SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

TDLs Part 5

Créé par: nintendofan721
Équipe: 2021-22 Flames de Calgary
Date de création initiale: 7 déc. 2021
Publié: 8 déc. 2021
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
This team has proven me wrong! I thought they were going to be terrible this year, but so far they have been excellent with Markstrom looking like a vezina candidate. They are a team that can go all in with they way they’ve been playing so far. The defense and the goaltending are really good so not much has to be done there. They could however, use another forward or two who can get a lot of points, since that’s what they need most. It’s mainly been the first line and Mangiapane scoring all the goals. As always, feel free to give feedback.
Transactions
1.
MTL
  1. Monahan, Sean
  2. Choix de 1e ronde en 2022 (CGY)
  3. Choix de 2e ronde en 2023 (CGY)
Détails additionnels:
A blockbuster trade with the Habs. Flames could use a second line winger and center, and these two can fit well. Montreal is in need of a rebuild so they can get a good return if they trade these two, and Monahan looks like a trade candidate for the Flames. I would say Dvorak = Monahan and Toffoli = a first and a second.
2.
CGY
  1. Choix de 4e ronde en 2022 (WSH)
WSH
  1. Zadorov, Nikita (937 500 $ retained)
Détails additionnels:
Anyone who can use an extra defenseman so the flames can get under the cap for this year. Assuming Valimaki is ready to be a full time NHLer by the trade deadline.
Rachats de contrats
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2022
Logo de FLA
Logo de CGY
Logo de WSH
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
2023
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
2024
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2381 500 000 $70 750 000 $0 $0 $10 750 000 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Flames de Calgary
6 750 000 $6 750 000 $
AG
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
4 850 000 $4 850 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 3
Logo de Flames de Calgary
7 000 000 $7 000 000 $
AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
2 125 000 $2 125 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 3
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
4 450 000 $4 450 000 $
C
UFA - 4
Logo de Flames de Calgary
2 425 000 $2 425 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
4 900 000 $4 900 000 $
AD, AG
NTC
UFA - 6
Logo de Flames de Calgary
5 350 000 $5 350 000 $
C
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Flames de Calgary
2 300 000 $2 300 000 $
AG, AD, C
RFA - 3
Logo de Flames de Calgary
5 250 000 $5 250 000 $
AG, AD
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 2
Logo de Flames de Calgary
800 000 $800 000 $
C
UFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
800 000 $800 000 $
AD, C
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Flames de Calgary
1 237 500 $1 237 500 $
DG
UFA - 3
Logo de Flames de Calgary
4 550 000 $4 550 000 $
DD
UFA - 5
Logo de Flames de Calgary
6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
G
NMC
UFA - 5
Logo de Flames de Calgary
750 000 $750 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
1 125 000 $1 125 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Flames de Calgary
750 000 $750 000 $
G
UFA - 2
Logo de Flames de Calgary
1 550 000 $1 550 000 $
DG
RFA - 2
Logo de Flames de Calgary
1 950 000 $1 950 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Flames de Calgary
1 750 000 $1 750 000 $
AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
900 000 $900 000 $
AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
750 000 $750 000 $
DD
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
8 déc. 2021 à 17 h 37
#1
Ballards Curse
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2017
Messages: 1,055
Mentions "j'aime": 271
Why change whats working tho? CGY looks playoff built. I think depth pieces would be better here rather then a BB for Monahan.

If they can snag someone like Debrusk from BOS, thatll solidify them even more then they are
8 déc. 2021 à 17 h 45
#2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 38,252
Mentions "j'aime": 19,514
Just tag Pitlick onto the Habs trade to make the cap work
soooonk a aimé ceci.
8 déc. 2021 à 17 h 45
#3
T.D.G line.
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2020
Messages: 578
Mentions "j'aime": 82
Quoting: hazard
Why change whats working tho? CGY looks playoff built. I think depth pieces would be better here rather then a BB for Monahan.

If they can snag someone like Debrusk from BOS, thatll solidify them even more then they are


I would keep Monahan for sure. Love to have him on the Habs Toffoli for 1st and 2nd ok done deal.
Stay away from Debrusk!
8 déc. 2021 à 17 h 54
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 38,252
Mentions "j'aime": 19,514
Quoting: hazard
Why change whats working tho? CGY looks playoff built. I think depth pieces would be better here rather then a BB for Monahan.

If they can snag someone like Debrusk from BOS, thatll solidify them even more then they are


DeBrusk would cost more than most rental options at his caliber and Flames would only be renting him anyways. Plus Calgary is already extremely deep at LW with more in the system (ie Pelletier), A trade like this would add a needed top 9 RHS as well as changing Monahan for 2 defensively strong players. Would be a very Sutter oriented deadline move. Similar to the Carter trade who at the time was 27 years old and in year 1 of an 11 year long deal
8 déc. 2021 à 17 h 59
#5
retired
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2020
Messages: 8,893
Mentions "j'aime": 4,761
too much for the habs package. take out the 2nd.
8 déc. 2021 à 19 h 1
#6
Boris Bagel
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2016
Messages: 2,817
Mentions "j'aime": 600
Flames add Poirier and Habs consider
8 déc. 2021 à 19 h 12
#7
Go Habs Go
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2017
Messages: 10,667
Mentions "j'aime": 4,091
I'd keep Dvorak over Monahan. He hasn't been as good as we hoped, but that's true for most of the team this year. Monahan would do no better, cost more, and be gone sooner.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage