SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Trades and Krejci

Créé par: Hude
Équipe: 2021-22 Bruins de Boston
Date de création initiale: 24 janv. 2022
Publié: 24 janv. 2022
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
CRÉÉANSCAP HIT
Kreijci, David
11 000 000 $
Transactions
1.
BOS
  1. Choix de 1e ronde en 2022 (NYR)
2.
BOS
  1. Ristolainen, Rasmus (2 700 000 $ retained)
PHI
  1. Choix de 2e ronde en 2022 (BOS)
  2. Choix de 4e ronde en 2022 (BOS)
3.
SEA
  1. Choix de 3e ronde en 2023 (BOS)
Enfoui
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2022
Logo de BOS
Logo de NYR
Logo de CGY
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
2023
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
2024
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2281 500 000 $80 335 674 $1 956 507 $0 $1 164 326 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Bruins de Boston
6 125 000 $6 125 000 $
AG
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo de Bruins de Boston
6 875 000 $6 875 000 $
C
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
3 100 000 $3 100 000 $
AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Bruins de Boston
6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
AG
NMC
UFA - 4
Kreijci, David
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
Logo de Bruins de Boston
6 666 667 $6 666 667 $
AD
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 2
Logo de Bruins de Boston
2 375 000 $2 375 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Bruins de Boston
5 250 000 $5 250 000 $
C, AD
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 5
Logo de Kraken de Seattle
750 000 $750 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
3 800 000 $3 800 000 $
AG, C, AD
NMC
UFA - 2
Logo de Bruins de Boston
1 750 000 $1 750 000 $
AG, C
UFA - 2
Logo de Bruins de Boston
800 000 $800 000 $
AD, C
UFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
750 000 $750 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Bruins de Boston
4 900 000 $4 900 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
G
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo de Bruins de Boston
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
DG
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Bruins de Boston
4 100 000 $4 100 000 $
DD
UFA - 6
Logo de Bruins de Boston
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
G
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
3 687 500 $3 687 500 $
DG
UFA - 3
Logo de Flyers de Philadelphie
2 700 000 $2 700 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
DG
UFA - 3
Logo de Bruins de Boston
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
DD
UFA - 2
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Bruins de Boston
2 750 000 $2 750 000 $
DG
UFA - 2
Logo de Bruins de Boston
1 050 000 $1 050 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Bruins de Boston
725 000 $725 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
24 janv. 2022 à 18 h 49
#1
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2021
Messages: 14,017
Mentions "j'aime": 4,585
Krejci basically can’t come back at this point
Rangers decline
Risto stinks.
At this point i wouldn’t want to take steen out of the lineup.
24 janv. 2022 à 19 h 8
#2
Am Yisrael Chai
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2018
Messages: 18,592
Mentions "j'aime": 6,725
DeBrusk is hardly worth a 2nd
24 janv. 2022 à 19 h 9
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2019
Messages: 1,724
Mentions "j'aime": 535
Krech isnt coming back

And at least spell his name right smh
24 janv. 2022 à 19 h 12
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2019
Messages: 1,724
Mentions "j'aime": 535
Quoting: Stanley_Cup_To_Manhattan
DeBrusk is hardly worth a 2nd


Bennett wasn't worth a 2nd when he got dealt, but he fetched one. Everybody was saying CGY fleeced Florida at the time. Turns out CGY got fleeced.

I agree though, this ACGM is extremely biased
24 janv. 2022 à 19 h 12
#5
Am Yisrael Chai
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2018
Messages: 18,592
Mentions "j'aime": 6,725
Quoting: KennyBoi
Bennett wasn't worth a 2nd when he got dealt, but he fetched one. Everybody was saying CGY fleeced Florida at the time. Turns out CGY got fleeced.


Bennett is the better player. I'm not really surprised and wouldn't compare the two.
24 janv. 2022 à 19 h 27
#6
Bruins fan
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2020
Messages: 1,479
Mentions "j'aime": 312
This in total is god awful
24 janv. 2022 à 19 h 30
#7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2019
Messages: 1,724
Mentions "j'aime": 535
Quoting: Stanley_Cup_To_Manhattan
Bennett is the better player. I'm not really surprised and wouldn't compare the two.


The 2 can absolutely be compared. There is no way you can tell me 2-3 years ago you would rather have Bennett on your team than JD.

Right now, JD is running pretty much the same course Bennett was before he got dealt at the deadline. In-fact, JD has better totals than Bennett was at the time he got dealt, and he somehow fetched a 2nd. JD can easily fetch a 2nd.
Hude a aimé ceci.
24 janv. 2022 à 19 h 32
#8
Démarrer sujet
Hude
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2018
Messages: 18
Mentions "j'aime": 0
Quoting: CMcAvoy73
Krejci basically can’t come back at this point
Rangers decline
Risto stinks.
At this point i wouldn’t want to take steen out of the lineup.


If Kreijci won't come back Bruins still needs 2nd line center and i don't trust Haula to fill that spot.
I would like to see Ristolainen on a team who have good leadership and is a winning team.
Debrusk's trade value is 1st or 2nd
24 janv. 2022 à 19 h 33
#9
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2021
Messages: 14,017
Mentions "j'aime": 4,585
Quoting: Hude
If Kreijci won't come back Bruins still needs 2nd line center and i don't trust Haula to fill that spot.
I would like to see Ristolainen on a team who have good leadership and is a winning team.
Debrusk's trade value is 1st or 2nd


There is no argument for debrusk being worth a first.

Risto is just not good.

Sure, go after a center.
KennyBoi a aimé ceci.
24 janv. 2022 à 20 h 11
#10
Démarrer sujet
Hude
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2018
Messages: 18
Mentions "j'aime": 0
Quoting: CMcAvoy73
There is no argument for debrusk being worth a first.

Risto is just not good.

Sure, go after a center.



Tampa paid 1st and Nolan Foote (2019 1st) and acquired Coleman. So Debrusk could be worth 1st.
24 janv. 2022 à 20 h 18
#11
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2021
Messages: 14,017
Mentions "j'aime": 4,585
Quoting: Hude
Tampa paid 1st and Nolan Foote (2019 1st) and acquired Coleman. So Debrusk could be worth 1st.


1. Coleman is better
2. Coleman had two year at 1.8M

You bringing up that as a comparison is weird.
24 janv. 2022 à 20 h 42
#12
Bedard23
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2021
Messages: 9,294
Mentions "j'aime": 4,476
Quoting: Hude
If Kreijci won't come back Bruins still needs 2nd line center and i don't trust Haula to fill that spot.
I would like to see Ristolainen on a team who have good leadership and is a winning team.
Debrusk's trade value is 1st or 2nd


I wouldn’t even pay a 6th for DeBrusk he just sucks in almost every aspect
24 janv. 2022 à 20 h 43
#13
Démarrer sujet
Hude
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2018
Messages: 18
Mentions "j'aime": 0
Quoting: CMcAvoy73
1. Coleman is better
2. Coleman had two year at 1.8M

You bringing up that as a comparison is weird.


I don't find it weird at all both players are 20-goal scorers. Coleman are little bit better i agree with that that's why Tampa paid two 1st rounders.
24 janv. 2022 à 20 h 46
#14
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2016
Messages: 11,500
Mentions "j'aime": 4,566
DeBrusk isnt worth a 1st
Hell no to Risto
Krejci isnt coming back
24 janv. 2022 à 21 h 47
#15
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2021
Messages: 14,017
Mentions "j'aime": 4,585
Quoting: Hude
I don't find it weird at all both players are 20-goal scorers. Coleman are little bit better i agree with that that's why Tampa paid two 1st rounders.


Contract.

And they didn’t pay two first rounders. It was one first rounder.
24 janv. 2022 à 21 h 49
#16
Démarrer sujet
Hude
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2018
Messages: 18
Mentions "j'aime": 0
Quoting: CMcAvoy73
Contract.

And they didn’t pay two first rounders. It was one first rounder.


Nolan Foote was first rounder.
24 janv. 2022 à 21 h 52
#17
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2021
Messages: 14,017
Mentions "j'aime": 4,585
Quoting: Hude
Nolan Foote was first rounder.


When he was drafted yes.

When he was traded he wasn’t a first rounder, he was Nolan Foote.
24 janv. 2022 à 22 h 3
#18
Démarrer sujet
Hude
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2018
Messages: 18
Mentions "j'aime": 0
Quoting: CMcAvoy73
When he was drafted yes.

When he was traded he wasn’t a first rounder, he was Nolan Foote.


Who was drafted in first round. Same value than that 2020 First rounder
24 janv. 2022 à 22 h 46
#19
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2021
Messages: 14,017
Mentions "j'aime": 4,585
Quoting: Hude
Who was drafted in first round. Same value than that 2020 First rounder


Maybe. Maybe not. Actually almost certainly not. A player drafted is usually a depreciating asset.

You gonna trade Zach Senyshyn and say, “well he’s a first rounder,” next? Of course not. You know how sometimes there are reaches in the draft? Like Senyshyn. Sweeney valued him more than other GMs so he took him higher up. A draft pick is a raw asset. It has objective worth. A prospect has subjective worth.
25 janv. 2022 à 2 h 51
#20
Am Yisrael Chai
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2018
Messages: 18,592
Mentions "j'aime": 6,725
Quoting: KennyBoi
The 2 can absolutely be compared. There is no way you can tell me 2-3 years ago you would rather have Bennett on your team than JD.

Right now, JD is running pretty much the same course Bennett was before he got dealt at the deadline. In-fact, JD has better totals than Bennett was at the time he got dealt, and he somehow fetched a 2nd. JD can easily fetch a 2nd.


I honestly agree tbh. Just don't see DeBrusk having that much of an impact after being dealt because I simply don't feel he's that level of player or ever has been.
KennyBoi a aimé ceci.
25 janv. 2022 à 4 h 48
#21
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2021
Messages: 12,418
Mentions "j'aime": 2,630
Quoting: KennyBoi
Bennett wasn't worth a 2nd when he got dealt, but he fetched one. Everybody was saying CGY fleeced Florida at the time. Turns out CGY got fleeced.

I agree though, this ACGM is extremely biased


You can't get fleeced when one team can't extract a certain value out of a player than another team can
25 janv. 2022 à 7 h 16
#22
Démarrer sujet
Hude
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2018
Messages: 18
Mentions "j'aime": 0
Quoting: CMcAvoy73
Maybe. Maybe not. Actually almost certainly not. A player drafted is usually a depreciating asset.

You gonna trade Zach Senyshyn and say, “well he’s a first rounder,” next? Of course not. You know how sometimes there are reaches in the draft? Like Senyshyn. Sweeney valued him more than other GMs so he took him higher up. A draft pick is a raw asset. It has objective worth. A prospect has subjective worth.

Yes, Senyshyn was worth 1st rounder in 2016. One year after the draft.
25 janv. 2022 à 7 h 48
#23
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2021
Messages: 12,418
Mentions "j'aime": 2,630
Quoting: Hude
Yes, Senyshyn was worth 1st rounder in 2016. One year after the draft.


tears of joy
25 janv. 2022 à 8 h 11
#24
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2021
Messages: 14,017
Mentions "j'aime": 4,585
Quoting: Hude
Yes, Senyshyn was worth 1st rounder in 2016. One year after the draft.


He wasn’t worth a first round pick eight seconds after he was drafted. That’s how long it took half the room to google who he was.
25 janv. 2022 à 8 h 35
#25
Démarrer sujet
Hude
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2018
Messages: 18
Mentions "j'aime": 0
Quoting: CMcAvoy73
He wasn’t worth a first round pick eight seconds after he was drafted. That’s how long it took half the room to google who he was.


It's easy to say that 6,5 years after the draft.😂
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage