis de performance32 500 $$32K)
          AG, C, AD
          RFA - 1
          Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
          925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance2 500 000 $$2M)
          C, AD
          RFA - 1
          Logo de Devils du New Jersey
          863 333 $863 333 $
          AG
          RFA - 3
          Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
          842 500 $842 500 $ (Bonis de performance82 500 $$82K)
          C
          UFA - 2
          Logo de Panthers de la Floride
          863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
          AD, AG
          UFA - 1
          Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
          925 000 $925 000 $
          AG
          UFA - 3
          Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
          811 667 $811 667 $ (Bonis de performance32 500 $$32K)
          AG, C
          RFA - 1
          Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
          750 000 $750 000 $
          AD, C, AG
          UFA - 1
          Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
          Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
          4 550 000 $4 550 000 $
          DG/DD
          UFA - 1
          Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
          5 400 000 $5 400 000 $
          DD
          M-NTC
          UFA - 1
          Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
          3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
          G
          M-NTC
          UFA - 1
          Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
          2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
          DG/DD
          M-NTC
          UFA - 4
          Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
          3 850 000 $3 850 000 $
          DD
          UFA - 1
          Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
          883 750 $883 750 $ (Bonis de performance82 500 $$82K)
          G
          RFA - 2
          Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
          850 000 $850 000 $
          DG/DD
          UFA - 1
          Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
          866 667 $866 667 $
          DD
          RFA - 2
          Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
          800 000 $800 000 $
          DG
          UFA - 1
          Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
          Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
          1 350 000 $1 350 000 $
          DG
          RFA - 3
          Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
          5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
          AD, C, AG
          M-NTC
          UFA - 3
          Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
          975 000 $975 000 $
          AG, C
          UFA - 2
          Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
          3 900 000 $3 900 000 $
          C, AD
          UFA - 1
          Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
          880 833 $880 833 $
          AD, C
          RFA - 1
          Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
          800 000 $800 000 $
          G
          UFA - 1

          Code d'intégration

          • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
          • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

          Texte intégré

          Cliquer pour surligner
          17 févr. 2022 à 12 h 12
          #1
          Avatar de l'utilisateur
          Rejoint: mai 2019
          Messages: 19,579
          Mentions "j'aime": 7,353
          yeah, they're not getting that for Hagel. That's the price because they dont want to move him at all and it would take a stupid over pay so they're blatantly saying it would take a stupid over pay.
          when teams do this the player is basically never traded
          xercuses, A_Habs_fan et RaZZe a aimé ceci.
          17 févr. 2022 à 12 h 12
          #2
          Xercuses
          Avatar de l'utilisateur
          Rejoint: juin 2021
          Messages: 13,506
          Mentions "j'aime": 3,616
          Thats so much
          17 févr. 2022 à 12 h 13
          #3
          Drumman44
          Avatar de l'utilisateur
          Rejoint: juin 2017
          Messages: 695
          Mentions "j'aime": 259
          I don't think Toronto fans are ever going to want to trade away Amirov, Knies, or Robertson
          17 févr. 2022 à 12 h 14
          #4
          Avatar de l'utilisateur
          Rejoint: juin 2019
          Messages: 10,711
          Mentions "j'aime": 10,395
          From what I've been hearing, CHI wants more than a top prospect and a 1st to even consider trading him. So I think you might be a little light on Hagel's return.
          17 févr. 2022 à 12 h 23
          #5
          Démarrer sujet
          Avatar de l'utilisateur
          Rejoint: mai 2017
          Messages: 8,269
          Mentions "j'aime": 4,915
          Quoting: JaredOfLondon
          yeah, they're not getting that for Hagel. That's the price because they dont want to move him at all and it would take a stupid over pay so they're blatantly saying it would take a stupid over pay.
          when teams do this the player is basically never traded


          apparently teams have offered around this much so who knows
          17 févr. 2022 à 12 h 23
          #6
          Avatar de l'utilisateur
          Rejoint: mai 2019
          Messages: 39,974
          Mentions "j'aime": 18,306
          Were the Devils mentioned as possible landing spot?
          17 févr. 2022 à 12 h 23
          #7
          Démarrer sujet
          Avatar de l'utilisateur
          Rejoint: mai 2017
          Messages: 8,269
          Mentions "j'aime": 4,915
          Quoting: NHLfan10506
          Were the Devils mentioned as possible landing spot?


          Devils, Flames, Panthers, Leafs
          17 févr. 2022 à 12 h 26
          #8
          In Connor We Trust
          Avatar de l'utilisateur
          Rejoint: juill. 2020
          Messages: 3,315
          Mentions "j'aime": 2,080
          Quoting: JaredOfLondon
          yeah, they're not getting that for Hagel. That's the price because they dont want to move him at all and it would take a stupid over pay so they're blatantly saying it would take a stupid over pay.
          when teams do this the player is basically never traded


          Quoting: Garak
          From what I've been hearing, CHI wants more than a top prospect and a 1st to even consider trading him. So I think you might be a little light on Hagel's return.


          You obviously haven't watch Brandon Hagel. He's 23 on an amazing deal and he's on pace for 50 points, Brandon Hagel is the Blackhawk's workhorse, he has the best work ethic on the whole team, every shift he shows the most energy on the ice. Personally I'd get super pissed if Chicago traded him, that's how much he's important to the team. He's gritty player with very good offensive capacities. I know for a fact if Brandon Hagel was on the Maple Leafs everyone would love him
          bald_and_bankrupt a aimé ceci.
          17 févr. 2022 à 12 h 28
          #9
          Avatar de l'utilisateur
          Rejoint: mai 2019
          Messages: 39,974
          Mentions "j'aime": 18,306
          Quoting: Wadejos123
          Devils, Flames, Panthers, Leafs


          Just a normal list of four elite, stantley cup favorites, I guess

          (ho-hum)
          17 févr. 2022 à 12 h 28
          #10
          Avatar de l'utilisateur
          Rejoint: mai 2019
          Messages: 19,579
          Mentions "j'aime": 7,353
          Quoting: Wadejos123
          apparently teams have offered around this much so who knows


          well a 1st and a good prospect is a huge value range, the leafs 1st and a guy like Abramov qualifies, but so does arizona's 1st and Guenther. without details it's basically impossible to pin down value. This just sounds like chicago is asking if people wanna get crazy then they might play
          SociallyHawkward a aimé ceci.
          17 févr. 2022 à 12 h 30
          #11
          Avatar de l'utilisateur
          Rejoint: mai 2019
          Messages: 19,579
          Mentions "j'aime": 7,353
          Quoting: Beetlejuice
          You obviously haven't watch Brandon Hagel. He's 23 on an amazing deal and he's on pace for 50 points, Brandon Hagel is the Blackhawk's workhorse, he has the best work ethic on the whole team, every shift he shows the most energy on the ice. Personally I'd get super pissed if Chicago traded him, that's how much he's important to the team. He's gritty player with very good offensive capacities. I know for a fact if Brandon Hagel was on the Maple Leafs everyone would love him


          dude, 23 year old wingers on pace for 50 points arnt worth top end prospects and 1st, it doesnt matter how hard he works. they just arnt. This is chicago purposfully over valuing a guy because it doesnt make sense to trade him unless a team gets dumb.
          17 févr. 2022 à 12 h 33
          #12
          Avatar de l'utilisateur
          Rejoint: juill. 2020
          Messages: 1,136
          Mentions "j'aime": 444
          Quoting: Wadejos123
          Devils, Flames, Panthers, Leafs


          Panthers? Wow, who wrote the article? I quite don't get why we would be in on Hagel
          17 févr. 2022 à 12 h 35
          #13
          Avatar de l'utilisateur
          Rejoint: mai 2019
          Messages: 19,579
          Mentions "j'aime": 7,353
          Quoting: RaZZe
          Panthers? Wow, who wrote the article? I quite don't get why we would be in on Hagel


          yeah, the panthers basically have 6 guys who can play LW, they dont make sense at all
          17 févr. 2022 à 12 h 50
          #14
          Démarrer sujet
          Avatar de l'utilisateur
          Rejoint: mai 2017
          Messages: 8,269
          Mentions "j'aime": 4,915
          Quoting: JaredOfLondon
          yeah, the panthers basically have 6 guys who can play LW, they dont make sense at all


          Hagel plays RW like half the time also. He's been playing on a Debrincat-Dach-Hagel line the last few weeks. Based on pratice today it looks like we'll see Hagel-Strome-Kane tonight.
          17 févr. 2022 à 12 h 55
          #15
          Avatar de l'utilisateur
          Rejoint: mai 2019
          Messages: 19,579
          Mentions "j'aime": 7,353
          Quoting: Wadejos123
          Hagel plays RW like half the time also. He's been playing on a Debrincat-Dach-Hagel line the last few weeks. Based on pratice today it looks like we'll see Hagel-Strome-Kane tonight.


          yeah, but florida also has like 7 guys who can play RW (and about the same who can play C), Hagel seems like a weird choice for them to go after no matter where he plays unless it's top 4 LD
          RaZZe a aimé ceci.
          17 févr. 2022 à 13 h 29
          #16
          Avatar de l'utilisateur
          Rejoint: mai 2021
          Messages: 2,222
          Mentions "j'aime": 459
          Leafs easily accept
          17 févr. 2022 à 13 h 32
          #17
          Leafs Sufferer
          Avatar de l'utilisateur
          Rejoint: juill. 2019
          Messages: 4,073
          Mentions "j'aime": 3,511
          TOR adds more if Robertson is in the deal?

          Hard pass. As Jared said above, they are asking for the moon with the intention of not moving him. Can't see anyone paying this.
          17 févr. 2022 à 14 h 41
          #18
          Avatar de l'utilisateur
          Rejoint: juin 2019
          Messages: 10,711
          Mentions "j'aime": 10,395
          Quoting: Beetlejuice
          You obviously haven't watch Brandon Hagel. He's 23 on an amazing deal and he's on pace for 50 points, Brandon Hagel is the Blackhawk's workhorse, he has the best work ethic on the whole team, every shift he shows the most energy on the ice. Personally I'd get super pissed if Chicago traded him, that's how much he's important to the team. He's gritty player with very good offensive capacities. I know for a fact if Brandon Hagel was on the Maple Leafs everyone would love him


          I was just stating a fact. The Hawks have supposedly already turned down bids for him that would've given CHI a high end prospect and a 1st. I watch Brandon Hagel every time the Hawks play. I know exactly how important he is to the team and what he is worth.
          17 févr. 2022 à 17 h 11
          #19
          Avatar de l'utilisateur
          Rejoint: juin 2019
          Messages: 38,241
          Mentions "j'aime": 19,510
          Quoting: JaredOfLondon
          dude, 23 year old wingers on pace for 50 points arnt worth top end prospects and 1st, it doesnt matter how hard he works. they just arnt. This is chicago purposfully over valuing a guy because it doesnt make sense to trade him unless a team gets dumb.


          I think you severely underrate Hagel. He's a sophomore in the league on a fantastically cheap 3 year deal. Ive watched Mangiapane grow into the player he currently is over the last 4 years and have also watched my fair share of Hagel. He is following a nearly identical development path, has just as good of a work ethic, and has a very similar play style. Only thing I would say he really needs to work on in comparison is his stick handling.

          Im not sure about you but adding the next Mangiapane to your roster on a dirt cheap deal and for 2 more years after this (and he's an RFA at the end) sounds like a great investment
          Wadejos123 a aimé ceci.
          17 févr. 2022 à 17 h 15
          #20
          Avatar de l'utilisateur
          Rejoint: mai 2019
          Messages: 19,579
          Mentions "j'aime": 7,353
          Quoting: Ledge_And_Dairy
          I think you severely underrate Hagel. He's a sophomore in the league on a fantastically cheap 3 year deal. Ive watched Mangiapane grow into the player he currently is over the last 4 years and have also watched my fair share of Hagel. He is following a nearly identical development path, has just as good of a work ethic, and has a very similar play style. Only thing I would say he really needs to work on in comparison is his stick handling.

          Im not sure about you but adding the next Mangiapane to your roster on a dirt cheap deal and for 2 more years after this (and he's an RFA at the end) sounds like a great investment


          The thing about developing players is that they arnt constants. Hagel could have peaked and he couls become jarome Iginla 2.0. Mangiapane was valued lower because he didnt have the value then. Value is earned, hagel hasnt earned significant value yet.
          The fact that he has promise is why Chicago wont give him up for a silly price, but that doesnt mean that's what he's worth to the market
          17 févr. 2022 à 17 h 41
          #21
          Avatar de l'utilisateur
          Rejoint: juin 2019
          Messages: 38,241
          Mentions "j'aime": 19,510
          Quoting: JaredOfLondon
          The thing about developing players is that they arnt constants. Hagel could have peaked and he couls become jarome Iginla 2.0. Mangiapane was valued lower because he didnt have the value then. Value is earned, hagel hasnt earned significant value yet.
          The fact that he has promise is why Chicago wont give him up for a silly price, but that doesnt mean that's what he's worth to the market


          2 years ago (which is where I consider Hagel in his current development) Mangiapane was valued about the same as Kapanen to the Leafs. He returned #15 OA. I don't think a late 1st and a top prospect is unreasonable at all right now as a base. (Im not saying elite prospect). Hagel is on pace for 50 points, at 23 Kapanen paved 43 in Toronto
          Wadejos123 a aimé ceci.
          17 févr. 2022 à 17 h 48
          #22
          Avatar de l'utilisateur
          Rejoint: mai 2019
          Messages: 19,579
          Mentions "j'aime": 7,353
          Quoting: Ledge_And_Dairy
          2 years ago (which is where I consider Hagel in his current development) Mangiapane was valued about the same as Kapanen to the Leafs. He returned #15 OA. I don't think a late 1st and a top prospect is unreasonable at all right now as a base. (Im not saying elite prospect). Hagel is on pace for 50 points, at 23 Kapanen paved 43 in Toronto


          Kapanen had 1st round pedigree which (wrongly) ups market value, He also had just come off a 20 goal 40+ point campaign mostly on the 3rd line and was on pace to do better than that. Also everyone at the time said it was an over payment. And even so ,one trade doesnt set the market.
          17 févr. 2022 à 19 h 9
          #23
          Avatar de l'utilisateur
          Rejoint: juin 2019
          Messages: 38,241
          Mentions "j'aime": 19,510
          Quoting: JaredOfLondon
          Kapanen had 1st round pedigree which (wrongly) ups market value, He also had just come off a 20 goal 40+ point campaign mostly on the 3rd line and was on pace to do better than that. Also everyone at the time said it was an over payment. And even so ,one trade doesnt set the market.


          I considered it a slight overpayment, I thought he was worth a 1st in the 20-25 range. However we are not GM's.

          I am also not saying that trade sets the market by any means. I am simply giving you context that you might be able to relate to. Last year as a rookie Hagel paced 38 points (not his fault it was a shortened season). This year as a sophomore he is on pace for 50 points and has a pretty good shot at hitting it at least 20 goals and 40 points.

          I've compared his game to and work ethic to Mangiapane too. Then you factor in he's only 23, has 2 more years left at 1.5M and is still an RFA at the end and the asking price starts making sense. I am not saying it has to specifically be Toronto here but I completely understand why Chicago is asking for this
          17 févr. 2022 à 19 h 16
          #24
          Avatar de l'utilisateur
          Rejoint: mai 2019
          Messages: 19,579
          Mentions "j'aime": 7,353
          Quoting: Ledge_And_Dairy
          I considered it a slight overpayment, I thought he was worth a 1st in the 20-25 range. However we are not GM's.

          I am also not saying that trade sets the market by any means. I am simply giving you context that you might be able to relate to. Last year as a rookie Hagel paced 38 points (not his fault it was a shortened season). This year as a sophomore he is on pace for 50 points and has a pretty good shot at hitting it at least 20 goals and 40 points.

          I've compared his game to and work ethic to Mangiapane too. Then you factor in he's only 23, has 2 more years left at 1.5M and is still an RFA at the end and the asking price starts making sense. I am not saying it has to specifically be Toronto here but I completely understand why Chicago is asking for this


          well yeah, it makes a ton of sense for chicago to ask for as much as they can. they have no reason to move him considering that they basically have to try and be good within the next 2-3 years after the Jones trade so they'll ask for the moon. They're pricing him out of the market on purpose
          25 févr. 2022 à 22 h 58
          #25
          Hakuna Matata
          Avatar de l'utilisateur
          Rejoint: févr. 2020
          Messages: 33,718
          Mentions "j'aime": 20,879
          Its probs gonna be robertson and a 1st if it happens as Amirov has a brain tumor
           
          Répondre
          To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
          Question:
          Options:
          Ajouter une option
          Soumettre le sondage