SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Cellar sellers

Créé par: Knuckl3s
Équipe: 2021-22 Canucks de Vancouver
Date de création initiale: 17 janv. 2022
Publié: 17 janv. 2022
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Transactions
1.
VAN
  1. Kapanen, Kasperi
  2. Marino, John
  3. Zucker, Jason
  4. Choix de 3e ronde en 2023 (PIT)
  5. Choix de 7e ronde en 2023 (TOR)
2.
VAN
  1. Choix de 3e ronde en 2022 (LAK)
3.
WPG
  1. Hamonic, Travis
  2. Choix de 3e ronde en 2022 (WPG)
4.
VAN
  1. DeSmith, Casey
  2. Choix de 4e ronde en 2022 (PIT)
  3. Choix de 7e ronde en 2022 (PIT)
5.
VAN
  1. DeBrusk, Jake
  2. Moore, John
  3. Studnicka, Jack
  4. Wagner, Chris
  5. Choix de 1e ronde en 2022 (BOS)
  6. Choix de 2e ronde en 2022 (BOS)
Rachats de contrats
Frais appliqués
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2022
Logo de VAN
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de LAK
Logo de VAN
Logo de PIT
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de PIT
2023
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de PIT
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de TOR
2024
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2381 500 000 $79 204 826 $648 780 $1 107 500 $2 295 174 $

Formation

Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
3 250 000 $3 250 000 $
AG
NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
7 350 000 $7 350 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 3
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
AD, AG
RFA - 3
Logo de Bruins de Boston
3 675 000 $3 675 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
4 125 000 $4 125 000 $
C
UFA - 2
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
4 950 000 $4 950 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 5
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
891 667 $891 667 $ (Bonis de performance200 000 $$200K)
AG, AD
RFA - 2
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
2 650 000 $2 650 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 3
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
3 200 000 $3 200 000 $
AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
5 500 000 $5 500 000 $
AG, AD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
750 000 $750 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
725 000 $725 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
7 850 000 $7 850 000 $
DG
UFA - 6
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
4 400 000 $4 400 000 $
DD
UFA - 6
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
G
UFA - 5
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
7 260 000 $7 260 000 $
DG
NMC
UFA - 6
Logo de Jets de Winnipeg
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
DD
UFA - 4
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
1 250 000 $1 250 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
2 750 000 $2 750 000 $
DG
UFA - 2
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
850 000 $850 000 $
DD
UFA - 2
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
AG, AD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Bruins de Boston
769 167 $769 167 $ (Bonis de performance57 500 $$58K)
AD, C
RFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
1 125 000 $1 125 000 $
AD, C
UFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
1 350 000 $1 350 000 $
AD, C
UFA - 2
Équipe de réserve
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
811 667 $811 667 $ (0 $$00 $$0) (Bonis de performance32 500 $$32K)
G
RFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
925 000 $925 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0) (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
DG
RFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
750 000 $750 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
C, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
750 000 $750 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
AD
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
17 janv. 2022 à 19 h 56
#1
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2018
Messages: 9,687
Mentions "j'aime": 4,536
No thanks from the Pens, but I don't think you guys should sell. I think you make the playoffs.
17 janv. 2022 à 19 h 58
#2
Lets Get Kraken
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2021
Messages: 8,603
Mentions "j'aime": 3,449
Pens and Canes pass. Way too much for Miller and Boeser
17 janv. 2022 à 19 h 59
#3
Démarrer sujet
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2021
Messages: 12,418
Mentions "j'aime": 2,630
Quoting: evelutions2
Pens and Canes pass. Way too much for Miller and Boeser


Definitely not too much for either player

Quoting: Mr_Gardoki
No thanks from the Pens, but I don't think you guys should sell. I think you make the playoffs.


You think we're making the playoffs?
17 janv. 2022 à 20 h 1
#4
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2018
Messages: 9,687
Mentions "j'aime": 4,536
Quoting: Knuckl3s
Definitely not too much for either player



You think we're making the playoffs?


I think you have a real shot of duking it out. I think you can catch SJ, but obviously you need CGY to slide a bit, but it's possible.
17 janv. 2022 à 20 h 5
#5
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2019
Messages: 10,245
Mentions "j'aime": 7,114
If NSH become buyers, they would be looking for a top 6 winger or bottom 6 center — they pass on Motte.
17 janv. 2022 à 20 h 6
#6
Lets Get Kraken
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2021
Messages: 8,603
Mentions "j'aime": 3,449
Quoting: Knuckl3s
Definitely not too much for either player



You think we're making the playoffs?


For that package for Miller, Canes would need retention, and that would get retention plus some. Canes aren’t giving up Bear or Fast to begin with, Bokk is available, and I don’t think the Canes are trading away their first unless it’s for someone who will fill their 2LW hole. Miller is better at C than LW, and Canes don’t need any more C. Canes pass.
17 janv. 2022 à 20 h 21
#7
Démarrer sujet
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2021
Messages: 12,418
Mentions "j'aime": 2,630
Quoting: Mr_Gardoki
I think you have a real shot of duking it out. I think you can catch SJ, but obviously you need CGY to slide a bit, but it's possible.


Mmm, thank you, I appreciate the encouragement from a Pens fan. We Canucks fans are really excited about where Rutherford is going to steer the ship moving forward. Patrik Allvin has been a potential candidate in a lot of rumors pertaining to the Canucks GM search, obviously he's worked with Rutherford and there is a an established relationship there
Mr_Gardoki a aimé ceci.
17 janv. 2022 à 20 h 21
#8
Démarrer sujet
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2021
Messages: 12,418
Mentions "j'aime": 2,630
Quoting: evelutions2
For that package for Miller, Canes would need retention, and that would get retention plus some. Canes aren’t giving up Bear or Fast to begin with, Bokk is available, and I don’t think the Canes are trading away their first unless it’s for someone who will fill their 2LW hole. Miller is better at C than LW, and Canes don’t need any more C. Canes pass.


Mmmk
17 janv. 2022 à 20 h 24
#9
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2018
Messages: 9,687
Mentions "j'aime": 4,536
Quoting: Knuckl3s
Mmm, thank you, I appreciate the encouragement from a Pens fan. We Canucks fans are really excited about where Rutherford is going to steer the ship moving forward. Patrik Allvin has been a potential candidate in a lot of rumors pertaining to the Canucks GM search, obviously he's worked with Rutherford and there is a an established relationship there


Yeah, if you guys miss this year I really don't think it will be by much and it will be on an upward trend. You guys have some ridiculous talent and clearly just had bad people steering the ship.
17 janv. 2022 à 20 h 31
#10
Démarrer sujet
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2021
Messages: 12,418
Mentions "j'aime": 2,630
Quoting: Mr_Gardoki
Yeah, if you guys miss this year I really don't think it will be by much and it will be on an upward trend. You guys have some ridiculous talent and clearly just had bad people steering the ship.


Yeah, I feel very confident in the team and management group going forward. Obviously Vancouver's roster situation is very different from what Rutherford was working with in Pittsburgh, but I think he probably just needed a change of scenery, I'm very encouraged by his messaging so far
17 janv. 2022 à 20 h 33
#11
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2018
Messages: 9,687
Mentions "j'aime": 4,536
Quoting: Knuckl3s
Yeah, I feel very confident in the team and management group going forward. Obviously Vancouver's roster situation is very different from what Rutherford was working with in Pittsburgh, but I think he probably just needed a change of scenery, I'm very encouraged by his messaging so far


If you guys can somehow find a way out of that OEL situation you can really have room to play.
17 janv. 2022 à 20 h 39
#12
Démarrer sujet
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2021
Messages: 12,418
Mentions "j'aime": 2,630
Quoting: Mr_Gardoki
If you guys can somehow find a way out of that OEL situation you can really have room to play.


His contract can be bought out a couple years down the road, and he's been very good this season
17 janv. 2022 à 20 h 43
#13
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2018
Messages: 1,364
Mentions "j'aime": 1,579
The Jets aren't going to want to swap defenceman given all the uncertainty with Hanafin this year, especially because their cap hits are identical. Also DeMelo looks to be on the top pairing since the coaching switch
17 janv. 2022 à 20 h 57
#14
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2020
Messages: 15,684
Mentions "j'aime": 6,958
There's no incentive for Winnipeg to downgrade Demelo to a 7/8 defenseman.
17 janv. 2022 à 21 h 41
#15
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2017
Messages: 5,418
Mentions "j'aime": 1,440
This is worse than the other Marino for Boeser trades lol. We aren’t taking on your cap dump and trading you Marino in the process. How about Boeser and Poolman for Kapanen and Matheson or Zucker? Yeah I didn’t think so lol
18 janv. 2022 à 4 h 12
#16
Démarrer sujet
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2021
Messages: 12,418
Mentions "j'aime": 2,630
Quoting: Pensfan89
This is worse than the other Marino for Boeser trades lol. We aren’t taking on your cap dump and trading you Marino in the process. How about Boeser and Poolman for Kapanen and Matheson or Zucker? Yeah I didn’t think so lol


That's a brutal counter offer. Boeser is more valuable than Kapanen, and if you think otherwise, then that's just another way of saying you're a Pens homer. Clearly you don't realize that Myers isn't a cap dump for Vancouver, because he's playing very well under Boudreau. Heck, Poolman isn't a cap dump either because he's been solid as well. If you don't like the idea of Boeser for Marino, that's fine
18 janv. 2022 à 10 h 11
#17
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2017
Messages: 5,418
Mentions "j'aime": 1,440
Quoting: Knuckl3s
That's a brutal counter offer. Boeser is more valuable than Kapanen, and if you think otherwise, then that's just another way of saying you're a Pens homer. Clearly you don't realize that Myers isn't a cap dump for Vancouver, because he's playing very well under Boudreau. Heck, Poolman isn't a cap dump either because he's been solid as well. If you don't like the idea of Boeser for Marino, that's fine


I never said Boeser wasn’t more valuable than Kapanen. What I said is they aren’t trading Marino for Boeser because Marino is more valuable to the pens than Boeser. The reason the counter offer was brutal was to make fun of the brutal initial offer. But ok let’s use your logic. If Myers isn’t a cap dump cause he is playing well under Boudreau (which is a whole what? Like 10-12 games?) then certainly Matheson isn’t since he is playing well under Sullivan which is a bigger sample size and the nucks should accept my counter offer. 🤷‍♂️
18 janv. 2022 à 17 h 19
#18
Démarrer sujet
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2021
Messages: 12,418
Mentions "j'aime": 2,630
Quoting: Pensfan89
I never said Boeser wasn’t more valuable than Kapanen. What I said is they aren’t trading Marino for Boeser because Marino is more valuable to the pens than Boeser. The reason the counter offer was brutal was to make fun of the brutal initial offer. But ok let’s use your logic. If Myers isn’t a cap dump cause he is playing well under Boudreau (which is a whole what? Like 10-12 games?) then certainly Matheson isn’t since he is playing well under Sullivan which is a bigger sample size and the nucks should accept my counter offer. 🤷‍♂️


Okay, and I never said Matheson was a cap dump. Between him and Myers, I'd say simply that neither player has particularly high trade value, they just aren't cap dumps. Myers was good in his 1st season with Vancouver, he was only bad in last years shortened covid season. He was actually playing fairly well under Green to start this season, but has found another gear since the coaching change
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage