SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Personally Ideal

Créé par: GeneralLandro
Équipe: 2022-23 Ducks d'Anaheim
Date de création initiale: 5 déc. 2021
Publié: 6 déc. 2021
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
If an Offer Sheet you think is matched I will remove it but let’s say the players sign it and it’s waiting for their team to make the choice to let them go or match
(Don’t think Vegas can match Hague but possibly Roy)

Getzlaf signs a big contract but is basically retired so Anaheim his the floor

Trades are approximate value I think the players are worth, not specifically to the team they were traded to here

Anaheim turns the 4 1st round picks into Nemec and Miroshnichenko for this world

*Just For Fun*

Cam Fowler ‘A’
Trevor Zegras ‘A’
Jakob Silfverberg ‘A’
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
62 950 000 $
33 500 000 $
31 250 000 $
54 110 000 $
31 350 000 $
2800 000 $
2800 000 $
2800 000 $
2800 000 $
2800 000 $
2800 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
11 450 000 $
11 000 000 $
21 250 000 $
112 500 000 $
21 100 000 $
CRÉÉANSCAP HIT
Nemec, Simon
3925 000 $
Miroshnichenko, Ivan
3925 000 $
Offres hostiles
Le salaire annuel moyen (AAV) de l'offre hostile est calculé en divisant la valeur totale du contrat par: 1. La durée totale du contrat, ou 2. Cinq ans
JOUEURAAVCOMPENSATION
Hague, Nicolas4 110 000 $
Choix de 2e ronde en 2022
Roy, Nicolas1 350 000 $Aucune compensation
Transactions
1.
ANA
  1. Choix de 1e ronde en 2022 (NYI)
  2. Choix de 2e ronde en 2023 (NYI)
Détails additionnels:
Prospect
NYI
    Hampus Lindholm
    50% retained
    21/22 TDL

    Any Team
    2.
    ANA
    1. Choix de 1e ronde en 2022 (TOR)
    2. Choix de 3e ronde en 2023 (TOR)
    Détails additionnels:
    or Prospect instead of 3rd
    TOR
      Rickard Rakell
      50-% retained
      21/22 TDL

      Any Team
      3.
      ANA
      1. Choix de 1e ronde en 2022 (WSH)
      2. Choix de 4e ronde en 2023 (WSH)
      Détails additionnels:
      or Prospect instead of 4th
      WSH
        Josh Manson
        50% retained
        21/22 YDL

        Any Team
        4.
        ANA
        1. Choix de 2e ronde en 2022 (NYR)
        2. Choix de 2e ronde en 2023 (NYR)
        Détails additionnels:
        Picks used to trade up in the 1st round
        NYR
        1. Henrique, Adam
        Détails additionnels:
        2022 Draft

        Any Team
        Rachats de contrats
        Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
        2022
        Logo de ANA
        Logo de NYI
        Logo de TOR
        Logo de WSH
        Logo de NYR
        Logo de ANA
        Logo de ANA
        Logo de TOR
        Logo de NSH
        2023
        Logo de ANA
        Logo de ANA
        Logo de NYI
        Logo de NYR
        Logo de ANA
        Logo de TOR
        Logo de ANA
        Logo de WSH
        Logo de ANA
        Logo de ANA
        2024
        Logo de ANA
        Logo de ANA
        Logo de ANA
        Logo de ANA
        Logo de ANA
        Logo de ANA
        Logo de ANA
        TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
        2382 500 000 $65 797 500 $0 $4 200 000 $16 702 500 $
        Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
        Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
        3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
        AG, AD
        UFA - 1
        Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
        925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
        C, AG
        RFA - 1
        Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
        1 450 000 $1 450 000 $
        AD
        UFA - 1
        Miroshnichenko, Ivan
        925 000 $925 000 $
        Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
        894 167 $894 167 $ (Bonis de performance2 500 000 $$2M)
        C, AG
        RFA - 3
        Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
        863 333 $863 333 $
        AD
        RFA - 3
        Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
        2 037 500 $2 037 500 $
        AG
        RFA - 1
        Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
        2 950 000 $2 950 000 $
        C, AG
        RFA - 2
        Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
        5 250 000 $5 250 000 $
        AD, AG
        M-NTC
        UFA - 2
        Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
        1 295 000 $1 295 000 $
        AG, AD
        RFA - 2
        Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
        822 500 $822 500 $
        C
        RFA - 1
        1 350 000 $1 350 000 $
        C, AD
        UFA - 5
        Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
        Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
        6 500 000 $6 500 000 $
        DG/DD
        M-NTC
        UFA - 4
        Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
        925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
        DD
        RFA - 1
        Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
        6 400 000 $6 400 000 $
        G
        M-NTC
        UFA - 5
        4 110 000 $4 110 000 $
        DG
        RFA - 3
        Nemec, Simon
        925 000 $925 000 $
        Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
        950 000 $950 000 $
        G
        UFA - 1
        Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
        1 250 000 $1 250 000 $
        DG
        UFA - 1
        Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
        3 900 000 $3 900 000 $
        DD
        M-NTC
        UFA - 1
        Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
        Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
        1 450 000 $1 450 000 $
        AG, AD
        UFA - 4
        Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
        12 500 000 $12 500 000 $
        C
        UFA
        Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
        1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
        C, AD
        UFA - 2
        1 250 000 $1 250 000 $
        DD
        UFA - 2
        Équipe de réserve
        Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
        1 100 000 $1 100 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
        C, AD
        UFA - 1
        Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
        800 000 $800 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
        C, AG
        RFA - 1
        Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
        1 500 000 $1 500 000 $ (375 000 $$375K375 000 $$375K)
        AG, C
        UFA - 1

        Code d'intégration

        • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
        • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

        Texte intégré

        Cliquer pour surligner
        6 déc. 2021 à 13 h 50
        #1
        Avatar de l'utilisateur
        Rejoint: juin 2018
        Messages: 1,837
        Mentions "j'aime": 908
        Rangers decline.
        6 déc. 2021 à 13 h 52
        #2
        Démarrer sujet
        Avatar de l'utilisateur
        Rejoint: juin 2021
        Messages: 15,257
        Mentions "j'aime": 11,643
        Quoting: hero9154
        Rangers decline.


        Any team so we good!
        6 déc. 2021 à 13 h 54
        #3
        LongtimeLeafsufferer
        Avatar de l'utilisateur
        Rejoint: juill. 2015
        Messages: 59,425
        Mentions "j'aime": 22,636
        Ducks aren't getting those returns in those trades. Liljegren for sure won't be offer sheet eligible. Kinda of a silly Getzalf scenario. Ownership, the players and fans want to win so spend that money on real players.
        6 déc. 2021 à 13 h 55
        #4
        Démarrer sujet
        Avatar de l'utilisateur
        Rejoint: juin 2021
        Messages: 15,257
        Mentions "j'aime": 11,643
        Modifié 6 déc. 2021 à 14 h 2
        Quoting: palhal
        Ducks aren't getting those returns in those trades. Liljegren for sure won't be offer sheet eligible. Kinda of a silly Getzalf scenario. Ownership, the players and fans want to win so spend that money on real players.


        Appreciate it

        I’d do 1st for each Rakell & Manson both 50% retained
        6 déc. 2021 à 14 h 6
        #5
        Big Shoots
        Avatar de l'utilisateur
        Rejoint: sept. 2020
        Messages: 3,570
        Mentions "j'aime": 1,087
        oof I don't think Ducks are getting 1st for all those guys let alone 1st+

        Change all the 1st to 2nds and Id say generally you'd be getting close
        6 déc. 2021 à 14 h 23
        #6
        LosPatos
        Avatar de l'utilisateur
        Rejoint: déc. 2019
        Messages: 3,316
        Mentions "j'aime": 1,823
        I have no interest in moving Lindholm.
        mytduxfan a aimé ceci.
        6 déc. 2021 à 14 h 24
        #7
        LosPatos
        Avatar de l'utilisateur
        Rejoint: déc. 2019
        Messages: 3,316
        Mentions "j'aime": 1,823
        Quoting: BigShoots
        oof I don't think Ducks are getting 1st for all those guys let alone 1st+

        Change all the 1st to 2nds and Id say generally you'd be getting close


        Clearly you know nothing of Lindholm or Rakell’s value and or play. Manson could MAYBE fetch a first. But saying Rakell or Lindholm won’t is just stupid
        GeneralLandro a aimé ceci.
        6 déc. 2021 à 14 h 31
        #8
        Démarrer sujet
        Avatar de l'utilisateur
        Rejoint: juin 2021
        Messages: 15,257
        Mentions "j'aime": 11,643
        Quoting: AntreDiAnaheim
        I have no interest in moving Lindholm.


        This is assuming he costs to much. I wouldn’t go over 6.5 mil for 6 years

        Any more and I think I pass
        6 déc. 2021 à 14 h 31
        #9
        Lenny7
        Avatar de l'utilisateur
        Rejoint: janv. 2017
        Messages: 13,291
        Mentions "j'aime": 11,051
        Quoting: AntreDiAnaheim
        Clearly you know nothing of Lindholm or Rakell’s value and or play. Manson could MAYBE fetch a first. But saying Rakell or Lindholm won’t is just stupid


        I agree that they both *should*, but the market hasn't ponied up a 1st for an expiring LD at the deadline since 2015.

        Far better off extending Hampus ASAP, and moving Rakell while he's still scoring.
        6 déc. 2021 à 14 h 44
        #10
        Avatar de l'utilisateur
        Rejoint: nov. 2021
        Messages: 492
        Mentions "j'aime": 160
        I know you said any team, but the Isles have a lottery pick, they won’t trade that.
        7 déc. 2021 à 7 h 33
        #11
        Avatar de l'utilisateur
        Rejoint: janv. 2017
        Messages: 1,457
        Mentions "j'aime": 462
        Quoting: AntreDiAnaheim
        I have no interest in moving Lindholm.


        Me either.

        Quoting: GeneralLandro
        This is assuming he costs to much. I wouldn’t go over 6.5 mil for 6 years

        Any more and I think I pass


        Why? That's a decent contract, but I'd go higher 7M x 8 would be my preferred rate, but I'd go as high as 7.5M. He's our best D-man by a longshot and makes his partner better. He's also got some really good chemistry with Drysdale. That would be our top pairing for the next 8 seasons... why mess with that to save few $$$?

        Quoting: Lenny7
        I agree that they both *should*, but the market hasn't ponied up a 1st for an expiring LD at the deadline since 2015.

        Far better off extending Hampus ASAP, and moving Rakell while he's still scoring.


        That would be my strategy. Cash in on Rakell and keep the rest. I'd consider moving Manson, but don't personally see it happening.
        GeneralLandro a aimé ceci.
        7 déc. 2021 à 7 h 37
        #12
        Lenny7
        Avatar de l'utilisateur
        Rejoint: janv. 2017
        Messages: 13,291
        Mentions "j'aime": 11,051
        Quoting: mytduxfan
        Me either.

        Why? That's a decent contract, but I'd go higher 7M x 8 would be my preferred rate, but I'd go as high as 7.5M. He's our best D-man by a longshot and makes his partner better. He's also got some really good chemistry with Drysdale. That would be our top pairing for the next 8 seasons... why mess with that to save few $$$?

        That would be my strategy. Cash in on Rakell and keep the rest. I'd consider moving Manson, but don't personally see it happening.


        Just Re: Hampus-I feel like it'll be $6.5, with the ceiling being $7...Rielly isn't a bad comp, but he's been healthier/more valuable to his team than Hampus has (Though Hampus is a beautttty).
         
        Répondre
        To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
        Question:
        Options:
        Ajouter une option
        Soumettre le sondage