SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Fresh starts

Créé par: dpdan
Équipe: 2021-22 Bruins de Boston
Date de création initiale: 4 déc. 2021
Publié: 4 déc. 2021
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
Basically swapping out a couple of wingers that have struggled the past couple seasons and have the same cap hit. Rakell has scored at a top 6 rate in the past (as has DeBrusk). Bs get a winger that can hopefully find his groove. Ducks get same and one that’s younger, a RFA, and could maybe grow with a younger team.
Could also maybe swap out Silverberg, although the $ gets trickier as he has more years left
Transactions
Enfoui
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2022
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de CGY
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
2023
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
2024
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2381 500 000 $77 873 813 $1 956 507 $125 000 $3 626 187 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Bruins de Boston
6 125 000 $6 125 000 $
AG
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo de Bruins de Boston
6 875 000 $6 875 000 $
C
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
6 666 667 $6 666 667 $
AD
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 2
Logo de Bruins de Boston
6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
AG
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo de Bruins de Boston
5 250 000 $5 250 000 $
C, AD
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 5
Logo de Bruins de Boston
3 100 000 $3 100 000 $
AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Bruins de Boston
3 800 000 $3 800 000 $
AG, C, AD
NMC
UFA - 2
Logo de Bruins de Boston
2 375 000 $2 375 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Bruins de Boston
725 000 $725 000 $
AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
1 750 000 $1 750 000 $
AG, C
UFA - 2
Logo de Bruins de Boston
750 000 $750 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
1 050 000 $1 050 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
2 463 139 $2 463 139 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
800 000 $800 000 $
AD, C
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Bruins de Boston
3 687 500 $3 687 500 $
DG
UFA - 3
Logo de Bruins de Boston
4 900 000 $4 900 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
G
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo de Bruins de Boston
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
DG
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Bruins de Boston
4 100 000 $4 100 000 $
DD
UFA - 6
Logo de Bruins de Boston
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance125 000 $$125K)
G
RFA - 2
Logo de Bruins de Boston
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
DG
UFA - 3
Logo de Bruins de Boston
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
DD
UFA - 2
Logo de Bruins de Boston
725 000 $725 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
4 déc. 2021 à 14 h 24
#1
LosPatos
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2019
Messages: 3,324
Mentions "j'aime": 1,844
Rakell is better than Debrusk. Boston would need to add.
4 déc. 2021 à 14 h 30
#2
Jah1722
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2018
Messages: 5,416
Mentions "j'aime": 2,896
Do you even watch hockey outside of Boston?
4 déc. 2021 à 14 h 48
#3
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2016
Messages: 295
Mentions "j'aime": 42
Quoting: AntreDiAnaheim
Rakell is better than Debrusk. Boston would need to add.


I agree, the post is more of an idea of the kind of player that the Bruins want back. I wouldn’t be surprised to see the Ducks move Rakell at the deadline for a tidy package
LosPatos a aimé ceci.
4 déc. 2021 à 15 h 11
#4
Ban Price trades
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2017
Messages: 6,482
Mentions "j'aime": 6,455
Quoting: AntreDiAnaheim
Rakell is better than Debrusk. Boston would need to add.


Quoting: Jah1722
Do you even watch hockey outside of Boston?


I'm curious about something and I'm hoping you two could aide me on it:

Should the Ducks look to emulate what St. Louis did a couple seasons ago - be in that wildcard race but opt to purge expiring assets for futures in hopes of fuelling a cup run down the road - is there a deal that could build on a basic DeBrusk-for-Rakell swap? I seem to recall the Bruins were in need of a decent LHD, which Lindholm fits the bill.

Does something along the lines of the following trade fit for the Ducks? Do Bruins fans even have an appetite for it?

Boston Bruins
Hampus Lindholm (50% retained)
Rickard Rakell

in exchange for

Anaheim Ducks
2022 BOS 1st Round Pick
2023 BOS 3rd Round Pick
Jake Debrusk
Urho Vaakanainen
4 déc. 2021 à 15 h 57
#5
Jah1722
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2018
Messages: 5,416
Mentions "j'aime": 2,896
Quoting: BeterChiarelli
I'm curious about something and I'm hoping you two could aide me on it:

Should the Ducks look to emulate what St. Louis did a couple seasons ago - be in that wildcard race but opt to purge expiring assets for futures in hopes of fuelling a cup run down the road - is there a deal that could build on a basic DeBrusk-for-Rakell swap? I seem to recall the Bruins were in need of a decent LHD, which Lindholm fits the bill.

Does something along the lines of the following trade fit for the Ducks? Do Bruins fans even have an appetite for it?

Boston Bruins
Hampus Lindholm (50% retained)
Rickard Rakell

in exchange for

Anaheim Ducks
2022 BOS 1st Round Pick
2023 BOS 3rd Round Pick
Jake Debrusk
Urho Vaakanainen


I think Lindholm re-signs. Rakell is iffy and I think Manson walks. So I don’t see a Lindholm trade happening. I’d only move Rakell for a big haul.

I’m of the thought that competing deep into the season and possibly a playoff series would be very beneficial for the young players. The game is different late in the season and playoffs and they’ll have to learn that eventually.

There’s also a business side so if the ducks are able to keep this play up and have a shot at the playoffs I think the Samueli’s will want those 2 extra home games being that the ducks struggle to make money as it is.

Some will think that no matter what happens the ducks should sell at the deadline and continue adding to the rebuild but they’ve got a solid young core coming or in the NHL already. Zegras is a top liner. Terry looks like at worst he’s a high end 2nd liner. Milano is growing into a top 6 W. Comtois has struggled some this year but last year showed he’s a 2nd line scorer. Lundestrom is a 3C. Drysdale is a top 4 D. Benoit is 3rd pair D with still some growth to be had. And then you have Perrault coming to boost the top 6. Tracey is finally developing and could be an NHLer. Zelwelger and Pastujov look to be top held roster players. And then McTavish hopefully develops into a top 6 player. And there’s a handful of college guys that have shown promise.

Basically I’m saying I don’t think they need to sell just because they’re supposed to be rebuilding.
BeterChiarelli et GeneralLandro a aimé ceci.
4 déc. 2021 à 21 h 52
#6
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2021
Messages: 15,316
Mentions "j'aime": 11,701
Quoting: Jah1722
I think Lindholm re-signs. Rakell is iffy and I think Manson walks. So I don’t see a Lindholm trade happening. I’d only move Rakell for a big haul.

I’m of the thought that competing deep into the season and possibly a playoff series would be very beneficial for the young players. The game is different late in the season and playoffs and they’ll have to learn that eventually.

There’s also a business side so if the ducks are able to keep this play up and have a shot at the playoffs I think the Samueli’s will want those 2 extra home games being that the ducks struggle to make money as it is.

Some will think that no matter what happens the ducks should sell at the deadline and continue adding to the rebuild but they’ve got a solid young core coming or in the NHL already. Zegras is a top liner. Terry looks like at worst he’s a high end 2nd liner. Milano is growing into a top 6 W. Comtois has struggled some this year but last year showed he’s a 2nd line scorer. Lundestrom is a 3C. Drysdale is a top 4 D. Benoit is 3rd pair D with still some growth to be had. And then you have Perrault coming to boost the top 6. Tracey is finally developing and could be an NHLer. Zelwelger and Pastujov look to be top held roster players. And then McTavish hopefully develops into a top 6 player. And there’s a handful of college guys that have shown promise.

Basically I’m saying I don’t think they need to sell just because they’re supposed to be rebuilding.


This take is prime, my man
5 déc. 2021 à 19 h 25
#7
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2016
Messages: 295
Mentions "j'aime": 42
Last 4 seasons (including this season):

Rakell 50 goals
DeBrusk 56 goals
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage