SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Nucks year 2

Créé par: theleano1
Équipe: 2022-23 Canucks de Vancouver
Date de création initiale: 8 janv. 2022
Publié: 8 janv. 2022
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
Year 2 to show the cap works with a flat cap
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
17 500 000 $
2925 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
16 000 000 $
11 500 000 $
12 000 000 $
1750 000 $
2750 000 $
Transactions
VAN
    Klingberg, John
    DAL
    1. Hamonic, Travis
    2. Poolman, Tucker
    3. Rathbone, Jack [Droits de RFA]
    4. Choix de 1e ronde en 2022 (VAN)
    5. Choix de 3e ronde en 2022 (WPG)
    Rachats de contrats
    Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
    2022
    Logo de VAN
    Logo de VAN
    Logo de VAN
    Logo de VAN
    2023
    Logo de VAN
    Logo de VAN
    Logo de VAN
    Logo de VAN
    Logo de VAN
    Logo de VAN
    2024
    Logo de VAN
    Logo de VAN
    Logo de VAN
    Logo de VAN
    Logo de VAN
    Logo de VAN
    Logo de VAN
    TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
    2281 500 000 $80 926 667 $1 250 000 $1 150 000 $573 333 $

    Formation

    Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
    Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
    4 950 000 $4 950 000 $
    AD, AG
    UFA - 4
    Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
    7 350 000 $7 350 000 $
    C, AG
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
    7 500 000 $7 500 000 $
    AD
    UFA - 3
    Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
    891 667 $891 667 $ (Bonis de performance300 000 $$300K)
    AG, AD
    RFA - 1
    Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
    5 250 000 $5 250 000 $
    C, AG, AD
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
    925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
    AD, AG
    RFA - 2
    Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
    2 650 000 $2 650 000 $
    C, AG
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
    4 125 000 $4 125 000 $
    C
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
    3 250 000 $3 250 000 $
    AG
    M-NTC
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
    1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
    AG, AD
    UFA - 1
    750 000 $750 000 $
    C, AD
    UFA
    Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
    750 000 $750 000 $
    AD
    UFA - 1
    Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
    Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
    7 850 000 $7 850 000 $
    DG
    UFA - 5
    6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
    DD
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
    5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
    G
    UFA - 4
    Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
    7 260 000 $7 260 000 $
    DG
    NMC
    UFA - 5
    Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
    6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
    DD
    M-NTC
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
    850 000 $850 000 $
    DD
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
    925 000 $925 000 $
    G
    RFA - 1
    2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
    DG
    UFA - 3
    Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
    Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
    750 000 $750 000 $
    C, AG
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
    3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
    AG, AD
    M-NTC
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
    750 000 $750 000 $
    DG/DD
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
    762 500 $762 500 $
    DD
    UFA - 1

    Code d'intégration

    • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
    • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

    Texte intégré

    Cliquer pour surligner
    8 janv. 2022 à 4 h 17
    #1
    Banni
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: sept. 2021
    Messages: 12,418
    Mentions "j'aime": 2,630
    Canucks aren't giving up that package to bring in Klingberg, and none of Klingberg, McNabb, or Motte is signing one year deals on their next contracts
    8 janv. 2022 à 4 h 20
    #2
    Démarrer sujet
    PDG over PDO
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: févr. 2020
    Messages: 4,976
    Mentions "j'aime": 4,044
    Quoting: Knuckl3s
    Canucks aren't giving up that package to bring in Klingberg, and none of Klingberg, McNabb, or Motte is signing one year deals on their next contracts

    i just forgot to change the years on the contracts, what would be a fair package for Klingberg? we are giving up 2 cap dumps maybe a 2nd instead of a 1st?
    8 janv. 2022 à 4 h 27
    #3
    Banni
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: sept. 2021
    Messages: 12,418
    Mentions "j'aime": 2,630
    Quoting: theleano1
    i just forgot to change the years on the contracts, what would be a fair package for Klingberg? we are giving up 2 cap dumps maybe a 2nd instead of a 1st?


    Canucks GM said they aren't trading any high draft picks right now. Also, Klingberg will likely be asking for more money than you are giving him, he would have to take a fairly team friendly contract for Vancouver to fit him under their cap, and he likely wants more term than they are comfortable giving him, plus he's already 30 years old
    8 janv. 2022 à 4 h 40
    #4
    Démarrer sujet
    PDG over PDO
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: févr. 2020
    Messages: 4,976
    Mentions "j'aime": 4,044
    Quoting: Knuckl3s
    Canucks GM said they aren't trading any high draft picks right now. Also, Klingberg will likely be asking for more money than you are giving him, he would have to take a fairly team friendly contract for Vancouver to fit him under their cap, and he likely wants more term than they are comfortable giving him, plus he's already 30 years old


    He's looking for about a 7mill a year deal i gave him 6 since he is having a down year. Don't think he will sign an 8 year deal either. the old JB special of a 6x6 should do it as i think his game can still be played at a good level at 36. i know JR said that but let's be honest there is countless examples of GM's going back on what they said Klingberg isn't that old he is 29 (30this summer) he still has a good 3.5 years left of prime hockey in him, he is only a year older then Miller. as suggested in my other comment a 2nd instead of a 1st is almost a no brainer for us. he is a legit top 4 RHD on 95% of the leagues d-cores still. RHD is a big need for us. he is a fine 2 way player we don't need a strictly chris tanev esc dman
    8 janv. 2022 à 5 h 16
    #5
    What in tarnation
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: oct. 2017
    Messages: 32,708
    Mentions "j'aime": 31,448
    Quoting: theleano1
    He's looking for about a 7mill a year deal i gave him 6 since he is having a down year. Don't think he will sign an 8 year deal either. the old JB special of a 6x6 should do it as i think his game can still be played at a good level at 36. i know JR said that but let's be honest there is countless examples of GM's going back on what they said Klingberg isn't that old he is 29 (30this summer) he still has a good 3.5 years left of prime hockey in him, he is only a year older then Miller. as suggested in my other comment a 2nd instead of a 1st is almost a no brainer for us. he is a legit top 4 RHD on 95% of the leagues d-cores still. RHD is a big need for us. he is a fine 2 way player we don't need a strictly chris tanev esc dman


    He was looking $8M+ from the Stars. That number is closer to $9M in Canada. Not saying he's worth that, but if he agreed to $7M I think Dallas would've kept him.
    8 janv. 2022 à 5 h 18
    #6
    Banni
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: sept. 2021
    Messages: 12,418
    Mentions "j'aime": 2,630
    Quoting: justaBoss
    He was looking $8M+ from the Stars. That number is closer to $9M in Canada. Not saying he's worth that, but if he agreed to $7M I think Dallas would've kept him.


    Probably. Personally though, I wouldn't give Klingberg more than 7.25M on a long-term deal
    theleano1 a aimé ceci.
    8 janv. 2022 à 5 h 18
    #7
    What in tarnation
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: oct. 2017
    Messages: 32,708
    Mentions "j'aime": 31,448
    Quoting: Knuckl3s
    Probably. Personally though, I wouldn't give Klingberg more than 7.25M on a long-term deal


    Me neither.
    8 janv. 2022 à 5 h 22
    #8
    Banni
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: sept. 2021
    Messages: 12,418
    Mentions "j'aime": 2,630
    Quoting: justaBoss
    Me neither.


    They guy is going to be 30 when he's UFA eligible. Klinger is crazy if he thinks he has enough leverage to ask for $8-9 million AAV long-term
    8 janv. 2022 à 5 h 26
    #9
    What in tarnation
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: oct. 2017
    Messages: 32,708
    Mentions "j'aime": 31,448
    Quoting: Knuckl3s
    They guy is going to be 30 when he's UFA eligible. Klinger is crazy if he thinks he has enough leverage to ask for $8-9 million AAV long-term


    Reports said he wanted $62-66 mil total on a 7-8 year extension with the Stars. DAL wouldn't cave in to those demands. This was at the very beginning of the season started to I'm not fully sure is he still after such numbers but I gotta imagine they haven't dropped much as his and Stars' negotiations hit a brick wall.
    8 janv. 2022 à 5 h 29
    #10
    Banni
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: sept. 2021
    Messages: 12,418
    Mentions "j'aime": 2,630
    Quoting: justaBoss
    Reports said he wanted $62-66 mil total on a 7-8 year extension with the Stars. DAL wouldn't cave in to those demands. This was at the very beginning of the season started to I'm not fully sure is he still after such numbers but I gotta imagine they haven't dropped much as his and Stars' negotiations hit a brick wall.


    Dallas doesn't even know how much longer they are going to be competitive they're so old already lol, who knows if re-signing Klingberg long-term is even the best thing for themselves
    8 janv. 2022 à 5 h 32
    #11
    What in tarnation
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: oct. 2017
    Messages: 32,708
    Mentions "j'aime": 31,448
    Quoting: Knuckl3s
    Dallas doesn't even know how much longer they are going to be competitive they're so old already lol, who knows if re-signing Klingberg long-term is even the best thing for themselves


    It's not, but it's better than losing him for free or moving him dirt cheap.

    As for this trade suggestion, I'm not a huge fan. Taking two cap dumps is not in the plans.
    EsoYeezus69 a aimé ceci.
    8 janv. 2022 à 5 h 39
    #12
    Banni
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: sept. 2021
    Messages: 12,418
    Mentions "j'aime": 2,630
    Quoting: justaBoss
    It's not, but it's better than losing him for free or moving him dirt cheap.

    As for this trade suggestion, I'm not a huge fan. Taking two cap dumps is not in the plans.


    Poolman and Hamonic aren't really cap dumps but obviously neither of them have much value especially compared to Klingberg
    8 janv. 2022 à 5 h 53
    #13
    What in tarnation
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: oct. 2017
    Messages: 32,708
    Mentions "j'aime": 31,448
    Quoting: Knuckl3s
    Poolman and Hamonic aren't really cap dumps but obviously neither of them have much value especially compared to Klingberg


    For us they are. Both are overpaid 3rd pair D-men, and we already have Hakanpää in that role.
    EsoYeezus69 a aimé ceci.
    8 janv. 2022 à 6 h 1
    #14
    Banni
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: sept. 2021
    Messages: 12,418
    Mentions "j'aime": 2,630
    Quoting: justaBoss
    For us they are. Both are overpaid 3rd pair D-men, and we already have Hakanpää in that role.


    Not overpaid by that much, and I would argue both of them are better than Hakanpaa, cause he's overpaid too
    theleano1 a aimé ceci.
    8 janv. 2022 à 6 h 3
    #15
    What in tarnation
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: oct. 2017
    Messages: 32,708
    Mentions "j'aime": 31,448
    Quoting: Knuckl3s
    Not overpaid by that much, and I would argue both of them are better than Hakanpaa


    Well that's where I disagree completely, but I think we've had that discussion already.
    EsoYeezus69 a aimé ceci.
    8 janv. 2022 à 6 h 5
    #16
    Banni
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: sept. 2021
    Messages: 12,418
    Mentions "j'aime": 2,630
    Quoting: justaBoss
    Well that's where I disagree completely, but I think we've had that discussion already.


    When the hell have we done that? Poolman and Hamonic might be slightly overpaid, but they are still both very effective 3rd pair guys. Hakanpaa isn't a great skater or puck mover but he's physical
     
    Répondre
    To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
    Question:
    Options:
    Ajouter une option
    Soumettre le sondage