SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Deadline Sales

Créé par: bluspy88
Équipe: 2021-22 Coyotes de l'Arizona
Date de création initiale: 20 janv. 2022
Publié: 20 janv. 2022
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
Just to preface, this is more of an idea of who could be moved and for what. I doubt all oft these happen especially Chychrun, but just interested in who can/will be moved and fit.

Holl's NTC would be an obstacle here, but lets assume he waives or maybe even Arizona flips him again. There are a few other pieces like Roussel, Lyubushkin, and maybe even Ghost that I am unsure if they are moved and to where.
Transactions
1.
ARI
  1. Choix de 1e ronde en 2022 (TBL)
Détails additionnels:
Very similar to Goodrow trade, possible more is added as he is younger
2.
ARI
  1. Hájek, Libor
  2. Choix de 2e ronde en 2022 (NYR)
NYR
  1. Kessel, Phil
Détails additionnels:
I think this would work cap wise if I read the site's estimation right? Only reasoning for not retaining is they may want to use that spot to pick up more picks
3.
ARI
  1. Tippett, Owen
  2. Vatrano, Frank
  3. Choix de 1e ronde en 2023 (FLA)
  4. Choix de 2e ronde en 2023 (FLA)
Détails additionnels:
Vatrano is mostly for cap reasons, I think they would be cutting it close without moving some money out. Not a knock on him, I know he's been good for them.
4.
ARI
  1. Choix de 4e ronde en 2022 (BOS)
BOS
  1. Boyd, Travis
Détails additionnels:
Has been playing pretty well on a bad team. Doesn't have to be Boston, just came to mind as a playoff team looking for bottom 6 scoring
5.
ARI
  1. Holl, Justin
  2. Ritchie, Nick
  3. Choix de 2e ronde en 2022 (TOR)
  4. Choix de 7e ronde en 2022 (TOR)
  5. Choix de 3e ronde en 2023 (TOR)
Détails additionnels:
The 2nd is mostly since they want to dump Holl and Ritchie along with retaining on Stralman.
TOR
  1. Larsson, Johan
  2. Strålman, Anton (2 750 000 $ retained)
Détails additionnels:
They may have to waive someone to get the 200k or so difference in overages but I think that is doable.
Rachats de contrats
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2022
Logo de ARI
Logo de COL
Logo de MTL
Logo de TBL
Logo de ARI
Logo de NYI
Logo de PHI
Logo de SJS
Logo de VAN
Logo de NYR
Logo de TOR
Logo de ARI
Logo de ARI
Logo de BOS
Logo de ARI
Logo de ARI
Logo de TOR
2023
Logo de ARI
Logo de FLA
Logo de ARI
Logo de FLA
Logo de ARI
Logo de NYI
Logo de TOR
Logo de ARI
Logo de ARI
Logo de ARI
Logo de VAN
2024
Logo de ARI
Logo de ARI
Logo de FLA
Logo de MTL
Logo de ARI
Logo de COL
Logo de ARI
Logo de SJS
Logo de ARI
Logo de ARI
Logo de ARI
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2281 500 000 $65 439 409 $196 951 $3 165 000 $16 060 591 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Coyotes de l'Arizona
5 850 000 $5 850 000 $
AD, C
UFA - 5
Logo de Coyotes de l'Arizona
7 150 000 $7 150 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 7
Logo de Coyotes de l'Arizona
6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
AG, AD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Coyotes de l'Arizona
750 000 $750 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Panthers de la Floride
863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Coyotes de l'Arizona
5 500 000 $5 500 000 $
AG
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Coyotes de l'Arizona
750 000 $750 000 $
AG, C, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Panthers de la Floride
2 533 333 $2 533 333 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Coyotes de l'Arizona
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
AG
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Coyotes de l'Arizona
750 000 $750 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Coyotes de l'Arizona
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Coyotes de l'Arizona
1 100 000 $1 100 000 $
AG, AD, C
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Coyotes de l'Arizona
4 500 000 $4 500 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Coyotes de l'Arizona
842 500 $842 500 $ (Bonis de performance82 500 $$82K)
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Coyotes de l'Arizona
775 000 $775 000 $
DG
RFA - 1
Logo de Coyotes de l'Arizona
1 350 000 $1 350 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Coyotes de l'Arizona
825 000 $825 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Coyotes de l'Arizona
886 667 $886 667 $ (Bonis de performance82 500 $$82K)
DG/DD
RFA - 3
Logo de Coyotes de l'Arizona
750 000 $750 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Rangers de New York
874 125 $874 125 $
DG
UFA - 1
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Coyotes de l'Arizona
3 200 000 $3 200 000 $
AD, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Coyotes de l'Arizona
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
C
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Coyotes de l'Arizona
894 167 $894 167 $ (Bonis de performance2 150 000 $$2M)
C, AG
RFA - 1
Logo de Coyotes de l'Arizona
850 000 $850 000 $
DD
RFA - 2
Logo de Coyotes de l'Arizona
750 000 $750 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Équipe de réserve
Logo de Coyotes de l'Arizona
750 000 $750 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Coyotes de l'Arizona
750 000 $750 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
DG
RFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
20 janv. 2022 à 10 h 1
#1
AM34 Biggest fan
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2022
Messages: 200
Mentions "j'aime": 35
Not enough for holl
20 janv. 2022 à 10 h 1
#2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2019
Messages: 19,545
Mentions "j'aime": 7,343
Taking on straleman alone would have all those picks going back to the leafs. He's terrible. Then throw in the fact that the leafs have zero need for Larsson, who isnt even much of an upgrade on ritchie, this makes no sense.
Not a single desirable piece, and they certainly arnt paying the coyotes to get worse
20 janv. 2022 à 10 h 24
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 1,832
Mentions "j'aime": 905
Ranger trade is fine. Arizona could and should get more for Chychrun than that.
bluspy88 et nyrfan81 a aimé ceci.
20 janv. 2022 à 10 h 48
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2019
Messages: 11,198
Mentions "j'aime": 5,207
Quoting: JaredOfLondon
Taking on straleman alone would have all those picks going back to the leafs. He's terrible. Then throw in the fact that the leafs have zero need for Larsson, who isnt even much of an upgrade on ritchie, this makes no sense.
Not a single desirable piece, and they certainly arnt paying the coyotes to get worse


Agree on not taking the trade, disagree on Larsson. Solid defensive bottom 6 F comfortable at center or wing, who is producing points. Could be good on the Kampf checking line allowing TOR to move Kase up in the lineup if an injury were to occur. That said I wouldn't pay much more than a 4th round pick
bluspy88 a aimé ceci.
20 janv. 2022 à 10 h 54
#5
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2019
Messages: 19,545
Mentions "j'aime": 7,343
Quoting: leafs101
Agree on not taking the trade, disagree on Larsson. Solid defensive bottom 6 F comfortable at center or wing, who is producing points. Could be good on the Kampf checking line allowing TOR to move Kase up in the lineup if an injury were to occur. That said I wouldn't pay much more than a 4th round pick


except he;s not solid defensivly and he's producing at a pierre engvall level numbers while getting almost 20 mins a night with significantly better linemates
20 janv. 2022 à 11 h 7
#6
Mysteryman
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2021
Messages: 888
Mentions "j'aime": 340
Boston does not have a need for Boyd. They are hard after Crouse. He might get a 1st but comparing him to Goodrow is not really fair. Goodrow played all 3 FW positions and is really good defensively and on the PK. Also had another year on his deal. Things Crouse is not. Crouse is more like a better Nick Ritchie. A bidding war might push him into 1st territory. 2nd and mid level prospect is more his value.
20 janv. 2022 à 11 h 13
#7
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2020
Messages: 980
Mentions "j'aime": 286
Quoting: Userunknown
Boston does not have a need for Boyd. They are hard after Crouse. He might get a 1st but comparing him to Goodrow is not really fair. Goodrow played all 3 FW positions and is really good defensively and on the PK. Also had another year on his deal. Things Crouse is not. Crouse is more like a better Nick Ritchie. A bidding war might push him into 1st territory. 2nd and mid level prospect is more his value.


I agree with you that Goodrow made sense looking now, but I think the general layman consensus at the time was "WTF?" Crouse is also a RFA when it expires, which should bring price up too similar to how Goodrow and Coleman had term before going to UFA.
20 janv. 2022 à 11 h 15
#8
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2020
Messages: 980
Mentions "j'aime": 286
Quoting: JaredOfLondon
except he;s not solid defensivly and he's producing at a pierre engvall level numbers while getting almost 20 mins a night with significantly better linemates


Your comments are very confusing to me. Leafs fans include Holl and Engvall in every trade proposal because they want them gone, but then when there are proposals that would replace or move them suddenly they are either 1.) Undervalued and we need more (Holl) or 2.) "Well that player is just as bad as the player we have now, but that player would get a good return if we did trade him".
20 janv. 2022 à 11 h 17
#9
Mysteryman
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2021
Messages: 888
Mentions "j'aime": 340
Quoting: bluspy88
I agree with you that Goodrow made sense looking now, but I think the general layman consensus at the time was "WTF?" Crouse is also a RFA when it expires, which should bring price up too similar to how Goodrow and Coleman had term before going to UFA.


Ya there was a lot of WTF. But Boston was hard after both those guys. TB overpaid to price them out of the market and kept them from someone that would be an obstacle. Was brilliant move actually. Those were 2 guys built for playoff hockey.
bluspy88 a aimé ceci.
20 janv. 2022 à 11 h 38
#10
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2019
Messages: 19,545
Mentions "j'aime": 7,343
Quoting: bluspy88
Your comments are very confusing to me. Leafs fans include Holl and Engvall in every trade proposal because they want them gone, but then when there are proposals that would replace or move them suddenly they are either 1.) Undervalued and we need more (Holl) or 2.) "Well that player is just as bad as the player we have now, but that player would get a good return if we did trade him".


Or leafs fans are over reacting and think just because worse players are on other teams they are better and im pointing out that they leafs players are actually decent and have value
20 janv. 2022 à 13 h 3
#11
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2019
Messages: 11,198
Mentions "j'aime": 5,207
Quoting: JaredOfLondon
except he;s not solid defensivly and he's producing at a pierre engvall level numbers while getting almost 20 mins a night with significantly better linemates


check the numbers again... over an 82 game pace Larsson is on pace for 47 points on a garbage team, engvall on pace for 31. And he is solid defensively. Yes to Larsson, no to the trade proposed
bluspy88 a aimé ceci.
20 janv. 2022 à 13 h 34
#12
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2019
Messages: 19,545
Mentions "j'aime": 7,343
Quoting: leafs101
check the numbers again... over an 82 game pace Larsson is on pace for 47 points on a garbage team, engvall on pace for 31. And he is solid defensively. Yes to Larsson, no to the trade proposed


Yes, hes producing numbers that engvall would produce in similar circumstances. If engvall was getting similar icetime and linemates that could score anyway at all
20 janv. 2022 à 14 h 17
#13
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2018
Messages: 1,679
Mentions "j'aime": 381
Goodrow had two more years of 800k contract when we traded for him, so this is not similar
21 janv. 2022 à 10 h 45
#14
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2019
Messages: 11,198
Mentions "j'aime": 5,207
Quoting: JaredOfLondon
Yes, hes producing numbers that engvall would produce in similar circumstances. If engvall was getting similar icetime and linemates that could score anyway at all


he plays with Kase or Mikheyev or Spezza, all of whom are producing. I would personally be shocked if Engvall ever put up 40-45 points
21 janv. 2022 à 11 h 13
#15
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2019
Messages: 19,545
Mentions "j'aime": 7,343
Quoting: leafs101
he plays with Kase or Mikheyev or Spezza, all of whom are producing. I would personally be shocked if Engvall ever put up 40-45 points


If he only ever gets 4th line minutes probably not, but then neither would larsson if he played 4th line minutes
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage