SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

two buyouts - a deadline and a refresh

Créé par: Wqrrior
Équipe: 2022-23 Sénateurs d'Ottawa
Date de création initiale: 5 déc. 2021
Publié: 5 déc. 2021
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
LISTE DE RÉSERVEANSCAP HIT
3925 000 $
RFAANSCAP HIT
87 250 000 $
31 450 000 $
1874 125 $
1800 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
54 150 000 $
42 500 000 $
23 000 000 $
Transactions
1.
OTT
  1. Knies, Matthew [Liste de réserve]
  2. Choix de 1e ronde en 2022 (TOR)
Détails additionnels:
Ilya Mik
TOR
  1. Brown, Connor (1 800 000 $ retained)
Détails additionnels:
Mete 50%
2.
OTT
  1. Labanc, Kevin
  2. Choix de 4e ronde en 2022 (SJS)
SJS
  1. White, Colin
  2. Choix de 2e ronde en 2022 (TBL)
Détails additionnels:
2022 @ Draft
3.
OTT
  1. Choix de 3e ronde en 2022 (MIN)
MIN
    Tierney
    4.
    NYI
    1. Choix de 3e ronde en 2022 (BOS)
    Détails additionnels:
    Offseason
    5.
    OTT
    1. Choix de 2e ronde en 2022 (WPG)
    2. Choix de 3e ronde en 2023 (WSH)
    WSH
      Nick Paul
      6.
      OTT
      1. Choix de 4e ronde en 2022 (WPG)
      Détails additionnels:
      (highest of 2 4ths)
      NYR
        Sanford
        7.
        NSH
        1. Brännström, Erik
        2. Choix de 3e ronde en 2022 (VAN)
        8.
        FLA
        1. Choix de 4e ronde en 2022 (SJS)
        Rachats de contrats
        Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
        Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
        2022
        Logo de OTT
        Logo de TOR
        Logo de OTT
        Logo de WPG
        Logo de OTT
        Logo de MIN
        Logo de WPG
        Logo de OTT
        Logo de OTT
        Logo de OTT
        Logo de NYI
        2023
        Logo de OTT
        Logo de OTT
        Logo de OTT
        Logo de WSH
        Logo de OTT
        Logo de OTT
        Logo de OTT
        Logo de OTT
        Logo de NSH
        2024
        Logo de OTT
        Logo de OTT
        Logo de OTT
        Logo de OTT
        Logo de OTT
        Logo de OTT
        Logo de OTT
        TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
        2382 500 000 $77 083 213 $0 $3 540 000 $5 416 787 $
        Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
        Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
        8 205 714 $8 205 714 $
        AG
        UFA - 6
        Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
        7 250 000 $7 250 000 $
        C
        UFA - 8
        Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
        4 975 000 $4 975 000 $
        AD, AG
        UFA - 5
        Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
        925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance2 500 000 $$2M)
        C
        UFA - 1
        Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
        925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance600 000 $$600K)
        C
        RFA - 1
        Logo de Sharks de San Jose
        4 725 000 $4 725 000 $
        AD, AG
        UFA - 2
        Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
        818 333 $818 333 $ (Bonis de performance15 000 $$15K)
        AG
        RFA - 1
        4 150 000 $4 150 000 $
        C, AG, AD
        UFA - 5
        Logo de Panthers de la Floride
        5 300 000 $5 300 000 $
        AD
        M-NTC
        UFA - 1
        Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
        1 450 000 $1 450 000 $
        AG
        RFA
        Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
        1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
        AD, AG
        UFA - 1
        2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
        C
        UFA - 3
        Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
        Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
        8 000 000 $8 000 000 $
        DG
        UFA - 6
        Logo de Predators de Nashville
        2 400 000 $2 400 000 $
        DD
        UFA - 1
        Logo de Islanders de New York
        5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
        G
        M-NTC
        UFA - 1
        Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
        2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
        DD
        UFA - 1
        Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
        787 500 $787 500 $
        G
        UFA - 1
        Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
        863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance425 000 $$425K)
        DD
        RFA - 2
        Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
        925 000 $925 000 $
        DG
        UFA - 2
        3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
        DG/DD
        UFA - 4
        Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
        Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
        800 000 $800 000 $
        C, AD
        UFA - 1
        Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
        762 500 $762 500 $
        AG
        RFA - 2
        Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
        750 000 $750 000 $
        DG
        UFA - 1

        Code d'intégration

        • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
        • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

        Texte intégré

        Cliquer pour surligner
        5 déc. 2021 à 1 h 52
        #1
        Avatar de l'utilisateur
        Rejoint: nov. 2021
        Messages: 492
        Mentions "j'aime": 160
        Varlamov for a 3rd? There's potential he gets a first from a contender. He nets at least a 2nd.
        Nightowl26 a aimé ceci.
        5 déc. 2021 à 1 h 54
        #2
        Avatar de l'utilisateur
        Rejoint: juin 2019
        Messages: 8,105
        Mentions "j'aime": 3,602
        How do you ask for a 1st and prospect for Connor brown then turn around and give San Jose that offer for labanc
        Wqrrior et Radu47 a aimé ceci.
        5 déc. 2021 à 1 h 54
        #3
        Démarrer sujet
        Avatar de l'utilisateur
        Rejoint: févr. 2019
        Messages: 10,305
        Mentions "j'aime": 3,986
        Quoting: Marcheesy
        Varlamov for a 3rd? There's potential he gets a first from a contender. He nets at least a 2nd.


        I'm willing to up the pick a bit.

        However, I think the days of him getting a first are gone. Last offseason was the chance for that.

        I also think most teams will be after retention on him, something IMO the Isles can't afford. Varly is a cap move. They'd rather the 5m in space than a few spots higher in the draft.

        Lastly, this has been a crummy start to the year and he's lost his starter role. As he gets older and performance gets worse, I can't imagine the return improves.


        Similar is why I have Florida sending the full cap of Hornqvist for so low. I think OTT is missing a veteran leader like him.
        5 déc. 2021 à 1 h 55
        #4
        Démarrer sujet
        Avatar de l'utilisateur
        Rejoint: févr. 2019
        Messages: 10,305
        Mentions "j'aime": 3,986
        Quoting: glarson17
        How do you ask for a 1st and prospect for Connor brown then turn around and give San Jose that offer for labanc


        That assessment is mostly from other threads I've seen here. Sharks fans seem surprisingly low on Labanc. Not really sure why. Maybe its just the contract, to where I could understand the dislike of White going back. This trade only makes a measure of sense if Hertl walks.
        Rob32sjsharks a aimé ceci.
        5 déc. 2021 à 1 h 57
        #5
        Ballards Curse
        Avatar de l'utilisateur
        Rejoint: déc. 2017
        Messages: 1,055
        Mentions "j'aime": 271
        TOR declines. Knies and Miky are better suited than Brown and Mete. Brown would be a 3rd liner on this roster atm, something Miky can already do
        Barilko14 a aimé ceci.
        5 déc. 2021 à 2 h 9
        #6
        Hakuna Matata
        Avatar de l'utilisateur
        Rejoint: févr. 2020
        Messages: 33,723
        Mentions "j'aime": 20,882
        I got some strange feeling if Murray gets bought out he is going to Toronto to be the backup and Mrazek will end up in Edmonton via trade.

        And that could help Murray as maybe being the backup will help him more and he should come cheaper than 3.8mill
        5 déc. 2021 à 2 h 19
        #7
        Avatar de l'utilisateur
        Rejoint: avr. 2020
        Messages: 11,159
        Mentions "j'aime": 4,640
        Quoting: Marcheesy
        Varlamov for a 3rd? There's potential he gets a first from a contender. He nets at least a 2nd.


        that’s a lot for a 33 year old rental goalie with a 3.68 GAA this year!
        5 déc. 2021 à 2 h 49
        #8
        Avatar de l'utilisateur
        Rejoint: juin 2019
        Messages: 8,105
        Mentions "j'aime": 3,602
        Quoting: Wqrrior
        That assessment is mostly from other threads I've seen here. Sharks fans seem surprisingly low on Labanc. Not really sure why. Maybe its just the contract, to where I could understand the dislike of White going back. This trade only makes a measure of sense if Hertl walks.


        Connor Brown has scored over 40 once and is returning a first, Knies (2020 2nd rounder) and an nhler. Labanc has scored more than 40 twice and has 56 points in a season and is returning a 2nd and an nhler.

        I guess I just don’t see how the value adds up. I guess I’m not as high on white, not sure. Both brown and labanc overall have similar ppg over their career with labanc being slightly higher. Just don’t really see how brown returns more.
        5 déc. 2021 à 2 h 56
        #9
        Nightowl26
        Avatar de l'utilisateur
        Rejoint: avr. 2021
        Messages: 1,496
        Mentions "j'aime": 444
        Quoting: Rob32sjsharks
        that’s a lot for a 33 year old rental goalie with a 3.68 GAA this year!


        Check Varly stats for the last 2 years. At the deadline, a playoff team is going to give more. 1st rounder is definitely in play for him at the deadline.
        Radu47 a aimé ceci.
        5 déc. 2021 à 3 h 2
        #10
        Banni
        Avatar de l'utilisateur
        Rejoint: oct. 2021
        Messages: 1,907
        Mentions "j'aime": 449
        May just be a 3rd round pick, but Minnesota doesn't need a bottom line c. They already have good, younger ones playing
        Radu47 a aimé ceci.
        5 déc. 2021 à 3 h 4
        #11
        Vegan Commie Hipster
        Avatar de l'utilisateur
        Rejoint: oct. 2020
        Messages: 7,888
        Mentions "j'aime": 3,256
        Modifié 5 déc. 2021 à 3 h 11
        Quoting: Rob32sjsharks
        that’s a lot for a 33 year old rental goalie with a 3.68 GAA this year!


        Getting really tired of the charlatan nonsense here of people trying to pretend 5 games of performance is a reasonable way to fully evaluate players

        Like seriously can you stop?

        It's silly, disingenuous and regressive

        Intellectually dishonest malarkey

        Waste of time for all of us here ffs

        Edit:

        Like seriously jim freaking Benning knows better than do that and of course you used highly flawed GAA instead of sv% like jfc dude, ugh
        5 déc. 2021 à 3 h 7
        #12
        Vegan Commie Hipster
        Avatar de l'utilisateur
        Rejoint: oct. 2020
        Messages: 7,888
        Mentions "j'aime": 3,256
        I'd just say that if Ottawa decide to buyout both they'd really have to make it worth it given their situation and shoot for the moon... this is a solid attempt

        But doesn't really get there

        Puts too much $ on the books for their key window
        5 déc. 2021 à 3 h 14
        #13
        Démarrer sujet
        Avatar de l'utilisateur
        Rejoint: févr. 2019
        Messages: 10,305
        Mentions "j'aime": 3,986
        Quoting: glarson17
        Connor Brown has scored over 40 once and is returning a first, Knies (2020 2nd rounder) and an nhler. Labanc has scored more than 40 twice and has 56 points in a season and is returning a 2nd and an nhler.

        I guess I just don’t see how the value adds up. I guess I’m not as high on white, not sure. Both brown and labanc overall have similar ppg over their career with labanc being slightly higher. Just don’t really see how brown returns more.


        Y'all should know in toronto that Brown is a heck of a lot more than just goals lol. Your analysis on the players is limited to exclusively points which isn't realistic at all. Brown is a discount Hyman - swiss army knife - do it all type player that coaches love. Labanc isn't that. Brown is the *type* of player all successful recent playoff teams lately have had (Compare with: Coleman, Goodrow, Josh Anderson, Alex Tuch) The return is also higher due to term retention being involved. You get him for 2 years. He fits the role player vibe of Coleman and Foligno. He costs a first.
        5 déc. 2021 à 3 h 15
        #14
        Démarrer sujet
        Avatar de l'utilisateur
        Rejoint: févr. 2019
        Messages: 10,305
        Mentions "j'aime": 3,986
        Quoting: Nightowl26
        Check Varly stats for the last 2 years. At the deadline, a playoff team is going to give more. 1st rounder is definitely in play for him at the deadline.


        I think without retention a 2nd is his cap. 3rd admittedly is low. But its a choice between return and retention. If you want the higher return, there's no question you have to retain as all the contenders are maxed out on cap. I think the retention causes more harm than good for you guys especially next year.
        5 déc. 2021 à 3 h 17
        #15
        Banni
        Avatar de l'utilisateur
        Rejoint: oct. 2021
        Messages: 1,907
        Mentions "j'aime": 449
        Quoting: Wqrrior
        I think without retention a 2nd is his cap. 3rd admittedly is low. But its a choice between return and retention. If you want the higher return, there's no question you have to retain as all the contenders are maxed out on cap. I think the retention causes more harm than good for you guys especially next year.


        Other than varly is a horrible person, sure I guess I'd another gm wants to have to explain trading for a person like that
        5 déc. 2021 à 3 h 19
        #16
        Avatar de l'utilisateur
        Rejoint: juin 2019
        Messages: 8,105
        Mentions "j'aime": 3,602
        Quoting: Wqrrior
        Y'all should know in toronto that Brown is a heck of a lot more than just goals lol. Your analysis on the players is limited to exclusively points which isn't realistic at all. Brown is a discount Hyman - swiss army knife - do it all type player that coaches love. Labanc isn't that. Brown is the *type* of player all successful recent playoff teams lately have had (Compare with: Coleman, Goodrow, Josh Anderson, Alex Tuch) The return is also higher due to term retention being involved. You get him for 2 years. He fits the role player vibe of Coleman and Foligno. He costs a first.


        Yeah I’m not a Toronto fan lol

        I don’t see how retention adds that much value to the deal
        5 déc. 2021 à 3 h 23
        #17
        Démarrer sujet
        Avatar de l'utilisateur
        Rejoint: févr. 2019
        Messages: 10,305
        Mentions "j'aime": 3,986
        Quoting: glarson17
        Yeah I’m not a Toronto fan lol

        I don’t see how retention adds that much value to the deal


        On a team that has had to complete a whole obstacle course every offseason to do literally anything with their cap? Toronto has to manipulate things to ice a competitive roster under the cap. Having a higher end 3rd liner and capable middle sixer at 1.8m is very solid. I think you're underestimating the value that these role players bring. I see you're a Wild fan, so Brown is to Ottawa what Foligno is to Minnesota. Minnesota isn't moving Foligno (probably at all) for any less than a first and an add.... not because of his point totals, but how versatile he is.
        5 déc. 2021 à 3 h 23
        #18
        Démarrer sujet
        Avatar de l'utilisateur
        Rejoint: févr. 2019
        Messages: 10,305
        Mentions "j'aime": 3,986
        Quoting: CAPDumba
        Other than varly is a horrible person, sure I guess I'd another gm wants to have to explain trading for a person like that


        huh?
        5 déc. 2021 à 3 h 45
        #19
        Avatar de l'utilisateur
        Rejoint: avr. 2020
        Messages: 11,159
        Mentions "j'aime": 4,640
        Quoting: Radu47
        Getting really tired of the charlatan nonsense here of people trying to pretend 5 games of performance is a reasonable way to fully evaluate players

        Like seriously can you stop?

        It's silly, disingenuous and regressive

        Intellectually dishonest malarkey

        Waste of time for all of us here ffs

        Edit:

        Like seriously jim freaking Benning knows better than do that and of course you used highly flawed GAA instead of sv% like jfc dude, ugh


        he’s 33 years old relegated to back up with an 886 S%
        yes it’s 5 games and yes he has a solid history of well above average tending, even last year 2.08 GAA and 929 S% but there has to be a reason he only has 5 games this year, yes Sorokin is good, but he’s not that much better than val has been for a long time… i think he might be injured, or aging. but unless he starts turing things around i don’t see him getting as much as he would have last year. which would have been a 1st and a high level prospect.
        5 déc. 2021 à 4 h 6
        #20
        Avatar de l'utilisateur
        Rejoint: avr. 2020
        Messages: 11,159
        Mentions "j'aime": 4,640
        Quoting: Wqrrior
        Y'all should know in toronto that Brown is a heck of a lot more than just goals lol. Your analysis on the players is limited to exclusively points which isn't realistic at all. Brown is a discount Hyman - swiss army knife - do it all type player that coaches love. Labanc isn't that. Brown is the *type* of player all successful recent playoff teams lately have had (Compare with: Coleman, Goodrow, Josh Anderson, Alex Tuch) The return is also higher due to term retention being involved. You get him for 2 years. He fits the role player vibe of Coleman and Foligno. He costs a first.


        your logic is there but isn’t brown in the dog house in Ottawa? i thought he was on the block and they don’t want him! same can be said for Labanc though as the sharks coaching staff want D first game plan and Labanc is an offensive talent better suited to up tempo play.
        5 déc. 2021 à 8 h 6
        #21
        Avatar de l'utilisateur
        Rejoint: mai 2019
        Messages: 19,581
        Mentions "j'aime": 7,353
        if the leafs are going to give up those assets, they're going to get a better player than brown
        5 déc. 2021 à 8 h 42
        #22
        Drover006
        Avatar de l'utilisateur
        Rejoint: févr. 2021
        Messages: 1,448
        Mentions "j'aime": 494
        2 years of brown at 1.8 is very compelling I just think that a 1st and especially knies who's looking like another Dubas steal (he got covid for start of draft year and dipped his pick spot) would be used elsewhere if any prospect was being traded would be Robby depending on if they have given up on him.
        5 déc. 2021 à 11 h 57
        #23
        Banni
        Avatar de l'utilisateur
        Rejoint: oct. 2021
        Messages: 1,907
        Mentions "j'aime": 449
        Quoting: Wqrrior
        huh?


        Look him up, and his Domestic violence arrest
        5 déc. 2021 à 14 h 54
        #24
        Démarrer sujet
        Avatar de l'utilisateur
        Rejoint: févr. 2019
        Messages: 10,305
        Mentions "j'aime": 3,986
        Quoting: JaredOfLondon
        if the leafs are going to give up those assets, they're going to get a better player than brown


        Nick Foligno!
        5 déc. 2021 à 14 h 54
        #25
        Avatar de l'utilisateur
        Rejoint: mai 2019
        Messages: 19,581
        Mentions "j'aime": 7,353
        Quoting: Wqrrior
        Nick Foligno!


        Yeah, worked out great eh?
         
        Répondre
        To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
        Question:
        Options:
        Ajouter une option
        Soumettre le sondage