SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Could Dillon be a fit

Créé par: gpmack95
Équipe: 2021-22 Maple Leafs de Toronto
Date de création initiale: 16 févr. 2022
Publié: 16 févr. 2022
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Transactions
1.
TOR
  1. Copp, Andrew (1 820 000 $ retained)
  2. Dillon, Brenden
WPG
  1. Dermott, Travis
  2. Kerfoot, Alexander
  3. Villeneuve, William
  4. Choix de 1e ronde en 2022 (TOR)
  5. Choix de 3e ronde en 2023 (TOR)
2.
ARI
  1. Holl, Justin
  2. Ritchie, Nick
  3. Choix de 2e ronde en 2023 (TOR)
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2022
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
2023
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
2024
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2281 500 000 $80 603 116 $0 $400 000 $896 884 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
950 000 $950 000 $
AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
11 640 250 $11 640 250 $
C
UFA - 3
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
10 903 000 $10 903 000 $
AD
UFA - 4
Logo de Jets de Winnipeg
1 820 000 $1 820 000 $
C, AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
11 000 000 $11 000 000 $
C, AG
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
6 962 366 $6 962 366 $
AD
UFA - 3
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
1 645 000 $1 645 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
C
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
1 250 000 $1 250 000 $
AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
1 250 000 $1 250 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
750 000 $750 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
900 000 $900 000 $
AD, AG
NTC
UFA - 2
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
5 625 000 $5 625 000 $
DG
NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
DG/DD
NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
1 650 000 $1 650 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
DG
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo de Jets de Winnipeg
3 900 000 $3 900 000 $
DG
UFA - 3
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
3 800 000 $3 800 000 $
G
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Coyotes de l'Arizona
1 350 000 $1 350 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
894 167 $894 167 $
DG
UFA - 1
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance400 000 $$400K)
DD
RFA - 1
Logo de Coyotes de l'Arizona
750 000 $750 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
16 févr. 2022 à 15 h 4
#26
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 24,997
Mentions "j'aime": 7,855
Quoting: Leafs09
It's becasue Toronto's top end players are some of the best in the league.
Matthews and Marner are top 10 NHL players. Nylander ( who i have disliked, game has been much much better ) and Tavares whi is declining is stiill an outstanding 2C.
That's what is making Kerfoot and Guys like that better.

Dillon is much bettre than Dermott, Copp and Kerfoot is a wash so I would not give up extra assets for that to lose Copp next year.

Oh and Holl is 30 ( not young ) and declining, as is Muzzin.


I think most of your assessments are wrong here. Nylander is unreal and JT is still a top centre on a pile of teams. Muzzin may be declining and Holl's taking the blame.
16 févr. 2022 à 15 h 7
#27
Jaxon34
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2019
Messages: 584
Mentions "j'aime": 73
Quoting: PleaseBanMeForMyOwnGood
I think most of your assessments are wrong here. Nylander is unreal and JT is still a top centre on a pile of teams. Muzzin may be declining and Holl's taking the blame.


I'm saying Nylander is good lol. and if JT is a #1 Center, then your team is very bad.
However my point is the Leafs depth players like Kerfoot, point total is much higher due to who he is playing with.
Copp may be better and put more up than Kerfoot playing with a Nylander, and Dillion is much bettre than Dermott.
16 févr. 2022 à 15 h 12
#28
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 24,997
Mentions "j'aime": 7,855
Quoting: Leafs09
I'm saying Nylander is good lol. and if JT is a #1 Center, then your team is very bad.
However my point is the Leafs depth players like Kerfoot, point total is much higher due to who he is playing with.
Copp may be better and put more up than Kerfoot playing with a Nylander, and Dillion is much bettre than Dermott.


Geez a guy who's going to end up with about 30 goals and 80+ points is a bad 1C then this league is nuts.
16 févr. 2022 à 15 h 29
#29
jimmyjets
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2016
Messages: 932
Mentions "j'aime": 317
I'm just going to add the Dillon is a left D and when we've needed a RD, he hasn't been moved over to the right, so thinking he would play the right side for you is a risky proposition.

This trade is a no from the Jets because they'd get more if they traded these guys seperately.

2 - 2nds for Dillon
a 1st for a 50% retained Copp.

We have a glut of NHL ready left D which is the only reason why Dillon may be available so Dermot isn't wanted at all.
Kerfoot is pretty good but he won't play C for us and also will be a third line left wing at best so there isn't a lot of interest in him either. You need us to take him for cap purposes so you'd need to pay us to do that.
Villenuve, as a 4th rounder he's a long shot but I don't mind him.

Anyhow, we're better off doing 2 separate trades where we don't have to eat any cap for next year.
16 févr. 2022 à 17 h 44
#30
Cold spaghetti
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2019
Messages: 4,917
Mentions "j'aime": 2,134
I would do Kerfoot and Dermott for those two without everything else lol
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage