SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

If the Jets are out

Équipe: 2021-22 Maple Leafs de Toronto
Date de création initiale: 21 déc. 2021
Publié: 21 déc. 2021
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
What do you guys think Demelo would cost?

He doesn't seem to be a name that's being thrown around a ton as a potential acquisition, but he might be my personal #1 RD target, all things considered.

Between the relatively affordable cap hit that could probably be brought down a bit lower if need be, the decent term, the likely trade price (unless my estimate is way off base), the fact that he is conceivably the odd man out in WPG this offseason - though a coaching change could possibly sway that, and his style of play which I personally think would fit well with the Leafs... I think this could sneakily be a really good move for Toronto.
Transactions
WPG
  1. Choix de 3e ronde en 2023 (TOR)
Détails additionnels:
Probably a later pick or a lower tier prospect added on.
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2022
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
2023
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
2024
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2381 500 000 $75 964 283 $0 $400 000 $5 535 717 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
11 640 250 $11 640 250 $
C
UFA - 3
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
6 962 366 $6 962 366 $
AD
UFA - 3
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
1 645 000 $1 645 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
11 000 000 $11 000 000 $
C, AG
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
1 250 000 $1 250 000 $
AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
1 250 000 $1 250 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
AG, C, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
900 000 $900 000 $
AD, AG
NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
950 000 $950 000 $
AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
C
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
834 167 $834 167 $
AG, AD
RFA - 3
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
750 000 $750 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
750 000 $750 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
5 625 000 $5 625 000 $
DG
NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
DG/DD
NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
3 800 000 $3 800 000 $
G
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
DG
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo de Jets de Winnipeg
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
1 650 000 $1 650 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance400 000 $$400K)
DD
RFA - 1
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
894 167 $894 167 $
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
10 903 000 $10 903 000 $
AD
UFA - 4

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
21 déc. 2021 à 20 h 30
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2021
Messages: 879
Mentions "j'aime": 535
I think DeMelo would be a good pickup if he is available. No idea what his value would be , but a good idea
21 déc. 2021 à 20 h 57
#2
MisstheWhalers
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2019
Messages: 23,625
Mentions "j'aime": 12,352
DeMelo is likely a cap casualty in the off-season anyway and if they can recoup a 3rd round pick which is what they gave for him then they'd maybe do it.
21 déc. 2021 à 21 h 23
#3
Trad Breliving
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2020
Messages: 3,492
Mentions "j'aime": 1,989
I’m gonna have to decline from the Leafs side.

There are cheaper (contract wise) options available.

Plus, DeMelo will likely be almost given away this offseason, dur to cap.
If we want him so bad, might as well wait.
MatthewsFan a aimé ceci.
21 déc. 2021 à 21 h 42
#4
wpg
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2017
Messages: 2,009
Mentions "j'aime": 1,028
Quoting: ZachHymanForTheHart
I’m gonna have to decline from the Leafs side.

There are cheaper (contract wise) options available.

Plus, DeMelo will likely be almost given away this offseason, dur to cap.
If we want him so bad, might as well wait.



more teams than the leafs would be interested in him im sure, by "given away" he'll go to the highest bidder

but the question i got is
why wait when ure going in for the cup?
i dont get it
LeafsFanForSomeReason a aimé ceci.
21 déc. 2021 à 21 h 59
#5
Ovchinnikov 137
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2019
Messages: 10,412
Mentions "j'aime": 11,982
I like the player but does not fit in long term with the Leafs. Next year is going to be really really tight.

If they are able to add a 3mil player I really hope it will be a top 6 fwd. There will be cheaper options (contract wise) that can provide the same value as DeMelo.
palhal a aimé ceci.
21 déc. 2021 à 22 h 11
#6
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2020
Messages: 6,716
Mentions "j'aime": 5,221
Quoting: ZachHymanForTheHart
I’m gonna have to decline from the Leafs side.

There are cheaper (contract wise) options available.

Plus, DeMelo will likely be almost given away this offseason, dur to cap.
If we want him so bad, might as well wait.


Might be cheaper options, but they're also probably not as good and/or don't carry the same term as Demelo, which I view as a huge plus. I don't think it'd be that hard to find a team to knock DD's price tag down a bit either.

Also, I don't think you can expect a serviceable RHD to be "given away". Even if Winnipeg isn't in the most favorable position when it comes to dealing him, I expect if they just let it be known around the league that he's up for grabs, they'd get a few calls.
21 déc. 2021 à 22 h 19
#7
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2020
Messages: 6,716
Mentions "j'aime": 5,221
Modifié 21 déc. 2021 à 22 h 31
Quoting: MatthewsFan
I like the player but does not fit in long term with the Leafs. Next year is going to be really really tight.

If they are able to add a 3mil player I really hope it will be a top 6 fwd. There will be cheaper options (contract wise) that can provide the same value as DeMelo.


I'd like to add a top-6 fwd as well (preferably a C/W), but I disagree that Demelo can't fit long-term with the Leafs. It'd be tough, yes, but next year is going to be tight regardless. Even if you have to pay extra to get a team to eat some of that money, I'd be more than willing to do that (so long as the price isn't outrageous) because - and maybe I'm being a bit bullish on Demelo, but I really like that player - it stabilizes the D-core for the next few years (so long as Muzzin can start pulling his weight again) and bridges a pretty good gap for the young guys to develop and take the next step.

If I'm looking at adding a top-4 RD at the deadline, Demelo is near the top of my list.
21 déc. 2021 à 22 h 43
#8
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2020
Messages: 15,687
Mentions "j'aime": 6,959
I don't see the Jets moving him at the TDL even if they are out, but if they did they would probably just go with the highest bidder, which would likely be more than a 3rd. However, he isn't a rental.
21 déc. 2021 à 23 h 10
#9
Ovchinnikov 137
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2019
Messages: 10,412
Mentions "j'aime": 11,982
Quoting: LeafsFanForSomeReason
I'd like to add a top-6 fwd as well (preferably a C/W), but I disagree that Demelo can't fit long-term with the Leafs. It'd be tough, yes, but next year is going to be tight regardless. Even if you have to pay extra to get a team to eat some of that money, I'd be more than willing to do that (so long as the price isn't outrageous) because - and maybe I'm being a bit bullish on Demelo, but I really like that player - it stabilizes the D-core for the next few years (so long as Muzzin can start pulling his weight again) and bridges a pretty good gap for the young guys to develop and take the next step.

If I'm looking at adding a top-4 RD at the deadline, Demelo is near the top of my list.


You’d effectively be saying goodbye to Campbell. Which for me, is an absolute priority to resign next year. There is too many moving pieces to add DeMelo’s contract. Who are you trading to fit him in this year?

Again, not hating the player, it’s nice to see a different addition. But because of there cap constraints, IMO they will look to add a D on an expiring deal.

Wish list would be a top six LW (Miller, Smith, Domi, Johansson, Namestnikov), Dmen (Pysyk, Manson, Miller, McNabb, Hagg, Lauzon) and maybe another C (Appleton, Paul)
21 déc. 2021 à 23 h 28
#10
LongtimeLeafsufferer
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2015
Messages: 59,424
Mentions "j'aime": 22,634
Seems like a waste of 3m in additional this year and next. Holl and Sandin are still on the team.
22 déc. 2021 à 3 h 12
#11
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2019
Messages: 6,284
Mentions "j'aime": 3,030
Quoting: MatthewsFan
You’d effectively be saying goodbye to Campbell. Which for me, is an absolute priority to resign next year. There is too many moving pieces to add DeMelo’s contract. Who are you trading to fit him in this year?

Again, not hating the player, it’s nice to see a different addition. But because of there cap constraints, IMO they will look to add a D on an expiring deal.

Wish list would be a top six LW (Miller, Smith, Domi, Johansson, Namestnikov), Dmen (Pysyk, Manson, Miller, McNabb, Hagg, Lauzon) and maybe another C (Appleton, Paul)


I decided to mess around with it a bit and I've found the cost wouldn't be Campbell, it would be Kerfoot. That's where the 3 mil cap comes from with Robertson hopefully stepping in as an ELC top 6 winger.
LeafsFanForSomeReason a aimé ceci.
22 déc. 2021 à 9 h 27
#12
Marner rocks
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2021
Messages: 4,006
Mentions "j'aime": 885
Quoting: palhal
Seems like a waste of 3m in additional this year and next. Holl and Sandin are still on the team.


Do you think by next year Demelo will be better then Liljegren? Liljegren has passed Holl and Dermott on the depth chart, he also looks good with Muzzin. So what the leafs need is a big nasty 3rd pairing guy who sticks up for his team mates and plays the PK.
22 déc. 2021 à 10 h 1
#13
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2020
Messages: 6,716
Mentions "j'aime": 5,221
Quoting: MatthewsFan
You’d effectively be saying goodbye to Campbell. Which for me, is an absolute priority to resign next year. There is too many moving pieces to add DeMelo’s contract. Who are you trading to fit him in this year?

Again, not hating the player, it’s nice to see a different addition. But because of there cap constraints, IMO they will look to add a D on an expiring deal.

Wish list would be a top six LW (Miller, Smith, Domi, Johansson, Namestnikov), Dmen (Pysyk, Manson, Miller, McNabb, Hagg, Lauzon) and maybe another C (Appleton, Paul)


I just don't see that, to be be honest. That probably just stems from our own differing opinions on contract projections, but by my own estimation (and supposedly that of @Byrr) the Leafs would be able to keep Campbell. It would mean losing Kerfoot if the Leafs took on the whole 3mil, but as I've said, I'd be paying a bit of a premium to knock that tag down a bit because it means securing an effective right side on our defence for the foreseeable future, and would allow them to keep Kerfoot or do with him as they please, not as they must.

Side note: This is under the assumptions that - the cap still rises it's projected $1m this offseason (which I'm sure would have to be written in stone by the deadline) - and that none of the big 4 are moving.

I like some of the guys you have listed there; Pysyk I think would be a great cheap depth add, Domi I like, but that's probably a pretty expensive rental which I don't like, Miller's obviously the big ticket item there... nice to think about for sure, but idk how likely it is; if he's available I'm sure a lot of teams would be in on him, andif the Canucks keep chugging along and get back into the mix they probably don't even move him.

Either way, I'm looking forward to see what happens.
22 déc. 2021 à 10 h 4
#14
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2020
Messages: 6,716
Mentions "j'aime": 5,221
Quoting: Byrr
I decided to mess around with it a bit and I've found the cost wouldn't be Campbell, it would be Kerfoot. That's where the 3 mil cap comes from with Robertson hopefully stepping in as an ELC top 6 winger.


And ideally it wouldn't be $3m in cap. I'd be looking for retention from a 3rd party here. If his price comes down even just to break even with Holl, who is likely getting moved, they can probably make it work even keeping Kerfoot.
22 déc. 2021 à 10 h 46
#15
Ovchinnikov 137
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2019
Messages: 10,412
Mentions "j'aime": 11,982
Modifié 22 déc. 2021 à 11 h 7
Quoting: Byrr
I decided to mess around with it a bit and I've found the cost wouldn't be Campbell, it would be Kerfoot. That's where the 3 mil cap comes from with Robertson hopefully stepping in as an ELC top 6 winger.


Quoting: LeafsFanForSomeReason
I just don't see that, to be be honest. That probably just stems from our own differing opinions on contract projections, but by my own estimation (and supposedly that of Byrr) the Leafs would be able to keep Campbell. It would mean losing Kerfoot if the Leafs took on the whole 3mil, but as I've said, I'd be paying a bit of a premium to knock that tag down a bit because it means securing an effective right side on our defence for the foreseeable future, and would allow them to keep Kerfoot or do with him as they please, not as they must.

Side note: This is under the assumptions that - the cap still rises it's projected $1m this offseason (which I'm sure would have to be written in stone by the deadline) - and that none of the big 4 are moving.

I like some of the guys you have listed there; Pysyk I think would be a great cheap depth add, Domi I like, but that's probably a pretty expensive rental which I don't like, Miller's obviously the big ticket item there... nice to think about for sure, but idk how likely it is; if he's available I'm sure a lot of teams would be in on him, andif the Canucks keep chugging along and get back into the mix they probably don't even move him.

Either way, I'm looking forward to see what happens.


Absolutely Kerfoot needs to go, he has to just to fit in DeMelo this year either being part of the trade or somewhere else for picks/prospects to free up the cap. Which then doesn’t leave you the space to add a top 6 fwd which for me is the first priority after the past two playoffs (CLB, MTL) scoring has been the issue, not keeping the puck out of the net. Now I’m not saying they shouldn’t add a RD to play with Muzzin but not at 3.5mil, too rich for this team.

As for next year Campbell getting 4,850,000 seems like a fair number for everyone. All of Ritchie, Holl, Dermott, plus Kerfoot the year before would have to go while keeping Kase, Sandin, and Liljegren. Too many moving parts
22 déc. 2021 à 11 h 10
#16
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2020
Messages: 6,716
Mentions "j'aime": 5,221
Quoting: MatthewsFan
Absolutely Kerfoot needs to go, he has to just to fit in DeMelo this year either being part of the trade or somewhere else for picks/prospects to free up the cap. Which then doesn’t leave you the space to add a top 6 fwd which for me is the first priority after the past two playoffs (CLB, MTL) scoring has been the issue, not keeping the puck out of the net. Now I’m not saying they shouldn’t add a RD to play with Muzzin but not at 3.5mil, too rich for this team.

As for next year Campbell getting 4,850,000 seems like a fair number for everyone. All of Ritchie, Holl, Dermott, plus Kerfoot the year before would have to go while keeping Kase, Sandin, and Liljegren. Too mushy moving parts


Kerfoot doesn't have to go. As I've said numerous times if I'm getting Demelo, I'm after retention on that deal - likely from a 3rd party. I'm not adding a "$3.5mil" RD (it's $3m at full cap btw which, again, it wouldn't be full cap). Holl's gone for sure, but the money works.

Moves have to be made, yes, but that's allowed.
22 déc. 2021 à 11 h 20
#17
Ovchinnikov 137
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2019
Messages: 10,412
Mentions "j'aime": 11,982
Quoting: LeafsFanForSomeReason
Kerfoot doesn't have to go. As I've said numerous times if I'm getting Demelo, I'm after retention on that deal - likely from a 3rd party. I'm not adding a "$3.5mil" RD (it's $3m at full cap btw which, again, it wouldn't be full cap). Holl's gone for sure, but the money works.

Moves have to be made, yes, but that's allowed.


With only 3 picks this year, I really don’t see them doing multiple trades with retention this year. If my wrong all good. DeMelo is a nice player, but the fit isn’t there.

Agree to disagree, all good.

Edit:

Show me how this works, build it out. Change my mind
22 déc. 2021 à 16 h 10
#18
LongtimeLeafsufferer
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2015
Messages: 59,424
Mentions "j'aime": 22,634
Quoting: jaok3
Do you think by next year Demelo will be better then Liljegren? Liljegren has passed Holl and Dermott on the depth chart, he also looks good with Muzzin. So what the leafs need is a big nasty 3rd pairing guy who sticks up for his team mates and plays the PK.
I

I don't think Liljegren has passed Holl on the depth chart? Why would anyone think that? Holl still plays 20 minutes a night and eats minutes on the PK.
Actually the Leafs seven Dmen are quite capable. Liljegren might be better than DeMelo next year and certain will be more cost efficient.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage