SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Is this enough for Chychrun

Créé par: Cyras
Équipe: 2021-22 Ducks d'Anaheim
Date de création initiale: 12 janv. 2022
Publié: 12 janv. 2022
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Transactions
ANA
  1. Chychrun, Jakob
  2. Choix de 3e ronde en 2022 (ARI)
ARI
  1. Larsson, Jacob
  2. Lindholm, Hampus
  3. Steel, Sam
  4. Choix de 2e ronde en 2023 (ANA)
Rachats de contrats
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2022
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ARI
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de TOR
Logo de NSH
2023
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
2024
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2081 500 000 $60 210 180 $0 $3 282 500 $21 289 820 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
2 037 500 $2 037 500 $
AG
RFA - 2
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $ (Bonis de performance1 500 000 $$2M)
C
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
1 450 000 $1 450 000 $
AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
1 700 000 $1 700 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
C, AG
RFA - 2
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
2 463 139 $2 463 139 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
5 250 000 $5 250 000 $
AD, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
874 125 $874 125 $
C, AG
RFA - 1
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
AG, C
UFA - 2
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
750 000 $750 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
750 000 $750 000 $
AD
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
6 500 000 $6 500 000 $
DG/DD
M-NTC
UFA - 5
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
2 050 000 $2 050 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
6 400 000 $6 400 000 $
G
M-NTC
UFA - 6
Logo de Coyotes de l'Arizona
4 600 000 $4 600 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 4
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
DD
RFA - 2
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
950 000 $950 000 $
G
UFA - 2
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
809 166 $809 166 $ (Bonis de performance82 500 $$82K)
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
3 900 000 $3 900 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
6 875 000 $6 875 000 $
C, AD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
1 456 250 $1 456 250 $
AG, C
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
1 295 000 $1 295 000 $
AG, AD
RFA - 3
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
750 000 $750 000 $
DG/DD
RFA - 2
Équipe de réserve
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
773 889 $773 889 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
750 000 $750 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
C, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
750 000 $750 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
DD
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
12 janv. 2022 à 14 h 27
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 5,617
Mentions "j'aime": 2,763
no, a ufa and a bunch of meh isnt getting a young stud LHD on a team friendly deal.
Lenny7 et TZ11 a aimé ceci.
12 janv. 2022 à 14 h 30
#2
Lenny7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2017
Messages: 13,291
Mentions "j'aime": 11,051
Quoting: hanson493
no, a ufa and a bunch of meh isnt getting a young stud LHD on a team friendly deal.


As a Ducks fan, I agree completely. No reason to think Hampus re-signs in Arizona, which leaves them with a mid 2nd, and 2 guys who haven't panned out.

That being said, the actual price to acquire him won't make sense for the Ducks anyway...just re-sign Hampus and keep building.
Salzy et TZ11 a aimé ceci.
12 janv. 2022 à 14 h 36
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 10,711
Mentions "j'aime": 10,394
Considering Lindholm is going to be a UFA, he doesn't hold much trade value to AZ unless he is signing a contract with them. Which I doubt a player like Lindholm opts to sign with a club like AZ.
12 janv. 2022 à 14 h 38
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2021
Messages: 179
Mentions "j'aime": 28
You have a rental, and 2 players who are middle of the lineup at best. The second could hold some value, but they are giving a 3rd along with Chychrun? Way too little. Have to imagine they ask for one of Drysdale, Zegras, or Terry.
12 janv. 2022 à 14 h 43
#5
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2021
Messages: 15,257
Mentions "j'aime": 11,643
Quoting: KMarner10
You have a rental, and 2 players who are middle of the lineup at best. The second could hold some value, but they are giving a 3rd along with Chychrun? Way too little. Have to imagine they ask for one of Drysdale, Zegras, or Terry.


Oof
12 janv. 2022 à 14 h 45
#6
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2021
Messages: 15,257
Mentions "j'aime": 11,643
Quoting: Lenny7
As a Ducks fan, I agree completely. No reason to think Hampus re-signs in Arizona, which leaves them with a mid 2nd, and 2 guys who haven't panned out.

That being said, the actual price to acquire him won't make sense for the Ducks anyway...just re-sign Hampus and keep building.


Unless we were to trade Hampus and use those picks to then acquire Chychrun .. probably not happening as that team could just have gotten him but a thought as I like the idea of possibly selling our UFA’s and then buying others
Lenny7 a aimé ceci.
12 janv. 2022 à 14 h 59
#7
Lenny7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2017
Messages: 13,291
Mentions "j'aime": 11,051
Quoting: GeneralLandro
Unless we were to trade Hampus and use those picks to then acquire Chychrun .. probably not happening as that team could just have gotten him but a thought as I like the idea of possibly selling our UFA’s and then buying others


Yeah, I guess it all depends...I love Hampus, but I don't think he brings back anything close to what we want at the deadline. Far better off extending him, and potentially selling off Rakell.

Also would be curious as to the message that would be received in the dressing room by selling all 3 pending UFA's...I get that it makes long term sense (Especially Rakell and/or Manson), but with the team in a competitive spot, maybe a bit of exposure to the playoffs would be a solid development tool?
GeneralLandro et TZ11 a aimé ceci.
12 janv. 2022 à 15 h 6
#8
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2021
Messages: 15,257
Mentions "j'aime": 11,643
Quoting: Lenny7
Yeah, I guess it all depends...I love Hampus, but I don't think he brings back anything close to what we want at the deadline. Far better off extending him, and potentially selling off Rakell.

Also would be curious as to the message that would be received in the dressing room by selling all 3 pending UFA's...I get that it makes long term sense (Especially Rakell and/or Manson), but with the team in a competitive spot, maybe a bit of exposure to the playoffs would be a solid development tool?


Probably wouldn’t be too bad since they’d be going to contenders most likely so it wouldn’t be like they’re just getting rid of them, but also the young guys are going to be it as soon as next year I believe

I think it could be a good move personally, moves like Rakell for a 1st + maybe then try and turn that into like a Brock Boeser or something like that so they still stay competitive but get younger and potentially better

I don’t think I’d like to just sell off guys and then tank, that would be bad
Lenny7 et TZ11 a aimé ceci.
12 janv. 2022 à 15 h 12
#9
Lenny7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2017
Messages: 13,291
Mentions "j'aime": 11,051
Quoting: GeneralLandro
Probably wouldn’t be too bad since they’d be going to contenders most likely so it wouldn’t be like they’re just getting rid of them, but also the young guys are going to be it as soon as next year I believe

I think it could be a good move personally, moves like Rakell for a 1st + maybe then try and turn that into like a Brock Boeser or something like that so they still stay competitive but get younger and potentially better

I don’t think I’d like to just sell off guys and then tank, that would be bad


Yeah, it's a weird spot to be in. I said it this morning...the last 10 games have really shown where the warts are in the roster, especially when it comes to depth. I would be extremely surprised if we can hold off all 3 of the Kings, Flames and Oilers, and I'd be even more surprised if the Pacific gets one of the wildcard spots. That being said, I'm surprised with where we're at right now, and am enjoying watching the boys go!
GeneralLandro et TZ11 a aimé ceci.
12 janv. 2022 à 15 h 12
#10
KFTW
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2018
Messages: 42,640
Mentions "j'aime": 23,795
Quoting: GeneralLandro
Oof


Not Terry, Zegras or Drysdale. But I could see the asking price be Lundestrom + Tracey/Zellweger + 1st
12 janv. 2022 à 15 h 15
#11
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2021
Messages: 15,257
Mentions "j'aime": 11,643
Quoting: Lenny7
Yeah, it's a weird spot to be in. I said it this morning...the last 10 games have really shown where the warts are in the roster, especially when it comes to depth. I would be extremely surprised if we can hold off all 3 of the Kings, Flames and Oilers, and I'd be even more surprised if the Pacific gets one of the wildcard spots. That being said, I'm surprised with where we're at right now, and am enjoying watching the boys go!


I agree with you — 2 years and we will look back and laugh at how fun they are to watch right now
Lenny7 a aimé ceci.
12 janv. 2022 à 15 h 15
#12
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2021
Messages: 2,385
Mentions "j'aime": 1,940
Quoting: KMarner10
Have to imagine they ask for one of Drysdale, Zegras, or Terry.


They wouldn't get that from the Ducks. They weren't even on the table for Eichel. The Ducks shouldn't even trade a single one of their best prospects at the moment which would automatically take them out of the Chychrun-conversation. They're still rebuilding.
GeneralLandro et Lenny7 a aimé ceci.
12 janv. 2022 à 15 h 15
#13
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2021
Messages: 15,257
Mentions "j'aime": 11,643
Quoting: csick
Not Terry, Zegras or Drysdale. But I could see the asking price be Lundestrom + Tracey/Zellweger + 1st


Yeah I just can’t really imagine us getting it done with what I personally would be willing to give up
TZ11 a aimé ceci.
12 janv. 2022 à 15 h 17
#14
KFTW
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2018
Messages: 42,640
Mentions "j'aime": 23,795
Quoting: GeneralLandro
Yeah I just can’t really imagine us getting it done with what I personally would be willing to give up


Probably the same as we paid for Bobby Ryan back in the day. Young top 6 player + 1st round prospect + 1st round pick
12 janv. 2022 à 15 h 18
#15
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2021
Messages: 2,385
Mentions "j'aime": 1,940
Quoting: csick
Not Terry, Zegras or Drysdale. But I could see the asking price be Lundestrom + Tracey/Zellweger + 1st


Ducks shouldn't do that either. But that might just be me, since I'm a big opponent of the Ducks trading any prospect, pick or young player at the moment.
GeneralLandro a aimé ceci.
12 janv. 2022 à 15 h 25
#16
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2021
Messages: 15,257
Mentions "j'aime": 11,643
Quoting: TZ11
Ducks shouldn't do that either. But that might just be me, since I'm a big opponent of the Ducks trading any prospect, pick or young player at the moment.


I’m with you. Open to trading UFA’s to possibly upgrade
Example: Rakell into Boeser
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage