SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Trade Machine Proposals

Klingberg to Calgary

Créé par: Johnnysucksathockey
Publié: 18 janv. 2022 à 20 h 55
Plafond salarial: 81 500 000 $
Journées à la saison: 101/200 (51%)
Détermination du registraire central: Cette transaction a rempli les différents critères exigés par le registraire central de la LNH.

Logo de Flames de CalgaryFlames de Calgary

DépartStatutSalaire retenuCap hit effectifFormationSPCListe de réserveChoix 1e rd2e et 3e rd4e à 7e rdPJGAPMBA%EFF
Monahan, SeanFlames de CalgaryLNH-3 219 375 $111---0000--
Choix de 1e ronde en 2022 (Logo de Flames de CalgaryCGY)---100------
Choix de 3e ronde en 2023 (Logo de Flames de CalgaryCGY)---010------
Choix de 4e ronde en 2023 (Logo de Flames de CalgaryCGY)---001------
ArrivéeStatutSalaire retenuCap hit effectifFormationSPCListe de réserveChoix 1e rd2e et 3e rd4e à 7e rdPJGAPMBA%EFF
Faksa, RadekStars de DallasLNH-1 641 250 $111---0000--
Klingberg, JohnStars de DallasLNH-2 146 250 $111---0000--
VariationEspace sous le plafond salarialFormationSPCListe de réserveChoix 1e rd2e et 3e rd4e à 7e rdPJGAPMBA%EFF
Initial1 508 475 $2246713610
Variation-568 125 $111-1-1-1
Final940 350 $ (↓)23 (↑)47 (↑)72 (↑)2 (↓)5 (↓)9 (↓)000

Logo de Stars de DallasStars de Dallas

La transaction a eu lieu alors que la LTIR est utilisée
Allègement provenant de la liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR): 4 916 667 $
Portion de la LTIR utilisée avant la transaction: 4 095 001 $
DépartStatutSalaire retenuCap hit effectifFormationSPCListe de réserveChoix 1e rd2e et 3e rd4e à 7e rdPJGAPMBA%EFF
Faksa, RadekStars de DallasLNH-3 250 000 $111---0000--
Klingberg, JohnStars de DallasLNH-4 250 000 $111---0000--
ArrivéeStatutSalaire retenuCap hit effectifFormationSPCListe de réserveChoix 1e rd2e et 3e rd4e à 7e rdPJGAPMBA%EFF
Monahan, SeanFlames de CalgaryLNH-6 375 000 $111---0000--
Choix de 1e ronde en 2022 (Logo de Flames de CalgaryCGY)---100------
Choix de 3e ronde en 2023 (Logo de Flames de CalgaryCGY)---010------
Choix de 4e ronde en 2023 (Logo de Flames de CalgaryCGY)---001------
VariationEspace sous le plafond salarialFormationSPCListe de réserveChoix 1e rd2e et 3e rd4e à 7e rdPJGAPMBA%EFF
Initial821 666 $2045603612
Variation1 125 000 $-1-1-1111
Final1 946 666 $ (↑)19 (↓)44 (↓)59 (↓)4 (↑)7 (↑)13 (↑)000
Who won?
Le graphique a été masqué

Options de sondage


18 janv. 2022 à 21 h 22
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2021
Messages: 6,587
Mentions "j'aime": 4,727
CAL def needs a PP QB,s so Klingberg is a good target for them, but I don't think DAL wants Monahan back. CAL has the space. so the picks and maybe a prospect work. I think the picks and Valimaki would be ideal, cause it give DAL a replacement D. Then trade Monahan's rights after the season to a lower end team that is desperate for a center for a pick or two and you're golden
EsoYeezus69 et C_LGRW71 a aimé ceci.
19 janv. 2022 à 3 h 0
#2
True Reverse Retro
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2018
Messages: 4,616
Mentions "j'aime": 3,032
Quoting: Dutchies
CAL def needs a PP QB,s so Klingberg is a good target for them, but I don't think DAL wants Monahan back. CAL has the space. so the picks and maybe a prospect work. I think the picks and Valimaki would be ideal, cause it give DAL a replacement D. Then trade Monahan's rights after the season to a lower end team that is desperate for a center for a pick or two and you're golden


If I’m Dallas, I’d rather get a late 1st & a Pelletier, Zary, Coronato type prospect. If Valimaki played on the right side, I’d be all over it, but the Stars have the left side of their blue line pretty well taken care of moving forward.
19 janv. 2022 à 3 h 35
#3
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2021
Messages: 12,418
Mentions "j'aime": 2,630
Quoting: Dutchies
CAL def needs a PP QB,s so Klingberg is a good target for them, but I don't think DAL wants Monahan back. CAL has the space. so the picks and maybe a prospect work. I think the picks and Valimaki would be ideal, cause it give DAL a replacement D. Then trade Monahan's rights after the season to a lower end team that is desperate for a center for a pick or two and you're golden


How about sending Backlund the other way instead of Monohan
C_LGRW71 a aimé ceci.
19 janv. 2022 à 9 h 16
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2021
Messages: 6,587
Mentions "j'aime": 4,727
Quoting: Knuckl3s
How about sending Backlund the other way instead of Monohan


That's even worse, cause he has 2 years left at an unfriendly cap hit. He's not producing to his contract, and probably won't ever again. DAL isn't in a position to take a cap dump. They already have a couple high priced forwards signed long term that aren't performing.
19 janv. 2022 à 16 h 21
#5
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2021
Messages: 12,418
Mentions "j'aime": 2,630
Quoting: Dutchies
That's even worse, cause he has 2 years left at an unfriendly cap hit. He's not producing to his contract, and probably won't ever again. DAL isn't in a position to take a cap dump. They already have a couple high priced forwards signed long term that aren't performing.


I think Dallas should probably start moving towards a rebuild, they shouldn't be afraid to weaponize their cap space going forward imo
Dutchies a aimé ceci.
19 janv. 2022 à 17 h 0
#6
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2021
Messages: 6,587
Mentions "j'aime": 4,727
Quoting: Knuckl3s
I think Dallas should probably start moving towards a rebuild, they shouldn't be afraid to weaponize their cap space going forward imo


I completely agree. That's why they wouldn't take Backlund for 2 more years
19 janv. 2022 à 17 h 26
#7
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2021
Messages: 12,418
Mentions "j'aime": 2,630
Quoting: Dutchies
I completely agree. That's why they wouldn't take Backlund for 2 more years


Uh, that's exactly why they would, to weaponize their cap space. You do know what that means right?
19 janv. 2022 à 17 h 41
#8
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2021
Messages: 6,587
Mentions "j'aime": 4,727
Quoting: Knuckl3s
Uh, that's exactly why they would, to weaponize their cap space. You do know what that means right?


Taking on a guy who's under performing and a big cap hit for 2 years past this year is not weaponizing it, it's taking it away.
19 janv. 2022 à 18 h 18
#9
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2021
Messages: 12,418
Mentions "j'aime": 2,630
Quoting: Dutchies
Taking on a guy who's under performing and a big cap hit for 2 years past this year is not weaponizing it, it's taking it away.


I'm not saying Dallas pays to take on Backlund, I mean Calgary pays to unload Backlund to Dallas
19 janv. 2022 à 18 h 33
#10
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2021
Messages: 6,587
Mentions "j'aime": 4,727
Quoting: Knuckl3s
I'm not saying Dallas pays to take on Backlund, I mean Calgary pays to unload Backlund to Dallas


Ok, I get you. So what would they pay? The first and the 4th are for Klingberg (cause they're in desperate need of a PP guy and they'll over pay) and the 3rd is for Faksa as a pretty good depth F. I'd say it takes another first or a top prospect to take on 2 more years at over $5mil for Backlund. Might be too steep for the Flames
19 janv. 2022 à 18 h 38
#11
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2021
Messages: 12,418
Mentions "j'aime": 2,630
Quoting: Dutchies
Ok, I get you. So what would they pay? The first and the 4th are for Klingberg (cause they're in desperate need of a PP guy and they'll over pay) and the 3rd is for Faksa as a pretty good depth F. I'd say it takes another first or a top prospect to take on 2 more years at over $5mil for Backlund. Might be too steep for the Flames


Faksa isn't good depth, he's bad cap. Faksa has really struggled ever since signing that five year deal he's currently on. I'd say Flames only have to pay a 3rd/4th rounder to dump Backlund as he is still somewhat useful
19 janv. 2022 à 18 h 57
#12
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2021
Messages: 6,587
Mentions "j'aime": 4,727
Quoting: Knuckl3s
Faksa isn't good depth, he's bad cap. Faksa has really struggled ever since signing that five year deal he's currently on. I'd say Flames only have to pay a 3rd/4th rounder to dump Backlund as he is still somewhat useful


Well, looks like I F'd up. For some reason I thought Faksa was on an expiring contract. Looks like it's time for me to retire..........
Knuckl3s a aimé ceci.
19 janv. 2022 à 19 h 11
#13
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2021
Messages: 12,418
Mentions "j'aime": 2,630
Quoting: Dutchies
Well, looks like I F'd up. For some reason I thought Faksa was on an expiring contract. Looks like it's time for me to retire..........


tears of joy tears of joy
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Chargement de l'animation
Soumettre les modifications du sondage