SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

The TDL

Créé par: Wadejos123
Équipe: 2021-22 Blackhawks de Chicago
Date de création initiale: 22 janv. 2022
Publié: 22 janv. 2022
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Transactions
1.
CHI
  1. Choix de 2e ronde en 2022 (TOR)
TOR
  1. De Haan, Calvin (2 275 000 $ retained)
2.
CHI
  1. Choix de 1e ronde en 2023 (COL)
COL
  1. Fleury, Marc-André (3 500 000 $ retained)
3.
CHI
  1. Choix de 2e ronde en 2022 (CGY)
  2. Choix de 2e ronde en 2022 (FLA)
4.
CHI
  1. Choix de 2e ronde en 2023 (EDM)
5.
CHI
    waived
    6.
    CHI
    1. Choix de 5e ronde en 2022 (EDM)
    EDM
    1. Carpenter, Ryan
    Détails additionnels:
    anywhere
    Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
    Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
    2022
    Logo de CHI
    Logo de TOR
    Logo de CGY
    Logo de FLA
    Logo de EDM
    Logo de TOR
    Logo de VGK
    Logo de CHI
    Logo de EDM
    Logo de CHI
    Logo de CBJ
    Logo de CHI
    2023
    Logo de CHI
    Logo de COL
    Logo de CHI
    Logo de TBL
    Logo de EDM
    Logo de CHI
    Logo de CHI
    Logo de CHI
    Logo de CHI
    Logo de CHI
    2024
    Logo de CHI
    Logo de CHI
    Logo de CHI
    Logo de CHI
    Logo de CHI
    Logo de CHI
    Logo de CHI
    TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
    2281 500 000 $59 717 547 $452 439 $2 647 500 $21 782 453 $
    Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
    Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
    842 500 $842 500 $ (Bonis de performance32 500 $$32K)
    AG, C, AD
    RFA - 1
    Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
    925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance2 500 000 $$2M)
    C, AD
    RFA - 1
    Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
    2 625 000 $2 625 000 $
    AD
    NMC
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
    6 400 000 $6 400 000 $
    AG, AD
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
    10 500 000 $10 500 000 $
    C
    NMC
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
    1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
    AG
    UFA - 3
    Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
    750 000 $750 000 $
    AD, C, AG
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
    1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
    C
    RFA - 2
    Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
    5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
    AD, C, AG
    M-NTC
    UFA - 3
    Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
    975 000 $975 000 $
    AG, C
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
    811 667 $811 667 $ (Bonis de performance32 500 $$32K)
    AG, C
    RFA - 1
    Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
    912 500 $912 500 $
    AG, AD
    UFA - 1
    Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
    Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
    2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
    DG/DD
    M-NTC
    UFA - 4
    Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
    5 400 000 $5 400 000 $
    DD
    M-NTC
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
    800 000 $800 000 $
    G
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
    867 500 $867 500 $ (Bonis de performance82 500 $$82K)
    DG
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
    3 850 000 $3 850 000 $
    DD
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
    1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
    G
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
    1 350 000 $1 350 000 $
    DG
    RFA - 3
    Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
    850 000 $850 000 $
    DG/DD
    UFA - 1
    Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
    Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
    880 833 $880 833 $
    AD, C
    RFA - 1
    Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
    3 900 000 $3 900 000 $
    C, AD
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
    3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
    AD, AG
    UFA - 2

    Code d'intégration

    • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
    • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

    Texte intégré

    Cliquer pour surligner
    22 janv. 2022 à 12 h 34
    #1
    Roster Architect
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: mars 2021
    Messages: 2,643
    Mentions "j'aime": 909
    Chicago fans either want the sun and the moon for Kubalik or nothing.. you really think just a couple of 2nd round picks is enough for Kubalik? I think you should be aiming higher than that
    22 janv. 2022 à 12 h 45
    #2
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: août 2020
    Messages: 11,352
    Mentions "j'aime": 9,005
    That’s a no from COL Kuemper is getting into his groove is 4-0-1 w/a shutout and a 920 save %. Since Dec 8 he is 9-01 w/a .937 sva. Why in the world would COL be looking for another goal tender now?
    coga16 et TJTwolf a aimé ceci.
    22 janv. 2022 à 12 h 47
    #3
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: août 2020
    Messages: 11,352
    Mentions "j'aime": 9,005
    Duplicate
    22 janv. 2022 à 12 h 48
    #4
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: mai 2019
    Messages: 11,202
    Mentions "j'aime": 5,207
    Leafs have Rielly - Muzzin - Sandin - Dermott on the left side, no need for another LD
    22 janv. 2022 à 13 h 5
    #5
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juin 2015
    Messages: 20,030
    Mentions "j'aime": 12,187
    Quoting: Xqb15a
    That’s a no from COL Kuemper is getting into his groove is 4-0-1 w/a shutout and a 920 save %. Since Dec 8 he is 9-01 w/a .937 sva. Why in the world would COL be looking for another goal tender now?


    Couldn’t agree more
    TJTwolf a aimé ceci.
    22 janv. 2022 à 13 h 33
    #6
    exo2769
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juill. 2015
    Messages: 15,602
    Mentions "j'aime": 9,691
    For the COL trade, I'd probably stick with DeHaan and Carpy. Right now Jack Johnson is their #2 LD and they could use some help on the PK.

    I don't think TOR is a good trade partner for CHI just on general.

    Gus will get something. He's actually been better than DeHaan in my mind.
    Wadejos123 a aimé ceci.
    22 janv. 2022 à 15 h 0
    #7
    Démarrer sujet
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: mai 2017
    Messages: 8,269
    Mentions "j'aime": 4,915
    Quoting: leafs101
    Leafs have Rielly - Muzzin - Sandin - Dermott on the left side, no need for another LD


    CDH plays the right and left interchangeably
    22 janv. 2022 à 15 h 1
    #8
    Démarrer sujet
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: mai 2017
    Messages: 8,269
    Mentions "j'aime": 4,915
    Quoting: exo2769
    For the COL trade, I'd probably stick with DeHaan and Carpy. Right now Jack Johnson is their #2 LD and they could use some help on the PK.

    I don't think TOR is a good trade partner for CHI just on general.

    Gus will get something. He's actually been better than DeHaan in my mind.


    I would love to hear your take on how Gus > CDH. Your opinion is one that I respect on this site so i'm just curius. I like Gus more than most of our fans but Dehaan has probably been our best dman the past month
    22 janv. 2022 à 16 h 34
    #9
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: mai 2017
    Messages: 1,232
    Mentions "j'aime": 419
    Quoting: TrueCanuck
    Chicago fans either want the sun and the moon for Kubalik or nothing.. you really think just a couple of 2nd round picks is enough for Kubalik? I think you should be aiming higher than that


    What would you expect Kubalik to return? He had an amazing rookie season, sure. Since then he has 26 goals in 96 games and is a pending RFA looking at a $4m QO. I feel like the pair of seconds is actually pretty fair for an inconsistent middle-6 forward.
    22 janv. 2022 à 19 h 58
    #10
    exo2769
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juill. 2015
    Messages: 15,602
    Mentions "j'aime": 9,691
    Modifié 24 janv. 2022 à 8 h 48
    Quoting: Wadejos123
    I would love to hear your take on how Gus > CDH. Your opinion is one that I respect on this site so i'm just curius. I like Gus more than most of our fans but Dehaan has probably been our best dman the past month


    Well first of all thank you for the kind words.

    As to the discussion though. There's a lot that goes into this as they are very different players. If your talking about a purely defensive Dman then yes DeHaan is the guy, but I've been impressed with the steps Gus has taken this year. I'd 100% sign him again next year...after another TDL trade to get assets.

    A.) DeHaan certainly has played against harder competition, but he's also played with Seth Jones. While it's a good thing to play against harder competition...being with Jones put into question whether or not it's DeHaan himself. Gus's leading Dpair is Riley Stillman. I think they pair well together, but Stillman isn't Seth Jones.

    B.) I do think DeHaan is a better defensive Dman, but last night's Foligno goal is something I notice about DeHaan (he's not at all the only Hawks dman that does this). DeHaan got caught puck watching and didn't try to feel for the pressure. DeHaan drifted in front of MAF and thought that was sufficient, but he needed to feel out for his true assignment. His assignment isn't just for an area, but the opponents entering that area. He let up that goal. Yes, that's just one example and Gus has those too, BUT I'd say that Gus of years ago's defense is not who he is today. I think he does a better job this year. I'm not a huge fan of +/-, but sometimes I'll take a peak. He's actually a +2 (so NO PP points) on a team that's a minus 35.

    C.) I don't know if you read Theo Fox on hockeybuzz, but he does a nice write up IMO. Gus is able to carry the mail and find how to progress the puck forward. That's something he talks about alot when discussing the progression of our D prospects/NHL hopefuls. OR just finding guys for an outlet pass. Kubalik's goal against Seattle for example. I'm not sure you'd argue with me that Gus is better offensively.

    D.) I'm not even sure this counts in a comp, but $800k cap hit vs $4.55M is a big difference in "Value". I understand DeHaan can be retained, but depending on how things go...the Hawks only have two of those left before they need AZ to jump in.
    Wadejos123 a aimé ceci.
     
    Répondre
    To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
    Question:
    Options:
    Ajouter une option
    Soumettre le sondage