SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Tank for Jiricek

Créé par: SlevinKalevra
Équipe: 2021-22 Stars de Dallas
Date de création initiale: 21 déc. 2021
Publié: 6 janv. 2022
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
See if you can get Ottawa or Detroit to bite on Lindell in the offseason. Find a proper head coach
Transactions
1.
DAL
  1. Pajuniemi, Lauri
  2. Choix de 1e ronde en 2022 (NYR)
NYR
  1. Pavelski, Joe (3 500 000 $ retained)
2.
DAL
  1. Holl, Justin
  2. Choix de 1e ronde en 2022 (TOR)
  3. Choix de 4e ronde en 2023 (TOR)
TOR
  1. Klingberg, John (2 125 000 $ retained)
3.
DAL
  1. Koskinen, Mikko
  2. Choix de 2e ronde en 2022 (EDM)
  3. Choix de 4e ronde en 2023 (EDM)
4.
DAL
  1. Choix de 3e ronde en 2022 (FLA)
FLA
  1. Radulov, Alexander (3 125 000 $ retained)
5.
DAL
  1. Choix de 4e ronde en 2022 (NYI)
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Enfoui
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2022
Logo de DAL
Logo de NYR
Logo de TOR
Logo de DAL
Logo de EDM
Logo de DAL
Logo de FLA
Logo de DAL
Logo de NYI
Logo de DAL
Logo de DAL
Logo de DAL
2023
Logo de DAL
Logo de DAL
Logo de DAL
Logo de DAL
Logo de TOR
Logo de EDM
Logo de DAL
Logo de DAL
Logo de DAL
2024
Logo de DAL
Logo de DAL
Logo de DAL
Logo de DAL
Logo de DAL
Logo de DAL
Logo de DAL
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2181 500 000 $73 205 406 $927 073 $832 500 $8 294 594 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Stars de Dallas
795 000 $795 000 $ (Bonis de performance82 500 $$82K)
AG, AD
RFA - 1
Logo de Stars de Dallas
3 150 000 $3 150 000 $
C
UFA - 2
Logo de Stars de Dallas
9 850 000 $9 850 000 $
C, AD
NMC
UFA - 6
Logo de Stars de Dallas
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance212 500 $$212K)
AG
RFA - 1
Logo de Stars de Dallas
9 500 000 $9 500 000 $
AG, C
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo de Stars de Dallas
2 550 000 $2 550 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Stars de Dallas
750 000 $750 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Stars de Dallas
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
C, AD, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Stars de Dallas
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Stars de Dallas
750 000 $750 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Stars de Dallas
725 000 $725 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Stars de Dallas
750 000 $750 000 $
AG, AD
RFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Stars de Dallas
5 800 000 $5 800 000 $
DG
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo de Stars de Dallas
8 450 000 $8 450 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 8
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
4 500 000 $4 500 000 $
G
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Stars de Dallas
3 650 000 $3 650 000 $
DG
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Stars de Dallas
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance537 500 $$538K)
G
RFA - 1
Logo de Stars de Dallas
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Stars de Dallas
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
DD
UFA - 3
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Stars de Dallas
750 000 $750 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 2
Logo de Stars de Dallas
4 916 667 $4 916 667 $
G
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 2

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
6 janv. 2022 à 19 h 53
#1
Deleted
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2021
Messages: 3,175
Mentions "j'aime": 1,812
You could probably get a better return on Klingberg
6 janv. 2022 à 19 h 54
#2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2019
Messages: 7,863
Mentions "j'aime": 4,119
Why are you giving away Faksa for only a fourth? Just if he was right handed, and we had the cap.. in my opinion, he’s very good for a 3c. Also, can we take the fourth, and Kiviranta out of the trade? If so, getting a better goalie in Holtby, and a depth guy in Raffl, I think we would have to accept, if we want to make the playoffs and go far.
6 janv. 2022 à 20 h 0
#3
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 5,282
Mentions "j'aime": 2,731
Quoting: Nate
You could probably get a better return on Klingberg


I went conservative considering he’s having a down year. If Nill gets first round picks for Pavs and Klinger along with some other pieces I would consider the TDL a win
Goofie a aimé ceci.
6 janv. 2022 à 20 h 4
#4
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 5,282
Mentions "j'aime": 2,731
Quoting: Nhl_oilers
Why are you giving away Faksa for only a fourth? Just if he was right handed, and we had the cap.. in my opinion, he’s very good for a 3c. Also, can we take the fourth, and Kiviranta out of the trade? If so, getting a better goalie in Holtby, and a depth guy in Raffl, I think we would have to accept, if we want to make the playoffs and go far.


Faksa is over paid and overrated. He doesn’t use his size any more so Glendening does the same job for cheaper. I’d be fine with taking Kivi and the fourth out of the deal. Just figured he might be an upgrade in a different system over some of the other depth players in Edmonton. I think Raffl and Holtby would be good adds for the Oilers
Nhl_oilers et Goofie a aimé ceci.
6 janv. 2022 à 20 h 6
#5
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2019
Messages: 7,863
Mentions "j'aime": 4,119
Quoting: SlevinKalevra
Faksa is over paid and overrated. He doesn’t use his size any more so Glendening does the same job for cheaper. I’d be fine with taking Kivi and the fourth out of the deal. Just figured he might be an upgrade in a different system over some of the other depth players in Edmonton. I think Raffl and Holtby would be good adds for the Oilers


With him only having 2 points thus far, we won’t need him. If he had more I would definitely want him! Most of our depth guys have more than 2 points. I agree about Holtby, and Raffl.
6 janv. 2022 à 20 h 11
#6
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2019
Messages: 6,270
Mentions "j'aime": 3,025
Klingberg is a bad fit for Toronto. He's not going to get the offensive opportunities that would make this kind of price worthwhile and might not even have time on the 1st PP unit. They need the guy who's PKing rather than the one who quarterbacks the PP.
6 janv. 2022 à 20 h 16
#7
MGITBPITNHL
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2020
Messages: 3,495
Mentions "j'aime": 1,530
It’s a yes from me
6 janv. 2022 à 20 h 31
#8
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 3,629
Mentions "j'aime": 1,515
A big NO Thanks from the Rangers for me. Not trading a 1st round pick for an aging rental, no matter how much I like Pavelski.
6 janv. 2022 à 20 h 32
#9
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2019
Messages: 1,823
Mentions "j'aime": 1,117
Klingberg could be a nice target for Florida. Their PP is not that good surprisingly. And, this is a must year for them to make a deep PO run.
EsoYeezus69 a aimé ceci.
6 janv. 2022 à 21 h 6
#10
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 5,282
Mentions "j'aime": 2,731
Quoting: Phleb2
Klingberg could be a nice target for Florida. Their PP is not that good surprisingly. And, this is a must year for them to make a deep PO run.


I’d be fine with that as well. Maybe one of their forward prospects and a second
Goofie a aimé ceci.
6 janv. 2022 à 21 h 7
#11
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 5,282
Mentions "j'aime": 2,731
Quoting: delneggs
A big NO Thanks from the Rangers for me. Not trading a 1st round pick for an aging rental, no matter how much I like Pavelski.


He would be dynamite for the Rangers. Perfect fit for the young talent and play style. Well worth a first and a prospect. We can agree to disagree tho
Masonh618 a aimé ceci.
6 janv. 2022 à 21 h 9
#12
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2020
Messages: 1,442
Mentions "j'aime": 728
Oilers accept.
6 janv. 2022 à 21 h 10
#13
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 5,282
Mentions "j'aime": 2,731
Quoting: Nhl_oilers
With him only having 2 points thus far, we won’t need him. If he had more I would definitely want him! Most of our depth guys have more than 2 points. I agree about Holtby, and Raffl.


I think he would do better with better line mates in a more offensive system, but again taking him and the fourth out wouldn’t keep me up at night
Nhl_oilers a aimé ceci.
6 janv. 2022 à 21 h 13
#14
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 5,282
Mentions "j'aime": 2,731
Quoting: Byrr
Klingberg is a bad fit for Toronto. He's not going to get the offensive opportunities that would make this kind of price worthwhile and might not even have time on the 1st PP unit. They need the guy who's PKing rather than the one who quarterbacks the PP.


That’s fair. Klinger to Toronto has just been popular on here for a while now and I’d like to see him go somewhere with some juicy forward talent and a more aggressive system. But not Rado. Rado doesn’t deserve any more nice things lmao
6 janv. 2022 à 21 h 28
#15
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2019
Messages: 1,823
Mentions "j'aime": 1,117
Quoting: SlevinKalevra
I’d be fine with that as well. Maybe one of their forward prospects and a second


Owen Tippett and a second round pick? Second round pick could turn into a first if they go on the SC finals or if Klingberg signs with them?
6 janv. 2022 à 21 h 29
#16
Jinx god
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2019
Messages: 10,201
Mentions "j'aime": 13,729
Quoting: Phleb2
Klingberg could be a nice target for Florida. Their PP is not that good surprisingly. And, this is a must year for them to make a deep PO run.


I thought about them too, but I’m not sure if they’d want him knowing that they can’t sign him next year.

Because they’ve got the enticing pieces, and a lot of them.
Goofie a aimé ceci.
6 janv. 2022 à 21 h 31
#17
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2019
Messages: 1,823
Mentions "j'aime": 1,117
Quoting: EsoYeezus69
I thought about them too, but I’m not sure if they’d want him knowing that they can’t sign him next year.

Because they’ve got the enticing pieces, and a lot of them.


Yeah, they would need to move pieces if they wanted to sign him.
EsoYeezus69 a aimé ceci.
6 janv. 2022 à 22 h 1
#18
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 3,629
Mentions "j'aime": 1,515
Quoting: SlevinKalevra
He would be dynamite for the Rangers. Perfect fit for the young talent and play style. Well worth a first and a prospect. We can agree to disagree tho


I know Pavelski well having him watched him play for the Sharks for years, and would have no problem with him as a rental for this year, but NOT at that cost. No way I give a first round pick. A prospect and a 3rd round, maybe or just a 2nd round pick. If that's not enough, keep him and trade him elsewhere.
6 janv. 2022 à 22 h 31
#19
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2019
Messages: 1,823
Mentions "j'aime": 1,117
Quoting: delneggs
I know Pavelski well having him watched him play for the Sharks for years, and would have no problem with him as a rental for this year, but NOT at that cost. No way I give a first round pick. A prospect and a 3rd round, maybe or just a 2nd round pick. If that's not enough, keep him and trade him elsewhere.


You are entitled to your opinion, of course. But if you look at the history of « rental price » of that caliber level, a first round pick is the starting point of discussion. This, regardless of age since the players in question are usually UFA after the season.

If you have a legit chance to go all the way this year with help from a player like Pavelski, I am pretty sure that your GM would not hesitate to pull the trigger. You never know if in the following years you will get a similar chance. Injuries, for example, can ruin a season.
6 janv. 2022 à 22 h 38
#20
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 3,629
Mentions "j'aime": 1,515
Quoting: Phleb2
You are entitled to your opinion, of course. But if you look at the history of « rental price » of that caliber level, a first round pick is the starting point of discussion. This, regardless of age since the players in question are usually UFA after the season.

If you have a legit chance to go all the way this year with help from a player like Pavelski, I am pretty sure that your GM would not hesitate to pull the trigger. You never know if in the following years you will get a similar chance. Injuries, for example, can ruin a season.


Not disagreeing with any of what you said above. The point I am making is Pavelski has less value to the Rangers than he does to other teams because of Chris Kreider. Pavelski is really good in front of the net and on the PP, but he won't get that ice time with the Rangers because Kreider has that job sewn up on the 1st PP unit and their 1st PP unit probably averages 1:30 of every 2:00 minutes, and sometimes they don't even leave the ice. I like Joe, and if he were younger and they could afford him, I would love to have him, but at this point in time, with the team the Rangers have, he isn't worth a 1st round pick as a rental....IMO. They would be better served going after Reilly Smith.
Goofie a aimé ceci.
6 janv. 2022 à 23 h 7
#21
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2019
Messages: 1,823
Mentions "j'aime": 1,117
Quoting: delneggs
Not disagreeing with any of what you said above. The point I am making is Pavelski has less value to the Rangers than he does to other teams because of Chris Kreider. Pavelski is really good in front of the net and on the PP, but he won't get that ice time with the Rangers because Kreider has that job sewn up on the 1st PP unit and their 1st PP unit probably averages 1:30 of every 2:00 minutes, and sometimes they don't even leave the ice. I like Joe, and if he were younger and they could afford him, I would love to have him, but at this point in time, with the team the Rangers have, he isn't worth a 1st round pick as a rental....IMO. They would be better served going after Reilly Smith.


We can send you Radulov for a 3rd round pick.
6 janv. 2022 à 23 h 17
#22
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 3,629
Mentions "j'aime": 1,515
Quoting: Phleb2
We can send you Radulov for a 3rd round pick.


I think Father Time has caught up with him. Reilly Smith is a much better option for the Rangers.
Goofie et SlevinKalevra a aimé ceci.
6 janv. 2022 à 23 h 36
#23
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2019
Messages: 1,823
Mentions "j'aime": 1,117
Quoting: delneggs
I think Father Time has caught up with him. Reilly Smith is a much better option for the Rangers.


You’re right but if you struck out with Smith, give us a call
6 janv. 2022 à 23 h 38
#24
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 3,629
Mentions "j'aime": 1,515
Quoting: Phleb2
You’re right but if you struck out with Smith, give us a call


Quite frankly, I'm fine with Rangers making no additions and keep letting the kids play. It will only pay off down the road.
7 janv. 2022 à 1 h 0
#25
MGITBPITNHL
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2020
Messages: 3,495
Mentions "j'aime": 1,530
Quoting: delneggs
I think Father Time has caught up with him. Reilly Smith is a much better option for the Rangers.


What does Reilly Smith do that Joe Pavelski doesn’t do?
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage