SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Starting to sell

Créé par: fixitf11
Équipe: 2022-23 Penguins de Pittsburgh
Date de création initiale: 28 déc. 2021
Publié: 28 déc. 2021
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
21 000 000 $
2950 000 $
21 000 000 $
2800 000 $
22 200 000 $
2800 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
43 500 000 $
26 500 000 $
15 000 000 $
15 000 000 $
1750 000 $
22 000 000 $
2800 000 $
21 750 000 $
Transactions
1.
PIT
  1. Lavoie, Raphael
  2. Choix de 2e ronde en 2022 (EDM)
  3. Choix de 4e ronde en 2023 (EDM)
  4. Choix de 6e ronde en 2023 (EDM)
EDM
  1. Kapanen, Kasperi [Droits de RFA]
2.
PIT
  1. Choix de 3e ronde en 2022 (BOS)
OTT
  1. Zucker, Jason (2 750 000 $ retained)
3.
PIT
  1. Howden, Brett [Droits de RFA]
  2. Choix de 3e ronde en 2022 (NYR)
  3. Choix de 3e ronde en 2023 (BUF)
VGK
  1. Dumoulin, Brian (2 050 000 $ retained)
Rachats de contrats
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2022
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de EDM
Logo de BOS
Logo de NYR
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
2023
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de BUF
Logo de EDM
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de EDM
Logo de PIT
Logo de TOR
2024
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2381 500 000 $74 530 175 $0 $0 $6 969 825 $

Formation

Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
4 500 000 $4 500 000 $
AG, AD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
8 700 000 $8 700 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 3
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
AG, C
UFA - 1
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
2 200 000 $2 200 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
C
UFA - 4
1 750 000 $1 750 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 4
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
863 333 $863 333 $
C, AG
RFA - 2
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
2 200 000 $2 200 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
800 000 $800 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
2 750 000 $2 750 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 3
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
4 025 175 $4 025 175 $
DG
UFA - 3
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
6 500 000 $6 500 000 $
DD
UFA - 6
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
950 000 $950 000 $
DG
RFA - 2
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
4 400 000 $4 400 000 $
DD
UFA - 5
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
G
UFA - 2
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
4 875 000 $4 875 000 $
DG
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 2
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
800 000 $800 000 $
AD, C, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
750 000 $750 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
750 000 $750 000 $
DD
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
28 déc. 2021 à 17 h 46
#1
sensonfire
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2021
Messages: 11,767
Mentions "j'aime": 4,438
Ottawa is not spending picks to bring in a pending UFA that won't re-sign with us.

Try again.
28 déc. 2021 à 19 h 5
#2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2017
Messages: 4,783
Mentions "j'aime": 2,005
Quoting: sensonfire
Ottawa is not spending picks to bring in a pending UFA that won't re-sign with us.

Try again.


If Puttsburgh is retaining 50%, why wouldn't Dorion do this? He flips Zucker eating another 50% and suddenly that 3rd looks like a late first. A $1.4 million Zucker sure as hell gets that.

Think outside the box.
fixitf11 a aimé ceci.
28 déc. 2021 à 19 h 21
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2019
Messages: 39,961
Mentions "j'aime": 18,301
Dumo deal is kind of cheap...I'd think Pens could get a little more there
28 déc. 2021 à 19 h 41
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2020
Messages: 9,527
Mentions "j'aime": 8,968
Quoting: swinny
If Puttsburgh is retaining 50%, why wouldn't Dorion do this? He flips Zucker eating another 50% and suddenly that 3rd looks like a late first. A $1.4 million Zucker sure as hell gets that.

Think outside the box.

maybe if he was still good lmao, the only problem is he sucks now
sensonfire a aimé ceci.
28 déc. 2021 à 20 h 7
#5
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2021
Messages: 619
Mentions "j'aime": 40
Quoting: Alfie11
maybe if he was still good lmao, the only problem is he sucks now


The problem isn’t that he’s not good, it’s that he isn’t worth 5.5M and doesn’t pair well with Sid or geno. He is still a good top 6 option that works better with finishers and isn’t compatible with other play drivers.
28 déc. 2021 à 20 h 48
#6
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2017
Messages: 4,783
Mentions "j'aime": 2,005
Quoting: Alfie11
maybe if he was still good lmao, the only problem is he sucks now


Yup ok. 🤣🤣🤣

I see a player that simply doesn't fit his current circumstance.

Reimer was average as a Cane. As a Shark he is looking like a Vezina candidate. Tatar as Canadien was fantastic. As a Devil, pedestrian.

Funny what scenery does.
28 déc. 2021 à 21 h 15
#7
sensonfire
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2021
Messages: 11,767
Mentions "j'aime": 4,438
Quoting: swinny
If Puttsburgh is retaining 50%, why wouldn't Dorion do this? He flips Zucker eating another 50% and suddenly that 3rd looks like a late first. A $1.4 million Zucker sure as hell gets that.

Think outside the box.


Dorion wouldn't do this because Zucker is a depreciating asset.


Let's assume we went along with your little scheme.

Another team would only give us a late 3rd round pick for Zucker after we spent an early 3rd round pick to get him from Pittsburgh in the first place.

It's a waste of time for Ottawa.



Sometimes, the best trade ideas are the ones that are so simple that they would actually work.

Try again.
28 déc. 2021 à 21 h 21
#8
sensonfire
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2021
Messages: 11,767
Mentions "j'aime": 4,438
Quoting: swinny
Yup ok. 🤣🤣🤣

I see a player that simply doesn't fit his current circumstance.

Reimer was average as a Cane. As a Shark he is looking like a Vezina candidate. Tatar as Canadien was fantastic. As a Devil, pedestrian.

Funny what scenery does.


I see a player that simply doesn't fit with a team that won't re-sign him.

In this scenario, Zucker would be going from a Stanley Cup contender to one of the worst teams in the league currently.

As a pending UFA.

Funny what scenery does.
28 déc. 2021 à 21 h 28
#9
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2017
Messages: 5,418
Mentions "j'aime": 1,440
Quoting: fixitf11
The problem isn’t that he’s not good, it’s that he isn’t worth 5.5M and doesn’t pair well with Sid or geno. He is still a good top 6 option that works better with finishers and isn’t compatible with other play drivers.


He’s almost a ppg player with Sid. It’s not about playing with finishers or playmakers. It’s about playing with north/south faster players as opposed to east/west slower players. Malkin plays more of an East/west game to open space for himself and Carter is old and slower. He is almost a ppg player with Crosby because Crosby is a north/south player and still has the legs to keep up.
28 déc. 2021 à 21 h 47
#10
I know more than you
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2020
Messages: 1,103
Mentions "j'aime": 438
Quoting: sensonfire
Ottawa is not spending picks to bring in a pending UFA that won't re-sign with us.

Try again.


It's a 3rd round pick for a solid top 6 winger only making 2.75.

Calm the f*ck down
28 déc. 2021 à 21 h 48
#11
I know more than you
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2020
Messages: 1,103
Mentions "j'aime": 438
That Dumoulin trade is horrific.

Howden isn't an NHL level player and the picks are worthless.
28 déc. 2021 à 21 h 49
#12
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2021
Messages: 619
Mentions "j'aime": 40
Quoting: sensonfire
Dorion wouldn't do this because Zucker is a depreciating asset.


Let's assume we went along with your little scheme.

Another team would only give us a late 3rd round pick for Zucker after we spent an early 3rd round pick to get him from Pittsburgh in the first place.

It's a waste of time for Ottawa.



Sometimes, the best trade ideas are the ones that are so simple that they would actually work.

Try again.


Your completely ignoring the point that they were making about cap retention. Zucker at 5.5=No value-Zucker at 2.75=3rd round pick-Zucker at 1.4=1st round pick (I’d say a 2cnd+low value player but that’s just me). Any player at 50% retention is more valuable than at full contract. If you want a comparable, look at mike Hoffman being traded to FLA after OTT traded him to SJS. His value was higher because he was acquired for a price and a team won’t flip a player for less than acquired on a short time span (especially with retention)
28 déc. 2021 à 22 h 59
#13
sensonfire
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2021
Messages: 11,767
Mentions "j'aime": 4,438
Quoting: Dpellz90
It's a 3rd round pick for a solid top 6 winger only making 2.75.

Calm the f*ck down


Zucker?

A solid top 6 winger?

That's rich.



Also, using coarse language to get someone to calm down is hilarious.

Never ceases to amaze me laugh
Xspyrit a aimé ceci.
28 déc. 2021 à 23 h 17
#14
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2017
Messages: 4,783
Mentions "j'aime": 2,005
Quoting: sensonfire
I see a player that simply doesn't fit with a team that won't re-sign him.

In this scenario, Zucker would be going from a Stanley Cup contender to one of the worst teams in the league currently.

As a pending UFA.

Funny what scenery does.


What's your point, acquire and flip.

No foward thinking here at all.
28 déc. 2021 à 23 h 22
#15
sensonfire
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2021
Messages: 11,767
Mentions "j'aime": 4,438
Modifié 28 déc. 2021 à 23 h 29
Quoting: fixitf11
Your completely ignoring the point that they were making about cap retention. Zucker at 5.5=No value-Zucker at 2.75=3rd round pick-Zucker at 1.4=1st round pick (I’d say a 2cnd+low value player but that’s just me). Any player at 50% retention is more valuable than at full contract. If you want a comparable, look at mike Hoffman being traded to FLA after OTT traded him to SJS. His value was higher because he was acquired for a price and a team won’t flip a player for less than acquired on a short time span (especially with retention)


1. If I was ignoring the point about cap retention, it's because Zucker will come to Ottawa as a pending UFA and then leave as a pending UFA.

We wouldn't even make the playoffs together or have the chance to say goodbye.

Furthermore, there's no guarantee that we would net a 1st for Zucker from a third team, let alone break even.

You're not seeing the forest for the trees.



2. So ...

the difference in value between Zucker at 2.75 million and Zucker at 1.4 million is the same as the difference in value between a 1st and a 3rd?

I'd love to know how you calculated all that.



3. You're way off with the Hoffman comparable because it's not comparable.

The Penguins would be better served by being the ones to actually trade Zucker for a 1st round pick.

Like so:

https://www.capfriendly.com/forums/thread/439452



This is not rocket science.
28 déc. 2021 à 23 h 28
#16
sensonfire
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2021
Messages: 11,767
Mentions "j'aime": 4,438
Quoting: swinny
What's your point, acquire and flip.

No foward thinking here at all.


My point is there's no guaranteed incentive for Ottawa to "acquire and flip".

Zucker is Pittsburgh's problem, not Ottawa's.

You're just going to have to deal with it.
29 déc. 2021 à 0 h 9
#17
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2017
Messages: 4,783
Mentions "j'aime": 2,005
Quoting: sensonfire
1. If I was ignoring the point about cap retention, it's because Zucker will come to Ottawa as a pending UFA and then leave as a pending UFA.

We wouldn't even make the playoffs together or have the chance to say goodbye.

Furthermore, there's no guarantee that we would net a 1st for Zucker from a third team, let alone break even.

You're not seeing the forest for the trees.



2. So ...

the difference in value between Zucker at 2.75 million and Zucker at 1.4 million is the same as the difference in value between a 1st and a 3rd?

I'd love to know how you calculated all that.



3. You're way off with the Hoffman comparable because it's not comparable.

The Penguins would be better served by being the ones to actually trade Zucker for a 1st round pick.

Like so:

https://www.capfriendly.com/forums/thread/439452



This is not rocket science.
29 déc. 2021 à 0 h 10
#18
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2017
Messages: 4,783
Mentions "j'aime": 2,005
Quoting: fixitf11
Your completely ignoring the point that they were making about cap retention. Zucker at 5.5=No value-Zucker at 2.75=3rd round pick-Zucker at 1.4=1st round pick (I’d say a 2cnd+low value player but that’s just me). Any player at 50% retention is more valuable than at full contract. If you want a comparable, look at mike Hoffman being traded to FLA after OTT traded him to SJS. His value was higher because he was acquired for a price and a team won’t flip a player for less than acquired on a short time span (especially with retention)


Person just isn't listening to reason.
29 déc. 2021 à 12 h 11
#19
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2016
Messages: 10,482
Mentions "j'aime": 3,711
The Zucker trade is not bad proposal. I don't know about his character "in the room" but could be a decent stop gap at that price.

But the thing is Ottawa might not have any openings, particularly in the forward group

Centers : Tim Stutzle, Josh Norris, Shane Pinto, Colin White (also RW), Nick Paul (also LW), Parker Kelly (also LW), Mark Kastelic (could be the 4th line center but not more)
LW : Brady Tkachuk, Alex Formenton, Ridly Greig (also C), Angus Crookshank, Roby Jarventie (won't bring him until he's 100% ready)
RW : Drake Batherson, ?????????, Connor Brown, Austin Watson, Egor Sokolov (won't bring him until he's 100% ready)


The real big hole is Top-6 RW. I know Connor Brown produces very well but he is not a top-6 forward, he's a matchup forward and pretty much all his offense comes at EV. The idea is to have a very strong top-9 and Connor on the "3rd line" definitely helps with that. Jason Zucker as the 2nd line RW DOES NOT.

Ottawa declines

@sensonfire

Quoting: Dpellz90
It's a 3rd round pick for a solid top 6 winger only making 2.75.

Calm the f*ck down


Uh, very confused by this... You're telling someone who is calm to calm down by... swearing? lol

Quoting: fixitf11
If you want a comparable, look at mike Hoffman being traded to FLA after OTT traded him to SJS. His value was higher because he was acquired for a price and a team won’t flip a player for less than acquired on a short time span (especially with retention)


No, this happened because Pierre Dorion was totally unqualified as a NHL GM (and still is)

Dorion didn't want to trade Hoffman East and he just got played by Wilson
sensonfire a aimé ceci.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage