SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Lottery Win 2023 Contenders

Créé par: Wadejos123
Équipe: 2022-23 Blackhawks de Chicago
Date de création initiale: 5 janv. 2022
Publié: 5 janv. 2022
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
1874 125 $
14 000 000 $
1850 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
55 500 000 $
15 000 000 $
36 000 000 $
11 000 000 $
CRÉÉANSCAP HIT
Wright, Shane
3925 000 $
Transactions
1.
CHI
  1. Choix de 1e ronde en 2022 (CHI)
CBJ
  1. Choix de 1e ronde en 2023 (CHI)
2.
CHI
  1. Choix de 1e ronde en 2022 (EDM)
  2. Choix de 2e ronde en 2023 (EDM)
Détails additionnels:
Koskinen

Conditions on Kieth trade removed
EDM
  1. Strome, Dylan [Droits de RFA]
Détails additionnels:
MAF @ 50%

TDL 2022
3.
CHI
  1. Chychrun, Jakob
Détails additionnels:
Dach and a 1st for chychrun

2nd for the cap dumps (roughly 3.5 mil dead cap hit after buyouts)
ARI
  1. Connolly, Brett
  2. Dach, Kirby [Droits de RFA]
  3. Johnson, Tyler
  4. Choix de 1e ronde en 2022 (EDM)
  5. Choix de 2e ronde en 2023 (TBL)
Détails additionnels:
Johnson waives to AZ because they agree to a buyout
4.
CHI
  1. Choix de 4e ronde en 2022 (PIT)
PIT
  1. Borgström, Henrik
Détails additionnels:
anywhere
Frais appliqués
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2022
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de EDM
Logo de TOR
Logo de VGK
Logo de CHI
Logo de PIT
Logo de CHI
Logo de CBJ
Logo de CHI
2023
Logo de CHI
Logo de EDM
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
2024
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2282 500 000 $77 308 837 $237 500 $1 275 000 $5 191 163 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
6 400 000 $6 400 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
C
UFA - 7
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
2 625 000 $2 625 000 $
AD
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance425 000 $$425K)
AG, C
RFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
10 500 000 $10 500 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 1
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
4 000 000 $4 000 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Wright, Shane
925 000 $925 000 $
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
975 000 $975 000 $
AG, C
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
800 000 $800 000 $
AG, C
RFA - 2
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Coyotes de l'Arizona
4 600 000 $4 600 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 3
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
9 500 000 $9 500 000 $
DD
NMC
UFA - 8
5 500 000 $5 500 000 $
G
UFA - 5
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
DG/DD
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
4 400 000 $4 400 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
883 750 $883 750 $
G
RFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
1 350 000 $1 350 000 $
DG
RFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
DD
RFA - 1
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
874 125 $874 125 $
AG, C, AD
RFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
850 000 $850 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
5 janv. 2022 à 19 h 52
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2020
Messages: 4,742
Mentions "j'aime": 3,509
TJ’s buyout is 5.6M cash and 7.2M deadcap for reference Marleau was 6.25M cap and 4M cash. So this offer for Chychrun is essentially Dach. Then you’d have to determine how Arizona would value Connolly.
5 janv. 2022 à 21 h 35
#2
Nah.
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2020
Messages: 4,361
Mentions "j'aime": 4,177
I think TOR does everything in their power to keep Campbell.

Not sure Pavelski, at his age, is going to settle for anything less than a sure-fire Stanley Cup contender. More likely to see him take a discount to go play for COL, VGK, or TB, or something like that.

Kadri as your 1C is…bold. I’d be very concerned about regression once he is no longer playing on a high-powered offense like he has with TML and COL. He’ll be 32 at the start of next season.

Quoting: BStinson
TJ’s buyout is 5.6M cash and 7.2M deadcap for reference Marleau was 6.25M cap and 4M cash. So this offer for Chychrun is essentially Dach. Then you’d have to determine how Arizona would value Connolly.


And this. If I’m AZ I ask for more. TJ alone is going to cost a 1st+ To dump. Once you start talking the base value for Chychrun, Dach is just a starting point, imo.
Wadejos123 a aimé ceci.
5 janv. 2022 à 21 h 37
#3
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2017
Messages: 8,186
Mentions "j'aime": 4,797
Quoting: dopplsan
I think TOR does everything in their power to keep Campbell.

Not sure Pavelski, at his age, is going to settle for anything less than a sure-fire Stanley Cup contender. More likely to see him take a discount to go play for COL, VGK, or TB, or something like that.

Kadri as your 1C is…bold. I’d be very concerned about regression once he is no longer playing on a high-powered offense like he has with TML and COL. He’ll be 32 at the start of next season.


Kadri in between Kane and Debrincat should work I would think. And he's an upgrade over Dach no doubt eigther way
5 janv. 2022 à 21 h 49
#4
Bedard23
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2021
Messages: 9,256
Mentions "j'aime": 4,439
Just hope 2023 isn’t Connor Bedard if we do in fact win the lottery
5 janv. 2022 à 22 h 2
#5
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2017
Messages: 8,186
Mentions "j'aime": 4,797
Quoting: IconicHawk
Just hope 2023 isn’t Connor Bedard if we do in fact win the lottery


If we get Wright it's easier to try to go in as a conteder in 2023. In theroy Wright, Dach, Debrincat, Jones, and Reichel is a good core to move forward with with Comesso hopefully waiting in the wings to be the next starting goalie. If we miss on Wright which we most likley will then idk, the prospect pool kinda sucks and it might be time to rebuild
5 janv. 2022 à 22 h 3
#6
Bedard23
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2021
Messages: 9,256
Mentions "j'aime": 4,439
Quoting: Wadejos123
If we get Wright it's easier to try to go in as a conteder in 2023. In theroy Wright, Dach, Debrincat, Jones, and Reichel is a good core to move forward with with Comesso hopefully waiting in the wings to be the next starting goalie. If we miss on Wright which we most likley will then idk, the prospect pool kinda sucks and it might be time to rebuild


I don’t think we should risk it for Chychrun but I did see that Arizona’s asking price is about what Jack Eichel got in return
5 janv. 2022 à 22 h 23
#7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 2,350
Mentions "j'aime": 851
Quoting: Wadejos123
If we get Wright it's easier to try to go in as a conteder in 2023. In theroy Wright, Dach, Debrincat, Jones, and Reichel is a good core to move forward with with Comesso hopefully waiting in the wings to be the next starting goalie. If we miss on Wright which we most likley will then idk, the prospect pool kinda sucks and it might be time to rebuild


In the unlikely event that we did get Wright, it still wouldn’t make a contender even on paper. Between fleury most likely leaving and coaching still being a mess, the team needs to finally REBUILD. We still need a 1C, 1D (it ain’t Jones), and various other pieces.

Even more importantly, this team seriously needs to learn how to develop talent. Every defensive prospect has been a mess and Dach has been subpar at best. I loved reichel when we drafted but now I’m actually getting worried for his future. As for commesso, that’s still three to four years from being a chance. Sadly, the hawks haven’t done anything lately to suggest he’ll pan out. Start selling and rip off the bandaid.
6 janv. 2022 à 0 h 58
#8
Backn 2da leff-JFK
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2020
Messages: 1,079
Mentions "j'aime": 388
MAF is gone.
Toews will be RoboToews
Kane and Debrincat will be 9million each
Dach and Strome are not 1Cs

This team should’ve hail Mary’d on Erik Karlsson when they had the chance. It’s rebuild time. The front office, coach, captain, best player(Kane), goalie are done. Whether u like it or not it’s all about watching Kane in his final years so embrace it hawks fans. It’ll be 30 years before they get another player like him.
HatterTParty a aimé ceci.
6 janv. 2022 à 17 h 9
#9
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2017
Messages: 8,186
Mentions "j'aime": 4,797
Quoting: HatterTParty
In the unlikely event that we did get Wright, it still wouldn’t make a contender even on paper. Between fleury most likely leaving and coaching still being a mess, the team needs to finally REBUILD. We still need a 1C, 1D (it ain’t Jones), and various other pieces.

Even more importantly, this team seriously needs to learn how to develop talent. Every defensive prospect has been a mess and Dach has been subpar at best. I loved reichel when we drafted but now I’m actually getting worried for his future. As for commesso, that’s still three to four years from being a chance. Sadly, the hawks haven’t done anything lately to suggest he’ll pan out. Start selling and rip off the bandaid.


In the unlikley event we get Wright, he is our 1C of the future. If/when we don't get him then yes, we need a 1C. I'm starting to think Dach isn't it.

I think Jones is a #1 D. Jones has been very good this year for us. People like to discount his play for the fact that we overpaid his contract and way overpaid to get him in the trade. The trade is done and the contract is signed, nothing we can do to undo that at this point. Regardless of all that Jones has been very good. Hawks need another top Dman on the Left. All those hawks teams that won cups had Kieth and Seabrook who were both top pair guys in their primes. Plus the compliment D men like hjalmerson and oduya ( current Mccabe and Murphy). If jones if our new Kieth, the hawks need to find their seabrook. That's the problem on D imo.

Hawks do need to retool and tostock the cubboards a bit with prospects but I don't think were going to be in a world where the hawks suck for the next 5+ years. A lot of the main pieces are there, and the haul we should get for what feels like the inevitible Kane trade should help things out as well. I don't see a reason why the hawks count't retool for like 2 years and be right back where the Rangers are now.
6 janv. 2022 à 22 h 8
#10
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 2,350
Mentions "j'aime": 851
Quoting: Wadejos123
In the unlikley event we get Wright, he is our 1C of the future. If/when we don't get him then yes, we need a 1C. I'm starting to think Dach isn't it.

I think Jones is a #1 D. Jones has been very good this year for us. People like to discount his play for the fact that we overpaid his contract and way overpaid to get him in the trade. The trade is done and the contract is signed, nothing we can do to undo that at this point. Regardless of all that Jones has been very good. Hawks need another top Dman on the Left. All those hawks teams that won cups had Kieth and Seabrook who were both top pair guys in their primes. Plus the compliment D men like hjalmerson and oduya ( current Mccabe and Murphy). If jones if our new Kieth, the hawks need to find their seabrook. That's the problem on D imo.

Hawks do need to retool and tostock the cubboards a bit with prospects but I don't think were going to be in a world where the hawks suck for the next 5+ years. A lot of the main pieces are there, and the haul we should get for what feels like the inevitible Kane trade should help things out as well. I don't see a reason why the hawks count't retool for like 2 years and be right back where the Rangers are now.


Dach isn’t the guy. I know people think I’m a hater on this site but come on, he’s gotta prove me wrong at some point right?

Yes, the Jones deal is done, but as to the point of a left side dman, who do you get? I don’t mean to make it sound grim, but wasn’t McCabe suppose to be that guy possibly? Murphy is a fan favorite but that hasn’t exactly translated to better defense. The hawks haven’t done anything to develop any of those defensive prospects fans were so high on two and a half years ago (remember the logjam that made people pick Dach over byram?). My concern is that between Jones’ deal, McCabe’s deal, and Murphy’s deal, who are we gonna sign that’s marquee? We’re not getting chycrun (misspell I know) and I don’t foresee any top pairing left handers being readily available in free agency.

The difference between the hawks and rangers is beyond comparison. The rangers actually had players in their prime who underperformed for a year or two, which landed them even better players. The hawks have had bad drafts, bad prospects, and players past their prime to the point that they only had one top 3 pick and they botched that one. We’re nothing like the rangers sadly. We also have an inexperienced coach at the helm who whole better than JC isn’t the long term answer. I get the optimism, but the hawks aren’t in a good place.
Wadejos123 a aimé ceci.
7 janv. 2022 à 16 h 38
#11
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2017
Messages: 8,186
Mentions "j'aime": 4,797
Quoting: HatterTParty
Dach isn’t the guy. I know people think I’m a hater on this site but come on, he’s gotta prove me wrong at some point right?

Yes, the Jones deal is done, but as to the point of a left side dman, who do you get? I don’t mean to make it sound grim, but wasn’t McCabe suppose to be that guy possibly? Murphy is a fan favorite but that hasn’t exactly translated to better defense. The hawks haven’t done anything to develop any of those defensive prospects fans were so high on two and a half years ago (remember the logjam that made people pick Dach over byram?). My concern is that between Jones’ deal, McCabe’s deal, and Murphy’s deal, who are we gonna sign that’s marquee? We’re not getting chycrun (misspell I know) and I don’t foresee any top pairing left handers being readily available in free agency.

The difference between the hawks and rangers is beyond comparison. The rangers actually had players in their prime who underperformed for a year or two, which landed them even better players. The hawks have had bad drafts, bad prospects, and players past their prime to the point that they only had one top 3 pick and they botched that one. We’re nothing like the rangers sadly. We also have an inexperienced coach at the helm who whole better than JC isn’t the long term answer. I get the optimism, but the hawks aren’t in a good place.


The hawks have two holes to fill really. #1 LD and #1 C. Yes those are huge holes to fill but we have a lot more there than like Arizona (although ironic that they just beat us), buffalo, etc. I just don't think we are as far away as teams like that are
HatterTParty a aimé ceci.
7 janv. 2022 à 20 h 46
#12
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 2,350
Mentions "j'aime": 851
Quoting: Wadejos123
The hawks have two holes to fill really. #1 LD and #1 C. Yes those are huge holes to fill but we have a lot more there than like Arizona (although ironic that they just beat us), buffalo, etc. I just don't think we are as far away as teams like that are


That is completely fair. We’re definitely not as bad as those teams. However, to be fair, if we’re trying to say we’re not as bad as those teams, we’re having the wrong conversation. We’re simply saying we’re top of the bottom to middle of the middle.
Wadejos123 a aimé ceci.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage