SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Only deal I would be interested in

Créé par: Shylo_Moxii
Équipe: 2021-22 Blues de St-Louis
Date de création initiale: 6 févr. 2022
Publié: 6 févr. 2022
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
Ben Chiarot is gone. I don't care if we have interest in him. Dumb idea to trade a 1st for a Liability.

Hampus Lindholm you don't know if he's going to stay or leave so get the assets before he walks. Kostin would be valuable and the first and second should be as well.

Jakub Chychrun has regressed the past 3 years. I know "big name means big asset value". Wrong. Understand he has regressed the past 3 years hasn't been doing well. "Well he has a bad team" well no half of the stats are isolated and 2 he had a decent team past 2 years they even made playoffs before this. Can't pull those dumb excuses. Perunovich Neighbours I'd say are out of the Picture. Kostin would be a solid pick up for Arizona obviously the picks work well. Dickinson should be a good prospect coming up. Now it can come up with alternate ideas but imagine Core Pieces, Perunovich, and Neighbours are completely out of the picture.
Transactions
1.
STL
  1. Lindholm, Hampus (2 600 000 $ retained)
ANA
  1. Kostin, Klim
  2. Choix de 1e ronde en 2022 (STL)
  3. Choix de 2e ronde en 2023 (STL)
2.
ARI
  1. Dickinson, Tanner
  2. Scandella, Marco
Détails additionnels:
2022 1st Round
2023 2nd Round
Klim Kostin
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2022
Logo de STL
Logo de STL
Logo de OTT
Logo de STL
Logo de STL
2023
Logo de STL
Logo de STL
Logo de STL
Logo de STL
Logo de STL
Logo de STL
2024
Logo de STL
Logo de STL
Logo de STL
Logo de STL
Logo de STL
Logo de STL
Logo de STL
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2381 500 000 $72 496 627 $306 349 $2 550 000 $9 003 373 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Blues de St-Louis
4 000 000 $4 000 000 $
AD, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Blues de St-Louis
1 875 000 $1 875 000 $
C
UFA - 2
Logo de Blues de St-Louis
3 750 000 $3 750 000 $
AD
NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Blues de St-Louis
6 500 000 $6 500 000 $
C, AG
NTC
UFA - 7
Logo de Blues de St-Louis
5 800 000 $5 800 000 $
AG, AD, C
UFA - 4
Logo de Blues de St-Louis
2 800 000 $2 800 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Blues de St-Louis
4 500 000 $4 500 000 $
AG, AD
NTC
UFA - 5
Logo de Blues de St-Louis
2 750 000 $2 750 000 $
AD, C
UFA - 2
Logo de Blues de St-Louis
2 800 000 $2 800 000 $
AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Blues de St-Louis
2 250 000 $2 250 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Blues de St-Louis
750 000 $750 000 $
C, AG
RFA - 1
Logo de Blues de St-Louis
750 000 $750 000 $ (Bonis de performance1 250 000 $$1M)
C, AD
NTC
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Blues de St-Louis
6 500 000 $6 500 000 $
DG
NTC
UFA - 6
Logo de Blues de St-Louis
6 500 000 $6 500 000 $
DD
NTC
UFA - 6
Logo de Blues de St-Louis
6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
G
NTC
UFA - 6
Logo de Blues de St-Louis
5 500 000 $5 500 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Blues de St-Louis
750 000 $750 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Blues de St-Louis
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance1 300 000 $$1M)
DG
RFA - 1
Logo de Blues de St-Louis
1 375 000 $1 375 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Blues de St-Louis
787 500 $787 500 $
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Blues de St-Louis
725 000 $725 000 $
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
2 778 $2 778 $
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Coyotes de l'Arizona
4 600 000 $4 600 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 4

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
6 févr. 2022 à 19 h 50
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2021
Messages: 15,266
Mentions "j'aime": 11,644
Yeah I’d accept that
Shylo_Moxii a aimé ceci.
6 févr. 2022 à 20 h 2
#2
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2018
Messages: 9,352
Mentions "j'aime": 2,738
Quoting: GeneralLandro
Yeah I’d accept that


thought Anaheim would.
GeneralLandro a aimé ceci.
6 févr. 2022 à 20 h 50
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2018
Messages: 2,565
Mentions "j'aime": 865
It's not the regression value that you're trading for in Chychrun. You'd be trading for his ceiling as a top 2 defenseman at just 4.6M, on the chance that he rebounds given a new environment (which I personally think he could) he'd be worth like 2 1sts + (at least). He's not playing well and there's nobody to blame that on but him, he just needs a change of scenery to change his perspective and get him going again.
6 févr. 2022 à 21 h 26
#4
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2018
Messages: 9,352
Mentions "j'aime": 2,738
Quoting: Club_de_Hockey_le_Canadien
It's not the regression value that you're trading for in Chychrun. You'd be trading for his ceiling as a top 2 defenseman at just 4.6M, on the chance that he rebounds given a new environment (which I personally think he could) he'd be worth like 2 1sts + (at least). He's not playing well and there's nobody to blame that on but him, he just needs a change of scenery to change his perspective and get him going again.


What ceiling? His ceiling has never been that of an elite Top 2 D-man. He has not ever played up to that rate nor probably ever will. Even a bounce wouldn't be Top 2. Only reason he ever played top 2 was because of the talent level of D under him vs over him. The risk involved looking back at certain defenseman like McDonagh, Karlsson, Shattenkirk, Seth Jones now, Tyson Barrie. Never lived up to the so called ceiling. Their ceiling was just that of what they were at the time. No particular defenseman has ever lived up to that type of ceiling after being in a slump and changing scenery it doesn't work like that. Do I think he will improve in this type of team, yes. Is it going to make that much of a difference on his stats and him being on our team it's not going to change drastically because he will be put in his true NHL talent role aka 2nd Pairing Defenseman role.
6 févr. 2022 à 23 h 56
#5
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2020
Messages: 1,275
Mentions "j'aime": 347
Quoting: Shylo_Moxii
What ceiling? His ceiling has never been that of an elite Top 2 D-man. He has not ever played up to that rate nor probably ever will. Even a bounce wouldn't be Top 2. Only reason he ever played top 2 was because of the talent level of D under him vs over him. The risk involved looking back at certain defenseman like McDonagh, Karlsson, Shattenkirk, Seth Jones now, Tyson Barrie. Never lived up to the so called ceiling. Their ceiling was just that of what they were at the time. No particular defenseman has ever lived up to that type of ceiling after being in a slump and changing scenery it doesn't work like that. Do I think he will improve in this type of team, yes. Is it going to make that much of a difference on his stats and him being on our team it's not going to change drastically because he will be put in his true NHL talent role aka 2nd Pairing Defenseman role.


He played like that just last year. You are crazy to value Chychrun and Lindholm at basically the same value. Blues would be dumb to do the Lindholm trade here and the Chychrun trade is highway robbery
7 févr. 2022 à 16 h 0
#6
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2018
Messages: 9,352
Mentions "j'aime": 2,738
Quoting: RClay321
He played like that just last year. You are crazy to value Chychrun and Lindholm at basically the same value. Blues would be dumb to do the Lindholm trade here and the Chychrun trade is highway robbery


wrong. You understand his specific year to year deals are inconsistent not to mention certain players elevated Chychrun not the other way around. If we give up those assets for a guy who has to have someone elevating him to be good. Then we just gave up a Top 4 Pairing defenseman that's going to last longer than 3 years in St.Louis, and giving up a Forward who basically has Top 6 potential which we already gave that up in Bokk. So prospect pool is already depleted. You want to give up another first round pick which brings us in a defenseman who's been horrible this year average at best last year and elevated by other players the year before that.... Yeah sorry I'm good on that one chief.
7 févr. 2022 à 19 h 21
#7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2020
Messages: 1,275
Mentions "j'aime": 347
Quoting: Shylo_Moxii
wrong. You understand his specific year to year deals are inconsistent not to mention certain players elevated Chychrun not the other way around. If we give up those assets for a guy who has to have someone elevating him to be good. Then we just gave up a Top 4 Pairing defenseman that's going to last longer than 3 years in St.Louis, and giving up a Forward who basically has Top 6 potential which we already gave that up in Bokk. So prospect pool is already depleted. You want to give up another first round pick which brings us in a defenseman who's been horrible this year average at best last year and elevated by other players the year before that.... Yeah sorry I'm good on that one chief.


he's 23, placed in 10th in Norris voting last year. Bokk is not a future top 6 forward. Only 10 points in the AHL this year. He might be a third liner in the future but that's about it. I am glad you are not a GM because your talent evaluations are terrible. I would easily give a 1st, Bolduc, and Perunovich for Chychrun. It is time to go try for another cup, not build up futures
7 févr. 2022 à 21 h 10
#8
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2018
Messages: 9,352
Mentions "j'aime": 2,738
Quoting: RClay321
he's 23, placed in 10th in Norris voting last year. Bokk is not a future top 6 forward. Only 10 points in the AHL this year. He might be a third liner in the future but that's about it. I am glad you are not a GM because your talent evaluations are terrible. I would easily give a 1st, Bolduc, and Perunovich for Chychrun. It is time to go try for another cup, not build up futures


he's had limited ice time. 10th in Norris isn't impressive especially in a shortened season and you play the same teams all year which up and down was not a good division. 5 of the 7 teams they played didn't have that great of an offense. Which tells me what? That he has good stats against bad teams.
7 févr. 2022 à 21 h 12
#9
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2018
Messages: 9,352
Mentions "j'aime": 2,738
Quoting: RClay321
he's 23, placed in 10th in Norris voting last year. Bokk is not a future top 6 forward. Only 10 points in the AHL this year. He might be a third liner in the future but that's about it. I am glad you are not a GM because your talent evaluations are terrible. I would easily give a 1st, Bolduc, and Perunovich for Chychrun. It is time to go try for another cup, not build up futures


honestly my evaluation is fine. You would pay that for name sake but not look at the details of him. If he gets traded here for that and he does terrible i'm coming right back here just for you. If you don't want to look at pure facts of even why he was considered "norris" why even bother to be on here. You bring no valid points.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage