SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Beefing up the top six and getting a goalie next season

Créé par: Oilfan1717
Équipe: 2022-23 Oilers d'Edmonton
Date de création initiale: 23 janv. 2022
Publié: 23 janv. 2022
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
34 000 000 $
31 500 000 $
2825 000 $
2825 000 $
2825 000 $
32 000 000 $
31 666 666 $
54 400 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
1750 000 $
1900 000 $
24 000 000 $
2775 000 $
Offres hostiles
Le salaire annuel moyen (AAV) de l'offre hostile est calculé en divisant la valeur totale du contrat par: 1. La durée totale du contrat, ou 2. Cinq ans
JOUEURAAVCOMPENSATION
Strome, Dylan4 000 000 $
Choix de 2e ronde en 2023
Transactions
1.
PHI
  1. Bourgault, Xavier [Liste de réserve]
  2. Foegele, Warren
  3. Skinner, Stuart
  4. Choix de 1e ronde en 2024 (EDM)
2.
EDM
  1. Bear, Ethan [Droits de RFA]
  2. Raanta, Antti
CAR
  1. Barrie, Tyson
  2. Choix de 1e ronde en 2022 (EDM)
3.
EDM
  1. Choix de 3e ronde en 2022 (SEA)
  2. Choix de 4e ronde en 2022 (SEA)
Rachats de contrats
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Enfoui
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2022
Logo de EDM
Logo de SEA
Logo de SEA
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
2023
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
2024
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2382 500 000 $83 365 128 $896 000 $2 200 000 $-865 128 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
4 000 000 $4 000 000 $
C
UFA - 1
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
12 500 000 $12 500 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
4 400 000 $4 400 000 $
AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
8 500 000 $8 500 000 $
C, AG
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 3
4 000 000 $4 000 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 6
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
5 500 000 $5 500 000 $
AD, AG
NMC
UFA - 6
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
5 125 000 $5 125 000 $
AG, C
NMC
UFA - 7
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
1 666 666 $1 666 666 $
AD
RFA - 2
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance500 000 $$500K)
AG, C
RFA - 2
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
C
RFA - 1
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
825 000 $825 000 $
AD, AG
UFA
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
825 000 $825 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
9 250 000 $9 250 000 $
DG
NMC
UFA - 8
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
DD
RFA - 1
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
5 538 462 $5 538 462 $
DG
NMC
UFA - 1
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
DG
RFA - 2
900 000 $900 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Flyers de Philadelphie
3 979 000 $3 979 000 $
G
RFA - 2
Logo de Hurricanes de la Caroline
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
775 000 $775 000 $
AD, AG
UFA
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
4 167 000 $4 167 000 $
DG
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
825 000 $825 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
2 200 000 $2 200 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
750 000 $750 000 $
DG/DD
UFA

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
23 janv. 2022 à 20 h 27
#1
Lets Get Kraken
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2021
Messages: 8,634
Mentions "j'aime": 3,470
Canes pass, they don’t want anything to do with Barrie or his contract. Canes also won’t shop Bear back to EDM unless they are willing to pay a kings ransom for him to return. That package doesn’t get you Hart. I don’t think Ceci will draw that much of a return.
23 janv. 2022 à 20 h 43
#2
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2020
Messages: 789
Mentions "j'aime": 131
as much as i LOVE that CAR trade, i cant see them giving us bear back
23 janv. 2022 à 21 h 3
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2020
Messages: 9,229
Mentions "j'aime": 2,961
Quoting: evelutions2
Canes pass, they don’t want anything to do with Barrie or his contract. Canes also won’t shop Bear back to EDM unless they are willing to pay a kings ransom for him to return. That package doesn’t get you Hart. I don’t think Ceci will draw that much of a return.


It is a risk but if we have serious concerns about TDA’s contract, it could be worth it. Neither of Bear or Raanta are going to put them over the hump. We are looking at a lottery 1st rounder to add to our deep pool already and a 3rd pair PP QB (which is how we view TDA at this point). If it isn’t a TD move, it is still a 13-16 pick more than likely. Plenty of talent there. The crazy part is we can trade him at 50% retain for future considerations the follow year just to get rid of his hit and save money knowing its Morrow’s spot on an ELC. Sign Manson as UFA in the off-season and we have a pretty good defense for another year. Trade TDA’s rights for a good ransom and profit.
Oilfan1717 a aimé ceci.
24 janv. 2022 à 2 h 14
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 19,537
Mentions "j'aime": 5,032
Quoting: evelutions2
Canes pass, they don’t want anything to do with Barrie or his contract. Canes also won’t shop Bear back to EDM unless they are willing to pay a kings ransom for him to return. That package doesn’t get you Hart. I don’t think Ceci will draw that much of a return.


I disagree here. This is a lottery pick in the off-season. It frees up a bottom pair role for someone like Chatfield who's extended and played brilliantly during his stint with the big club. On top of that, they get even more leverage on the TDA contract saying "we don't need you, either sign for this, or Russia is waiting" kind of thing. If they don't want to keep Barrie around, there's still a market for RD men, especially offensive RD.

It also means they can get a more reliable backup. Someone like Jaro Halak in free agency who doesn't have the same injury history and will be there most of the year.

I really don't see a reason not to do this.
24 janv. 2022 à 6 h 46
#5
Lets Get Kraken
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2021
Messages: 8,634
Mentions "j'aime": 3,470
Quoting: ecupirate07
It is a risk but if we have serious concerns about TDA’s contract, it could be worth it. Neither of Bear or Raanta are going to put them over the hump. We are looking at a lottery 1st rounder to add to our deep pool already and a 3rd pair PP QB (which is how we view TDA at this point). If it isn’t a TD move, it is still a 13-16 pick more than likely. Plenty of talent there. The crazy part is we can trade him at 50% retain for future considerations the follow year just to get rid of his hit and save money knowing its Morrow’s spot on an ELC. Sign Manson as UFA in the off-season and we have a pretty good defense for another year. Trade TDA’s rights for a good ransom and profit.


Quoting: Caniac2000
I disagree here. This is a lottery pick in the off-season. It frees up a bottom pair role for someone like Chatfield who's extended and played brilliantly during his stint with the big club. On top of that, they get even more leverage on the TDA contract saying "we don't need you, either sign for this, or Russia is waiting" kind of thing. If they don't want to keep Barrie around, there's still a market for RD men, especially offensive RD.

It also means they can get a more reliable backup. Someone like Jaro Halak in free agency who doesn't have the same injury history and will be there most of the year.

I really don't see a reason not to do this.

I guess what I’m saying is unless Barrie gets paired with a defensive wall like Cole, he can’t be used in our own dzone. TDA has been surprisingly really good defensively. We have up so little for Bear, and with how good he had played for us, I think we could squeeze a bit more out of Holland’s pocket. I mean it rarely is cheaper to reacquire a player after trading them away. In Raantas case, we definitely need someone more consistent in terms of health. The problem I have when it comes to Barrie, is his contract. Unless Canes get retention on him, it really won’t work that well cap wise. I definitely feel a team like BUF, ARI, or SEA would have to retain 50% of that contract for the Canes to really consider the risk.
24 janv. 2022 à 6 h 54
#6
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2020
Messages: 9,229
Mentions "j'aime": 2,961
Quoting: evelutions2
I guess what I’m saying is unless Barrie gets paired with a defensive wall like Cole, he can’t be used in our own dzone. TDA has been surprisingly really good defensively. We have up so little for Bear, and with how good he had played for us, I think we could squeeze a bit more out of Holland’s pocket. I mean it rarely is cheaper to reacquire a player after trading them away. In Raantas case, we definitely need someone more consistent in terms of health. The problem I have when it comes to Barrie, is his contract. Unless Canes get retention on him, it really won’t work that well cap wise. I definitely feel a team like BUF, ARI, or SEA would have to retain 50% of that contract for the Canes to really consider the risk.


TDA is in the lower echelon for ES defense according to evolving hockey. The guy hasn’t been a train wreck defensively but Barrie has less ES xGA than TDA.
24 janv. 2022 à 7 h 1
#7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 19,537
Mentions "j'aime": 5,032
Quoting: evelutions2
I guess what I’m saying is unless Barrie gets paired with a defensive wall like Cole, he can’t be used in our own dzone. TDA has been surprisingly really good defensively. We have up so little for Bear, and with how good he had played for us, I think we could squeeze a bit more out of Holland’s pocket. I mean it rarely is cheaper to reacquire a player after trading them away. In Raantas case, we definitely need someone more consistent in terms of health. The problem I have when it comes to Barrie, is his contract. Unless Canes get retention on him, it really won’t work that well cap wise. I definitely feel a team like BUF, ARI, or SEA would have to retain 50% of that contract for the Canes to really consider the risk.


Barrie is a RHD. They always have value. Contenders like RD that can QB a PP and move the puck like Barrie. Finding him a new home wouldn't be hard, or you could keep him in place of TDA.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage