SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Boeser deadline

Créé par: BradTolliverGoalie
Équipe: 2021-22 Penguins de Pittsburgh
Date de création initiale: 16 déc. 2021
Publié: 16 déc. 2021
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
Don’t take this seriously. I didn’t.
Transactions
PIT
  1. Boeser, Brock
  2. Halák, Jaroslav (750 000 $ retained)
  3. Choix de 3e ronde en 2022 (WPG)
VAN
  1. DeSmith, Casey
  2. Poulin, Samuel
  3. Zucker, Jason
  4. Choix de 2e ronde en 2022 (PIT)
Détails additionnels:
2nd upgrades to a 1st if pens advance to the final.
Rachats de contrats
Enfoui
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2022
Logo de PIT
Logo de WPG
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
2023
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de TOR
2024
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2381 500 000 $79 753 206 $0 $1 500 000 $1 746 794 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
4 500 000 $4 500 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 3
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
8 700 000 $8 700 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
5 875 000 $5 875 000 $
AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
9 500 000 $9 500 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
3 200 000 $3 200 000 $
AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
AG, C
UFA - 1
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
2 636 364 $2 636 364 $
AD, C
UFA - 1
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
1 100 000 $1 100 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
2 750 000 $2 750 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 4
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
2 200 000 $2 200 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
1 725 000 $1 725 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
4 100 000 $4 100 000 $
DG
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
G
UFA - 2
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
4 025 175 $4 025 175 $
DG
UFA - 4
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
4 875 000 $4 875 000 $
DG
M-NTC
UFA - 5
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
7 250 000 $7 250 000 $
DD
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
750 000 $750 000 $ (Bonis de performance1 500 000 $$2M)
G
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
4 400 000 $4 400 000 $
DD
UFA - 6
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
750 000 $750 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
750 000 $750 000 $
AG, C
UFA - 1
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
725 000 $725 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
750 000 $750 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
16 déc. 2021 à 23 h 4
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2019
Messages: 7,870
Mentions "j'aime": 6,382
Marino or it isn't gonna happen
mv21227, cooliny, majormoose007 and 2 others a aimé ceci.
16 déc. 2021 à 23 h 6
#2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2020
Messages: 10,166
Mentions "j'aime": 7,852
So you still need to pay for Boeser.
16 déc. 2021 à 23 h 9
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2020
Messages: 9,664
Mentions "j'aime": 9,034
Marino needs to be part of a Boeser deal
16 déc. 2021 à 23 h 14
#4
Vancouerrific
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2019
Messages: 3,214
Mentions "j'aime": 1,052
200.gif
BradTolliverGoalie a aimé ceci.
16 déc. 2021 à 23 h 17
#5
PDG over PDO
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2020
Messages: 4,976
Mentions "j'aime": 4,044
That's the price to dump Zucker's contract now add Marino for Boeser
16 déc. 2021 à 23 h 22
#6
MajorMoose
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2019
Messages: 3,425
Mentions "j'aime": 2,602
lol not close
17 déc. 2021 à 0 h 40
#7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2020
Messages: 1,249
Mentions "j'aime": 301
No way. Add Marino and we have a deal.
17 déc. 2021 à 0 h 40
#8
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2020
Messages: 3,256
Mentions "j'aime": 1,173
Doesnt make sense for VAN. I also cant see the Pens moving so many assets.
17 déc. 2021 à 2 h 1
#9
Big Shoots
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2020
Messages: 3,570
Mentions "j'aime": 1,087
Quoting: Sonuvabirch69
No way. Add Marino and we have a deal.


Do we though. Are we taking Zucker and all that crap just to get Marino for Boeser? I still reject with Marino in the deal I think. It is close though.
theleano1 a aimé ceci.
17 déc. 2021 à 2 h 24
#10
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2021
Messages: 12,418
Mentions "j'aime": 2,630
Quoting: BigShoots
Do we though. Are we taking Zucker and all that crap just to get Marino for Boeser? I still reject with Marino in the deal I think. It is close though.


More like swap Zucker for Marino, but Vancouver's 3rd round pick shouldn't be there either. It should be Boeser for a package surrounding Marino. I know I know, top 4 defenseman are typically more valuable than top six wingers from a positional relation, but I do believe Boeser is a franchise caliber winger, while Marino hasn't quite solidified himself as a top pairing defenseman yet, but he's certainly a quality top 4 D-man, that much can be said about him thus far. You know, considering Marino refused to sign with Edmonton, the team that drafted him, much like Adam Fox with Calgary and later Carolina, I'm honestly suspicious of whether or not Marino would even be willing to suite up for a Canadian team, despite the fact that he can't have trade protection being in an RFA year
17 déc. 2021 à 13 h 52
#11
Big Shoots
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2020
Messages: 3,570
Mentions "j'aime": 1,087
Quoting: Knuckl3s
More like swap Zucker for Marino, but Vancouver's 3rd round pick shouldn't be there either. It should be Boeser for a package surrounding Marino. I know I know, top 4 defenseman are typically more valuable than top six wingers from a positional relation, but I do believe Boeser is a franchise caliber winger, while Marino hasn't quite solidified himself as a top pairing defenseman yet, but he's certainly a quality top 4 D-man, that much can be said about him thus far. You know, considering Marino refused to sign with Edmonton, the team that drafted him, much like Adam Fox with Calgary and later Carolina, I'm honestly suspicious of whether or not Marino would even be willing to suite up for a Canadian team, despite the fact that he can't have trade protection being in an RFA year


I would trade Boeser for Marino straight personally. My biggest concern was taking cap dumps. Marino is signed for another 5 seasons after this on a good contract. He'll play where he's told to play. Top 4 RD are so hard to find and Marino is on a great deal. On the surface it might seem like Boeser is worth more but I really think this would play out as a steal for the Canucks. Boeser I feel has lost a step, and I fear its because of the back injury he sustained his rookie yr. He hasn't been as dynamic since. Also I disagree that he is a franchise winger. Those are rare and their names are Kane, Huberdeau, Rantanen, Marner, Marchand, Kucherov. Boeser isn't even close to that. Hell JT Miller isn't even a franchise winger and he's twice the player Boeser is.
17 déc. 2021 à 19 h 0
#12
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2021
Messages: 12,418
Mentions "j'aime": 2,630
Quoting: BigShoots
I would trade Boeser for Marino straight personally. My biggest concern was taking cap dumps. Marino is signed for another 5 seasons after this on a good contract. He'll play where he's told to play. Top 4 RD are so hard to find and Marino is on a great deal. On the surface it might seem like Boeser is worth more but I really think this would play out as a steal for the Canucks. Boeser I feel has lost a step, and I fear its because of the back injury he sustained his rookie yr. He hasn't been as dynamic since. Also I disagree that he is a franchise winger. Those are rare and their names are Kane, Huberdeau, Rantanen, Marner, Marchand, Kucherov. Boeser isn't even close to that. Hell JT Miller isn't even a franchise winger and he's twice the player Boeser is.


Boeser just had a strong 2 goal game, I'm still of the mind of don't count your chickens before they hatch. If he doesn't quite compare to the names you listed, which is a fair argument, but I would still argue he isn't far off. Don't get me wrong, Marino is super super tempting throw an offer at Hextall and co. over in the burgh, but forgive me if I'm a little hesitant to just deal Boeser at this point, because while he's been a little bit inconsistent over his career, I'm not at the point where I feel comfortable giving up on his fit in Vancouver, if that makes sense
18 déc. 2021 à 0 h 50
#13
Big Shoots
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2020
Messages: 3,570
Mentions "j'aime": 1,087
Quoting: Knuckl3s
Boeser just had a strong 2 goal game, I'm still of the mind of don't count your chickens before they hatch. If he doesn't quite compare to the names you listed, which is a fair argument, but I would still argue he isn't far off. Don't get me wrong, Marino is super super tempting throw an offer at Hextall and co. over in the burgh, but forgive me if I'm a little hesitant to just deal Boeser at this point, because while he's been a little bit inconsistent over his career, I'm not at the point where I feel comfortable giving up on his fit in Vancouver, if that makes sense


That's fair. And I will say the goals he's scored the last couple games were the type of goals he was scoring his rookie yr. Pure sniper shots that only 10-20 guys in the whole league can do. So I guess we'll see how he does under Beaudreau. If he does fall back to that lumbering player we've seen this season previously I'd try to maximize my asset before the league catches on. Top 4 RD are not made available often and its the Canucks biggest need is why I'd be willing to even take a loss on the trade (on the surface of it).
Knuckl3s a aimé ceci.
18 déc. 2021 à 2 h 39
#14
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2021
Messages: 12,418
Mentions "j'aime": 2,630
Quoting: BigShoots
That's fair. And I will say the goals he's scored the last couple games were the type of goals he was scoring his rookie yr. Pure sniper shots that only 10-20 guys in the whole league can do. So I guess we'll see how he does under Beaudreau. If he does fall back to that lumbering player we've seen this season previously I'd try to maximize my asset before the league catches on. Top 4 RD are not made available often and its the Canucks biggest need is why I'd be willing to even take a loss on the trade (on the surface of it).


Definitely how I would like for JR to manage that. I really do believe that it was Travis Green's tighter system that was holding not just Boeser but many Canuck players back this season, and now Gabby has loosened them all up and they've all greatly benefitted from it
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage