SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Rebuild

Créé par: Christian17
Équipe: 2021-22 Ducks d'Anaheim
Date de création initiale: 15 déc. 2021
Publié: 15 déc. 2021
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
The Ducks could very well make the playoffs this season, and although they've been playing better than VGK, EDM, and SJ this year I don't think it's realistic for the franchise to try to contend this season. And they can't afford to just walk away from real good assets in Rakell, Manson, and Lindholm, and save maybe Lindholm, their contract windows don't fit the Ducks contending window.

With these trades the Ducks three low first-round picks, while improving their current forward depth and greatly depleting their defensive depth. With this roster they could probably make it into the playoffs as a wild card, however, they would likely be ousted quickly if they faced one of CGY, VGK, MIN, or COL. And they can afford to keep on Monahan and Dadonov's big contracts next season as they likely won't have any big signings increases besides Milano, Lundy, and Liljegren's increases which should be around 9M combined. This leaves them with approximately 6M-7M to sign an LD placeholder until Mahura, Benoit, Zellweger or Thrun become tenable in the top 4. That could very well be Lindholm if he wants to come back to ANA and sign a 2-year deal where he has ample opportunity to rack up some points with a likely improved ANA offense and then cash in with his 30s contract.
Transactions
1.
ANA
  1. Dadonov, Evgeni
  2. Choix de 2e ronde en 2022 (VGK)
VGK
  1. Deslauriers, Nicolas
Détails additionnels:
I am literally basing this trade solely on what I saw on Vegas Armchair GMs. Ducks can afford to have his 5M on the books for next year.
2.
ANA
  1. DeBrusk, Jake
  2. Choix de 1e ronde en 2022 (BOS)
  3. Choix de 3e ronde en 2022 (CGY)
BOS
  1. Rakell, Rickard (1 894 722 $ retained)
  2. Steel, Sam
Détails additionnels:
Rakell is on pace for 30 goals, with an already awesome contract and retention.
3.
ANA
  1. Monahan, Sean
  2. Choix de 1e ronde en 2022 (CGY)
  3. Choix de 2e ronde en 2022 (FLA)
Détails additionnels:
I see Monahan as a negative value with the contract, basing this off Flames Armchair GM teams and his obviously bad stats all around for his contract.
CGY
  1. DeBrusk, Jake
  2. Manson, Josh (2 050 000 $ retained)
Détails additionnels:
Manson I think can get a low 1st, especially if Chiarot is commanding that. Manson is much better than Chiarot.

The retention plus Debrusk and taking away Monahan's next year gets the 2nd rounder which will likely be as good as a 3rd round pick.
4.
ANA
  1. Liljegren, Timothy
  2. Choix de 1e ronde en 2022 (TOR)
Détails additionnels:
Toronto needs to get serious about winning a Cup. This move gives them probably the best defense in the East once Sandin gets back.

Rielly-Brodie
Lindholm-Sandin
Muzzin-Dermott/Holl
TOR
  1. Lindholm, Hampus (2 600 000 $ retained)
Détails additionnels:
Lindholm is a top 2 D man on most teams. I saw lots of Leafs fans asking for Manson, but Lindholm is a lot better than Manson. Manson is a top 4 Dman, but Lindholm can take a really bad defensive partner and make him look good. I'm looking at you Holl, or one of him or Sandin can move to the right side.

I'm aware Liliegren has played well this season, but these are the types of moves that you need to make if you want to win a Cup.
Rachats de contrats
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2022
Logo de ANA
Logo de BOS
Logo de CGY
Logo de TOR
Logo de ANA
Logo de VGK
Logo de FLA
Logo de CGY
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de TOR
Logo de NSH
2023
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
2024
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2381 500 000 $60 705 096 $0 $3 682 500 $20 794 904 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
1 700 000 $1 700 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
C, AG
RFA - 2
Logo de Golden Knights de Vegas
2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
AD, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
1 456 250 $1 456 250 $
AG, C
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $ (Bonis de performance1 500 000 $$2M)
C
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
1 450 000 $1 450 000 $
AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
2 037 500 $2 037 500 $
AG
RFA - 2
Logo de Flames de Calgary
6 375 000 $6 375 000 $
C, AG, AD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
5 250 000 $5 250 000 $
AD, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
1 295 000 $1 295 000 $
AG, AD
RFA - 3
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
874 125 $874 125 $
C, AG
RFA - 1
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
750 000 $750 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
6 500 000 $6 500 000 $
DG/DD
M-NTC
UFA - 5
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
DD
RFA - 2
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
6 400 000 $6 400 000 $
G
M-NTC
UFA - 6
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
750 000 $750 000 $
DG/DD
RFA - 2
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
3 900 000 $3 900 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
950 000 $950 000 $
G
UFA - 2
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
809 166 $809 166 $ (Bonis de performance82 500 $$82K)
DG
RFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance400 000 $$400K)
DD
RFA - 1
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
AG, C
UFA - 2
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
6 875 000 $6 875 000 $
C, AD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
750 000 $750 000 $
AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
1 200 000 $1 200 000 $
DG
UFA - 1
Équipe de réserve
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
822 500 $822 500 $ (0 $$00 $$0) (Bonis de performance132 500 $$132K)
G
RFA - 2

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
15 déc. 2021 à 3 h 45
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2019
Messages: 6,270
Mentions "j'aime": 3,025
Why is Anaheim rebuilding again? They are 1st in the Pacific right now.
OldNYIfan a aimé ceci.
15 déc. 2021 à 3 h 50
#2
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2017
Messages: 472
Mentions "j'aime": 72
If CGY fans say they don't need Manson because they have Tanev there, I hate to break it to you but he is due for an injury. The guy missed 50% of his games due to injury from 2015-2019. Also, even if he's healthy then you can bench Gudbranson and have incredible D depth for the playoffs with:

Hanifin-Andersson
Kylington-Tanev/Manson
Valimaki-Tanev/Manson
Zadorov-Gudbranson
OldNYIfan a aimé ceci.
15 déc. 2021 à 3 h 57
#3
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2017
Messages: 472
Mentions "j'aime": 72
Quoting: Byrr
Why is Anaheim rebuilding again? They are 1st in the Pacific right now.


Well, I guess it's more of a retool. Management seems to recognize that the Ducks aren't going to be contending for a Cup this year as Solomon said they are still in a rebuild. With valuable core players going to UFA status, this current conglomeration of the Ducks isn't worth trying to keep together given the age of the pieces.

Losing these pieces will definitely hurt them competing this year but it will set them up to really succeed when McTavish, Perrault, Zellweger, Thrun, and Pastujov break into the roster. It's not about just being in the playoffs, it's about setting up a team that can win within Zegras and Drysdale's primes. However, with the pieces still on the team, and players coming back from injury, I think this Ducks roster could still make the playoffs beating out one of SJ, WPG or NSH for a wild card spot.
GeneralLandro et Byrr a aimé ceci.
15 déc. 2021 à 4 h 53
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2020
Messages: 9,527
Mentions "j'aime": 8,968
that trade literally makes calgary worse today, and we're paying a 1st+2nd for the privilege? get lost
15 déc. 2021 à 9 h 31
#5
Once a Kings Fan Too
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 39,662
Mentions "j'aime": 24,576
I think that we'll succeed in re-signing Hampus.

If Monahan is someone we need, andI'm not convinced, I think we'd need to add and I don't think that we'd be getting the draft picks back. I understand that Flames fans are currently down on Monahan, but he's still a serviceable top-6 center.
15 déc. 2021 à 11 h 37
#6
Tyler Mulek
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2021
Messages: 324
Mentions "j'aime": 98
What would you want to see from Edmonton to land Rakell, Steel and Manson?

22 - 1st, 23 - 1st, Yamo, Kassian, b prospect/Mid round pick? just trying to gauge based off what you are acquiring from CGY/BOS
16 déc. 2021 à 1 h 31
#7
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2017
Messages: 472
Mentions "j'aime": 72
Quoting: OldNYIfan
I think that we'll succeed in re-signing Hampus.

If Monahan is someone we need, andI'm not convinced, I think we'd need to add and I don't think that we'd be getting the draft picks back. I understand that Flames fans are currently down on Monahan, but he's still a serviceable top-6 center.


I saw a bunch of Calgary fans proposing Debrusk for Monahan one for one on here, hence the trade. I don't think Boston makes that trade because of how bad Monahan is compared to his contract and the extra year on it.

Hence why I think this trade works. It's not a trade to acquire Monahan it's a trade to get picks, Monahan is just the body that comes with them.
16 déc. 2021 à 1 h 33
#8
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2017
Messages: 472
Mentions "j'aime": 72
Quoting: Mulicked
What would you want to see from Edmonton to land Rakell, Steel and Manson?

22 - 1st, 23 - 1st, Yamo, Kassian, b prospect/Mid round pick? just trying to gauge based off what you are acquiring from CGY/BOS


Yea probably something similar to that.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage