SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Question for Boston Fans

Créé par: hockeyconnor97
Équipe: 2021-22 Bruins de Boston
Date de création initiale: 12 janv. 2022
Publié: 12 janv. 2022
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
Now that Rask is signed, do you think you guys would trade Swayman or Ullmark?

I'd imagine if Rask is as good as he was in prior years you wouldn't need all three goalies, and you might as well trade one of them for an impact player.

If so, what would you want in return?
Enfoui
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2022
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de CGY
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
2023
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
2024
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2481 500 000 $80 085 674 $1 956 507 $125 000 $1 414 326 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Bruins de Boston
6 125 000 $6 125 000 $
AG
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo de Bruins de Boston
6 875 000 $6 875 000 $
C
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
6 666 667 $6 666 667 $
AD
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 2
Logo de Bruins de Boston
6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
AG
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo de Bruins de Boston
5 250 000 $5 250 000 $
C, AD
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 5
Logo de Bruins de Boston
3 100 000 $3 100 000 $
AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Bruins de Boston
3 675 000 $3 675 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
2 375 000 $2 375 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Bruins de Boston
3 800 000 $3 800 000 $
AG, C, AD
NMC
UFA - 2
Logo de Bruins de Boston
1 050 000 $1 050 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Bruins de Boston
1 750 000 $1 750 000 $
AG, C
UFA - 2
Logo de Bruins de Boston
800 000 $800 000 $
AD, C
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Bruins de Boston
3 687 500 $3 687 500 $
DG
UFA - 3
Logo de Bruins de Boston
4 900 000 $4 900 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
G
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo de Bruins de Boston
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
DG
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Bruins de Boston
4 100 000 $4 100 000 $
DD
UFA - 6
Logo de Bruins de Boston
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
G
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
DG
UFA - 3
Logo de Bruins de Boston
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
DD
UFA - 2
Logo de Bruins de Boston
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance125 000 $$125K)
G
RFA - 2
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Bruins de Boston
750 000 $750 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
725 000 $725 000 $
AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
725 000 $725 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1
Équipe de réserve
Logo de Bruins de Boston
809 167 $809 167 $ (0 $$00 $$0) (Bonis de performance82 500 $$82K)
C, AD
RFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
12 janv. 2022 à 12 h 4
#1
Wolf.for.Vezina
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2021
Messages: 978
Mentions "j'aime": 253
have swayman be in ahl then input him later
Lenny7 a aimé ceci.
12 janv. 2022 à 12 h 7
#2
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2021
Messages: 14,017
Mentions "j'aime": 4,585
This year, no. The goalies stay.
In the offseason: swayman? Still no. Ullmark, I certainly would assume he would be on the market. He would have to waive his no trade protection, which he has in a complete capacity for years one and two of his four year deal. That said, if he think he’ll be third string, which he should think, then i assume he’ll waive.

I think a lot of people will expect a first, I think a second would be fine.
12 janv. 2022 à 12 h 7
#3
No longer a Virgin
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2020
Messages: 6,023
Mentions "j'aime": 2,606
I doubt they'll trade either. Rask is 34 on a one year deal, Ullmark has term and Swayman is the man of the future so I doubt Boston moves any of those three.
12 janv. 2022 à 12 h 7
#4
Lenny7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2017
Messages: 13,291
Mentions "j'aime": 11,051
Quoting: Fire_Brad_Treliving
have swayman be in ahl then input him later


Yeah, I think that's probably the plan. Ullmark just signed, and has a NMC this season and next...can't see him being moved. Who knows how Rask's body will actually hold up too...big gamble to trade either of those guys.
12 janv. 2022 à 12 h 9
#5
GM CRIME DAWG
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2019
Messages: 4,940
Mentions "j'aime": 2,691
Swayman as mentioned above ^ ^
Ullmark has NMC...
12 janv. 2022 à 12 h 14
#6
Mysteryman
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2021
Messages: 888
Mentions "j'aime": 340
Modifié 12 janv. 2022 à 12 h 46
Swayman - zero chance

Ullmark - 10% - has full NMC for 2 years. But if the price was right and he was willing…maybe.

Rask is only signed for this year. Couid be his last hurrah and then retire. Where would that leave them? Swayman is waiver exempt. There is no need to do anything. If Rask wants another year or 2 after this then they will have to make some decisions.

Would think a 1st would be required for them to even consider it.
12 janv. 2022 à 12 h 14
#7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2016
Messages: 11,499
Mentions "j'aime": 4,566
Modifié 12 janv. 2022 à 16 h 21
The earliest you'd see someone moved would be in the off-season and that only if Rask wants to come back. At that point they'd explore moving Ullmark, but his NMC put him in the driver seat. He knew the plans was for Rask to come back and that's why he wanted a NMC his first 2 years.
12 janv. 2022 à 12 h 29
#8
Your favorite Ranger
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2021
Messages: 2,286
Mentions "j'aime": 304
The taxi squad makes keeping a 3rd goalie possible (if one of them is waivers-exempt).
12 janv. 2022 à 14 h 50
#9
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2016
Messages: 295
Mentions "j'aime": 42
Quoting: CMcAvoy73
This year, no. The goalies stay.
In the offseason: swayman? Still no. Ullmark, I certainly would assume he would be on the market. He would have to waive his no trade protection, which he has in a complete capacity for years one and two of his four year deal. That said, if he think he’ll be third string, which he should think, then i assume he’ll waive.

I think a lot of people will expect a first, I think a second would be fine.




Would you rather have picks or prospects? I’m wondering if say a player that already has some AHL time under his belt and grades out as a middle 6 or 2nd pair D might help more in the next two years before they can really reset the roster moving forward
12 janv. 2022 à 15 h 50
#10
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2021
Messages: 14,017
Mentions "j'aime": 4,585
Quoting: dpdan
Would you rather have picks or prospects? I’m wondering if say a player that already has some AHL time under his belt and grades out as a middle 6 or 2nd pair D might help more in the next two years before they can really reset the roster moving forward


Picks would likely fit the time table better.
12 janv. 2022 à 15 h 56
#11
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 5,617
Mentions "j'aime": 2,763
bruins arent trading either goalie. swayman is the goalie of the future. rask wants another shot at a cup. I dont see boston asking ullmark to waive his nmc 1 year removed from FA. just wont happen, you want get free agents to come to you if you trade them quickly after signing.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage