SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Just a test

Créé par: OutCold13
Équipe: 2021-22 Sharks de San Jose
Date de création initiale: 10 déc. 2021
Publié: 10 déc. 2021
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
I was listening to a podcast where it was suggested that maybe a little time in the AHL playing top 6 minutes would be good for Weatherby, if the Sharks opted for that option this would be a trade i think might be worth exploring.
Transactions
SJS
  1. Rask, Victor
Détails additionnels:
Rask is slow but he makes plays and is the kind of center Labanc needs to get going. If nothing else it's a low cost look at a player who could help Labanc rebound his value for a possible trade deadline or off-season trade. Wild could retain a bit if Sharks have not yet accrued enough cap space to fit Rask.
MIN
  1. Choix de 7e ronde en 2022 (MIN)
Détails additionnels:
This is a cap move for the Wild so that they can add at the deadline. Rask doesn't suck but he doesn't fit the Wilds current style of play.
Rachats de contrats
Enfoui
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2022
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de BUF
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de ARI
2023
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
2024
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2381 500 000 $66 360 363 $0 $212 500 $15 139 637 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
8 000 000 $8 000 000 $
C
M-NTC
UFA - 6
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
750 000 $750 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
5 625 000 $5 625 000 $
C
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
1 550 000 $1 550 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
750 000 $750 000 $
AG, AD
RFA - 1
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
C
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
4 725 000 $4 725 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 3
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
500 000 $500 000 $
AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
1 025 000 $1 025 000 $
C, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
850 000 $850 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
725 000 $725 000 $
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
10 000 000 $10 000 000 $
DD
NMC
UFA - 6
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
2 250 000 $2 250 000 $
G
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance212 500 $$212K)
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
5 280 000 $5 280 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
2 175 000 $2 175 000 $
G
UFA - 2
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
7 000 000 $7 000 000 $
DG/DD
NMC
UFA - 5
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
750 000 $750 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
783 333 $783 333 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
796 667 $796 667 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
2 250 000 $2 250 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 3
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
750 000 $750 000 $
C
UFA - 2

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
10 déc. 2021 à 22 h 29
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2020
Messages: 5,204
Mentions "j'aime": 2,861
Time in the AHL could be decent for Weatherby. He’s shown some decent results but he’s just been really inconsistent lately. Played great against the Flames imo then had a bad game against the wild. Not sure how I feel about rask though it’s a very low risk move but I can’t say I’m a big fan of his even if he’s an upgrade over Bonino offensively.
OutCold13 et CheechYou a aimé ceci.
11 déc. 2021 à 0 h 33
#2
Démarrer sujet
Hockey Fan13
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2019
Messages: 3,914
Mentions "j'aime": 2,487
Quoting: FunMustBeAlways
Time in the AHL could be decent for Weatherby. He’s shown some decent results but he’s just been really inconsistent lately. Played great against the Flames imo then had a bad game against the wild. Not sure how I feel about rask though it’s a very low risk move but I can’t say I’m a big fan of his even if he’s an upgrade over Bonino offensively.


Fair enough.
11 déc. 2021 à 11 h 47
#3
14m in dead cap
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2019
Messages: 3,560
Mentions "j'aime": 3,043
I don't see why they'd unload Rask unless they're looking to acquire 2 expensive players. The Wild can currently take on a player with a $8.7m cap hit at the deadline (slightly higher if they send someone down to accrue more cap space before the deadline). Better to just hold on to Rask for more depth in case you need him, the 7th isn't likely to ever play a NHL game and certainly doesn't help them in the playoffs this year.
OutCold13 a aimé ceci.
11 déc. 2021 à 14 h 42
#4
train, train
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2015
Messages: 2,996
Mentions "j'aime": 730
Quoting: FunMustBeAlways
Time in the AHL could be decent for Weatherby. He’s shown some decent results but he’s just been really inconsistent lately. Played great against the Flames imo then had a bad game against the wild. Not sure how I feel about rask though it’s a very low risk move but I can’t say I’m a big fan of his even if he’s an upgrade over Bonino offensively.


Agreed about Weatherby. I personally wouldn't do this move if I'm DW.
OutCold13 a aimé ceci.
11 déc. 2021 à 18 h 14
#5
Démarrer sujet
Hockey Fan13
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2019
Messages: 3,914
Mentions "j'aime": 2,487
Quoting: JayTea
I don't see why they'd unload Rask unless they're looking to acquire 2 expensive players. The Wild can currently take on a player with a $8.7m cap hit at the deadline (slightly higher if they send someone down to accrue more cap space before the deadline). Better to just hold on to Rask for more depth in case you need him, the 7th isn't likely to ever play a NHL game and certainly doesn't help them in the playoffs this year.


Moving Rask also opens a roster spot, but yeah i see it as a more likely scenario Wild don't do much for trades this season unless they really hit the skids.
11 déc. 2021 à 23 h 9
#6
14m in dead cap
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2019
Messages: 3,560
Mentions "j'aime": 3,043
Quoting: OutCold13
Moving Rask also opens a roster spot, but yeah i see it as a more likely scenario Wild don't do much for trades this season unless they really hit the skids.


If they're picking up 2 deadline players, that makes sense. Otherwise Czuczman (who I forgot was on the roster) would just go back to Iowa and they can acquire a 23rd roster player for under $8.7m or so with Rask on the roster.
OutCold13 a aimé ceci.
12 déc. 2021 à 2 h 18
#7
Démarrer sujet
Hockey Fan13
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2019
Messages: 3,914
Mentions "j'aime": 2,487
Quoting: JayTea
If they're picking up 2 deadline players, that makes sense. Otherwise Czuczman (who I forgot was on the roster) would just go back to Iowa and they can acquire a 23rd roster player for under $8.7m or so with Rask on the roster.


I was thinking of opening up a spot for Boldy and Rossi,but they can be black aces so that really doesn't hold water. To be honest probably not much reason to move Rask.
How about this idea. Wild trade Sturm. I like Sturm but don't know how the Wild will be able to re-sign him and he will be a UFA. Rossi is probably already as good as him. To the right team i bet Sturm returns a 1st or early 2nd. Thoughts on that?
12 déc. 2021 à 11 h 39
#8
14m in dead cap
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2019
Messages: 3,560
Mentions "j'aime": 3,043
Quoting: OutCold13
I was thinking of opening up a spot for Boldy and Rossi,but they can be black aces so that really doesn't hold water. To be honest probably not much reason to move Rask.
How about this idea. Wild trade Sturm. I like Sturm but don't know how the Wild will be able to re-sign him and he will be a UFA. Rossi is probably already as good as him. To the right team i bet Sturm returns a 1st or early 2nd. Thoughts on that?


If Rossi isn't ready for a top 6 role, he should be in Iowa until he is. They didn't use a #9 overall pick to get a 4C. That being said, I can't imagine Sturm will be THAT expensive to resign if he likes it here and even if he was, teams that are first in their conference don't typically trade away cheap depth that they can use for a playoff run. I really don't see the Wild trading away any players this deadline for picks, they'll be looking for trades to make the team immediately better. Maybe they move someone as part of a deal to bring in someone who might an upgrade, like JT Miller if the Canucks can't get back into the playoff picture. Leipold is going to want that playoff ticket sale revenue.
OutCold13 a aimé ceci.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage