SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Retooling is fun

Créé par: justaBoss
Équipe: 2021-22 Stars de Dallas
Date de création initiale: 19 janv. 2022
Publié: 19 janv. 2022
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
Disclaimer: it's really not
Transactions
1.
DAL
  1. Holl, Justin
  2. Robertson, Nicholas
  3. Choix de 1e ronde en 2022 (TOR)
  4. Choix de 3e ronde en 2023 (TOR)
TOR
  1. Kiviranta, Joel
  2. Klingberg, John (2 125 000 $ retained)
2.
DAL
  1. Pajuniemi, Lauri
  2. Choix de 1e ronde en 2022 (NYR)
3.
DAL
  1. Puutio, Kasper [Liste de réserve]
  2. Choix de 3e ronde en 2022 (FLA)
FLA
  1. Holtby, Braden (1 000 000 $ retained)
4.
DAL
  1. Moore, John
  2. Choix de 2e ronde en 2022 (BOS)
  3. Choix de 2e ronde en 2023 (BOS)
BOS
  1. Radulov, Alexander (3 125 000 $ retained)
  2. Choix de 4e ronde en 2022 (DAL)
5.
DAL
  1. Choix de 4e ronde en 2022 (NSH)
6.
DAL
  1. Choix de 4e ronde en 2023 (WSH)
7.
DAL
    Future Considerations
    Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
    Enfoui
    Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
    2022
    Logo de DAL
    Logo de TOR
    Logo de NYR
    Logo de DAL
    Logo de BOS
    Logo de DAL
    Logo de FLA
    Logo de NSH
    Logo de DAL
    Logo de DAL
    Logo de DAL
    2023
    Logo de DAL
    Logo de DAL
    Logo de BOS
    Logo de DAL
    Logo de TOR
    Logo de DAL
    Logo de WSH
    Logo de DAL
    Logo de DAL
    Logo de DAL
    2024
    Logo de DAL
    Logo de DAL
    Logo de DAL
    Logo de DAL
    Logo de DAL
    Logo de DAL
    Logo de DAL
    TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
    2281 500 000 $71 649 572 $927 073 $1 797 500 $9 850 428 $
    Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
    Logo de Stars de Dallas
    795 000 $795 000 $ (Bonis de performance82 500 $$82K)
    AG, AD
    RFA - 1
    Logo de Stars de Dallas
    3 150 000 $3 150 000 $
    C
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
    796 667 $796 667 $
    AG, AD
    RFA - 3
    Logo de Stars de Dallas
    2 550 000 $2 550 000 $
    AD, AG
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Stars de Dallas
    803 333 $803 333 $ (Bonis de performance132 500 $$132K)
    C
    RFA - 2
    Logo de Stars de Dallas
    9 850 000 $9 850 000 $
    C, AD
    NMC
    UFA - 6
    Logo de Stars de Dallas
    842 500 $842 500 $ (Bonis de performance82 500 $$82K)
    AG, C
    RFA - 2
    Logo de Stars de Dallas
    9 500 000 $9 500 000 $
    AG, C
    NMC
    UFA - 4
    Logo de Stars de Dallas
    863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance537 500 $$538K)
    AD
    RFA - 2
    Logo de Stars de Dallas
    925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance212 500 $$212K)
    AG
    RFA - 1
    Logo de Stars de Dallas
    3 250 000 $3 250 000 $
    C, AG
    M-NTC
    UFA - 4
    Logo de Stars de Dallas
    1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
    C, AD, AG
    UFA - 2
    Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
    Logo de Stars de Dallas
    5 800 000 $5 800 000 $
    DG
    NMC
    UFA - 4
    Logo de Stars de Dallas
    8 450 000 $8 450 000 $
    DG/DD
    UFA - 8
    Logo de Stars de Dallas
    925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance537 500 $$538K)
    G
    RFA - 1
    Logo de Stars de Dallas
    863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance212 500 $$212K)
    DG
    RFA - 3
    Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
    2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
    DD
    M-NTC
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Stars de Dallas
    3 333 333 $3 333 333 $
    G
    M-NTC
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Stars de Dallas
    3 650 000 $3 650 000 $
    DG
    NMC
    UFA - 4
    Logo de Stars de Dallas
    1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
    DD
    UFA - 3
    Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
    Logo de Stars de Dallas
    750 000 $750 000 $
    DG/DD
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Stars de Dallas
    4 916 667 $4 916 667 $
    G
    M-NTC, NMC
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Stars de Dallas
    750 000 $750 000 $
    C, AG
    UFA - 2

    Code d'intégration

    • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
    • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

    Texte intégré

    Cliquer pour surligner
    19 janv. 2022 à 13 h 48
    #1
    aecliptic
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juin 2019
    Messages: 2,947
    Mentions "j'aime": 1,284
    With the reports out there about JT Miller, I doubt the Rangers grab Pavelski unless the Miller thing falls though.
    19 janv. 2022 à 13 h 48
    #2
    Banni
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: nov. 2020
    Messages: 789
    Mentions "j'aime": 131
    thats a rip off for the leafs, easy decline
    19 janv. 2022 à 13 h 50
    #3
    Démarrer sujet
    What in tarnation
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: oct. 2017
    Messages: 32,708
    Mentions "j'aime": 31,448
    Quoting: Yash97
    thats a rip off for the leafs, easy decline


    It's the most common Klingberg trade suggested by Leafs fans on this site (Holl+Robertson+1st for half-retained Klingberg). I added Kiviranta for a low pick to be nice and to even out the value.
    Goofie a aimé ceci.
    19 janv. 2022 à 13 h 50
    #4
    Démarrer sujet
    What in tarnation
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: oct. 2017
    Messages: 32,708
    Mentions "j'aime": 31,448
    Quoting: aecliptic
    With the reports out there about JT Miller, I doubt the Rangers grab Pavelski unless the Miller thing falls though.


    Yeah if they go after Miller then Pavelski is not happening of course
    19 janv. 2022 à 13 h 52
    #5
    aecliptic
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juin 2019
    Messages: 2,947
    Mentions "j'aime": 1,284
    Quoting: justaBoss
    Yeah if they go after Miller then Pavelski is not happening of course


    Unless they really want to go ham on the playoffs and a cup run and send 2022 1st to VAN and 2023 1st to DAL.
    justaBoss a aimé ceci.
    19 janv. 2022 à 13 h 53
    #6
    Démarrer sujet
    What in tarnation
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: oct. 2017
    Messages: 32,708
    Mentions "j'aime": 31,448
    Quoting: aecliptic
    Unless they really want to go ham on the playoffs and a cup run and send 2022 1st to VAN and 2023 1st to DAL.


    Indeed.
    19 janv. 2022 à 14 h 10
    #7
    New Star Rising
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juill. 2018
    Messages: 486
    Mentions "j'aime": 130
    Pavs to NYR is good, but I don’t like the return. With the RHD depth the rangers have, they could part with a RHD prospect. That’s what Dallas lacks.
    justaBoss et Goofie a aimé ceci.
    19 janv. 2022 à 14 h 19
    #8
    Démarrer sujet
    What in tarnation
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: oct. 2017
    Messages: 32,708
    Mentions "j'aime": 31,448
    Quoting: C_M_O_R
    Pavs to NYR is good, but I don’t like the return. With the RHD depth the rangers have, they could part with a RHD prospect. That’s what Dallas lacks.


    DAL also lacks in goal scoring prospects. I can see a new Gurianov coming in Pajuniemi, which is also something DAL needs.
    Goofie a aimé ceci.
    19 janv. 2022 à 14 h 21
    #9
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: mai 2021
    Messages: 15
    Mentions "j'aime": 4
    I think Pavelski would be a better fit in boston than Radulov, Boston is still looking for a centre to replace Krecji (spelling my bad lol), and Pavelski has played centre for the majority of his career in San Jose.
    Goofie a aimé ceci.
    19 janv. 2022 à 14 h 24
    #10
    Démarrer sujet
    What in tarnation
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: oct. 2017
    Messages: 32,708
    Mentions "j'aime": 31,448
    Quoting: broucheta
    I think Pavelski would be a better fit in boston than Radulov, Boston is still looking for a centre to replace Krecji (spelling my bad lol), and Pavelski has played centre for the majority of his career in San Jose.


    Sure, but I don't think Bruins could afford taking him without retention, which was one of the main reasons I moved him to Rangers.
    broucheta et TheMooterus a aimé ceci.
    19 janv. 2022 à 14 h 28
    #11
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: mai 2021
    Messages: 15
    Mentions "j'aime": 4
    Quoting: justaBoss
    Sure, but I don't think Bruins could afford taking him without retention, which was one of the main reasons I moved him to Rangers.


    Check out my Dallas retooling, I was able to move both Pavelski and Radulov to boston with retention for a decent return. Let me know what you think
    19 janv. 2022 à 14 h 33
    #12
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: déc. 2019
    Messages: 1,052
    Mentions "j'aime": 113
    Quoting: Yash97
    thats a rip off for the leafs, easy decline


    On what planet?!!? Leafs should take this deal in a heart beat! Klingberg > Holl - compensation to even the value out is Robertson - #1 pick comp for the retention + Kivirantha - GIDDY UP!

    Leafs should then sign Klingberg to a 3 or 4 year deal for around $5m-$6m (if possible). He would be an excellent compliment to Muzzin on the 2nd pairing. Allowing Muzzin to only focus on the defensive side of things - which is what he does best - when paired with Holl he has to worry about defense and transition and offense- too much for Jake to handle.
    19 janv. 2022 à 14 h 33
    #13
    New Star Rising
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juill. 2018
    Messages: 486
    Mentions "j'aime": 130
    Quoting: justaBoss
    DAL also lacks in goal scoring prospects. I can see a new Gurianov coming in Pajuniemi, which is also something DAL needs.


    Wyatt Johnston seems a fit for the need. Mavrik and Stankoven are probable if size isn’t an issue. It just seems that Pajuniemi is slated as a mid six which seems to be the composition of our whole forward group outside of Robo, Hintz, and Pavs. I would like to see Dallas do a Newy / Iginlia trade where we receive the A+ prospect. It could happen with all the quality we have to sell this year.
    19 janv. 2022 à 14 h 34
    #14
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: mai 2019
    Messages: 1,823
    Mentions "j'aime": 1,117
    Quoting: justaBoss
    DAL also lacks in goal scoring prospects. I can see a new Gurianov coming in Pajuniemi, which is also something DAL needs.


    You are 100% right. Last night was the obvious example. But we are so thin at D in the prospect pool. I mean, beside Harley there is squat compared to the forward front where we have Bourque, Stankoven, Johnston, Damiani, etc.
    justaBoss a aimé ceci.
    19 janv. 2022 à 14 h 35
    #15
    Banni
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: mai 2018
    Messages: 24,997
    Mentions "j'aime": 7,855
    Quoting: justaBoss
    It's the most common Klingberg trade suggested by Leafs fans on this site (Holl+Robertson+1st for half-retained Klingberg). I added Kiviranta for a low pick to be nice and to even out the value.


    If you trade Holl though we don't need the retention. I know it appears that way on capfriendly but that is only because the accrued space isn't shown. Also Holl isn't a cap dump. He had a rough start to the season but has rebounded nicely. He has value without a doubt. If you want this package it would have to be Ritchie instead of Holl.
    19 janv. 2022 à 14 h 36
    #16
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: mai 2019
    Messages: 1,823
    Mentions "j'aime": 1,117
    Quoting: HollywoodHudon
    On what planet?!!? Leafs should take this deal in a heart beat! Klingberg > Holl - compensation to even the value out is Robertson - #1 pick comp for the retention + Kivirantha - GIDDY UP!

    Leafs should then sign Klingberg to a 3 or 4 year deal for around $5m-$6m (if possible). He would be an excellent compliment to Muzzin on the 2nd pairing. Allowing Muzzin to only focus on the defensive side of things - which is what he does best - when paired with Holl he has to worry about defense and transition and offense- too much for Jake to handle.


    If Klingberg could be signed for 3 to 4 years @ 5M$-6M$ he would not be on the block. He would have already signed with Dallas.

    Supposedly, he is asking for a 8 * 8 deal.
    19 janv. 2022 à 14 h 43
    #17
    Banni
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: mai 2018
    Messages: 24,997
    Mentions "j'aime": 7,855
    Quoting: HollywoodHudon
    On what planet?!!? Leafs should take this deal in a heart beat! Klingberg > Holl - compensation to even the value out is Robertson - #1 pick comp for the retention + Kivirantha - GIDDY UP!

    Leafs should then sign Klingberg to a 3 or 4 year deal for around $5m-$6m (if possible). He would be an excellent compliment to Muzzin on the 2nd pairing. Allowing Muzzin to only focus on the defensive side of things - which is what he does best - when paired with Holl he has to worry about defense and transition and offense- too much for Jake to handle.


    They can't afford that contract. Klingberg would be a one off deadline acquisition. Which I am not against but this trade doesn't make a lot of sense. With Holl going the other way, they technically don't need retention and with Klingberg's decline in play (personally I think it's a system thing opposed to his actual ability) his value is reduced. Holl has rebounded and has been a good player for TO for the past couple of seasons. Holl is without question better than some of the guys getting thrown around on this site. (Braun, Chiarot, Mayfield etc).

    So if Dallas offered this, I would say instead of Holl we'll give you Ritchie. Which would make it a 1st and Robertson for Klingberg and a 2nd to take on Ritchie who has a very favorable buyout. Hell Ritchie could even prove to be decent in the Dallas system. Holl could then be flipped for something else. No need to move Holl and ask for retention.
    19 janv. 2022 à 15 h 3
    #18
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: déc. 2019
    Messages: 1,052
    Mentions "j'aime": 113
    Holl vs Ritchie = $500k difference.

    Klingberg is demanding to be traded out of Dallas - who says he would re-sign there if he was willing to do a 3 or 4 by $5-$6. And right now... BIG difference between where Dallas is at and where Toronto is at re: Stanley Cup aspirations!
    19 janv. 2022 à 15 h 15
    #19
    True Reverse Retro
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: mars 2018
    Messages: 4,616
    Mentions "j'aime": 3,032
    Quoting: HollywoodHudon
    Holl vs Ritchie = $500k difference.

    Klingberg is demanding to be traded out of Dallas - who says he would re-sign there if he was willing to do a 3 or 4 by $5-$6. And right now... BIG difference between where Dallas is at and where Toronto is at re: Stanley Cup aspirations!


    Because the issue early in the season wasn’t the money Dallas was willing to pay? It was the term. If Klingberg was willing to take 3-4 years, Dallas would have given him that contract in the offseason or earlier this year.

    He may want out of Dallas now, but negotiations stalled earlier this year due to the fact that Dallas wouldn’t go 8 years on his contract.
    20 janv. 2022 à 0 h 11
    #20
    Démarrer sujet
    What in tarnation
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: oct. 2017
    Messages: 32,708
    Mentions "j'aime": 31,448
    Quoting: HollywoodHudon
    Holl vs Ritchie = $500k difference.

    Klingberg is demanding to be traded out of Dallas - who says he would re-sign there if he was willing to do a 3 or 4 by $5-$6. And right now... BIG difference between where Dallas is at and where Toronto is at re: Stanley Cup aspirations!


    Reports say Klingberg wants a contract similar to Hedman. If he agreed to such numbers you suggested DAL would've re-signed him a long time ago.
     
    Répondre
    To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
    Question:
    Options:
    Ajouter une option
    Soumettre le sondage