SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Preparing for a Playoff Run Next Year

Équipe: 2022-23 Sénateurs d'Ottawa
Date de création initiale: 10 févr. 2022
Publié: 15 févr. 2022
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
With Sanderson arriving, Brannstrom is more valuable to some other teams than to Ottawa. (So is Colin White). Trade Brannstrom and White to Arizona for Power Forward Lawson Crouse. Sign Crouse for 3-4 years. (Assumption is that Shane Pinto will play RW with Stutzle and Formenton or Crouse)
Acquire Shutdown RD David Savard (3 years left @ 3.5) + 70% of Paul Byron's contract for Nikita Zaitsev ( Ottawa retains 500K, so 2 years left @ 4.0) + promising RD Max Guenette + 2022 Ott 3rd Rd pick.
Result would be a 22-23 Sens roster averaging about 6'2"/200 lbs, with cap space left to extend Zub, Stutzle, C Brown, Pinto etc in summer of 2023.
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
LISTE DE RÉSERVEANSCAP HIT
3925 000 $
RFAANSCAP HIT
77 500 000 $
21 300 000 $
32 500 000 $
21 750 000 $
42 750 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
52 500 000 $
1900 000 $
CRÉÉANSCAP HIT
Crouse, Lawson
43 200 000 $
Transactions
1.
2.
OTT
  1. Byron, Paul (1 133 333 $ retained)
  2. Savard, David
MTL
  1. Guénette, Maxence
  2. Zaitsev, Nikita (500 000 $ retained)
  3. Choix de 3e ronde en 2022 (OTT)
Rachats de contrats
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Enfoui
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2022
Logo de OTT
Logo de OTT
Logo de TBL
Logo de BOS
Logo de VAN
Logo de OTT
Logo de OTT
Logo de OTT
Logo de NYI
2023
Logo de OTT
Logo de OTT
Logo de OTT
Logo de OTT
Logo de OTT
Logo de OTT
Logo de OTT
Logo de NSH
2024
Logo de OTT
Logo de OTT
Logo de OTT
Logo de OTT
Logo de OTT
Logo de OTT
Logo de OTT
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2381 500 000 $67 688 214 $0 $3 965 000 $13 811 786 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
8 205 714 $8 205 714 $
AG
UFA - 6
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
7 500 000 $7 500 000 $
C
UFA - 8
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
4 975 000 $4 975 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 5
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
AG
RFA
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance2 500 000 $$2M)
C
UFA - 1
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance600 000 $$600K)
C
RFA - 1
Crouse, Lawson
3 200 000 $3 200 000 $
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 7
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
3 600 000 $3 600 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
821 667 $821 667 $
C, AD
RFA - 1
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
818 333 $818 333 $ (Bonis de performance15 000 $$15K)
AG
RFA - 1
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
2 266 667 $2 266 667 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
8 000 000 $8 000 000 $
DG
UFA - 6
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
4 687 500 $4 687 500 $
G
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
925 000 $925 000 $
DG
UFA - 2
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
DD
UFA - 3
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
787 500 $787 500 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
1 300 000 $1 300 000 $
DG
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance425 000 $$425K)
DD
RFA - 2
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
900 000 $900 000 $
DG
UFA - 2
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance425 000 $$425K)
DD
RFA - 1
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
1 300 000 $1 300 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 1
2 750 000 $2 750 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 5

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
16 févr. 2022 à 23 h 45
#26
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 19,215
Mentions "j'aime": 4,837
Quoting: PleaseBanMeForMyOwnGood
The first half of that paragraph can be summed up with, "I don't care what concrete proof says, my opinion is the best" also you can splash a "it doesn't matter if they are a top 10 team they aren't too 10!"

Points percentage is how the league has determined playoff order in the past and when teams have played a different number of games, they use it over points. Because a team that is 20-20-2 in 42 games may have 42 points but they are not equal to a team that is 20-5-2 through 27 games. They have the same number of points but have done so in much less games. I know it's confusing, but when you look at more than 1 stat to justify your opinion and ignore everything else all the time, you tend to miss some stuff.


you have no concrete anything.
They aren't even top 6 teams in their own division. VGK, COL, MIN, CGY........they aren't top 10. Bye now.
17 févr. 2022 à 6 h 40
#27
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 24,997
Mentions "j'aime": 7,855
Quoting: pharrow
you have no concrete anything.
They aren't even top 6 teams in their own division. VGK, COL, MIN, CGY........they aren't top 10. Bye now.


I know I said all 8 teams in a playoff spot in the east are at worst top 12. At least that was the case when I made that statement. I haven't checked again and teams have played so things could have changed. If you had read what was written and had the ability to understand said words, you would have caught that but as has become abundantly clear, you either don't bother to read anything or are not able to grasp what you read. So here we are.
17 févr. 2022 à 7 h 32
#28
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 19,215
Mentions "j'aime": 4,837
Quoting: PleaseBanMeForMyOwnGood
I know I said all 8 teams in a playoff spot in the east are at worst top 12. At least that was the case when I made that statement. I haven't checked again and teams have played so things could have changed. If you had read what was written and had the ability to understand said words, you would have caught that but as has become abundantly clear, you either don't bother to read anything or are not able to grasp what you read. So here we are.


no i read. you said they were top 10 teams, they aren't. That has nothing to do with points. It's just facts. Bye
17 févr. 2022 à 9 h 12
#29
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 24,997
Mentions "j'aime": 7,855
Quoting: pharrow
no i read. you said they were top 10 teams, they aren't. That has nothing to do with points. It's just facts. Bye


I was paraphrasing your statement, if you had read or could understand the big words used, you would have understood that I originally had said they are top 12. To which you said something along the lines of "Not even close!" Which is why we are where we are. You like to insult people and call them stupid and bully people on here because you are so strong and tough but unfortunately lack the ability to really have any substance.
17 févr. 2022 à 10 h 45
#30
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 19,215
Mentions "j'aime": 4,837
Quoting: PleaseBanMeForMyOwnGood
I was paraphrasing your statement, if you had read or could understand the big words used, you would have understood that I originally had said they are top 12. To which you said something along the lines of "Not even close!" Which is why we are where we are. You like to insult people and call them stupid and bully people on here because you are so strong and tough but unfortunately lack the ability to really have any substance.


sure thing there passive aggressive one.

or maybe you can just admit you're wrong. as you back track all over everything and then revert to name calling....again.

bye
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage