that's a hell of alot to pay for a guy who is worse than Holl in every way

No, Minnesota isn't doing this! Rask has barely half a year @ 1.5 while holl who wouldn't play on wild once spurgeon & brodin returns has multi year's @ 3mil. Minnesota is good at d , with good depth, so no.

Your opinions invalid since Holl has another year at 2m and Rask is @ 4m for the rest of the year lol.

His point is that we don’t want Holl and his $2M for another year. Rask at least expires. MIN def declines this.

He doesn't have 4mil! He was put on waivers and cleared so you are wrong. He came into the year with 4. Again, justin hill won't play on Minnesota and is expensive, so while it 1 year after this, Minnesota isn't taking him on. So you are wrong and yours are invalid

CHI are going to have to pass on this. We just signed Murphy for another 4 years. This offer may be what you could offer (ultimately still decline) for him without any term.

His contract is 4m. he was on waivers and is sent down. Minny only gets 1.2m in cap relief having him down there. with a Rask at 50% for holl the wilds cap wont be effected until next season

Holl is more negative value than Rask is for MN. He's redundant for MN and his cap next year is something they can't afford.