Forums/Armchair-GM

Jumpstart

Créé par: Knuckl3s
Date de création initiale: 21 déc. 2021
Publié: 21 déc. 2021
Équipe: 2022-23 Canucks de Vancouver
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
Brisebois, Guillaume2800 000 $
DiPietro, Michael2800 000 $
Highmore, Matthew2800 000 $
Juulsen, Noah2800 000 $
Lammikko, Juho2800 000 $
Lockwood, William2800 000 $
Rathbone, Jack2800 000 $
Rempal, Sheldon2800 000 $
Stephens, Devante2800 000 $
Appleton, Mason31 750 000 $
Roy, Nicolas31 750 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
Bailey, Justin2850 000 $
Petan, Nicolas2850 000 $
Dries, Sheldon2850 000 $
Chiasson, Alex2850 000 $
Motte, Tyler51 450 000 $
Hunt, Brad2800 000 $
Di Giuseppe, Phillip2800 000 $
Martin, Spencer2800 000 $
Sautner, Ashton2800 000 $
Stevens, John2800 000 $
Transactions
1.
VAN
  1. Appleton, Mason [Droits de RFA]
SEA
  1. 2022 3e round pick (WPG)
2.
VAN
  1. Roy, Nicolas [Droits de RFA]
  2. 2023 6e round pick (VGK)
VGK
  1. 2023 2e round pick (VAN)
3.
VAN
  1. Nyquist, Gustav
  2. 2022 1e round pick (CHI)
  3. 2023 2e round pick (CBJ)
CBJ
  1. Miller, J.T.
4.
VAN
  1. 2022 4e round pick (DAL)
  2. 2023 5e round pick (DAL)
DAL
  1. Nyquist, Gustav
5.
VAN
  1. Blueger, Teddy
  2. McGinn, Brock
  3. Hållander, Filip
  4. 2022 2e round pick (PIT)
  5. 2023 2e round pick (PIT)
PIT
  1. Boeser, Brock [Droits de RFA]
Rachats de contrats
  • Braden Holtby: 1 900 000 $
  • Jake Virtanen: 500 000 $
ANNÉE DE REPÊCHAGERONDE 1RONDE 2RONDE 3RONDE 4RONDE 5RONDE 6RONDE 7
2022
Logo de VAN
Logo de CHI
Logo de PIT
Logo de VAN
Logo de DAL
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
2023
Logo de VAN
Logo de CBJ
Logo de PIT
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de DAL
Logo de VAN
Logo de VGK
2024
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2382 500 000 $74 726 667 $1 250 000 $1 150 000 $7 773 333 $

Formation

Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de VAN
Garland, Conor
4 950 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 4
Logo de VAN
Pettersson, Elias
7 350 000 $
C, AG
RFA - 2
Logo de VAN
Podkolzin, Vasily
925 000 $
AG, AD
RFA - 2
Logo de VAN
Pearson, Tanner
3 250 000 $
AG
NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de VAN
Horvat, Bo
5 500 000 $
C
UFA - 1
Logo de VAN
Höglander, Nils
891 667 $
AG, AD
RFA - 1
Logo de VAN
Dickinson, Jason
2 650 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 2
Roy, Nicolas
1 750 000 $
C, AD
RFA
Appleton, Mason
1 750 000 $
AD
RFA
Logo de VAN
Motte, Tyler
1 450 000 $
AG, AD
UFA
Logo de PIT
Blueger, Teddy
2 200 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de PIT
McGinn, Brock
2 750 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 3
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de VAN
Hughes, Quinn
7 850 000 $
DG
UFA - 5
Logo de VAN
Hamonic, Travis
3 000 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de VAN
Demko, Thatcher
5 000 000 $
G
UFA - 4
Logo de VAN
Ekman-Larsson, Oliver
7 260 000 $
DG
NMC
UFA - 5
Logo de VAN
Myers, Tyler
6 000 000 $
DD
NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de VAN
DiPietro, Michael
800 000 $
G
RFA
Logo de VAN
Rathbone, Jack
800 000 $
DG
RFA - 2
Logo de VAN
Poolman, Tucker
2 500 000 $
DD
UFA - 3
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de VAN
Schenn, Luke
850 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de VAN
Ferland, Micheal
3 500 000 $
AG, AD
NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de VAN
Lammikko, Juho
800 000 $
C, AG
RFA
Logo de VAN
Highmore, Matthew
800 000 $
AG, AD
RFA
Équipe de réserve
Logo de VAN
Burroughs, Kyle
750 000 $ (0 $)
DG/DD
UFA - 1
Logo de VAN
Chiasson, Alex
850 000 $ (0 $)
AD
UFA
Logo de VAN
Dowling, Justin
750 000 $ (0 $)
C, AG
UFA - 1

Unités spéciales

Avantage numérique 1
Garland, C.
Podkolzin, V.
Pettersson, E.
Hughes, Q.
Horvat, B.
Avantage numérique 2
Appleton, M.
Pearson, T.
Höglander, N.
Ekman-Larsson, O.
Rathbone, J.
Infériorité numérique 1
Motte, T.
Roy, N.
Ekman-Larsson, O.
Poolman, T.
Infériorité numérique 2
Blueger, T.
McGinn, B.
Hamonic, T.
Myers, T.

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
21 déc. 2021 à 20 h 23
#1
Hockey IQ
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2019
Messages: 2,044
Mentions "j'aime": 1,022
Bet. PIT accepts
BigShoots a aimé ceci.
21 déc. 2021 à 20 h 29
#2
Big Shoots
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2020
Messages: 1,503
Mentions "j'aime": 443
That Boeser deal is rough
PeterForsberg21 a aimé ceci.
21 déc. 2021 à 20 h 30
#3
Démarrer sujet
Canucks...
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2021
Messages: 7,815
Mentions "j'aime": 1,678
Quoting: BigShoots
That Boeser deal is rough


How? Blueger and McGinn are excellent bottom six pieces
21 déc. 2021 à 20 h 32
#4
Big Shoots
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2020
Messages: 1,503
Mentions "j'aime": 443
Quoting: Knuckl3s
How? Blueger and McGinn are excellent bottom six pieces


Exactly and Boeser is a first line winger. Probably top 10 RW in the league.
audiodave et PeterForsberg21 a aimé ceci.
21 déc. 2021 à 20 h 39
#5
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2021
Messages: 709
Mentions "j'aime": 321
That Boeser trade is so bad, why would Van trade a young top 6 scorer for guys that would be on the 4th line in Van? Makes absolutely no sense. Maybe one of blueger or mcginn with rust and a 1st
21 déc. 2021 à 20 h 49
#6
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 1,102
Mentions "j'aime": 352
No thanks on Pittsburgh end. Just RFA rights? Not worth it. Maybe if he is signed to a good deal with term, it could work, but that's a lot of depth and picks moving. I'd honestly rather start with Kapanen and a pick on a deal.
21 déc. 2021 à 21 h 12
#7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2021
Messages: 720
Mentions "j'aime": 427
Wow it's a good thing you aren't the VAN GM
PeterForsberg21 a aimé ceci.
21 déc. 2021 à 21 h 19
#8
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2017
Messages: 2,104
Mentions "j'aime": 690
Roy would be a perfect add but I can't see Vegas giving him up.
21 déc. 2021 à 22 h 2
#9
Friedman for Norris
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2021
Messages: 668
Mentions "j'aime": 146
Pit says yes every day of the week
21 déc. 2021 à 22 h 37
#10
Nah.
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2020
Messages: 2,320
Mentions "j'aime": 1,690
CBJ pass. Whole point of moving Gus is to make room for the young guys.

Rebuilding team has no use for JT right now. If he wants to come home, we can talk FA in a year.
Ajp_18 a aimé ceci.
22 déc. 2021 à 2 h 38
#11
Démarrer sujet
Canucks...
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2021
Messages: 7,815
Mentions "j'aime": 1,678
Quoting: brgh4life
No thanks on Pittsburgh end. Just RFA rights? Not worth it. Maybe if he is signed to a good deal with term, it could work, but that's a lot of depth and picks moving. I'd honestly rather start with Kapanen and a pick on a deal.


Really? Everybody else is calling it a fleecing by the Penguins
22 déc. 2021 à 2 h 39
#12
Démarrer sujet
Canucks...
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2021
Messages: 7,815
Mentions "j'aime": 1,678
Quoting: Canucks33
Roy would be a perfect add but I can't see Vegas giving him up.


Can you see anyway Vegas is able to afford him beyond this season when they have to be able to fit Eichel under their cap?
22 déc. 2021 à 2 h 40
#13
Démarrer sujet
Canucks...
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2021
Messages: 7,815
Mentions "j'aime": 1,678
Quoting: BigShoots
Exactly and Boeser is a first line winger. Probably top 10 RW in the league.


As a Canucks fan, I'd like to believe that, but I don't think many would agree with that assessment. Boeser doesn't even make team USA on most mock rosters

Quoting: Aasen6
That Boeser trade is so bad, why would Van trade a young top 6 scorer for guys that would be on the 4th line in Van? Makes absolutely no sense. Maybe one of blueger or mcginn with rust and a 1st


Quoting: QualityTrades1
Wow it's a good thing you aren't the VAN GM


I don't think you guys realize how good Blueger and McGinn are
SidTheKid35 et Pens3lieve a aimé ceci.
22 déc. 2021 à 8 h 30
#14
Friedman for Norris
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2021
Messages: 668
Mentions "j'aime": 146
Blueger and McGinn are very good depth pieces - but I wouldn’t hesitate a second to get brock boeser for them instead of losing a player like kapanen
22 déc. 2021 à 9 h 31
#15
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2021
Messages: 720
Mentions "j'aime": 427
Quoting: Knuckl3s
As a Canucks fan, I'd like to believe that, but I don't think many would agree with that assessment. Boeser doesn't even make team USA on most mock rosters





I don't think you guys realize how good Blueger and McGinn are


This is 100% a troll post if you believe a top-line RW is worth quality depth pieces.
22 déc. 2021 à 12 h 59
#16
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 1,102
Mentions "j'aime": 352
Quoting: Knuckl3s
Really? Everybody else is calling it a fleecing by the Penguins


Just saw this was an offseason move, which changes things. But I think it's getting called a fleecing because a guy like Boeser should return a 1st and a high end prospect, not two 3rd liners and multiple 2nd round picks.
22 déc. 2021 à 16 h 12
#17
Big Shoots
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2020
Messages: 1,503
Mentions "j'aime": 443
Quoting: Knuckl3s
As a Canucks fan, I'd like to believe that, but I don't think many would agree with that assessment. Boeser doesn't even make team USA on most mock rosters



I'm not even that high on Boeser. I'm quite worried about his game TBH, his mobility is awful and his shot has lost something. I chalked it up to that back injury from his rookie yr. He really was a different, far more dynamic player before that. The last few game under Boudreau seem to be going much better for him though. The goals he scored were snipes, so from the perspective I wanna wait on him before dealing him. If the old Boeser comes back with a new coach he is absolutely top 10 RW. As of now he's probably just outside of that. The US will end up playing C and LW on the RW because they have so much talent elsewhere. Doesn't really change Boeser's NHL ranking.


Quoting: Knuckl3s
I don't think you guys realize how good Blueger and McGinn are


They're decent bottom 6 fwds who I would like to have on the Canucks sure but you don't trade first line talent for that. Its like offering Motte, Pearson and 2 2nds for Jake Guentzel.
22 déc. 2021 à 18 h 28
#18
Démarrer sujet
Canucks...
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2021
Messages: 7,815
Mentions "j'aime": 1,678
Quoting: BigShoots
I'm not even that high on Boeser. I'm quite worried about his game TBH, his mobility is awful and his shot has lost something. I chalked it up to that back injury from his rookie yr. He really was a different, far more dynamic player before that. The last few game under Boudreau seem to be going much better for him though. The goals he scored were snipes, so from the perspective I wanna wait on him before dealing him. If the old Boeser comes back with a new coach he is absolutely top 10 RW. As of now he's probably just outside of that. The US will end up playing C and LW on the RW because they have so much talent elsewhere. Doesn't really change Boeser's NHL ranking.




They're decent bottom 6 fwds who I would like to have on the Canucks sure but you don't trade first line talent for that. Its like offering Motte, Pearson and 2 2nds for Jake Guentzel.


Boeser was really good in last years Covid season, arguably the team's best forward, I'm not worried that he's lost his dynamisms due to injury just yet, but I get the concern. Truth was that nobody was playing well under Travis Green toward the end, like Stan Smyl said, there was no finger pointing to be had

Quoting: QualityTrades1
This is 100% a troll post if you believe a top-line RW is worth quality depth pieces.


How about quality depth pieces + high draft picks?
23 déc. 2021 à 1 h 1
#19
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2017
Messages: 2,104
Mentions "j'aime": 690
Quoting: Knuckl3s
Can you see anyway Vegas is able to afford him beyond this season when they have to be able to fit Eichel under their cap?


Move Dadanov and they're good pretty much
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Supprimer une option
Soumettre le sondage