SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Post Deadline according to Stauffer

Créé par: Eberles_Backcheck
Équipe: 2021-22 Oilers d'Edmonton
Date de création initiale: 22 déc. 2021
Publié: 22 déc. 2021
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
Link to Tweet: https://twitter.com/Bob_Stauffer/status/1473366541945094145?s=20

No Chychrun basically confirmed by Friedman. Big mistake not trying to add him. Why try to add more elite players right?

Anyway here's a prediction based on Bob's tweet.
Transactions
1.
CBJ
  1. Koskinen, Mikko
  2. Tullio, Tyler
  3. Choix de 2e ronde en 2022 (EDM)
2.
EDM
  1. Choix de 3e ronde en 2023 (NYI)
Rachats de contrats
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Enfoui
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2022
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
2023
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
Logo de NYI
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
2024
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2381 500 000 $76 064 468 $669 339 $1 390 000 $5 435 532 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
2 750 000 $2 750 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 3
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
12 500 000 $12 500 000 $
C
UFA - 5
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
1 175 000 $1 175 000 $
AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
1 325 000 $1 325 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
8 500 000 $8 500 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 4
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
5 500 000 $5 500 000 $
AD, AG
NMC
UFA - 7
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance400 000 $$400K)
AG, C
RFA - 3
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
5 125 000 $5 125 000 $
AG, C
NMC
UFA - 8
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
1 175 000 $1 175 000 $
AD
RFA - 1
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
750 000 $750 000 $
AD, C
UFA - 1
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
834 167 $834 167 $ (Bonis de performance57 500 $$58K)
C
RFA - 1
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
3 200 000 $3 200 000 $
AD
UFA - 3
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
5 600 000 $5 600 000 $
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
DD
RFA - 2
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
2 200 000 $2 200 000 $
G
UFA - 2
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
5 538 462 $5 538 462 $
DG
NMC
UFA - 2
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
3 250 000 $3 250 000 $
DD
UFA - 4
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
750 000 $750 000 $
G
UFA - 2
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
817 500 $817 500 $ (Bonis de performance82 500 $$82K)
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
4 500 000 $4 500 000 $
DD
UFA - 3
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
1 250 000 $1 250 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
4 167 000 $4 167 000 $
DG
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
925 000 $925 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 2
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
1 250 000 $1 250 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
785 000 $785 000 $
G
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
22 déc. 2021 à 12 h 36
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2019
Messages: 3,758
Mentions "j'aime": 3,219
We don’t need koskonen and are gonna need more to move domi.
22 déc. 2021 à 12 h 39
#2
Simpleton
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2017
Messages: 1,365
Mentions "j'aime": 502
Difficult to imagine Columbus taking on Koskinen, unless they are throwing in the towel or have some other deal that moves Korpisalo out. I'm also not sold on RNH as the 3C, although he might turn out to be a nice on-ice presence for Holloway.
22 déc. 2021 à 12 h 42
#3
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2018
Messages: 791
Mentions "j'aime": 223
Quoting: The_Cannon
We don’t need koskonen and are gonna need more to move domi.


If Koskinen is moved, and thats a big if, its not because the team acquiring him NEEDS him.
22 déc. 2021 à 13 h 58
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2019
Messages: 3,758
Mentions "j'aime": 3,219
Quoting: Eberles_Backcheck
If Koskinen is moved, and thats a big if, its not because the team acquiring him NEEDS him.


Right. And as we don’t need him, he is of negative value to us. Therefore making this package even more insufficient. A first and a better prospect along with koskonen for a domi at half retained would be our counter proposal.
22 déc. 2021 à 14 h 44
#5
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2021
Messages: 962
Mentions "j'aime": 787
Maybe they're not looking to acquire Chychrun because he is of great value and not because they don't think he'd help the team. Everyone on here seems to think their team can just fleece Arizona with a bunch of mid tier players for him. His price is likely more than most teams could afford without absolutely selling the farm/current roster.
22 déc. 2021 à 17 h 30
#6
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2018
Messages: 791
Mentions "j'aime": 223
Quoting: BJ_Lover
Maybe they're not looking to acquire Chychrun because he is of great value and not because they don't think he'd help the team. Everyone on here seems to think their team can just fleece Arizona with a bunch of mid tier players for him. His price is likely more than most teams could afford without absolutely selling the farm/current roster.


If you've seen any of my other threads, you'd see that they are more of an overpay than a flleece of Arizona. which imo the Oilers need to strongly consider.
22 déc. 2021 à 17 h 33
#7
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2018
Messages: 791
Mentions "j'aime": 223
Quoting: The_Cannon
Right. And as we don’t need him, he is of negative value to us. Therefore making this package even more insufficient. A first and a better prospect along with koskonen for a domi at half retained would be our counter proposal.


Or one could look at as, if its the best offer in terms of what assets are coming back, then taking on a contract like Koskinen is the only way the trade could be made.

I don't think you are getting the return you mentioned for Domi. a 2nd and Tullio is a good offer imo. Tullio has been having a great season, in what is essentially his D+1 season.
22 déc. 2021 à 20 h 5
#8
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2019
Messages: 3,758
Mentions "j'aime": 3,219
Quoting: Eberles_Backcheck
Or one could look at as, if its the best offer in terms of what assets are coming back, then taking on a contract like Koskinen is the only way the trade could be made.

I don't think you are getting the return you mentioned for Domi. a 2nd and Tullio is a good offer imo. Tullio has been having a great season, in what is essentially his D+1 season.


He’s had a fine season. Not anything noteworthy. He’s a b/ c prospect. On that line. Domi has 15 points in 18 games and can be had for 2.65. He’s worth a first. Then your having us take mk. He’s a dump. That’s worth a decent prospect or a 2nd/3rd to get rid of. So yes your offer is insufficient. We’ll go over to Toronto and get a first for him there.
22 déc. 2021 à 22 h 9
#9
Nah.
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2020
Messages: 4,428
Mentions "j'aime": 4,296
I’d counter with Domi and Korpi (half retained each), for Koskinen, a 1st, and maybe Bourgault (or any mid-tier EDM prospect). I figure if EDM is dumping a G, might as well get an affordable replacement.

Domi has a 1st value, Korpi is probably about a mid-rounder (Love him or hate him, but there is apparently a decent market for him that includes EDM). Add value of half retention each, and taking on Koskinen, no retention.

Added note, would be willing to talk Bemstrom or Foudy as an add if EDM is willing to add. Young guys, cheap, tons of upside, just getting squeezed out with roster space on CBJ.
23 déc. 2021 à 10 h 21
#10
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2018
Messages: 791
Mentions "j'aime": 223
Quoting: The_Cannon
He’s had a fine season. Not anything noteworthy. He’s a b/ c prospect. On that line. Domi has 15 points in 18 games and can be had for 2.65. He’s worth a first. Then your having us take mk. He’s a dump. That’s worth a decent prospect or a 2nd/3rd to get rid of. So yes your offer is insufficient. We’ll go over to Toronto and get a first for him there.


I will personally be surprised in CBJ gets a 1st for Domi. They likely dont trade him at all anyway.
23 déc. 2021 à 10 h 22
#11
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2018
Messages: 791
Mentions "j'aime": 223
Quoting: dopplsan
I’d counter with Domi and Korpi (half retained each), for Koskinen, a 1st, and maybe Bourgault (or any mid-tier EDM prospect). I figure if EDM is dumping a G, might as well get an affordable replacement.

Domi has a 1st value, Korpi is probably about a mid-rounder (Love him or hate him, but there is apparently a decent market for him that includes EDM). Add value of half retention each, and taking on Koskinen, no retention.

Added note, would be willing to talk Bemstrom or Foudy as an add if EDM is willing to add. Young guys, cheap, tons of upside, just getting squeezed out with roster space on CBJ.


I dont think EDM has any interest in Korpisalo. The guys they have now have better numbers. Maybe they had interst in the past, but not now. Also Bourgault wont be moved for a rental. He'd only get moved to bring in a Top 6 fwd under contract or a Top 4 D.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage