SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Trash Oilers TLD

Créé par: Eclipze
Équipe: 2021-22 Oilers d'Edmonton
Date de création initiale: 21 nov. 2021
Publié: 5 déc. 2021
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
This team is literally trash. If they don’t get stellar goaltending or McDavid and Draisaitl putting up 3 points each they completely fall apart.
Transactions
1.
EDM
  1. Lindholm, Hampus (2 600 000 $ retained)
ANA
  1. Koekkoek, Slater
  2. Rodrigue, Olivier
  3. Turris, Kyle
  4. Choix de 1e ronde en 2022 (EDM)
2.
EDM
  1. Blackwell, Colin
  2. Choix de 2e ronde en 2022 (SEA)
  3. Choix de 2e ronde en 2023 (WPG)
3.
4.
5.
OTT
  1. Lavoie, Raphael
  2. Choix de 1e ronde en 2023 (EDM)
6.
EDM
  1. Johnsson, Andreas (1 700 000 $ retained)
NJD
  1. Choix de 2e ronde en 2023 (EDM)
  2. Choix de 4e ronde en 2024 (EDM)
7.
EDM
  1. Fleury, Marc-André (3 500 000 $ retained)
  2. Choix de 3e ronde en 2022 (EDM)
  3. Choix de 4e ronde en 2023 (CHI)
CHI
  1. Koskinen, Mikko
  2. Choix de 2e ronde en 2022 (EDM)
  3. Choix de 2e ronde en 2022 (SEA)
Rachats de contrats
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2022
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
2023
Logo de WPG
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
Logo de CHI
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
2024
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2381 500 000 $72 693 913 $669 339 $1 407 500 $8 806 087 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Devils du New Jersey
1 700 000 $1 700 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
12 500 000 $12 500 000 $
C
UFA - 5
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
5 500 000 $5 500 000 $
AD, AG
NMC
UFA - 7
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
5 125 000 $5 125 000 $
AG, C
NMC
UFA - 8
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
8 500 000 $8 500 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 4
Logo de Hurricanes de la Caroline
894 167 $894 167 $ (Bonis de performance500 000 $$500K)
AD
RFA - 3
Logo de Bruins de Boston
3 675 000 $3 675 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Kraken de Seattle
725 000 $725 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
3 600 000 $3 600 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
750 000 $750 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
834 167 $834 167 $ (Bonis de performance57 500 $$58K)
C
RFA - 1
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
3 200 000 $3 200 000 $
AD
UFA - 3
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
5 600 000 $5 600 000 $
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Hurricanes de la Caroline
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
750 000 $750 000 $
G
UFA - 2
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
2 778 $2 778 $
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
DD
RFA - 2
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
5 538 462 $5 538 462 $
DG
NMC
UFA - 2
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
3 250 000 $3 250 000 $
DD
UFA - 4
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
0 $0 $
G
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
850 000 $850 000 $
AG, C, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
4 167 000 $4 167 000 $
DG
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
750 000 $750 000 $
AD, C
UFA - 1
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
2 200 000 $2 200 000 $
G
UFA - 2
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
1 250 000 $1 250 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
785 000 $785 000 $
G
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
5 déc. 2021 à 23 h 21
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2021
Messages: 70
Mentions "j'aime": 33
chicago rejects
OldNYIfan a aimé ceci.
5 déc. 2021 à 23 h 25
#2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2021
Messages: 15,280
Mentions "j'aime": 11,656
Think Anaheim says no
OldNYIfan a aimé ceci.
5 déc. 2021 à 23 h 29
#3
Démarrer sujet
EclipzeEDM
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2019
Messages: 992
Mentions "j'aime": 225
Quoting: GeneralLandro
Think Anaheim says no


Samorukov was supposed to be added I redid the trade when I forgot retention didn’t put him back in the deal.
Radu47 a aimé ceci.
5 déc. 2021 à 23 h 36
#4
Vegan Commie Hipster
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2020
Messages: 7,888
Mentions "j'aime": 3,256
Yeah it's really really underrated how McDraisaitl aren't a big enough cap hit to preclude quality depth like 20M for two players at that level is a bargain

60ish win team should be the expectation

10 NHL teams similarly have at least two players making 20ish million, rarely both elite, often one of them is a terrible contract even

Then most other teams have 3 at 20M so

Yeah it really sucks whenever the gaslighting malarkey machine tries to spew up stuff to try and defend the mediocre work of Holland and especially chiarelli
Eclipze et OldNYIfan a aimé ceci.
6 déc. 2021 à 6 h 44
#5
Lets Get Kraken
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2021
Messages: 8,612
Mentions "j'aime": 3,458
These have got to be jokes right? Barrie is useless defensively and is only good offensively when playing with McJesus and Draisaitl. Pulju is overrated. Bear and Jarvis have been excellent for us, so why would we trade them. Jarvis also wasn’t being considered in an Eichel package so why would Carolina trade him for what would be a useless player of Barrie if he came here, and then Pulju.
OldNYIfan a aimé ceci.
6 déc. 2021 à 7 h 46
#6
Once a Kings Fan Too
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 40,124
Mentions "j'aime": 25,039
Not the package for Lindholm we'd be looking for. Rodrigue is a nice goalie prospect but Lukas Dostal is a better one. Neither Koekkuk nor Samorukov is an improvement on Benoit and Mahura. Turris is a useless mouth in light of Zegras, McTavish, Steel and Groulx and would be waived upon arrival. In short, nothing in your prospect pool that you'd like to give up is something to make us think about trading Hampus.
6 déc. 2021 à 8 h 14
#7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2017
Messages: 23,973
Mentions "j'aime": 7,731
What a mess!
Eclipze a aimé ceci.
6 déc. 2021 à 10 h 22
#8
Vegan Commie Hipster
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2020
Messages: 7,888
Mentions "j'aime": 3,256
Quoting: evelutions2
These have got to be jokes right? Barrie is useless defensively and is only good offensively when playing with McJesus and Draisaitl. Pulju is overrated. Bear and Jarvis have been excellent for us, so why would we trade them. Jarvis also wasn’t being considered in an Eichel package so why would Carolina trade him for what would be a useless player of Barrie if he came here, and then Pulju.


Barrie is still the 29th highest scoring D in NHL history and only half of his career has been with elite forwards, his xGA numbers ~30th percentile

So he's just meh defensively

The fact that he drives play helps that a bunch

Why so reluctant to research?

The barrie narrative on this site is lazy at very best
6 déc. 2021 à 10 h 24
#9
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2016
Messages: 10,488
Mentions "j'aime": 3,716
Modifié 6 déc. 2021 à 10 h 54
Value for Connor Brown is good and it would be a smart move for Edmonton¸

But Ottawa needs him even more though. They should be looking to extend him, not trade him but not a lot of what Sens management does make sense so...
Eclipze a aimé ceci.
6 déc. 2021 à 19 h 27
#10
Ken Holland Hater
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2019
Messages: 1,383
Mentions "j'aime": 371
the Yamamoto, Brown, Pulju, and Koskinen trades are all pretty meh I think. Yamamoto is better than Blackwell. Brown is just not that good of a player (he's good but not 1st round pick good). Carolina isn't trading bear and edmonton isn't (or at least shouldn't) trade Pulju. and Koskinen is having a good year right now so why trade him plus solid draft picks for an older, potentially worse rental?
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage