Forums/Armchair-GM

Continue the Rebuild

Créé par: stephane_robidas
Date de création initiale: 15 janv. 2022
Publié: 15 janv. 2022
Équipe: 2021-22 Ducks d'Anaheim
Explications
Having a great season, yes. But what if the Ducks continue the rebuild by moving their pending UFAs? I still think this could be a playoff contending team when healthy, while speeding up their rebuild with a plethora of new picks.
Transactions
1.
ANA
  1. 2022 2e round pick (CGY)
  2. 2022 2e round pick (FLA)
CGY
  1. Rakell, Rickard (1 500 000 $ retained)
  2. Deslauriers, Nicolas
2.
ANA
  1. Holl, Justin
  2. 2022 1e round pick (TOR)
Détails additionnels:
Leaf fans seem to want Holl out ASAP.
TOR
  1. Manson, Josh (2 050 000 $ retained)
3.
ANA
  1. Moore, John
  2. 2023 1e round pick (BOS)
  3. 2022 3e round pick (CGY)
Détails additionnels:
Third for taking Moore back.
BOS
  1. Lindholm, Hampus (2 500 000 $ retained)
Rachats de contrats
  • Corey Perry: 2 000 000 $
  • Simon Despres: 0 $
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
  • Rickard Rakell: 1 500 000 $ (60.9%)
  • Josh Manson: 2 050 000 $ (100%)
  • Hampus Lindholm: 2 500 000 $ (96.05%)
  • Rickard Rakell: 1 326 305 $ (35%)
  • Hampus Lindholm: 2 602 778 $ (50%)
  • Josh Manson: 2 050 000 $ (50%)
Enfoui
  • John Moore: 1 625 000 $ (2 750 000 $)
ANNÉE DE REPÊCHAGERONDE 1RONDE 2RONDE 3RONDE 4RONDE 5RONDE 6RONDE 7
2022
Logo de ANA
Logo de TOR
Logo de ANA
Logo de CGY
Logo de FLA
Logo de CGY
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de TOR
Logo de NSH
2023
Logo de ANA
Logo de BOS
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
2024
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2381 500 000 $66 118 999 $0 $3 282 500 $15 381 001 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de ANA
Milano, Sonny
1 700 000 $
AG, AD
RFA - 1
Logo de ANA
Zegras, Trevor
925 000 $
C
RFA - 2
Logo de ANA
Terry, Troy
1 450 000 $
AD, C
RFA - 2
Logo de ANA
Comtois, Maxime
2 037 500 $
AG
RFA - 2
Logo de ANA
Getzlaf, Ryan
3 000 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo de ANA
Silfverberg, Jakob
5 250 000 $
AD, AG
NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de ANA
Lundeström, Isac
874 125 $
C, AG
RFA - 1
Logo de ANA
Henrique, Adam
5 825 000 $
C, AG
NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de ANA
Carrick, Sam
750 000 $
AD, C
UFA - 1
Logo de ANA
Jones, Max
1 295 000 $
AG, AD
RFA - 3
Logo de ANA
Steel, Sam
874 125 $
C, AG
RFA - 1
Logo de ANA
Grant, Derek
1 500 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 2
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de ANA
Fowler, Cam
6 500 000 $
DG/DD
NTC
UFA - 5
Logo de ANA
Shattenkirk, Kevin
3 900 000 $
DD
NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de ANA
Gibson, John
6 400 000 $
G
NTC
UFA - 6
Logo de ANA
Benoit, Simon
809 166 $
DG
RFA - 1
Logo de ANA
Drysdale, Jamie
925 000 $
DD
RFA - 2
Logo de ANA
Stolarz, Anthony
950 000 $
G
UFA - 2
Logo de ANA
Larsson, Jacob
1 200 000 $
DG
RFA - 1
Logo de TOR
Holl, Justin
2 000 000 $
DD
NTC
UFA - 2
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de ANA
Guhle, Brendan
800 000 $
DG
RFA - 1
Logo de ANA
Kesler, Ryan
6 875 000 $
C, AD
NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de ANA
Robinson, Buddy
750 000 $
AD
UFA - 1
Logo de ANA
Mahura, Josh
750 000 $
DG/DD
RFA - 2
Équipe de réserve
Logo de ANA
Groulx, Benoit-Olivier
822 500 $ (0 $)
C
RFA - 2
Logo de ANA
Eriksson Ek, Olle
773 889 $ (0 $)
G
RFA - 1
Logo de ANA
Lettieri, Vinni
750 000 $ (0 $)
C, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de ANA
Pateryn, Greg
750 000 $ (0 $)
DD
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
15 janv. à 16 h 31
#1
Fowler 4 Norris
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2021
Messages: 5,307
Mentions "j'aime": 3,692
Need a 1st coming back for Rakell and Lindholm is worth more than that
OldNYIfan, stephane_robidas, Nqutilus and 1 other person a aimé ceci.
15 janv. à 16 h 35
#2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2019
Messages: 13,752
Mentions "j'aime": 4,853
the difference between Holl and Manson isnt even remotly close to a 1st rounder
B_seka17 a aimé ceci.
15 janv. à 16 h 45
#3
First NY Then LA
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 26,952
Mentions "j'aime": 15,005
Rakell with 50% retention should get us a second and a decent prospect. No need to include DesLauriers in that deal, so we won't be getting another second.

Lindholm will get us a 2022 first and a decent prospect, not a cast-off, but we shouldn't be trading him unless it's clear that we can't re-sign him.

I can't see Toronto exchanging Holl for Manson, because what if Josh doesn't re-sign there? In any event, I see us getting a second plus a decent prospect for him, too.

Unlike some of my fellow-Ducks-fan brethren, I'm not expecting us to get a first for Rakell or Manson, even with retention, unless that's the only element coming back.
stephane_robidas, TZ11 et B_seka17 a aimé ceci.
15 janv. à 16 h 58
#4
Bruins fan
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2020
Messages: 1,466
Mentions "j'aime": 307
Bruins accept
15 janv. à 17 h 30
#5
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2021
Messages: 2,281
Mentions "j'aime": 1,858
Quoting: OldNYIfan
Rakell with 50% retention should get us a second and a decent prospect. No need to include DesLauriers in that deal, so we won't be getting another second.

Lindholm will get us a 2022 first and a decent prospect, not a cast-off, but we shouldn't be trading him unless it's clear that we can't re-sign him.

I can't see Toronto exchanging Holl for Manson, because what if Josh doesn't re-sign there? In any event, I see us getting a second plus a decent prospect for him, too.

Unlike some of my fellow-Ducks-fan brethren, I'm not expecting us to get a first for Rakell or Manson, even with retention, unless that's the only element coming back.


I agree 100%. can't see a 1st coming back for those two either. I obviously hope so, but it seems unlikely.
OldNYIfan a aimé ceci.
15 janv. à 17 h 34
#6
Démarrer sujet
scott sabourin
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2020
Messages: 2,319
Mentions "j'aime": 1,241
Quoting: OldNYIfan
Rakell with 50% retention should get us a second and a decent prospect. No need to include DesLauriers in that deal, so we won't be getting another second.

Lindholm will get us a 2022 first and a decent prospect, not a cast-off, but we shouldn't be trading him unless it's clear that we can't re-sign him.

I can't see Toronto exchanging Holl for Manson, because what if Josh doesn't re-sign there? In any event, I see us getting a second plus a decent prospect for him, too.

Unlike some of my fellow-Ducks-fan brethren, I'm not expecting us to get a first for Rakell or Manson, even with retention, unless that's the only element coming back.


Hm, fair enough. Thank you for your kind and friendly criticism, fellow hockey fan!
OldNYIfan a aimé ceci.
15 janv. à 20 h 9
#7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2016
Messages: 201
Mentions "j'aime": 113
Honestly I rather get a first than a top prospect. Anaheim’s scouting department has a serious eye for talent.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Supprimer une option
Soumettre le sondage