SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Labanc for Kerfoot Holl and Acquiring Dadanov as SJ Persuade Hertl to Stay

Créé par: CheechYou
Équipe: 2021-22 Sharks de San Jose
Date de création initiale: 8 févr. 2022
Publié: 8 févr. 2022
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Transactions
1.
2.
SJS
  1. Dadonov, Evgeni
  2. Choix de 2e ronde en 2022 (VGK)
VGK
  1. Pederson, Lane
  2. Choix de 4e ronde en 2022 (SJS)
Rachats de contrats
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2022
Logo de SJS
Logo de VGK
Logo de SJS
Logo de BUF
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de ARI
Logo de MIN
2023
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
2024
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2381 500 000 $65 105 000 $0 $212 500 $16 395 000 $

Formation

Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
5 625 000 $5 625 000 $
C
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
750 000 $750 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
8 000 000 $8 000 000 $
C
M-NTC
UFA - 6
Logo de Golden Knights de Vegas
2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
AD, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
750 000 $750 000 $
AG, AD
RFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
AG, C, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
1 550 000 $1 550 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
500 000 $500 000 $
AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
1 025 000 $1 025 000 $
C, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
850 000 $850 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
725 000 $725 000 $
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
10 000 000 $10 000 000 $
DD
NMC
UFA - 6
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
2 250 000 $2 250 000 $
G
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance212 500 $$212K)
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
5 280 000 $5 280 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
2 175 000 $2 175 000 $
G
UFA - 2
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
7 000 000 $7 000 000 $
DG/DD
NMC
UFA - 5
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
750 000 $750 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
796 667 $796 667 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
783 333 $783 333 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
2 250 000 $2 250 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 3

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
8 févr. 2022 à 16 h 19
#1
Bleeding blue and wh
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2020
Messages: 402
Mentions "j'aime": 49
Hard no from toronto. Kerfoot is too valuable and holl is not that much of a negative.
ZachHymanForTheHart a aimé ceci.
8 févr. 2022 à 16 h 23
#2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2019
Messages: 19,581
Mentions "j'aime": 7,353
Labanc has as many points as kerfoot has goals and the leafs are throwing in holl too? Why do they do this?
ZachHymanForTheHart et palhal a aimé ceci.
8 févr. 2022 à 16 h 24
#3
What in tarnation
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2017
Messages: 32,709
Mentions "j'aime": 31,449
I'd much rather take Kerfoot, who has 31 points in 42 games and can play center over Labanc, who costs a million more and who have scored 6 points in 21 games this year while being unable to play C. It's a no brainer to decline this.
ZachHymanForTheHart et palhal a aimé ceci.
8 févr. 2022 à 16 h 33
#4
Datsyukian
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2021
Messages: 445
Mentions "j'aime": 194
Even when this SJ team went to the Cup they weren't very good, but man have they fallen fast.
8 févr. 2022 à 16 h 54
#5
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2020
Messages: 11,160
Mentions "j'aime": 4,640
Quoting: Datsyukian
Even when this SJ team went to the Cup they weren't very good, but man have they fallen fast.


what? San Jose was stacked for years and the cup run we got the only team that year that had our number.
8 févr. 2022 à 17 h 59
#6
Datsyukian
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2021
Messages: 445
Mentions "j'aime": 194
Quoting: Rob32sjsharks
what? San Jose was stacked for years and the cup run we got the only team that year that had our number.


Huh? Stacked? The team came in 3rd in their division lol they were incredibly mediocre, barely giving Pitt any trouble in the Finals.

You're actually right though. The Sharks teams that NEVER went to the Cup - the team that battled Detroit in the WC - were light years better than the team that did.
8 févr. 2022 à 22 h 29
#7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2020
Messages: 11,160
Mentions "j'aime": 4,640
Quoting: Datsyukian
Huh? Stacked? The team came in 3rd in their division lol they were incredibly mediocre, barely giving Pitt any trouble in the Finals.

You're actually right though. The Sharks teams that NEVER went to the Cup - the team that battled Detroit in the WC - were light years better than the team that did.


i’ll give you the sharks had better teams, but the cup run team was pretty sold with good depth, and that was ali’s back when the west was stacked and you expected a west team in the conference finals each season.
9 févr. 2022 à 0 h 20
#8
H.Lindholm Lover
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2021
Messages: 3,598
Mentions "j'aime": 921
Quoting: Jaws49
Hard no from toronto. Kerfoot is too valuable and holl is not that much of a negative.


kerfoot is valuable, but you dont realize how much better off this team is without holl on it.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage