SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Buffalo

Créé par: Richard88
Équipe: 2021-22 Sabres de Buffalo
Date de création initiale: 15 févr. 2022
Publié: 15 févr. 2022
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Transactions
1.
BUF
  1. Zhuravlyov, Danila [Liste de réserve]
  2. Choix de 3e ronde en 2022 (COL)
COL
  1. Miller, Colin (1 937 500 $ retained)
2.
COL
  1. Luukkonen, Ukko-Pekka
Détails additionnels:
Not sure how highly rated he is, but if Levi and Portillo are the goalies of the future then maybe Luukkonen may be spare? Would give the Avs a waivers-exempt no.3 goalie this year and some organizational depth going forward.
3.
BUF
  1. Choix de 7e ronde en 2022 (COL)
Détails additionnels:
(Conditional 7th: rises to a 6th if Dell plays 2 playoff games).
COL
  1. Dell, Aaron
Détails additionnels:
If the Luukkonen deal above doesn't work then do this instead.
Rachats de contrats
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2022
Logo de BUF
Logo de FLA
Logo de VGK
Logo de BUF
Logo de BUF
Logo de COL
Logo de BUF
Logo de NJD
Logo de BUF
Logo de BUF
Logo de COL
2023
Logo de BUF
Logo de BUF
Logo de PHI
Logo de VGK
Logo de BUF
Logo de BUF
Logo de BUF
Logo de BUF
2024
Logo de BUF
Logo de BUF
Logo de BUF
Logo de BUF
Logo de BUF
Logo de BUF
Logo de BUF
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2381 500 000 $67 945 013 $113 916 $1 687 500 $13 554 987 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
9 000 000 $9 000 000 $
AG, AD
NMC
UFA - 6
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
AG, C
RFA - 3
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
AD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
3 050 000 $3 050 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
1 400 000 $1 400 000 $
C
UFA - 2
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
4 750 000 $4 750 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 5
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance412 500 $$412K)
C, AG
RFA - 3
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
894 167 $894 167 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
C, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance425 000 $$425K)
AD
RFA - 2
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
1 600 000 $1 600 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
2 250 000 $2 250 000 $
C
UFA - 1
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
825 000 $825 000 $
AG, C
RFA - 2
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
750 000 $750 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
750 000 $750 000 $
C, AG, AD
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 3
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
DD
RFA - 3
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
750 000 $750 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
1 600 000 $1 600 000 $
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
900 000 $900 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
725 000 $725 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
925 000 $925 000 $
DG
UFA - 2
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
750 000 $750 000 $
DD
UFA - 2
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
889 166 $889 166 $
DG/DD
RFA - 1
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
2 822 764 $2 822 764 $
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
2 200 000 $2 200 000 $
AG, C
UFA - 2
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
1 050 000 $1 050 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
894 167 $894 167 $
AD, AG
RFA - 4
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
850 000 $850 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
750 000 $750 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
15 févr. 2022 à 18 h 45
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2019
Messages: 14,042
Mentions "j'aime": 5,158
I like the Kaut vs UPL
Richard88 a aimé ceci.
15 févr. 2022 à 18 h 48
#2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2021
Messages: 2,206
Mentions "j'aime": 1,669
Buffalo is not trading UPL at this stage and it wouldn't be for Kaut.
15 févr. 2022 à 19 h 14
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2019
Messages: 1,533
Mentions "j'aime": 618
Quoting: Fjordy
Buffalo is not trading UPL at this stage and it wouldn't be for Kaut.


What the Hell, why do people even take the time to type these trades, here's who you can have for Martin Kaut = Patrick Polino, a guys who's worthless for an NHL team for a guy who's worthless for an NHL team.
Fjordy et gretzkyghosts a aimé ceci.
15 févr. 2022 à 19 h 36
#4
Démarrer sujet
John 3 16
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2020
Messages: 9,581
Mentions "j'aime": 4,618
Quoting: Sabresforlife
What the Hell, why do people even take the time to type these trades, here's who you can have for Martin Kaut = Patrick Polino, a guys who's worthless for an NHL team for a guy who's worthless for an NHL team.

Thanks for your feedback, much appreciated.

The reason I made this AGM (and other recent ones) is because I'm trying to familiarize myself a bit more with other teams rosters and prospect pools ahead of the deadline.

I'm not an expert on Buffalo prospects so forgive me if my proposal isn't to your liking.

Please feel free to indicate which prospects might be available, if for no other reason other than reclamation projects in a prospect-swap sort of deal.

Thanks in advance.
gretzkyghosts a aimé ceci.
15 févr. 2022 à 19 h 37
#5
Démarrer sujet
John 3 16
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2020
Messages: 9,581
Mentions "j'aime": 4,618
Quoting: Fjordy
Buffalo is not trading UPL at this stage and it wouldn't be for Kaut.


What would the price of each of your young goalies be, hypothetically speaking?
15 févr. 2022 à 19 h 45
#6
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2021
Messages: 2,206
Mentions "j'aime": 1,669
Quoting: Richard88
What would the price of each of your young goalies be, hypothetically speaking?


But we haven't even seen Levi and Portillo in action yet. UPL looked solid in the NHL this season until he got injured. I think Buffalo has no desire to trade Levi or UPL, maybe in theory Portillo could be available for a decent RD prospect, not sure.
sabres89 et Richard88 a aimé ceci.
15 févr. 2022 à 20 h 2
#7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2017
Messages: 8,245
Mentions "j'aime": 6,234
Quoting: Fjordy
But we haven't even seen Levi and Portillo in action yet. UPL looked solid in the NHL this season until he got injured. I think Buffalo has no desire to trade Levi or UPL, maybe in theory Portillo could be available for a decent RD prospect, not sure.


Agreed. Portillo probably the guy (levi is off limits i suspect), he may be better than upl, but he's farther away. Look at the roster and the guys we have coming- I want a high end center, which a goalie prospect absolutely doesn't get you, and we need right d, preferably a guy who knows where his own end is, and a little size wouldn't hurt. So nothing anybody would give us for a goalie prospect. Also, dell has been pretty bad, I would be extremely uneasy if he was starting 2 playoff games.
Richard88 et Fjordy a aimé ceci.
15 févr. 2022 à 20 h 48
#8
Démarrer sujet
John 3 16
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2020
Messages: 9,581
Mentions "j'aime": 4,618
Quoting: sabres89
Agreed. Portillo probably the guy (levi is off limits i suspect), he may be better than upl, but he's farther away. Look at the roster and the guys we have coming- I want a high end center, which a goalie prospect absolutely doesn't get you, and we need right d, preferably a guy who knows where his own end is, and a little size wouldn't hurt. So nothing anybody would give us for a goalie prospect. Also, dell has been pretty bad, I would be extremely uneasy if he was starting 2 playoff games.


Quoting: Fjordy
But we haven't even seen Levi and Portillo in action yet. UPL looked solid in the NHL this season until he got injured. I think Buffalo has no desire to trade Levi or UPL, maybe in theory Portillo could be available for a decent RD prospect, not sure.


Thanks for your feedback!

Appreciate that goalie prospects aren't the easiest to trade, probably why we don't see many such trades until they're a bit older.

How has Pysyk done with you guys this year? Do you think he'd be a solid deadline pickup for a contender like Colorado, or how would you evaluate/rate him?
gretzkyghosts a aimé ceci.
15 févr. 2022 à 20 h 55
#9
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2021
Messages: 2,206
Mentions "j'aime": 1,669
Quoting: Richard88
Thanks for your feedback!

Appreciate that goalie prospects aren't the easiest to trade, probably why we don't see many such trades until they're a bit older.

How has Pysyk done with you guys this year? Do you think he'd be a solid deadline pickup for a contender like Colorado, or how would you evaluate/rate him?


That's the problem, goalies are a lottery and we don't know how they will play in the NHL.

Pysyk is was solid, he plays in the top 4 for us and looks good, I think he would be a solid #5 - #6 in the contender. Probably Buffalo will try to re-sign him and trade Miller. Idk maybe they will trade Pysyk as well, and in the summer they will sign him again, but I'm not sure that they will trade him at TDL.
Richard88 a aimé ceci.
15 févr. 2022 à 21 h 6
#10
Démarrer sujet
John 3 16
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2020
Messages: 9,581
Mentions "j'aime": 4,618
Quoting: Fjordy
That's the problem, goalies are a lottery and we don't know how they will play in the NHL.

Pysyk is was solid, he plays in the top 4 for us and looks good, I think he would be a solid #5 - #6 in the contender. Probably Buffalo will try to re-sign him and trade Miller. Idk maybe they will trade Pysyk as well, and in the summer they will sign him again, but I'm not sure that they will trade him at TDL.


Thanks!

What would you say the values on the deadline market will be for Pysyk and Miller, respectively?
15 févr. 2022 à 21 h 22
#11
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2017
Messages: 8,245
Mentions "j'aime": 6,234
Quoting: Richard88
Thanks for your feedback!

Appreciate that goalie prospects aren't the easiest to trade, probably why we don't see many such trades until they're a bit older.

How has Pysyk done with you guys this year? Do you think he'd be a solid deadline pickup for a contender like Colorado, or how would you evaluate/rate him?


Pysyk has been ok. What you'd expect, low event, gotta look for him. I would absolutely take him as an insurance policy, the Sabres had a real shot at getting to a cup 15 years ago, but they were down to their 9th and 10th defenseman. Much rather have pysyk than Jeff jillson.
gretzkyghosts a aimé ceci.
15 févr. 2022 à 21 h 24
#12
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2021
Messages: 2,206
Mentions "j'aime": 1,669
Quoting: Richard88
Thanks!

What would you say the values on the deadline market will be for Pysyk and Miller, respectively?


I would expect 2nd for Miller with 50% retain,

It's hard for me to put a value on Pysyk, he looked better than Miller on defense and he can play on PK, also his contract better, but I hope if we trade Pysyk we will get no less than for Miller, it would be logical given his game this season.
Richard88 a aimé ceci.
15 févr. 2022 à 21 h 30
#13
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2017
Messages: 8,245
Mentions "j'aime": 6,234
Quoting: Richard88
Thanks!

What would you say the values on the deadline market will be for Pysyk and Miller, respectively?


Miller retained for a 2nd. Apparently the ask is a first, which, I think is crazy. Pysyk probably a 4th or 5th.
Richard88 a aimé ceci.
15 févr. 2022 à 23 h 56
#14
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2021
Messages: 7,136
Mentions "j'aime": 3,156
Modifié 16 févr. 2022 à 0 h 5
Quoting: Richard88
What would the price of each of your young goalies be, hypothetically speaking?


Don’t think we’d trade ANY of them right now
None are a “sure thing”
But all with potential to be a franchise goalie for us
UPL will get 1st shot at being our “goalie of the future”

IF he doesn’t work out….
THEN Levi/Portillo will get their chances
But they’re both YEARS away
Maybe we’d trade one of them, but IMO it would have to be for a YOUNG right shot defenseman who projects to be a LOCK for top4 minutes
We’d want a significant young player back IMO
Likely one that another team would not want to part with

Other than that,
i think we’d keep them & see which ones work out
Having too many good goalies would be a good problem to have

But as of right now….
I don’t see ANY way we’re likely to trade UPL
*or Levi *or Portillo

In the Sabres case,
we aren’t looking to trade our good young talent
We are rebuilding
So if anything, we’d be looking to acquire more


Btw….
U can always read up on a team’s prospects so u don’t get trashed here
Richard88 et Lenny54 a aimé ceci.
16 févr. 2022 à 0 h 0
#15
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2021
Messages: 7,136
Mentions "j'aime": 3,156
Quoting: sabres89
Miller retained for a 2nd. Apparently the ask is a first, which, I think is crazy. Pysyk probably a 4th or 5th.


The PLAN to get a 1st for Miller INCLUDES taking back a “Cap dump” as well
Idk that it’ll happen, but that’s the thinking
Richard88 a aimé ceci.
16 févr. 2022 à 4 h 45
#16
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2017
Messages: 1,228
Mentions "j'aime": 657
Quoting: Richard88
What would the price of each of your young goalies be, hypothetically speaking?


At the present time I don't think there is a price for any of them...UPL will be back up with the Sabres by seasons end and will be expected to carry the load next season. With the season Levi is having I don't think he has a price...he'll be in the AHL next season and maybe part of the following season. Same can be said of Portillo. These 3 will fight it out and until there is a clear cut winner I don't see any one of them being shipped out.
Richard88 et gretzkyghosts a aimé ceci.
16 févr. 2022 à 7 h 27
#17
Démarrer sujet
John 3 16
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2020
Messages: 9,581
Mentions "j'aime": 4,618
Quoting: Buffalove
The PLAN to get a 1st for Miller INCLUDES taking back a “Cap dump” as well
Idk that it’ll happen, but that’s the thinking


Doubt any team is trading a cap dump with a 1st for Miller. If I'm a GM I'd just pay a 2nd/3rd for Miller and trade the capdump separately if I have to.
Lenny54 et gretzkyghosts a aimé ceci.
16 févr. 2022 à 10 h 15
#18
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2018
Messages: 5,350
Mentions "j'aime": 4,799
Quoting: Richard88
Doubt any team is trading a cap dump with a 1st for Miller. If I'm a GM I'd just pay a 2nd/3rd for Miller and trade the capdump separately if I have to.
Pysyk played for the Panthers for 4 years.
He had a career year in his last year with 9 goals and 18 points.
The Panthers liked his defense so much they moved him to RW.
He then signed with the Stars for a staggering $750,000 who gave up on him which allowed Buffalo to sign him for $900,000.
In Buffalo he appears to be decent RHD.
As a unit, Buffalo has one of the worse collection of defensemen in the NHL.
Only six teams have given up more goals and only one team has more shots against.
I sincerely hope Buffalo could get a 2nd for Miller and after the first 18 games that appeared to be a minimum return as he had 11 points.
Now with one point in his last 14, who knows what sort of return he will receive as he was playing with an injury (as has Olofsson).
Today, Karmanos would most likely be satisfied with a 3rd for Miller and 4th for Pysyk.

BTW, I was shocked that you made this post.
I have read your comments and rarely found them lacking in substance or accuracy.
But that trade for Luukkonen? Wow as you could see others thought it was totally unreasonable.
IMO it would take a return as MTL received for Taffoli to pry Luukkonen out of the system, and I am sure there would be Sabre ACGM's who would complain.
Richard88 et GMTD a aimé ceci.
16 févr. 2022 à 10 h 53
#19
Démarrer sujet
John 3 16
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2020
Messages: 9,581
Mentions "j'aime": 4,618
Quoting: gretzkyghosts
Pysyk played for the Panthers for 4 years.
He had a career year in his last year with 9 goals and 18 points.
The Panthers liked his defense so much they moved him to RW.
He then signed with the Stars for a staggering $750,000 who gave up on him which allowed Buffalo to sign him for $900,000.
In Buffalo he appears to be decent RHD.
As a unit, Buffalo has one of the worse collection of defensemen in the NHL.
Only six teams have given up more goals and only one team has more shots against.
I sincerely hope Buffalo could get a 2nd for Miller and after the first 18 games that appeared to be a minimum return as he had 11 points.
Now with one point in his last 14, who knows what sort of return he will receive as he was playing with an injury (as has Olofsson).
Today, Karmanos would most likely be satisfied with a 3rd for Miller and 4th for Pysyk.

BTW, I was shocked that you made this post.
I have read your comments and rarely found them lacking in substance or accuracy.
But that trade for Luukkonen? Wow as you could see others thought it was totally unreasonable.
IMO it would take a return as MTL received for Taffoli to pry Luukkonen out of the system, and I am sure there would be Sabre ACGM's who would complain.


Thanks for your feedback, really appreciate it.

I figure Pysyk will be near the bottom of the list of deadline targets for teams needing defensive depth, perhaps only as a 6/7 type to guard against injury if the price is cheap.

As I said above I really don't know how to value Buffalo's goalies. The trade proposal above was more exploratory than anything, just to spark a conversation and see how Buffalo fans rate their goalies. And thanks to a few posters on here I've got my answer on that smile
gretzkyghosts a aimé ceci.
16 févr. 2022 à 15 h 52
#20
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2021
Messages: 7,136
Mentions "j'aime": 3,156
Quoting: Richard88
Doubt any team is trading a cap dump with a 1st for Miller. If I'm a GM I'd just pay a 2nd/3rd for Miller and trade the capdump separately if I have to.


Like i said, I don’t think we’ll get a 1st
That’s just what we’re attempting to do
Richard88 a aimé ceci.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage