SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Eichel Package

Créé par: hazard
Équipe: 2021-22 Maple Leafs de Toronto
Date de création initiale: 20 déc. 2021
Publié: 20 déc. 2021
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Transactions
1.
ARI
  1. Niemelä, Topi [Liste de réserve]
  2. Ritchie, Nick
  3. Robertson, Nicholas
  4. Choix de 1e ronde en 2022 (TOR)
  5. Choix de 2e ronde en 2022 (TOR)
2.
TOR
  1. Choix de 3e ronde en 2022 (MIN)
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Enfoui
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2022
Logo de MIN
Logo de TOR
2023
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
2024
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2081 500 000 $81 258 116 $0 $400 000 $241 884 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
950 000 $950 000 $
AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
11 640 250 $11 640 250 $
C
UFA - 3
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
10 903 000 $10 903 000 $
AD
UFA - 4
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
AG, C, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
11 000 000 $11 000 000 $
C, AG
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
6 962 366 $6 962 366 $
AD
UFA - 3
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
1 645 000 $1 645 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
C
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
1 250 000 $1 250 000 $
AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
1 250 000 $1 250 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
900 000 $900 000 $
AD, AG
NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
750 000 $750 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
DG
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
DG/DD
NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
1 650 000 $1 650 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
5 625 000 $5 625 000 $
DG
NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Coyotes de l'Arizona
4 600 000 $4 600 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 4
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
3 800 000 $3 800 000 $
G
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
894 167 $894 167 $
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance400 000 $$400K)
DD
RFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
20 déc. 2021 à 22 h 29
#1
LongtimeLeafsufferer
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2015
Messages: 59,072
Mentions "j'aime": 22,466
Leafs wouldn't do that deal for a position that isn't needed that much. Really not cap compliant and more issues next season with Reilly and other wanting raises.
20 déc. 2021 à 22 h 44
#2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 37,918
Mentions "j'aime": 19,294
How is that the Eichel package? You are comparing Ritchie to Tuch
homiedaclown a aimé ceci.
20 déc. 2021 à 23 h 27
#3
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 4,892
Mentions "j'aime": 3,372
Chychrun didn't play for the Soo Greyhounds so I doubt this trade happens.
hazard a aimé ceci.
20 déc. 2021 à 23 h 59
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2020
Messages: 559
Mentions "j'aime": 123
Quoting: Ledge_And_Dairy
How is that the Eichel package? You are comparing Ritchie to Tuch


No hes not. What he means by “Eichel Package” is the amount of assests returning. In the Eichel deal, there was 4 assests, which included a player that could slot into the lineup now, a prospect would could slot into the lineup now or the following season, and 2 high round draft picks, ideally a 1st round and 2nd round pick. A lot of hickey insiders have reported that if a Chychrun trade were to happen, that a trade structured like the Eichel trade would be the most likely scenario
hazard a aimé ceci.
21 déc. 2021 à 0 h 19
#5
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2021
Messages: 1,907
Mentions "j'aime": 449
Might just be a 3rd round pick, but Minnesota isn't taking on Justin holl , and the cap ensuring with him
21 déc. 2021 à 0 h 27
#6
Démarrer sujet
Ballards Curse
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2017
Messages: 1,055
Mentions "j'aime": 271
Quoting: palhal
Leafs wouldn't do that deal for a position that isn't needed that much. Really not cap compliant and more issues next season with Reilly and other wanting raises.


Next season is next season tho, thats a later problem. Could be a mrazek deal, kerfoot deal, could even be a Muzzin deal that helps them get out of it.

Muzzin already showing signs of decline, and this trade doesnt take anyone off the current roster, just makes them better now and for the long run
21 déc. 2021 à 0 h 29
#7
Démarrer sujet
Ballards Curse
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2017
Messages: 1,055
Mentions "j'aime": 271
Quoting: Ledge_And_Dairy
How is that the Eichel package? You are comparing Ritchie to Tuch


Eichel got a blue chip prospect, a solid player in Tuch, and a 1st+2nd.

Instead of the solid player, I added 2 blue chip prospects, the 1st, and the 2nd. Ritchie is to balance the books, as ARI will still need him to get to cap floor, especially after Kessel is traded later this season
21 déc. 2021 à 0 h 29
#8
Démarrer sujet
Ballards Curse
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2017
Messages: 1,055
Mentions "j'aime": 271
Quoting: Letter_Kenny
Chychrun didn't play for the Soo Greyhounds so I doubt this trade happens.


I didn't think of this. Damn
21 déc. 2021 à 0 h 31
#9
Démarrer sujet
Ballards Curse
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2017
Messages: 1,055
Mentions "j'aime": 271
Quoting: GophersBenJ
Might just be a 3rd round pick, but Minnesota isn't taking on Justin holl , and the cap ensuring with him


Could really be any team that is looking for defensive depth. EDM, ANA and others that are other options. Just chose MIN cause thats where Holl is from
21 déc. 2021 à 1 h 50
#10
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 37,918
Mentions "j'aime": 19,294
Quoting: jchafe77
No hes not. What he means by “Eichel Package” is the amount of assests returning. In the Eichel deal, there was 4 assests, which included a player that could slot into the lineup now, a prospect would could slot into the lineup now or the following season, and 2 high round draft picks, ideally a 1st round and 2nd round pick. A lot of hickey insiders have reported that if a Chychrun trade were to happen, that a trade structured like the Eichel trade would be the most likely scenario


No they've stated that Arizona wants a return of similar value to Eichel. Not just 4 assets
homiedaclown a aimé ceci.
21 déc. 2021 à 1 h 53
#11
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 37,918
Mentions "j'aime": 19,294
Quoting: hazard
Eichel got a blue chip prospect, a solid player in Tuch, and a 1st+2nd.

Instead of the solid player, I added 2 blue chip prospects, the 1st, and the 2nd. Ritchie is to balance the books, as ARI will still need him to get to cap floor, especially after Kessel is traded later this season


Neither of those prospects are in the same league as Krebs. Together they have around the same value as Krebs, maybe a slight bit more. Still missing the entire value of Tuch and then add in the negative value of Ritchie
homiedaclown a aimé ceci.
21 déc. 2021 à 2 h 16
#12
Démarrer sujet
Ballards Curse
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2017
Messages: 1,055
Mentions "j'aime": 271
Quoting: Ledge_And_Dairy
Neither of those prospects are in the same league as Krebs. Together they have around the same value as Krebs, maybe a slight bit more. Still missing the entire value of Tuch and then add in the negative value of Ritchie


What? Robertson is just about equal to Krebbs lol. He's an extremely highly touted player. Niemela is RD and won dman of the tournament last year during the world juniors... They are blue chips lol.

Ritchie doesn't have negative value. As I said, they need players to also reach the capfloor. With Chyk off, thats 4.6 and another 3.4 for Kessel, thats 8 mill. They also... need players to play for them lmao

Would Kerfoot instead of Niemela be better?
21 déc. 2021 à 2 h 17
#13
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2021
Messages: 7,136
Mentions "j'aime": 3,156
Quoting: jchafe77
No hes not. What he means by “Eichel Package” is the amount of assests returning. In the Eichel deal, there was 4 assests, which included a player that could slot into the lineup now, a prospect would could slot into the lineup now or the following season, and 2 high round draft picks, ideally a 1st round and 2nd round pick. A lot of hickey insiders have reported that if a Chychrun trade were to happen, that a trade structured like the Eichel trade would be the most likely scenario


Except Ritchie is nowhere close to as good as Tuch
And the prospects aren’t on the level of Krebs
This package is quite LESS VALUABLE than the “Eichel package”

If someone’s gonna call it that, they should keep the overall value roughly the same
21 déc. 2021 à 2 h 20
#14
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2021
Messages: 7,136
Mentions "j'aime": 3,156
Quoting: hazard
What? Robertson is just about equal to Krebbs lol. He's an extremely highly touted player. Niemela is RD and won dman of the tournament last year during the world juniors... They are blue chips lol.

Ritchie doesn't have negative value. As I said, they need players to also reach the capfloor. With Chyk off, thats 4.6 and another 3.4 for Kessel, thats 8 mill. They also... need players to play for them lmao

Would Kerfoot instead of Niemela be better?


Neither Ritchie, nor Kerfoot, have any kind of value when it comes to getting players like Chychrun

And Roberson is not on the same level as Krebs as a prospect

U Leafs fans are hilarious 🤣🤣🤣
21 déc. 2021 à 2 h 34
#15
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 37,918
Mentions "j'aime": 19,294
Quoting: hazard
What? Robertson is just about equal to Krebbs lol. He's an extremely highly touted player. Niemela is RD and won dman of the tournament last year during the world juniors... They are blue chips lol.

Ritchie doesn't have negative value. As I said, they need players to also reach the capfloor. With Chyk off, thats 4.6 and another 3.4 for Kessel, thats 8 mill. They also... need players to play for them lmao

Would Kerfoot instead of Niemela be better?


Robertson has had a handful of injuries now and his hype train has really fallen off. He had a good D+1 year but nothing really impressive since. He's still a fine prospect but Krebs definitely has a higher ceiling and plays a more important role.

Niemela is also fine but again you are over valuing him. He is not blue chip, he is not an A+ prospect.

How does Ritchie not have negative value? Come on man take off your blinders here.

You would have to add Kerfoot and not remove Niemela, i really dont yhink you get *** far off the value is
21 déc. 2021 à 11 h 20
#16
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2020
Messages: 559
Mentions "j'aime": 123
Quoting: Ledge_And_Dairy
Robertson has had a handful of injuries now and his hype train has really fallen off. He had a good D+1 year but nothing really impressive since. He's still a fine prospect but Krebs definitely has a higher ceiling and plays a more important role.

Niemela is also fine but again you are over valuing him. He is not blue chip, he is not an A+ prospect.

How does Ritchie not have negative value? Come on man take off your blinders here.

You would have to add Kerfoot and not remove Niemela, i really dont yhink you get *** far off the value is


Niemela not an blue chip? Dude, the youngster is 19 years old and is leading the LaLiga in points as a defenseman. If not leading, very close to leading. He was named WJC best defenseman last year and his game keeps improving by the day.
21 déc. 2021 à 12 h 19
#17
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 37,918
Mentions "j'aime": 19,294
Quoting: jchafe77
Niemela not an blue chip? Dude, the youngster is 19 years old and is leading the LaLiga in points as a defenseman. If not leading, very close to leading. He was named WJC best defenseman last year and his game keeps improving by the day.


So Nils Lundkvist 2.0, blue chip is the elite of the elite prospects. A+ level. Guys very l8kely to be top line/pair players.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage