1. Re-sign conditions are banned
2. Hertl as the 3C is pretty awful asset management.
3. No, much rather have a Lundkvist over a Kravtsov.

Sharks say no. Can’t have resign conditions and even if there were, 6th to a 2nd? No guarantee that Kravstov will come back so I’m hesitant to accept a deal with him being the main piece coming back. 1st and Schneider gets it done. If not him: 1st, kravstov, one of lundqvist or Jones for Hertl without the 5th.

1. didn't know that good to know
2. rangers would be able to roll these 3 lines w the talent level which would be pretty dope imo
3. counter w kravtsov and robertson

how abt robertson

Nah, rather have someone better than their 4th best defensive prospect.

Lundkvist or Krieder + Chytil for Hertl (only to have Hertl and DW already have a deal in place for him to sign with SJ in the offseason mwuahahahaha).

ur on crack if u think any team will give up their leading goal scorer plus a roster center or anything remotely close to that for hertl

rangers defensive prospect depth is so deep that our 4th best is 1st in most teams systems. he's just not close enough for nyr to keep around when the other 3 all have nhl games under their belt.

So why would the sharks want him compared to any of the others for their elite center?

bc the sharks can't pick and choose bc they don't have the leverage. they have one asset for the rangers and there r other centers on the market so the rangers will take the cheapest deal they get

Yeah they can pick and choose all they want. That’s how a trade works. They pick a player they want in return and if the rangers don’t like they either counter or move on to the next team. The sharks aren’t giving him for anything less than a great return and a teams 4th best D prospect isn’t getting it done unless you add another prospect too

Yes they can chose and now that kane is gone may chose to resign hertl.

Well, that makes two of us then, because you're on crack if you think Kravstov and a late 1st gets you Hertl.