Kravtsov for Chiarot: Sure.
Allen and Poehling for Georgiev: Sure.

Lundkvist for nothing? Get outta heeeere.

You can do better than Monahan for Toffoli though.

Chiarot is a 1st and 3rd. Then allen and a 3rd for georgiev. So the 3rds cancel each other out. Kravtsov for poehling. Lundqvist could be instead of the 1st. Therefore the trade would be perfect

For toffoli it's a 1st, 1st round caliber prospect, 2nd or 2nd round caliber player. Therefore the trade is: Toffoli and kulak for 1st,Monahan,pelltier,5th

Yeah that's an easy no from the Rangers.

Lmao, that's a big overpay. Nobody will ever offer that for him

It is OK if we don't agree... here my evaluation;

Georgiev & Kravtsov: Peohling & Allen (Allen as more value than Geor and same for Krav)
Lundkvist: Chariot (everyone not me says that he worth a 1st... Lundvist as this value and the Rangers have enough depth at D with Sanderson coming In behind Fox & Trouba)
With this trade NYR secure their position in the cup race

Totally on board for a friendly discussion!

I respectfully disagree:

Re: the Krav+Georgiev for Poehling+Allen valuation-Georgiev and Allen have been equally poor (Allen has below league average numbers in 4 of the past 5 seasons), and Georgiev's QO will essentially be the same dollar value as Allen. Kravtsov is better than Poehling, and while there's obviously some issues there, Poehling would be more likely to be waived at some point by the Rangers than for him to show any sort of success. The Rangers already have fringy NHL centers at the bottom of their roster.

Re: Lundkvist for Chiarot-Sure, the Habs *might* get a 1st for him (I don't think they will, but there's no point arguing it...my guess would be a 2nd+3rd/equivalent prospect). There's a big difference between a 1st and a top prospect that a team has developed, coming off a couple of outstanding U20 seasons in the SHL. Yes, the Rangers have a solid troup of RD's, but if you're moving Lundkvist, why not use him to actually upgrade your roster for more than a couple of months? There are better trade options than sending 6+ years of team control on a top prospect away for Chiarot.