SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Deadline

Créé par: justaBoss
Équipe: 2021-22 Maple Leafs de Toronto
Date de création initiale: 22 janv. 2022
Publié: 22 janv. 2022
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
CRÉÉANSCAP HIT
Domi, Max
11 325 000 $
Transactions
1.
TOR
  1. Kiviranta, Joel
  2. Klingberg, John (2 125 000 $ retained)
DAL
  1. Holl, Justin
  2. Robertson, Nicholas
  3. Choix de 1e ronde en 2022 (TOR)
  4. Choix de 3e ronde en 2023 (TOR)
2.
TOR
  1. Carlsson, Gabriel
  2. Domi, Max (2 650 000 $ retained)
CBJ
  1. Abramov, Mikhail
  2. Dermott, Travis
  3. Rindell, Axel [Liste de réserve]
  4. Choix de 2e ronde en 2023 (TOR)
3.
TOR
  1. Lagesson, William
  2. Turris, Kyle
  3. Choix de 5e ronde en 2022 (EDM)
EDM
  1. Engvall, Pierre
  2. Kokkonen, Mikko [Liste de réserve]
  3. Choix de 7e ronde en 2022 (TOR)
Détails additionnels:
EDM retains the remaining half of Domi's contract
4.
TOR
EDM
  1. Domi, Max
Détails additionnels:
Contract unloaded
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2022
Logo de TOR
Logo de EDM
2023
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
2024
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2181 500 000 $81 433 116 $0 $400 000 $66 884 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Stars de Dallas
1 050 000 $1 050 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
11 640 250 $11 640 250 $
C
UFA - 3
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
10 903 000 $10 903 000 $
AD
UFA - 4
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
AG, C, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
11 000 000 $11 000 000 $
C, AG
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
6 962 366 $6 962 366 $
AD
UFA - 3
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
950 000 $950 000 $
AG
UFA - 2
Domi, Max
1 325 000 $1 325 000 $
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
750 000 $750 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
1 645 000 $1 645 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
C
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
1 250 000 $1 250 000 $
AD
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
DG
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
DG/DD
NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
1 650 000 $1 650 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
5 625 000 $5 625 000 $
DG
NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Stars de Dallas
2 125 000 $2 125 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
3 800 000 $3 800 000 $
G
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
894 167 $894 167 $
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance400 000 $$400K)
DD
RFA - 1
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
900 000 $900 000 $
AD, AG
NTC
UFA - 2
Équipe de réserve
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
2 500 000 $2 500 000 $ (1 375 000 $$1M1 375 000 $$1M)
AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
1 650 000 $1 650 000 $ (525 000 $$525K525 000 $$525K)
C, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
725 000 $725 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
725 000 $725 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
DG/DD
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
22 janv. 2022 à 13 h 55
#1
Roster Architect
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2021
Messages: 2,643
Mentions "j'aime": 909
I honestly don't get how people don't see that Klingberg is the furthest thing from a fit in Toronto. He's Tyson Barrie 2.0 which didn't work cause he'd be relegated to the 2nd PP unit (maybe - Sandin is likely the guy there) and not get the ice time he needs to produce. He's horrendous defensively 5v5 so he doesn't fit that need at all. & they're especially not giving up Robertson + 1st + a useful NHL dman for him. Klingberg and Holl would have the same role on the Leafs so why give up the rest?

That being said, as a Stars fan what's your opinion on this idea:

https://www.capfriendly.com/armchair-gm/team/2960291
oneX a aimé ceci.
22 janv. 2022 à 14 h 28
#2
Démarrer sujet
What in tarnation
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2017
Messages: 32,708
Mentions "j'aime": 31,448
Quoting: TrueCanuck
I honestly don't get how people don't see that Klingberg is the furthest thing from a fit in Toronto. He's Tyson Barrie 2.0 which didn't work cause he'd be relegated to the 2nd PP unit (maybe - Sandin is likely the guy there) and not get the ice time he needs to produce. He's horrendous defensively 5v5 so he doesn't fit that need at all. & they're especially not giving up Robertson + 1st + a useful NHL dman for him. Klingberg and Holl would have the same role on the Leafs so why give up the rest?

That being said, as a Stars fan what's your opinion on this idea:

https://www.capfriendly.com/armchair-gm/team/2960291


I did respond to your trade idea (which was decent tbh) in your post

I kinda think Klingberg will eventually make his way to Leafs first PP. He's excellent in those situations, and I'd argue he's much better than Barrie. Closer to Rielly really, but not as defensively responsible.

I agree that the fit might not be the best possible, but I'd argue adding Klingberg would make this team better, and offensively deeper as latest playoffs for the Leafs have seriously taken a hit by injuries towards their top3 D-men, in particularly with Muzzin.
TrueCanuck a aimé ceci.
22 janv. 2022 à 15 h 10
#3
Roster Architect
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2021
Messages: 2,643
Mentions "j'aime": 909
Quoting: justaBoss
I did respond to your trade idea (which was decent tbh) in your post

I kinda think Klingberg will eventually make his way to Leafs first PP. He's excellent in those situations, and I'd argue he's much better than Barrie. Closer to Rielly really, but not as defensively responsible.

I agree that the fit might not be the best possible, but I'd argue adding Klingberg would make this team better, and offensively deeper as latest playoffs for the Leafs have seriously taken a hit by injuries towards their top3 D-men, in particularly with Muzzin.


I honestly don't see the fit for Klingberg at all in Toronto. You say he's excellent on the PP but he wouldn't get any time in Toronto on it. Rielly already has the 1st unit locked down and he's not being moved off it, and Sandin has been a great fit on the 2nd unit. The Leafs currently have the top PP in the league so I don't think they're primary ads will be for a PP specialist defenceman like Klingberg, it just doesn't make sense.

As for the injury situation (which is bound to happen cause Muzzin is fragile every playoffs), Klingberg doesn't really fit that either. When Muzzin goes down, Toronto needs a defensive reliable replacement and Klingberg is the furthest thing from that. Add in the fact that he'll be looking at at least $6.5M - $7M as a free agent and it makes him a pure rental, just doesn't seem like a fit at all unless the price was extremely low (which it obviously won't be)
oneX a aimé ceci.
22 janv. 2022 à 16 h 26
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2019
Messages: 2,741
Mentions "j'aime": 2,601
Quoting: TrueCanuck
I honestly don't see the fit for Klingberg at all in Toronto. You say he's excellent on the PP but he wouldn't get any time in Toronto on it. Rielly already has the 1st unit locked down and he's not being moved off it, and Sandin has been a great fit on the 2nd unit. The Leafs currently have the top PP in the league so I don't think they're primary ads will be for a PP specialist defenceman like Klingberg, it just doesn't make sense.

As for the injury situation (which is bound to happen cause Muzzin is fragile every playoffs), Klingberg doesn't really fit that either. When Muzzin goes down, Toronto needs a defensive reliable replacement and Klingberg is the furthest thing from that. Add in the fact that he'll be looking at at least $6.5M - $7M as a free agent and it makes him a pure rental, just doesn't seem like a fit at all unless the price was extremely low (which it obviously won't be)


You broke down every point very well here and this is exactly how I feel about adding Klingberg to the Leafs. Bad fit generally and even worse if injuries are taken into account.

Perhaps there just isn't the type of D available that the Leafs need for a playoff run at this deadline.
TrueCanuck a aimé ceci.
22 janv. 2022 à 16 h 30
#5
Roster Architect
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2021
Messages: 2,643
Mentions "j'aime": 909
Quoting: oneX
You broke down every point very well here and this is exactly how I feel about adding Klingberg to the Leafs. Bad fit generally and even worse if injuries are taken into account.

Perhaps there just isn't the type of D available that the Leafs need for a playoff run at this deadline.


The issue isn't going to be fixed with adding a defenceman at the deadline - 1 guy isn't going to impact the team that much. That's not the problem. The problem is that there's no accountability with the stars and being responsible defensively and that's on the e coaching staff and management. You don't continuously blow 3 goal leads (not just this stretch but over the years) and think that 1 defenceman is gonna fix that l. It won't.
oneX a aimé ceci.
22 janv. 2022 à 17 h 7
#6
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2019
Messages: 2,741
Mentions "j'aime": 2,601
Quoting: TrueCanuck
The issue isn't going to be fixed with adding a defenceman at the deadline - 1 guy isn't going to impact the team that much. That's not the problem. The problem is that there's no accountability with the stars and being responsible defensively and that's on the e coaching staff and management. You don't continuously blow 3 goal leads (not just this stretch but over the years) and think that 1 defenceman is gonna fix that l. It won't.


Yep, that too. I still am not convinced Keefe is the right coach for this team. Largely, you are right, the lapses in defense are on the players, particularly the forwards and not having the details figured out.

I wonder if Dubas has thought of just rolling with what he has and send the message about being better internally.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage