SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Most Id Pay For Klingberg

Créé par: CoopsTroops
Équipe: 2021-22 Lightning de Tampa Bay
Date de création initiale: 9 janv. 2022
Publié: 9 janv. 2022
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
Klingberg would only be a 1 year rental, so this is the most I'd offer. No additional first or Thompson.

I'd prefer not to trade for him, but JBB has proven himself as a big-ticket TDL buyer.
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
CRÉÉANSCAP HIT
Klingberg, John
11 062 500 $
Transactions
1.
TBL
  1. Klingberg, John (2 125 000 $ retained)
DAL
  1. Foote, Cal
  2. Rutta, Jan
  3. Choix de 1e ronde en 2022 (TBL)
  4. Choix de 3e ronde en 2023 (TBL)
2.
TBL
    Pleasure doing business
    DET
    1. Choix de 4e ronde en 2023 (TBL)
    Rachats de contrats
    Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
    2022
    Logo de TBL
    Logo de TBL
    Logo de DET
    Logo de TBL
    Logo de NYR
    2023
    Logo de TBL
    Logo de TBL
    Logo de TBL
    Logo de TBL
    Logo de ANA
    2024
    Logo de TBL
    Logo de TBL
    Logo de TBL
    Logo de TBL
    Logo de TBL
    Logo de TBL
    Logo de TBL
    TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
    2281 500 000 $81 161 788 $145 122 $0 $338 212 $
    Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
    Logo de Lightning de Tampa Bay
    5 300 000 $5 300 000 $
    AG, AD
    M-NTC
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Lightning de Tampa Bay
    6 750 000 $6 750 000 $
    C, AD
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Lightning de Tampa Bay
    9 500 000 $9 500 000 $
    AD
    NMC
    UFA - 6
    Logo de Lightning de Tampa Bay
    4 450 000 $4 450 000 $
    AD, AG
    M-NTC
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Lightning de Tampa Bay
    4 800 000 $4 800 000 $
    C, AG
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Lightning de Tampa Bay
    8 500 000 $8 500 000 $
    AG, C
    NMC
    UFA - 3
    Logo de Lightning de Tampa Bay
    900 000 $900 000 $
    AG, AD
    M-NTC
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Lightning de Tampa Bay
    1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
    C, AG
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Lightning de Tampa Bay
    1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
    AD
    NTC
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Lightning de Tampa Bay
    737 500 $737 500 $
    AG, AD
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Lightning de Tampa Bay
    1 125 000 $1 125 000 $
    C, AG
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Lightning de Tampa Bay
    758 333 $758 333 $
    AD
    RFA - 3
    Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
    Logo de Lightning de Tampa Bay
    7 875 000 $7 875 000 $
    DG
    NMC
    UFA - 4
    Klingberg, John
    1 062 500 $1 062 500 $
    Logo de Lightning de Tampa Bay
    9 500 000 $9 500 000 $
    G
    NMC
    UFA - 7
    Logo de Lightning de Tampa Bay
    6 750 000 $6 750 000 $
    DG
    NTC
    UFA - 5
    Logo de Lightning de Tampa Bay
    2 950 000 $2 950 000 $
    DD
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Lightning de Tampa Bay
    900 000 $900 000 $
    G
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Lightning de Tampa Bay
    4 800 000 $4 800 000 $
    DG/DD
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Lightning de Tampa Bay
    850 000 $850 000 $
    DD
    NTC
    UFA - 3
    Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
    Logo de Lightning de Tampa Bay
    750 000 $750 000 $
    DD
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Lightning de Tampa Bay
    6 875 000 $6 875 000 $
    DD
    NMC
    UFA - 3
    Logo de Lightning de Tampa Bay
    758 333 $758 333 $
    AG
    RFA - 3
    Logo de Stars de Dallas
    2 125 000 $2 125 000 $
    DD
    UFA - 1
    Équipe de réserve
    Logo de Lightning de Tampa Bay
    750 000 $750 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
    AG
    UFA - 1

    Code d'intégration

    • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
    • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

    Texte intégré

    Cliquer pour surligner
    9 janv. 2022 à 4 h 12
    #1
    What in tarnation
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: oct. 2017
    Messages: 32,708
    Mentions "j'aime": 31,448
    I'd take it
    EsoYeezus69, Goofie, SlevinKalevra and 1 other person a aimé ceci.
    9 janv. 2022 à 5 h 19
    #2
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juill. 2021
    Messages: 6,457
    Mentions "j'aime": 2,421
    And TB gets an injury on the back end and are done they'd be forced into Sustr no thanks
    9 janv. 2022 à 5 h 23
    #3
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juill. 2021
    Messages: 6,457
    Mentions "j'aime": 2,421
    JBB has also shown he doesn't trade current roster players away at the TDL
    9 janv. 2022 à 8 h 47
    #4
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: déc. 2017
    Messages: 21,485
    Mentions "j'aime": 11,898
    So Detroit is retaining?
    CoopsTroops a aimé ceci.
    9 janv. 2022 à 15 h 19
    #5
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juill. 2019
    Messages: 2,445
    Mentions "j'aime": 546
    I wouldn't trade both Rutta and Foote. Tampa won't be able to re-sign Klingberg, so gutting the future of the right side is a short sighted move. I'd offer Rutta, 1st+ one of the top D prospects that Tampa has(Schmidt or Thompson perhaps), and then an additional 3rd or 4th for the 25% retention to make it work, but that's about it. Tampa's window isn't closed after this year, so there's no reason to really go that "all in" with this move.
    9 janv. 2022 à 15 h 44
    #6
    Démarrer sujet
    Rutta 4ever
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: sept. 2020
    Messages: 4,539
    Mentions "j'aime": 3,913
    Modifié 9 janv. 2022 à 15 h 50
    Quoting: JTBF81
    I wouldn't trade both Rutta and Foote. Tampa won't be able to re-sign Klingberg, so gutting the future of the right side is a short sighted move. I'd offer Rutta, 1st+ one of the top D prospects that Tampa has(Schmidt or Thompson perhaps), and then an additional 3rd or 4th for the 25% retention to make it work, but that's about it. Tampa's window isn't closed after this year, so there's no reason to really go that "all in" with this move.


    I wouldn't consider this an all in move.

    We are accustomed to never having our current season's first round pick after the trade deadline, I still have my reservations about Foote ever developing into anything more than a third pairing defender, and there's no guarantee Rutta returns next year to begin with.

    We'd do just fine with Cernak, Bogosian, and Sustr as our right-side defenders until another TDL add next season. Rutta and Foote will not be make-it-or-break-it options for the team.

    I wouldn't trade Thompson under any circumstance. He's the closest thing we have to a Makar or Fox in our prospect pool at defense. Probably will never top out at their level, but his offensive talent is legit.
    9 janv. 2022 à 16 h 8
    #7
    Jones is Underpaid
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: mars 2021
    Messages: 1,481
    Mentions "j'aime": 939
    Yeah, I think Dallas would take that.
    9 janv. 2022 à 18 h 10
    #8
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juill. 2019
    Messages: 2,445
    Mentions "j'aime": 546
    Quoting: CoopsTroops
    I wouldn't consider this an all in move.

    We are accustomed to never having our current season's first round pick after the trade deadline, I still have my reservations about Foote ever developing into anything more than a third pairing defender, and there's no guarantee Rutta returns next year to begin with.

    We'd do just fine with Cernak, Bogosian, and Sustr as our right-side defenders until another TDL add next season. Rutta and Foote will not be make-it-or-break-it options for the team.

    I wouldn't trade Thompson under any circumstance. He's the closest thing we have to a Makar or Fox in our prospect pool at defense. Probably will never top out at their level, but his offensive talent is legit.


    Any team that has to rely on Sustr as a top 6 regular is in bad shape. Furthermore, the defense never stays healthy all year, so then they are in even worse trouble next year when that inevitably happens. Foote has improved but is still iffy on whether he will make a top 4 role, but his cost controlled status makes him more valuable to the team. I could see Foote as part of a trade for a defensive upgrade, but not for a rental they have no hope of keeping.
    9 janv. 2022 à 19 h 30
    #9
    Démarrer sujet
    Rutta 4ever
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: sept. 2020
    Messages: 4,539
    Mentions "j'aime": 3,913
    Quoting: JTBF81
    Any team that has to rely on Sustr as a top 6 regular is in bad shape. Furthermore, the defense never stays healthy all year, so then they are in even worse trouble next year when that inevitably happens. Foote has improved but is still iffy on whether he will make a top 4 role, but his cost controlled status makes him more valuable to the team. I could see Foote as part of a trade for a defensive upgrade, but not for a rental they have no hope of keeping.


    We don't get defensive upgrades with our cap situation. It's gets by with the left side and Cernak, and then drop a bunch of assets at the TDL on a double retention want/need.
    9 janv. 2022 à 21 h 5
    #10
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juill. 2019
    Messages: 2,445
    Mentions "j'aime": 546
    Quoting: CoopsTroops
    We don't get defensive upgrades with our cap situation. It's gets by with the left side and Cernak, and then drop a bunch of assets at the TDL on a double retention want/need.


    They could easily get a real RD upgrade if they moved Foote+other assets, but if they did thos trade thwy would be awful on the right side next year, just awful. Bogo always misses time, Sustr is one of the worst defenseman this team has ever had the misfortune of icing, so that leaves one real RD next year. By '23-'24, hopefully Thompson is ready and the team possibly re-signs Rutta, but if they are going for a rental UFA, there are cheaper options that will still serve Tampa's needs.
    10 janv. 2022 à 13 h 24
    #11
    Boi
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: févr. 2020
    Messages: 1,947
    Mentions "j'aime": 379
    No need to make this trade not to mention it’s a big overpay for a player that’s gonna be gone after playoffs
     
    Répondre
    To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
    Question:
    Options:
    Ajouter une option
    Soumettre le sondage